PHang lahat ng karunungan ng tao ay kamangmangan sa Dios ts
-
Welcome to PHCorner Forums! Sign up for free to unlock full access and exclusive privileges, including:
- Asking questions about computer and mobile issues
- Discovering internet tips for your mobile network and computer
🕯️ Traditions Do you believe that the bible is authentic?open na po sa gustong mag-share.
- Thread starter Thea18
- Start date
- Status
ang lahat ng karunungan ng tao ay kamangmangan sa Dios ts
appocalips
Enthusiast
ayus iligtas kasana ng sayad mo hihihi ganap na ganap talaga sayo ang salitang mang mang
Attachments
Over 500 Scientists Proclaim Their
Doubts About Darwin’s Theory of
Evolution
Robert L. Crowther, II | @RLCrowther
February 20, 2006, 7:28 AM
Over 500 doctoral scientists have now signed a statement
publicly E×ρréššing their skepticism about the contemporary
theory of Darwinian evolution.
The Scientific Dissent From Darwinism statement reads: “We
are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and
natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful
examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be
encouraged.”
The list of 514 signatories includes member scientists from
the prestigious US and Russian National Academy of
Sciences. Signers include 154 biologists, the largest single
scientific discipline represented on the list, as well as 76
chemists and 63 physicists. Signers hold doctorates in
biological sciences, physics, chemistry, mathematics,
medicine, computer science, and related disciplines. Many are
professors or researchers at major universities and research
institutions such as MIT, The Smithsonian, Cambridge
University, UCLA, UC Berkeley, Princeton, the University of
Pennsylvania, the Ohio State University, the University of
Georgia, and the University of Washington.
Discovery Institute first published its Scientific Dissent From
Darwinism list in 2001 to challenge false statements about
Darwinian evolution made in promoting PBS’s “Evolution”
series. At the time it was claimed that “virtually every scientist
in the world believes the theory to be true.”
“Darwinists continue to claim that no serious scientists doubt
the theory and yet here are 500 scientists who are willing to
make public their skepticism about the theory,” said Dr. John
G. West, associate director of Discovery Institute’s Center for
Science & Culture. “Darwinist efforts to use the courts, the
media and academic tenure committees to suppress dissent
and stifle discussion are in fact fueling even more dissent and
inspiring more scientists to ask to be added to the list.”
According to West, it was the fast growing number of
scientific dissenters which encouraged the Institute to launch
a website — You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. — to give the list a
permanent home. The website is the Institute’s response to
the demand for information and access to the list both by the
public, and by scientists who want to add their name to list.
“Darwin’s theory of evolution is the great white elephant of
contemporary thought,” said Dr. David Berlinski, one of the
original signers, a mathematician and philosopher of science
with Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture
(CSC). “It is large, almost completely useless, and the object
of superstitious awe.”
Other prominent signatories include U.S. National Academy of
Sciences member Philip Skell; American Association for the
Advancement of Science Fellow Lyle Jensen; evolutionary
biologist and textbook author Stanley Salthe; Smithsonian
Institution evolutionary biologist and a researcher at the
National Institutes of Health’s National Center for
Biotechnology Information Richard von Sternberg; Editor of
Rivista di Biologia / Biology Forum –the oldest still published
biology journal in the world — Giuseppe Sermonti; and Russian
Academy of Natural Sciences embryologist Lev Beloussov.
If you have a Ph.D. in engineering, mathematics, computer
science, biology, chemistry, or one of the other natural
sciences, and you agree with the following statement, “We are
skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and
natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful
examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be
encouraged,” then please contact us at
cscinfo@discovery.org
Doubts About Darwin’s Theory of
Evolution
Robert L. Crowther, II | @RLCrowther
February 20, 2006, 7:28 AM
Over 500 doctoral scientists have now signed a statement
publicly E×ρréššing their skepticism about the contemporary
theory of Darwinian evolution.
The Scientific Dissent From Darwinism statement reads: “We
are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and
natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful
examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be
encouraged.”
The list of 514 signatories includes member scientists from
the prestigious US and Russian National Academy of
Sciences. Signers include 154 biologists, the largest single
scientific discipline represented on the list, as well as 76
chemists and 63 physicists. Signers hold doctorates in
biological sciences, physics, chemistry, mathematics,
medicine, computer science, and related disciplines. Many are
professors or researchers at major universities and research
institutions such as MIT, The Smithsonian, Cambridge
University, UCLA, UC Berkeley, Princeton, the University of
Pennsylvania, the Ohio State University, the University of
Georgia, and the University of Washington.
