Thoughts About Duterte's ICC Arrest

​

Thoughts About Duterte's ICC Arrest
--> You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

1. Was Duterte's arrest îllégâl?
--> No. It was supposed to be yes, but Duterte himself withdrew the Philippines from the Rome Statute in March 2019. This means that the Rome Statute no longer applies to the Philippines since then.

2. Why does the ICC still meddle with crimes in the Philippines despite its withdrawal from the Rome Statute?
--> The ICC retains jurisdiction over crimes committed before the withdrawal. The ICC has the legal right to prosecute Duterte for crimes that happen before March 2019.

3. Why does Duterte invoke Article 59 of the Rome Statute to claim that his arrest was îllégâl?
--> Because this is his last clear chance to avoid accountability for the crimes committed during his WOD.

So, why attempt to invoke this right?
MY OPINION: Duterte, once again, is trying to play his card by toying with the laws that govern countries, including the Philippines and its citizens.

******************************************​

• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Soul Calibre]

View attachment 3603428

Aminin na kasi ts, na double standard karin. Politicians is considered as high profile. Bias ka towards the Duterete. There is nothing wrong with admitting such biases.

Gawa ng AI yan? LOL. Let me dance the way you dance. Heto... gawa rin ito ng AI:

takot tlga sila maiipit . di nila kyang ipagkalulo di naman kase desperado ang pangulo ng mongol . haha

Did you even read the article I stated earlier? Let me quote...

In a statement to POLITICO on Tuesday, a Mongolian government spokesperson said that the country finds itself in a position of energy dependence, rendering it difficult to handcuff Putin on the International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant over war crimes in Ukraine.

"Mongolia imports 95% of its petroleum products and over 20% of electricity from our immediate neighborhood, which have previously suffered interruption for technical reasons. This supply is critical to ensure our existence and that of our people," the spokesperson said.

View attachment 3603459


Ang sabi mo kasi nag tatago diba? The guy simple said, na panong nag tago e pumunta naman sa Mongola. That's the point. Proof kapa ng proof sa iba eh di naman katutuhanan pinagsasabi mo. LMAO.

When I stated nagtatago, I didn't mean na nagtatago inside a closet or something. What I mean is, either unknown ang whereabouts nya or nasa mga non-ICC member countries sya.

If hindi sya nahuli, syempre. No one can mess around against this superpower nation. Eh America ka mismo, withdraw themselves with this self proclaim justice of the ICC.

Basahin mo ito: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

haha you mean di ko alam na nag agree na pala ako sa claim mo?

Manipulative as always.. wala na bang bago? Binasa mo ba ang mga sinabi mo?

haha nag bigay ka ng opinion pero ayaw mo tumanggap din ng opinion ko sa opinion mo?

My statements were backed with an article. Ikaw, nasaan ang article na hinihinge ko? Bakit wala kang maibigay? Kasi ang argument mo, based on nothing but your own opinion. Your opinion against a statement backed by an article.. your point is pointless.

 

[plhbg1]

Manipulative as always.. wala na bang bago? Binasa mo ba ang mga sinabi mo?

haha manipulative pala yung mag agree sayo ayos

My statements were backed with an article. Ikaw, nasaan ang article na hinihinge ko? Bakit wala kang maibigay? Kasi ang argument mo, based on nothing but your own opinion. Your opinion against a statement backed by an article.. your point is pointless.

none of your articles proves Rome Statute no longer applies lol, di mo nakita URL ng article mo?

manilatimes.net/2025/03/15/opinion/

 

[Soul Calibre]

haha manipulative pala yung mag agree sayo ayos

none of your articles proves Rome Statute no longer applies lol, di mo nakita URL ng article mo?

manilatimes.net/2025/03/15/opinion/

Gaya ng sinabi ko, ang statements ko ay supported with articles. Ilabas mo na ang articles that could support your argument. Kanina ko pa hinihinge pero wala kang maibigay.

Nakakahiya namang mang-manipula ng walang supporting articles. O baka ako lang ang nahihiya para sa’yo? Baka naman..

