PH-
Welcome to PHCorner Forums! Sign up for free to unlock full access and exclusive privileges, including:
- Asking questions about computer and mobile issues
- Discovering internet tips for your mobile network and computer
🕯️ Traditions Totoo bang persona si Satanas?
- Thread starter Gentleman007
- Start date
- Status
ICE Coffee
⭐⭐☕⭐⭐
[XX='Task_Failed_Successfully, c: 985718, m: 874587'][/XX] tama tama!! agree ako sayo jan
Gentleman007
Forum Expert
Ano ang Hitsura ng Diyablo?
Ang sagot ng Bibliya
Ang Diyablo ay isang di-nakikitang espiritu, kaya wala siyang pisikal na katawan.—Efeso 6:11, 12.
Madalas ilarawan ang Diyablo na isang nilalang na may pagkakahawig sa kambing, na may sungay, buntot, at malaking tinidor. Naniniwala ang ilan na ang ganitong paglalarawan sa Diyablo ay mula sa sinaunang mga artist na malamang na naimpluwensiyahan ng alamat at mitolohiya.
Paano inilalarawan ng Bibliya ang Diyablo?
Mga teksto tungkol sa Diyablo
Paano inilalarawan ng Bibliya ang Diyablo?
Gumagamit ang Bibliya ng ilang paghahalintulad tungkol sa Diyablo. Tinutulungan tayo ng mga ito na maintindihan ang kaniyang mga ugali, at hindi ang kaniyang hitsura. Ito ang ilan sa mga paghahalintulad:
Isang anghel ng liwanag. Pinapaniwala niya ang mga tao na maganda ang iniaalok niya sa kanila para siya ang sundin nila, imbes na ang Diyos.—2 Corinto 11:14.
Isang umuungal na leon. Walang awa niyang inaatake ang mga mananamba ng Diyos.—1 Pedro 5:8.
Isang malaking dragon. Nakakatakot siya, malakas, at mapaminsala.—Apocalipsis 12:9.
Mga teksto tungkol sa Diyablo
2 Corinto 11:14: “Si Satanas mismo ay laging nagkukunwaring isang anghel ng liwanag.”
Ibig sabihin: Nagkukunwaring mabuti si Satanas para lokohin ang mga tao na sundin ang itinuturo niya, imbes na ang itinuturo ng Diyos.
Efeso 6:11: “Isuot ninyo ang kumpletong kasuotang pandigma mula sa Diyos para maging matatag kayo sa kabila ng tusong mga pakana ng Diyablo.”
Ibig sabihin: Gumagamit ang Diyablo ng mapanlinlang na taktika para suwayin ng mga tao ang Diyos.
Santiago 4:7: “Magpasakop kayo sa Diyos; pero labanan ninyo ang Diyablo, at lalayo siya sa inyo.”
Ibig sabihin: Puwedeng matalo ng isang tao si Satanas kung susundin niya ang Diyos, hindi ang Diyablo.
1 Pedro 5:8: “Ang kalaban ninyo, ang Diyablo, ay gumagala-gala gaya ng isang umuungal na leon, na naghahanap ng malalapa.”
Ibig sabihin: Galít ang Diyablo sa mga sumusunod sa Diyos, at gusto niyang sirain ang kaugnayan nila sa Diyos.
Ang sagot ng Bibliya
Ang Diyablo ay isang di-nakikitang espiritu, kaya wala siyang pisikal na katawan.—Efeso 6:11, 12.
Madalas ilarawan ang Diyablo na isang nilalang na may pagkakahawig sa kambing, na may sungay, buntot, at malaking tinidor. Naniniwala ang ilan na ang ganitong paglalarawan sa Diyablo ay mula sa sinaunang mga artist na malamang na naimpluwensiyahan ng alamat at mitolohiya.
Paano inilalarawan ng Bibliya ang Diyablo?
Mga teksto tungkol sa Diyablo
Paano inilalarawan ng Bibliya ang Diyablo?