Discovery Institute first published its Scientific Dissent From
Darwinism list in 2001 to challenge false statements about
Darwinian evolution made in promoting PBS’s “Evolution”
series. At the time it was claimed that “virtually every scientist
in the world believes the theory to be true.”
“Darwinists continue to claim that no serious scientists doubt
the theory and yet here are 500 scientists who are willing to
make public their skepticism about the theory,” said Dr. John
G. West, associate director of Discovery Institute’s Center for
Science & Culture. “Darwinist efforts to use the courts, the
media and academic tenure committees to suppress dissent
and stifle discussion are in fact fueling even more dissent and
inspiring more scientists to ask to be added to the list.”
According to West, it was the fast growing number of
scientific dissenters which encouraged the Institute to launch
a website — You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. — to give the list a
permanent home. The website is the Institute’s response to
the demand for information and access to the list both by the
public, and by scientists who want to add their name to list.
“Darwin’s theory of evolution is the great white elephant of
contemporary thought,” said Dr. David Berlinski, one of the
original signers, a mathematician and philosopher of science
with Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture
(CSC). “It is large, almost completely useless, and the object
of superstitious awe.”
Other prominent signatories include U.S. National Academy of
Sciences member Philip Skell; American Association for the
Advancement of Science Fellow Lyle Jensen; evolutionary
biologist and textbook author Stanley Salthe; Smithsonian
Institution evolutionary biologist and a researcher at the
National Institutes of Health’s National Center for
Biotechnology Information Richard von Sternberg; Editor of
Rivista di Biologia / Biology Forum –the oldest still published
biology journal in the world — Giuseppe Sermonti; and Russian
Academy of Natural Sciences embryologist Lev Beloussov.
If you have a Ph.D. in engineering, mathematics, computer
science, biology, chemistry, or one of the other natural
sciences, and you agree with the following statement, “We are
skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and
natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful
examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be
encouraged,” then please contact us at
cscinfo@discovery.org
RSR's List of Scientists
Doubting Darwin
Feb 15, 2019
* Nobody Doubts Darwin They Say : Nobody qualified,
anyway. Certainly no scientists! This week celebrating
Darwin Day the Pew Research Center claimed that
evolution, "is accepted by virtually all scientists" and a while
back PBS promoted their series, "Evolution" claiming
likewise that, "Virtually every scientist in the world believes
the theory to be true." Taking that even further, theoretical
physicist (emphasis on the theoretical) Lawrence
Krauss told RSR that biological science cannot be practiced
without a belief in Darwinian evolution and so "all scientists
are atheists." And hence, Darwinists. However, he forgot
James Tour . And they're all forgetting Fred Williams and
Bob Enyart's ever-growing meta-list of highly-educated
Darwin doubters including many thousands of Ph.D.s,
scientists, and professors! The guys also have reported on
the hundreds of astronomers, astrophysicists and
cosmologists who doubt the Big Bang. (See below rsr.org/
doubters#bb ). So welcome to Real Science Radio's List of
Scholars Doubting Darwin!
* Except for These Guys :
Those who have gone out
of their way to declare
their doubt about Darwin
include the:
- 100 scientists with
master's degrees or
Ph.D.s listed over at AiG
- 200 Ph.D.s listed at
Australia's creation.com
- 300 medical doctors at
Physicians & Surgeons
for Scientific Integrity
- 500 Ph.D. scientists at
the Korean Association of Creation Research
- 600 advanced degreed scientists at the Creation Research
Society
- 1,000 scientists who signified their opposition at
DissentFromDarwin.org
- 3,000 scientists and professors (most of whom hold a
Ph.D. in some field of science) who reject secular
Darwinism to varying degrees as named online by Dr. Jerry
Bergman
* Another Scholar
Doubting Darwin : A
thousand evolutionists
have incorrectly referenced
Newsweek magazine to
claim that 99.86% of
scientists affirm
Darwinism. (See RSR's
original reporting and
debunking of that
misinformation, below .) In
contrast to false reporting,
consider that the famed atheist professor Thomas Nagel
who wrote Mind and Cosmos: why the materialist neo-
Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false .
* Add to the those 5,000 Scientists, Ph.D.s. and Scholars :
Those who think that almost all educated people affirm
Darwin, are forgetting about those listed above, and then
these folks, all identified by careful research conducted by
pro-Darwin institutions:
- 30,000 U.S. public high school biology teachers do not
endorse Darwinism in class
- 100,000 college professors in the U.S. alone who,
according to Harvard researchers, agree that "intelligent
design IS a serious scientific alternative to the Darwinian
theory of evolution."