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

Gaya ng sinabi ko, ang statements ko ay supported with articles. Ilabas mo na ang articles that could support your argument. Kanina ko pa hinihinge pero wala kang maibigay.

Nakakahiya namang mang-manipula ng walang supporting articles. O baka ako lang ang nahihiya para sa’yo? Baka naman..

yan ang gusto ko sayo idol supported mo ang mga statements mo. kaya paki sagot na tong tanong ko kanina.


so anong case ba sinasabi mo boss?
paki basa yung definition boss para maliwanagan ka

in legal terms, a "case" can be synonymous with a "lawsuit," particularly in the context of civil court where one party (the plaintiff) files a complaint against another (the defendant) seeking a remedy for an alleged wrong.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Case: In a legal context, a "case" refers to a legal matter that is brought before a court for adjudication.
• Lawsuit: A "lawsuit" is a legal action initiated by a plaintiff (the person or entity bringing the claim) against a defendant (the person or entity being sued) in a court of law.
• Civil Case: A civil case is a lawsuit that involves disputes between individuals or businesses over money or some injury to personal rights, according to LawHelp.org [3].
• Criminal Case: A criminal case is a lawsuit where the government (the prosecution) brings charges against an individual accused of violating criminal laws.
• Litigation: A case, controversy, or lawsuit

 

[Soul Calibre]

yan ang gusto ko sayo idol supported mo ang mga statements mo. kaya paki sagot na tong tanong ko kanina.


so anong case ba sinasabi mo boss?
paki basa yung definition boss para maliwanagan ka

in legal terms, a "case" can be synonymous with a "lawsuit," particularly in the context of civil court where one party (the plaintiff) files a complaint against another (the defendant) seeking a remedy for an alleged wrong.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Case: In a legal context, a "case" refers to a legal matter that is brought before a court for adjudication.
• Lawsuit: A "lawsuit" is a legal action initiated by a plaintiff (the person or entity bringing the claim) against a defendant (the person or entity being sued) in a court of law.
• Civil Case: A civil case is a lawsuit that involves disputes between individuals or businesses over money or some injury to personal rights, according to LawHelp.org [3].
• Criminal Case: A criminal case is a lawsuit where the government (the prosecution) brings charges against an individual accused of violating criminal laws.
• Litigation: A case, controversy, or lawsuit

Really? So you wanted me to mention it? OK, fine. The case I am pertaining to is nothing but “impeachment case”. That word itself triggers lo-and-behold. Gets?

 

[plhbg1]

Gaya ng sinabi ko, ang statements ko ay supported with articles. Ilabas mo na ang articles that could support your argument. Kanina ko pa hinihinge pero wala kang maibigay.

Nakakahiya namang mang-manipula ng walang supporting articles. O baka ako lang ang nahihiya para sa’yo? Baka naman..

tinatanong nga kita kung hindi mo ba nakita yung URL ng articles mo? nag provide ka ng article pero opinion page pala ng isang news company, di mo alam na opinion page? tingnan mo maigi yung URL ng articles mo jusko lerd

manilatimes.net/2025/03/15/opinion/

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

Really? So you wanted me to mention it? OK, fine. The case I am pertaining to is nothing but “impeachment case”. That word itself triggers lo-and-behold. Gets?

on what grounds idol? war on drugs ba? maybe magandang tanungin mo si leni kasi lawyer sya at alam mo naman na hindi sya takot kay duterte dahil hindi tikom ang bibig nya sa pag tuligsa sa war on drugs. baket hindi sya nag file ng impeachment complain against duterte.. dawala lang ang posibleng sagot dyan, either wala syang tiwalang uusad sa camara ang complain or wala syang ebidensyang matibay para gawing basis ng complain nya. but anyway, 3 years nang wala sa pwesto si duterte at halos lahat ng mga tao sa kamara de representante eh gustong makulong si duterte wala na syang immunity sa lawsuit hindi na sya kelangan munang ma impeach bago makasuhan sa korte, baket hanggang ngayun walang nag sumite ng kaso laban kay duterte sa korte suprema? it only suggests na wala silang matibay na ebidensya in fact, yung pinang totroll lang ni duterte na mga salita nya ang pinanghahawakan lang nilang ebidensya. kaya wag na tayong maglokohan dito boss. alam nating lahat na yan ang dahilan kung baket walang nag sampa ng kaso sa kanya dito sa locol courts at hindi yung napaka lame na dinadahilan mong kesyo complicated and justice system dito, may problema pag sa high profile ect.. pang batang argumento yan boss nakakahiyang ilatag yung mga ganyang argumento sa mga diskusyong pang may utak.