Gumagamit ang Bibliya ng ilang paghahalintulad tungkol sa Diyablo. Tinutulungan tayo ng mga ito na maintindihan ang kaniyang mga ugali, at hindi ang kaniyang hitsura. Ito ang ilan sa mga paghahalintulad:
Isang anghel ng liwanag. Pinapaniwala niya ang mga tao na maganda ang iniaalok niya sa kanila para siya ang sundin nila, imbes na ang Diyos.—2 Corinto 11:14.
Isang umuungal na leon. Walang awa niyang inaatake ang mga mananamba ng Diyos.—1 Pedro 5:8.
Isang malaking dragon. Nakakatakot siya, malakas, at mapaminsala.—Apocalipsis 12:9.
Mga teksto tungkol sa Diyablo
2 Corinto 11:14: “Si Satanas mismo ay laging nagkukunwaring isang anghel ng liwanag.”
Ibig sabihin: Nagkukunwaring mabuti si Satanas para lokohin ang mga tao na sundin ang itinuturo niya, imbes na ang itinuturo ng Diyos.
Efeso 6:11: “Isuot ninyo ang kumpletong kasuotang pandigma mula sa Diyos para maging matatag kayo sa kabila ng tusong mga pakana ng Diyablo.”
Ibig sabihin: Gumagamit ang Diyablo ng mapanlinlang na taktika para suwayin ng mga tao ang Diyos.
Santiago 4:7: “Magpasakop kayo sa Diyos; pero labanan ninyo ang Diyablo, at lalayo siya sa inyo.”
Ibig sabihin: Puwedeng matalo ng isang tao si Satanas kung susundin niya ang Diyos, hindi ang Diyablo.
1 Pedro 5:8: “Ang kalaban ninyo, ang Diyablo, ay gumagala-gala gaya ng isang umuungal na leon, na naghahanap ng malalapa.”
Ibig sabihin: Galít ang Diyablo sa mga sumusunod sa Diyos, at gusto niyang sirain ang kaugnayan nila sa Diyos.
Nope, satan was just a hebrew word meaning “adversary” and “accuser” romans use this word to call out bad people or rebels, jesus was a spiritual rebel he dispelled the status Quo during his time.
satan was just a metaphoric of Bad, a polarity of Low and High Frequency, we are frequencies and Vibrations
satan was just a metaphoric of Bad, a polarity of Low and High Frequency, we are frequencies and Vibrations
Gentleman007
Forum Expert
Look out that no one takes you captive by means of the philosophy and empty deceptionYou do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. according to human tradition, according to the elementary things of the worldYou do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. and not according to Christ;
-You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.:8
-You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.:8
That Verse was Irrelevant and Invalid, and it is Hypocritical. romans invented that names such as colossians, the author of the bibles were anonymous, and wrote in greek, therefore the bible isn't preserved. no human knows who wrote the bibles. none of the authors were eyewitness to jesus or isa
it was just use to strengthen the stronghold of that religious followers, a flock of sheep
it was just use to strengthen the stronghold of that religious followers, a flock of sheep
Gentleman007
Forum Expert
Jesus Christ—Evidence That He Walked the Earth
DO YOU believe in the existence of the man named Albert Einstein? You may readily answer yes, but why? Most people have not personally met him. Yet, reliable reports of his accomplishments prove that he did exist. The influence of his existence is felt through scientific applications of his discoveries. For instance, many benefit from electricity generated by nuclear energy, the release of which is closely linked with the application of Einstein’s famous equation, E=mc2 (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared).
The same reasoning applies to Jesus Christ, admittedly the most influential man in history. What was written about him and the visible evidence of the influence he wielded prove beyond doubt that he did exist. As interesting as the recent archaeological finding of the James inscription, described in the preceding article, may be, Jesus’ historicity does not depend on this or any other artifact. The fact is, we can find evidence of Jesus’ existence in what secular historians wrote about him and his followers.
Testimony of Historians
For instance, consider the testimony of Flavius Josephus, a first-century Jewish historian who was a Pharisee. He referred to Jesus Christ in the book Jewish Antiquities. Although some doubt the authenticity of the first reference where Josephus mentioned Jesus as the Messiah, Professor Louis H. Feldman of Yeshiva University says that few have doubted the genuineness of the second reference. There Josephus said: “[Ananus the high priest] convened the judges of the Sanhedrin and brought before them a man named James, the brother of Jesus who was called the Christ.” (Jewish Antiquities, XX, 200) Yes, a Pharisee, a member of the sect many of whose adherents were avowed enemies of Jesus, acknowledged the existence of “James, the brother of Jesus.”