- 570,000 medical doctors in the U.S. , specialists in applied
science, say God brought about or directly created humans,
as reported by the prestigious Louis Finkelstein Institute.
The field of medicine is an actual applied science (see
definition and applied science section below ) within biology,
practiced by highly educated professionals. Significantly,
60% of U.S. medical doctors reject the secular Darwinist
explanation for our existence with three of five docs
agreeing that either God initiated and guided the process
that led to human life or that God specially created us
human beings.
And so on...
Doubting Darwin
Feb 15, 2019
* Nobody Doubts Darwin They Say : Nobody qualified,
anyway. Certainly no scientists! This week celebrating
Darwin Day the Pew Research Center claimed that
evolution, "is accepted by virtually all scientists" and a while
back PBS promoted their series, "Evolution" claiming
likewise that, "Virtually every scientist in the world believes
the theory to be true." Taking that even further, theoretical
physicist (emphasis on the theoretical) Lawrence
Krauss told RSR that biological science cannot be practiced
without a belief in Darwinian evolution and so "all scientists
are atheists." And hence, Darwinists. However, he forgot
James Tour . And they're all forgetting Fred Williams and
Bob Enyart's ever-growing meta-list of highly-educated
Darwin doubters including many thousands of Ph.D.s,
scientists, and professors! The guys also have reported on
the hundreds of astronomers, astrophysicists and
cosmologists who doubt the Big Bang. (See below rsr.org/
doubters#bb ). So welcome to Real Science Radio's List of
Scholars Doubting Darwin!
* Except for These Guys :
Those who have gone out
of their way to declare
their doubt about Darwin
include the:
- 100 scientists with
master's degrees or
Ph.D.s listed over at AiG
- 200 Ph.D.s listed at
Australia's creation.com
- 300 medical doctors at
Physicians & Surgeons
for Scientific Integrity
- 500 Ph.D. scientists at
the Korean Association of Creation Research
- 600 advanced degreed scientists at the Creation Research
Society
- 1,000 scientists who signified their opposition at
DissentFromDarwin.org
- 3,000 scientists and professors (most of whom hold a
Ph.D. in some field of science) who reject secular
Darwinism to varying degrees as named online by Dr. Jerry
Bergman
* Another Scholar
Doubting Darwin : A
thousand evolutionists
have incorrectly referenced
Newsweek magazine to
claim that 99.86% of
scientists affirm
Darwinism. (See RSR's
original reporting and
debunking of that
misinformation, below .) In
contrast to false reporting,
consider that the famed atheist professor Thomas Nagel
who wrote Mind and Cosmos: why the materialist neo-
Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false .
* Add to the those 5,000 Scientists, Ph.D.s. and Scholars :
Those who think that almost all educated people affirm
Darwin, are forgetting about those listed above, and then
these folks, all identified by careful research conducted by
pro-Darwin institutions:
- 30,000 U.S. public high school biology teachers do not
endorse Darwinism in class
- 100,000 college professors in the U.S. alone who,
according to Harvard researchers, agree that "intelligent
design IS a serious scientific alternative to the Darwinian
theory of evolution."
- 570,000 medical doctors in the U.S. , specialists in applied
science, say God brought about or directly created humans,
as reported by the prestigious Louis Finkelstein Institute.
The field of medicine is an actual applied science (see
definition and applied science section below ) within biology,
practiced by highly educated professionals. Significantly,
60% of U.S. medical doctors reject the secular Darwinist
explanation for our existence with three of five docs
agreeing that either God initiated and guided the process
that led to human life or that God specially created us
human beings.
And so on...
appocalips
Enthusiast
hindi mo nga mapatunayan yung unggoy ka eh.. evolution is different in mutation
kung gusto mo ikaw nalang ang unggoy wag mo na kami isali
Hindi naman talaga unggoy ang tao e at walang scientists na naniniwalang unggoy ang tao. Kamag-anak ng tao ang unggoy. Hindi unggoy ang tao. Pareho ang ancestors nila. Un ang evolution.
appocalips
Enthusiast
wehh paano naging kamag anak kung hindi tao ibig sabihin kamag anak ka ng baka
di mo nga kyang patunayan yan kahit muka kng unngoy
kung mag kamag anak yan dapat pareho yan ng dna at chromosome bakit mag kaiba
yung isda kamag anak pala ng aguila bakit kinakain ng aguila yun isda wala palang sense yang mag kakamag anak na yan..