 

[Soul Calibre]

tinatanong nga kita kung hindi mo ba nakita yung URL ng articles mo? nag provide ka ng article pero opinion page pala ng isang news company, di mo alam na opinion page? tingnan mo maigi yung URL ng articles mo jusko lerd

manilatimes.net/2025/03/15/opinion/

So? It’s an article posted my Manila Times, though tagged as opinion. Eh ikaw? Nasaan articles mo? Maglabas ka muna kung meron man

on what grounds idol? war on drugs ba? maybe magandang tanungin mo si leni kasi lawyer sya at alam mo naman na hindi sya takot kay duterte dahil hindi tikom ang bibig nya sa pag tuligsa sa war on drugs. baket hindi sya nag file ng impeachment complain against duterte.. dawala lang ang posibleng sagot dyan, either wala syang tiwalang uusad sa camara ang complain or wala syang ebidensyang matibay para gawing basis ng complain nya. but anyway, 3 years nang wala sa pwesto si duterte at halos lahat ng mga tao sa kamara de representante eh gustong makulong si duterte wala na syang immunity sa lawsuit hindi na sya kelangan munang ma impeach bago makasuhan sa korte, baket hanggang ngayun walang nag sumite ng kaso laban kay duterte sa korte suprema? it only suggests na wala silang matibay na ebidensya in fact, yung pinang totroll lang ni duterte na mga salita nya ang pinanghahawakan lang nilang ebidensya. kaya wag na tayong maglokohan dito boss. alam nating lahat na yan ang dahilan kung baket walang nag sampa ng kaso sa kanya dito sa locol courts at hindi yung napaka lame na dinadahilan mong kesyo complicated and justice system dito, may problema pag sa high profile ect.. pang batang argumento yan boss nakakahiyang ilatag yung mga ganyang argumento sa mga diskusyong pang may utak.

It will circle back to what I stated… our justice system is broken that’s why nobody formally filed an impeachment case.

 

[plhbg1]

So? It’s an article posted my Manila Times, though tagged as opinion. Eh ikaw? Nasaan articles mo? Maglabas ka muna kung meron man

ginawa mong facts ang opinion, ayos haha di mo ata alam that news companies also caters editorial/opinion topics, balikan mo yung high school english topics about parts of a newspaper, if sakaling nakapag high school ka nga

 

[Lelouch2]

Gawa ng AI yan? LOL. Let me dance the way you dance. Heto... gawa rin ito ng AI:

Di pala gusto ng AI daw. Oh ito meriam webster na yan.

Wag na kasing palusot pa. Admit it na bias ka at double standard. Politicians will always be considered high profile kasi thay are public servants and they gather so much media attention in it self.

When I stated nagtatago, I didn't mean na nagtatago inside a closet or something. What I mean is, either unknown ang whereabouts nya or nasa mga non-ICC member countries sya.

Lol! Excuse pa. Kitang kita na. The points has been taken just take the L.

Oh bat nag mention ka na nasa non-ICC member siya kaya kuno hindi nahuhuli. Diba ang pinas hindi naman? Halatang-halata ang bias mo ah.

Basahin mo ito: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Binasa ko na yan. And they can say whatever they want to say. In reality no ones mess around superpower nation.

 

[Soul Calibre]

ginawa mong facts ang opinion,

I said, my statements are supported by articles. Hindi mo gets yan?

ayos haha di mo ata alam that news companies also caters editorial/opinion topics, balikan mo yung high school english topics about parts of a newspaper, if sakaling nakapag high school ka nga

Manipulation + Gaslighting = ??