The influence of Jesus’ existence was felt through the activities of his followers. When the apostle Paul was imprisoned in Rome about 59 C.E., the principal men of the Jews told him: “As regards this sect it is known to us that everywhere it is spoken against.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) They called Jesus’ disciples “this sect.” If they were everywhere spoken against, secular historians would likely report about them, would they not?
Tacitus, born about 55 C.E. and considered one of the world’s greatest historians, mentioned the Christians in his Annals. In the account about Nero’s blaming the great fire of Rome in 64 C.E. on them, he wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.” The details of this account match the information regarding the Jesus of the Bible.
Another writer who commented on Jesus’ followers was Pliny the Younger, the governor of Bithynia. In about the year 111 C.E., Pliny wrote to Emperor Trajan, asking how to handle Christians. People who were falsely accused of being Christians, wrote Pliny, would repeat an invocation to the gods and worship the statue of Trajan, just to prove that they were not Christians. Pliny continued: “There is no forcing, it is said, those who are really Christians, into any of these compliances.” That testifies to the reality of the existence of the Christ, whose followers were prepared to give their lives for their belief in him.
After summarizing the references to Jesus Christ and his followers by the historians of the first two centuries, The Encyclopædia Britannica (2002 edition) concludes: “These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus, which was disputed for the first time and on inadequate grounds at the end of the 18th, during the 19th, and at the beginning of the 20th centuries.”
Testimony of Jesus’ Followers
“The New Testament supplies nearly all the evidence for a historical reconstruction of Jesus’ life and fate and for the earliest Christian interpretations of his significance,” says The Encyclopedia Americana. Skeptics may not accept the Bible as evidence of Jesus’ existence. Yet, two lines of reasoning based on Scriptural accounts particularly help to establish that Jesus actually walked the earth.
As we noted, Einstein’s great theories prove his existence. Similarly, Jesus’ teachings prove the reality of his existence. Take for example the Sermon on the Mount, a well-known discourse that Jesus gave. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) The apostle Matthew wrote of the impact of that sermon: “The crowds were astounded at his way of teaching; for he was teaching them as a person having authority.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Regarding the effect the sermon has had on people over the centuries, Professor Hans Dieter Betz noted: “The influences exerted by the Sermon on the Mount generally far transcend the borderlines of Judaism and Christianity, or even Western culture.” He added that this sermon has “a peculiarly universalistic appeal.”
Consider the following concise and practical words of wisdom found in the Sermon on the Mount: “Whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other also to him.” “Take good care not to practice your righteousness in front of men.” “Never be anxious about the next day, for the next day will have its own anxieties.” “Do not . . . throw your pearls before swine.” “Keep on asking, and it will be given you.” “All things . . . that you want men to do to you, you also must likewise do to them.” “Go in through the narrow gate.” “By their fruits you will recognize them.” “Every good tree produces fine fruit.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
No doubt you have heard some of these E×ρréššions or the gist of them. Perhaps they have become proverbs in your language. These are all taken from the Sermon on the Mount. The influence that this sermon has on many peoples and cultures eloquently testifies to the existence of “the great teacher.”
Let us imagine that someone fabricated a figure called Jesus Christ. Suppose that person was clever enough to come up with the teachings credited to Jesus in the Bible. Would he not contrive to make Jesus and his teachings as palatable as possible to people in general? Yet, the apostle Paul observed: “Both the Jews ask for signs and the Greeks look for wisdom; but we preach Christ impaled, to the Jews a cause for stumbling but to the nations foolishness.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) The message of Christ impaled was attractive neither to the Jews nor to the nations. That was, though, the Christ that first-century Christians proclaimed. Why the depiction of the Christ impaled? The only satisfactory explanation would be that the writers of the Christian Greek Scriptures recorded the truth about Jesus’ life and death.