parang ikaw lang pala yan
di mo nga kyang patunayan yan kahit muka kng unngoy
kung mag kamag anak yan dapat pareho yan ng dna at chromosome bakit mag kaiba
yung isda kamag anak pala ng aguila bakit kinakain ng aguila yun isda wala palang sense yang mag kakamag anak na yan..
parang ikaw lang pala yan
appocalips
Enthusiast
wehhh di kasi namain pinag aaralan yung mga walang katotohanan
primates ka jan kung ganon bakit hindi pwedeng gamitin ang dna ng chipanzy tulad mo sa tao kung parehong primates yan..
sa school namin kasi walang naniniwala sa cimpanzy tulad mo na mag kamag anak ang unngoy sa tao... kung talagang mag kamag anak yan pareho dapat ang type ng dugo nyan eh.. bakit di pwedeng kunin ang dugo nyan para gamitin sa tao...ang pinag uusapan dito is hindi yung uri kung di yung paniniwala mong lahi kang chimpanzee.. sige nga patunayan mo nga na talagang mag kamag anak yan.. kahit nga tirahin mo yan hindi magiging tao ang anak nyo nang chimpanzee na yan.. kapag nag kapareho maniniwala ako na primates nga yan..
at fyi yung kulokoy na si darwin na pareho taxonomy ng microbio hanggang sa mga ibon kasama dun ang isda aral ka ulit.. balik ka ssa kinder..
Baka simbahan ang skul mo kaya mo namiss ang biology lessons. Enroll ka sa tunay at accredited na science school at mauunawaan mo ang tungkol sa biology at evolution. Wag puro religion. Walang tama at magandang mapululot jan sa religion. Sa Europe nga banned na ang religion sa schools dahil tinuturuang maging mangmang ang mga tao.
appocalips
Enthusiast
kayo ang mang mang eh.. kahit san anggulo mo tignan hindi pwedeng maging ka mag anak ang tao at hayop.
patunay yan sa buong mundo yung mga mangmang na tulad nyo naniniwalang ang bulate naging ibon.. dilng mangmang ang mga athiestado pulpul pah... geh nga patunayan mo nga na nag ivolve ang baka naging kabayo...
appocalips
Enthusiast
biology
the study of living organisms, divided into many specialized fields that cover their morphology, physiology, anatomy, behavior, origin, and distribution.
- the plants and animals of a particular area.
ikaw nlang ang unngoy wagmo isama abg science mangmang
Ikaw ang mangmang. Ang evolution ay subfield ng biology. Yang "origin" jan sa post mo, covered yan ng evolution. Walang biology kung hindi totoo ang evolution.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
appocalips
Enthusiast
asan nga yung evolution mo wala ka nmang mapatunayan saan yun? nasa utak nyo na mga mangmang
hindi mo nga mapatunayan yung tao at hayop isa lang ang origin
kunwari naniniwala ka sa science pero wala ka namang makitang totoo nga yan.. asan na yung evolution mo yung pusa naging leon tapos yung sea lion dating leon nag evolve naging sea lion na tangga naman ng theory na yan kung ako sa sea lion na yan bakit ako titira sa dagat eh. nasa lupa ako eh di tannga niloloko nyo sarili nyo
Hindi mo makikita lang basta sa definition ng biology ang evolution. Try mong magbasa ng buong articles tungkol sa biology. Eto o, 45x namention ang "evolution" sa wiki page ng biology.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Ito pa. May section mismo tungkol sa evolution dito sa entry ng britannica tungkol sa biology.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
appocalips
Enthusiast
eh di nga totoo eh bakit ang genesis million mention di ka naniniwala
eh. patunay yan ng history at science yung evolution mo iniwan na ng mga scientist di raw na patunayan ang theory ni darwin tapos ikaw wala ka namang napapatunayan eh.. bilib na bilib ka sa theory na yan kwento lang yan si cristo nasa history ng roma yung evolution mo wala pang napatunayan
at fyi yung mga nag mention na yan ay dought kay darwin hindi totoo.. parang ikaw di totoo sayo ang dimo nakikita kaya wag ka maniwala sa hangin mangmang
Grabe na ang kamangmangan ng mga theist. Akala ko wala nang hihigit pa kay Initializing meron pa pala. Ikaw! Ba'la ka jan!
- Status