Wala na bang bago?

Asan na articles mo na kanina ko pa hinahanap? Bakit wala kang maibigay?

 

[plhbg1]

I said, my statements are supported by articles. Hindi mo gets yan?

Manipulation + Gaslighting = ??

Wala na bang bago?

Asan na articles mo na kanina ko pa hinahanap? Bakit wala kang maibigay?

you mean supporting an opinion with another opinion? haha

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

It will circle back to what I stated… our justice system is broken that’s why nobody formally filed an impeachment case.

hindi sa local court nag susumite ng impeachment complain boss kundi sa kamara. di mo alam yun boss? hindi yan lawsuit di ba nga? ang justice system ay nasa korte wala sa kamara magkaiba yun bossing

 

[Soul Calibre]

Di pala gusto ng AI daw. Oh ito meriam webster na yan.View attachment 3603557
Wag na kasing palusot pa. Admit it na bias ka at double standard. Politicians will always be considered high profile kasi thay are public servants and they gather so much media attention in it self.

Ang bilis namang magpalit ng tactic kasi yung una hindi guman. Wahahahahaha

Lol! Excuse pa. Kitang kita na. The points has been taken just take the L.

Excuse? Making excuses ba talaga ako or sadyang hindi mo lang naintindihan?

Oh bat nag mention ka na nasa non-ICC member siya kaya kuno hindi nahuhuli. Diba ang pinas hindi naman? Halatang-halata ang bias mo ah.

The PH was once a member, and so the authorities comply with the law. Masama ba ang sumunod sa batas?

Binasa ko na yan. And they can say whatever they want to say. In reality no ones mess around superpower nation.

Aaah. Kaya naman pala. OK.

you mean supporting an opinion with another opinion? haha

Magbigay muna ng article bago dumada.

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

The PH was once a member, and so the authorities comply with the law. Masama ba ang sumunod sa batas?

ibig mong sabihin once a member will always be a member? anong specific na batas ba yung sinunod ng gobyerno ng pilipinas na kahit hindi na tayo member? can you ellaborate?

 

[Soul Calibre]

hindi sa local court nag susumite ng impeachment complain boss kundi sa kamara. di mo alam yun boss? hindi yan lawsuit di ba nga? ang justice system ay nasa korte wala sa kamara magkaiba yun bossing

The justice system is not only handled by judiciary. Hindi mo alam yan?

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

The justice system is not only handled by judiciary. Hindi mo alam yan?

well prove it so i can be enlightened

 

[Soul Calibre]

ibig mong sabihin once a member will always be a member? anong specific na batas ba yung sinunod ng gobyerno ng pilipinas na kahit hindi na tayo member? can you ellaborate?

The ICC retains jurisdiction over crimes committed while the Philippines was still a member

 

[Lelouch2]

Ang bilis namang magpalit ng tactic kasi yung una hindi guman. Wahahahahaha

panong di gumana? Eh di mo gusto ang AI as if hindi nanggaling sa dictionary ang meaning nya. I just wen to the source itself. LMAO. Just admit na that you are bias and double standard.

Excuse? Making excuses ba talaga ako or sadyang hindi mo lang naintindihan?

Excuse at damage control nayang mga sinasabi mo na di kuno na intindihan na ikaw mismo nag sabi na nagtatago.

The PH was once a member, and so the authorities comply with the law. Masama ba ang sumunod sa batas?

Then wag mong gamitin na excuse na hindi daw nadakip si Putin dahil nandun sya sa non member sa ICC. Just because PH was once a member, the PH itself has the power not to obliged to whatever the ICC demands since we are no longer a member. It's clearly a political move.

 

[plhbg1]

Magbigay muna ng article bago dumada.

haha ikaw yung may thread bossing at sabi mo backed by articles yung thread mo, yung pala opinion ang articles, it still doesn't change the fact that none of your articles prove that Rome Statute no longer applies