Another line of reasoning supporting Jesus’ historicity is found in the untiring preaching of his teachings by his followers. Only some 30 years after Jesus started his ministry, Paul could say that the good news “was preached in all creation that is under heaven.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Yes, Jesus’ teachings spread throughout the ancient world despite opposition. Paul, who was himself persecuted as a Christian, wrote: “If Christ has not been raised up, our preaching is certainly in vain, and our faith is in vain.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) If preaching a Christ who had not been resurrected would be in vain, preaching a Christ who had never existed would be even more in vain. As we read in the report by Pliny the Younger, first-century Christians were willing to die for their belief in Christ Jesus. They risked their lives for Christ because he was real; he had walked the earth and had lived as the Gospel accounts record.
You Have Seen Proof
Belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ was the prerequisite for Christian preaching. In your mind’s eye, you too can envision the resurrected Jesus by seeing the impact he is making today.
Just before Jesus was impaled, he gave a grand prophecy about his future presence. He also indicated that he would be resurrected and would sit at God’s right hand awaiting the time to deal with his enemies. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Thereafter, he would take action and oust Satan and his demons from the heavens.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
When would all of that happen? Jesus gave his disciples ‘the sign of his presence and of the conclusion of the system of things.’ The sign to identify his invisible presence included great wars, food shortages, earthquakes, the appearance of false prophets, an increase of lawlessness, and severe pestilences. Such calamitous events were to be expected, for the ouster of Satan the Devil would mean “woe for the earth.” The Devil has come down to the vicinity of the earth “having great anger, knowing he has a short period of time.” In addition, the sign includes the preaching of the good news of the Kingdom “in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle that fit together, the things that Jesus prophesied have occurred. Since the outbreak of World War I in 1914, we have seen the composite evidence of the invisible presence of Jesus Christ. He is reigning as the King of God’s Kingdom and is wielding tremendous influence. That you have this magazine in your hand is evidence that the Kingdom preaching work is being carried out today.
To appreciate further the effect of Jesus’ existence, you need to study the Bible.
DO YOU believe in the existence of the man named Albert Einstein? You may readily answer yes, but why? Most people have not personally met him. Yet, reliable reports of his accomplishments prove that he did exist. The influence of his existence is felt through scientific applications of his discoveries. For instance, many benefit from electricity generated by nuclear energy, the release of which is closely linked with the application of Einstein’s famous equation, E=mc2 (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared).
The same reasoning applies to Jesus Christ, admittedly the most influential man in history. What was written about him and the visible evidence of the influence he wielded prove beyond doubt that he did exist. As interesting as the recent archaeological finding of the James inscription, described in the preceding article, may be, Jesus’ historicity does not depend on this or any other artifact. The fact is, we can find evidence of Jesus’ existence in what secular historians wrote about him and his followers.
Testimony of Historians
For instance, consider the testimony of Flavius Josephus, a first-century Jewish historian who was a Pharisee. He referred to Jesus Christ in the book Jewish Antiquities. Although some doubt the authenticity of the first reference where Josephus mentioned Jesus as the Messiah, Professor Louis H. Feldman of Yeshiva University says that few have doubted the genuineness of the second reference. There Josephus said: “[Ananus the high priest] convened the judges of the Sanhedrin and brought before them a man named James, the brother of Jesus who was called the Christ.” (Jewish Antiquities, XX, 200) Yes, a Pharisee, a member of the sect many of whose adherents were avowed enemies of Jesus, acknowledged the existence of “James, the brother of Jesus.”
The influence of Jesus’ existence was felt through the activities of his followers. When the apostle Paul was imprisoned in Rome about 59 C.E., the principal men of the Jews told him: “As regards this sect it is known to us that everywhere it is spoken against.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) They called Jesus’ disciples “this sect.” If they were everywhere spoken against, secular historians would likely report about them, would they not?
Tacitus, born about 55 C.E. and considered one of the world’s greatest historians, mentioned the Christians in his Annals. In the account about Nero’s blaming the great fire of Rome in 64 C.E. on them, he wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.” The details of this account match the information regarding the Jesus of the Bible.
