Thea18
About Flat Earth:
Actually, bago pa lang ang bible alam na ng mga ancient civilizations na bilog ang Mundo. May Ancient Sumerian texts at cave carvings ng buong solar system, including pluto. Ang confirmation ni Magellan was just a rediscovery, alam na natin dati pa, even during the time of the Ancient Greeks. Si Pythagoras din nag propose na bilog ang mundo sometime around 500BC.
In short, we can't use the bible as the main reference of the argument regarding the planet's shape. Prior to the bible being compiled, we already know this as a fact.
If totoo ba ang bible:
It depends on where you look, pero the bible is the most reliable historical document. That's why we have archaological accounts referencing the bible for dates (ex. "before christ"). It's true that Caesar existed during the time of Jesus and recently it's been discovered that Pontius Pilate did exist nung na discover ang slab with his name in it.
But that doesn't mean the bible is the
ultimate source of truth. The bible is reliable enough, especially if the facts are taken. But the integrity of the bible is still very questionable. Ginamit na ang bible ng several governments to control people, at marami na ring books sa bible ang nawala or tinatago. I have a suspicion that some of the lost books of the bible ay nasa Vatican Secret Archives.
Take note na nung bago palang namatay si Jesus, ang early preachers didn't mention that he was crucified. Why? Kasi kahiya-hiya yun nung time na yun, at lalaki ang chance na hindi sila ma coconvert into Christianity if it wasn't revealed.
If pwede mangyari ang ganitong bagay, then more likely mataas ang chance na we have already re-adjusted the bible so many times to our liking.
If you widen your reading a bit, a encounter mo ang topic sa lost books. One excerpt I've known is bago nanganak si Mary, merong midwife actually sa scene. Pinasok nya ang daliri nya sa ari ni Mary para ma determine if totoo ang ****** siya, at na shock ang midwife upon knowing this and proclaimed she truly is holy.
Now, wala namang malisya sa part na to. But we have removed this kasi malaswa para sa iba. If we can remove this, then perhaps we can remove everything else din?
Scrolls dating back 2nd century have been found, lost gospels that include the Gospel of Magdalene, which dates back to the early times of Christian revolution. It's called the Nag Hammadi library. Pero hindi siya inaccept ng churches. Why? Because it's controversial.
The bible is reliable, but it isn't the whole truth.
Sa Genesis, si God nag refer sa kanyang sarili as "Elohim", which means "Mighty Gods". It's a plural word. Si Elohim ang gumawa ng Earth, ng life. May plurality sa Elohim, which means hindi siya name ng isang tao but nag rerefer sa madaming tao. Yet, due to the evolution of our religious preferences to monotheism, Elohim became just one man. Pero it's clear in the bible that we are made by multiple God/People/Beings, not just one.
We tend to change the bible to our own liking.
Hindi masyadong namemention ang immoral parts. Say for example, when Noah and his family survived the great flood, anong ginawa nya? Nag effort syang gumawa ng vineyard at nag timpla ng wine. Nagpakalasing sya to celebrate. Sa sobrang kalasingan,
he slept outside his tent uncovered (nakatulog sya sa labas na nakahubad), yet we portray the guy as a totally righteous man. But after all this, he's just a man and God(s) loves him regardless. In the Nag Hammadi gospels, na mention din ang relationship ni Magdalene kay Jesus, and that she was not a prostitute. She also claimed herself to be Jesus' favorite desciple. But we changed it over time kasi hundreds of years ago, men are supposed to be stronger than women. Women did not have a high place in the society, so it was removed and worse, Magdalene was then labeled prostitute.
I have other things in mind, pero masyado nang mahaba.

I'll leave it up for you to decide.