Another writer who commented on Jesus’ followers was Pliny the Younger, the governor of Bithynia. In about the year 111 C.E., Pliny wrote to Emperor Trajan, asking how to handle Christians. People who were falsely accused of being Christians, wrote Pliny, would repeat an invocation to the gods and worship the statue of Trajan, just to prove that they were not Christians. Pliny continued: “There is no forcing, it is said, those who are really Christians, into any of these compliances.” That testifies to the reality of the existence of the Christ, whose followers were prepared to give their lives for their belief in him.
After summarizing the references to Jesus Christ and his followers by the historians of the first two centuries, The Encyclopædia Britannica (2002 edition) concludes: “These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus, which was disputed for the first time and on inadequate grounds at the end of the 18th, during the 19th, and at the beginning of the 20th centuries.”
Testimony of Jesus’ Followers
“The New Testament supplies nearly all the evidence for a historical reconstruction of Jesus’ life and fate and for the earliest Christian interpretations of his significance,” says The Encyclopedia Americana. Skeptics may not accept the Bible as evidence of Jesus’ existence. Yet, two lines of reasoning based on Scriptural accounts particularly help to establish that Jesus actually walked the earth.
As we noted, Einstein’s great theories prove his existence. Similarly, Jesus’ teachings prove the reality of his existence. Take for example the Sermon on the Mount, a well-known discourse that Jesus gave. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) The apostle Matthew wrote of the impact of that sermon: “The crowds were astounded at his way of teaching; for he was teaching them as a person having authority.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Regarding the effect the sermon has had on people over the centuries, Professor Hans Dieter Betz noted: “The influences exerted by the Sermon on the Mount generally far transcend the borderlines of Judaism and Christianity, or even Western culture.” He added that this sermon has “a peculiarly universalistic appeal.”
Consider the following concise and practical words of wisdom found in the Sermon on the Mount: “Whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other also to him.” “Take good care not to practice your righteousness in front of men.” “Never be anxious about the next day, for the next day will have its own anxieties.” “Do not . . . throw your pearls before swine.” “Keep on asking, and it will be given you.” “All things . . . that you want men to do to you, you also must likewise do to them.” “Go in through the narrow gate.” “By their fruits you will recognize them.” “Every good tree produces fine fruit.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
No doubt you have heard some of these E×ρréššions or the gist of them. Perhaps they have become proverbs in your language. These are all taken from the Sermon on the Mount. The influence that this sermon has on many peoples and cultures eloquently testifies to the existence of “the great teacher.”
Let us imagine that someone fabricated a figure called Jesus Christ. Suppose that person was clever enough to come up with the teachings credited to Jesus in the Bible. Would he not contrive to make Jesus and his teachings as palatable as possible to people in general? Yet, the apostle Paul observed: “Both the Jews ask for signs and the Greeks look for wisdom; but we preach Christ impaled, to the Jews a cause for stumbling but to the nations foolishness.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) The message of Christ impaled was attractive neither to the Jews nor to the nations. That was, though, the Christ that first-century Christians proclaimed. Why the depiction of the Christ impaled? The only satisfactory explanation would be that the writers of the Christian Greek Scriptures recorded the truth about Jesus’ life and death.
Another line of reasoning supporting Jesus’ historicity is found in the untiring preaching of his teachings by his followers. Only some 30 years after Jesus started his ministry, Paul could say that the good news “was preached in all creation that is under heaven.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Yes, Jesus’ teachings spread throughout the ancient world despite opposition. Paul, who was himself persecuted as a Christian, wrote: “If Christ has not been raised up, our preaching is certainly in vain, and our faith is in vain.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) If preaching a Christ who had not been resurrected would be in vain, preaching a Christ who had never existed would be even more in vain. As we read in the report by Pliny the Younger, first-century Christians were willing to die for their belief in Christ Jesus. They risked their lives for Christ because he was real; he had walked the earth and had lived as the Gospel accounts record.
You Have Seen Proof
Belief in the resurrection of Jesus Christ was the prerequisite for Christian preaching. In your mind’s eye, you too can envision the resurrected Jesus by seeing the impact he is making today.
Just before Jesus was impaled, he gave a grand prophecy about his future presence. He also indicated that he would be resurrected and would sit at God’s right hand awaiting the time to deal with his enemies. (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) Thereafter, he would take action and oust Satan and his demons from the heavens.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
When would all of that happen? Jesus gave his disciples ‘the sign of his presence and of the conclusion of the system of things.’ The sign to identify his invisible presence included great wars, food shortages, earthquakes, the appearance of false prophets, an increase of lawlessness, and severe pestilences. Such calamitous events were to be expected, for the ouster of Satan the Devil would mean “woe for the earth.” The Devil has come down to the vicinity of the earth “having great anger, knowing he has a short period of time.” In addition, the sign includes the preaching of the good news of the Kingdom “in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle that fit together, the things that Jesus prophesied have occurred. Since the outbreak of World War I in 1914, we have seen the composite evidence of the invisible presence of Jesus Christ. He is reigning as the King of God’s Kingdom and is wielding tremendous influence. That you have this magazine in your hand is evidence that the Kingdom preaching work is being carried out today.
To appreciate further the effect of Jesus’ existence, you need to study the Bible.
Tomsline screamer
Honorary Poster
Hahahaha... nice thread..
Ask ko lang po Ginoong TS.. Ang pandemya ba ay may kaugnayan kay Satanas..?
Ask ko lang po Ginoong TS.. Ang pandemya ba ay may kaugnayan kay Satanas..?
you're bringing einstein now, he believed in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now. 'god' of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now., in fact he strengthen the theory that Time is an Illusion with his theory of relativity and his E=MC2 discover that everything is energy, we are energy beings, eneregy is light, light is divine therefore we are divine beings. and all the matter in this world are just a energies and frequency and a binary of codes just like video game.
Gentleman007
Forum Expert
[XX='thy-wilt, c: 1006264, m: 633393'][/XX] ISANG MALAKING KALOKOHAN!
[XX='Gentleman007, c: 1007527, m: 631158'][/XX] ganyan talaga pag nalaman mo na ang katotohanan sa mundong ito, ganyang ganyan ang reaction nang mga high priest sa jerusalem nang ipabatid nang batang yeshua na mali ang doctrina nang mga ito, Ironic? Alam mo bang pakana ng council of niccea na sakupin ang mundo sa pa mamagitan ng bibliya? At si hesus a isang alegorya nang Araw sa popular na bibliya?? Nasa sayo na yan kung tatanggapin mo ang knowledge na ito, nasa tao na pasya nang kanyang landas
Attachments
Gentleman007
Forum Expert
Si satanas ang ugat ng kasaaan pero may pagkakataon na maisisisi rin sa tao ang dahilan dahil sa maling paggamit ng kalayaan.. mas pinipili ng maraming tao sa mundo na gamitin ang kanilang buhay sa paggawa ng masama na sya namang pumipinsala sa inosenteng mga tao.
Tomsline screamer
Honorary Poster
Salamat sa magandang kasagutan mga brader..
Kung totoong ginawa ng tao ang COVID, masasabi nating minanipula ni satanas ang mga tao para gumawa ng kasamaan..
So kung lahat ng tao sa mundo ay naniniwala at may pananampalataya kay God baka maaring hindi makapasok sa katawan at sa isip ng mga tao laban sa kasamaan.. Dahil magaling sa kasamaan si satanas mga hayop naman ang papasukin nya dahil ang mga hayop at insekto hindi naman sila marunong manampalataya o manalangin.. satanas talaga
Gentleman007
Forum Expert
[XX='thy-wilt, c: 1009075, m: 633393'][/XX] iyan pinakita mong picture ay hindi naman yan si Jesus kaya siguradong huwad yan hehehe
- Status
Similar threads
-
💡 Trivia Bakit hindi ginagamit ni Satanas ang pangalan ng Diyos?
- Started by Gentleman007
- Replies: 0
-
💡 Trivia BAKIT GALING KAY SATANAS ANG DOKTRINA NG TRINIDAD?
- Started by Gentleman007
- Replies: 0
-
-
🕯️ Traditions Bakit Nangyayari ang Masasamang Bagay sa Mabubuting Tao?
- Started by QuietSeeker
- Replies: 0
-
🕯️ Traditions Dapat Bang Paniwalaan ang Trinidad Ayon sa Bibliya?
- Started by QuietSeeker
- Replies: 0