Thoughts About Duterte's ICC Arrest

​

Thoughts About Duterte's ICC Arrest
--> You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

1. Was Duterte's arrest îllégâl?
--> No. It was supposed to be yes, but Duterte himself withdrew the Philippines from the Rome Statute in March 2019. This means that the Rome Statute no longer applies to the Philippines since then.

2. Why does the ICC still meddle with crimes in the Philippines despite its withdrawal from the Rome Statute?
--> The ICC retains jurisdiction over crimes committed before the withdrawal. The ICC has the legal right to prosecute Duterte for crimes that happen before March 2019.

3. Why does Duterte invoke Article 59 of the Rome Statute to claim that his arrest was îllégâl?
--> Because this is his last clear chance to avoid accountability for the crimes committed during his WOD.

So, why attempt to invoke this right?
MY OPINION: Duterte, once again, is trying to play his card by toying with the laws that govern countries, including the Philippines and its citizens.

******************************************​

• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
• You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

Nabanggit rin sa video ang bagay na ito. Again, may problema ang justice system dito sa Pinas when it comes to prosecuting high profile individuals.

isnt it leila delima also a high profile individual??

 

[plhbg1]

Proof sa sinabi mong.....

Or, was it just a scheme to manipulate my statement?

argument ko nga yan sakaling magka-totoo yung sinasabi mo sa first post mo, i argued na binibigyan mo lang ng reason lalo kung bakit na-delay ng more than ten years ang investigation ng icc

The ICC made a statement when Duterte mentioned his goal of eliminating human lives.

This is a valid article: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

haha same thing pa din, this time 2017 na lang yung claim nila imbes na 2016

 

[Soul Calibre]

breaktime muna boss para makapag isip ka ng maayos sa mga isinasagot mo parang wala na sa hulog eh. hehehe

Another attempt to gaslight? Wala na bang bago? Ikaw kaya ang mag-break time baka sakaling maintindihan mo ang sinasabi sa video at sa articles that I shared.

isnt it leila delima also a high profile individual??

Is she? LMAO. Si duterte ba common netizen?

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

Another attempt to gaslight? Wala na bang bago? Ikaw kaya ang mag-break time baka sakaling maintindihan mo ang sinasabi sa video at sa articles that I shared.


Is she? LMAO. Si duterte ba common netizen?

nako boss ikaw ang nag sabi na may problema ang justice system natin pag dating sa mga high profile na individuals. kaya itinanong ko sayo kung si leila delima ba ay hindi high profile dahil gumana sa kanya ang justice system at sa katunayan, nakalaya sya. gutom ka na nga ata talaga boss kain ka muna

 

[Soul Calibre]

argument ko nga yan sakaling magka-totoo yung sinasabi mo sa first post mo, i argued na binibigyan mo lang ng reason lalo kung bakit na-delay ng more than ten years ang investigation ng icc

So, you tried to manipulate my statement by using an argument that is based on nothing but your opinion? Ang lala naman.

haha same thing pa din, this time 2017 na lang yung claim nila imbes na 2016

It was never in 2016, it was not more than 10 years ago.. so mali ka. Maglabas ka ng proof mo about sa sinabi mong more than 10 years ago.

nako boss ikaw ang nag sabi na may problema ang justice system natin pag dating sa mga high profile na individuals. kaya itinanong ko sayo kung si leila delima ba ay hindi high profile dahil gumana sa kanya ang justice system at sa katunayan, nakalaya sya. gutom ka na nga ata talaga boss kain ka muna

Teka.. baka naman iba ang pagkakaintindi mo sa ibigsabihin ng "high profile individual"?

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

Teka.. baka naman iba ang pagkakaintindi mo sa ibigsabihin ng "high profile individual"?

boss meron bang ibang ibig sabihin ng high profile individual? o baka meron kang special na meaning ng high profile individual na si duterte lang ang ibig mong sabihing high profile? hahaha

 

[plhbg1]

So, you tried to manipulate my statement by using an argument that is based on nothing but your opinion? Ang lala naman.

haha actually nag what if na nga ako sa statement mo na maging true, pumabor na nga ako sa statement mo haha sinabi ko lang yung implications ng opening post mo sakaling magka-totoo nga na yan magiging hatol ng court na Rome Statute no longer applies

It was never in 2016, it was not more than 10 years ago.. so mali ka. Maglabas ka ng proof mo about sa sinabi mong more than 10 years ago.

warrant na mismo nagsabi bossing that the crime ay 2011 pa nangyari so by 2016 that's 5 years delayed na at nagpatuloy pa yung delay until 2024 which is more than ten years na

 

[Soul Calibre]

boss meron bang ibang ibig sabihin ng high profile individual? o baka meron kang special na meaning ng high profile individual na si duterte lang ang ibig mong sabihing high profile? hahaha

Hindi mo talaga naiintindihan.. ganito na lang. During Duterte's administration, may nag-attempt ba to file a case against him?

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

Hindi mo talaga naiintindihan.. ganito na lang. During Duterte's administration, may nag-attempt ba to file a case against him?

hindi na sya ang presidente ngayun sa pilipinas almost 3 years ago na boss. and siguro alam mo naman na immune sa lawsuit ang presidente habang nasa katungkulan sya. sino naman ang bob0ng lawyer na magkakaso sa kanya na hindi alam na immune ang presidente? medyo komendyante datingan mo boss ha. hindi mo alam yan boss??

 

[Soul Calibre]

haha actually nag what if na nga ako sa statement mo na maging true, pumabor na nga ako sa statement mo haha sinabi ko lang yung implications ng opening post mo sakaling magka-totoo nga na yan magiging hatol ng court na Rome Statute no longer applies

Pumabor in what way? By manipulating the contents of my thread?

warrant na mismo nagsabi bossing that the crime ay 2011 pa nangyari so by 2016 that's 5 years delayed na at nagpatuloy pa yung delay until 2024 which is more than ten years na

So, asan nga proof mo na pinalabas kong naghintay lang ang ICC na kumalas ang Pilipinas before arresting Duterte? When in fact, the investigation already started kahit nung nasa posisyon pa lang si Duterte.

kaya nga pinapa-labas mo na nag hintay yung icc na kumalas ang Pinas just to arrest someone for a crime committed more than ten years ago, questionable na nga yung super delayed investigation nila eh binigyan mo pa talaga ng reason para maghintay sila ng ganun katagal kasi may benefit nga pala talaga sa kanila pag naging non-member na yung state

hindi na sya ang presidente ngayun sa pilipinas almost 3 years ago na boss. and siguro alam mo naman na immune sa lawsuit ang presidente habang nasa katungkulan sya. sino naman ang bob0ng lawyer na magkakaso sa kanya na hindi alam na immune ang presidente? medyo komendyante datingan mo boss ha. hindi mo alam yan boss??

I said "file a case", why jump into a conclusion na lawsuit? Ibabalik ko ang sinabi mo... medyo komedyante ang datingan mo.

 

[plhbg1]

Pumabor in what way? By manipulating the contents of my thread?

manipulating at hindi pag pabor ba yung mag agree ako sa claim mo? haha

So, asan nga proof mo na pinalabas kong naghintay lang ang ICC na kumalas ang Pilipinas before arresting Duterte? When in fact, the investigation already started kahit nung nasa posisyon pa lang si Duterte.

yung sinabi mo nga na Rome Statute no longer applies ang magiging reason ng icc para mag hintay

 

[Soul Calibre]

manipulating at hindi pag pabor ba yung mag agree ako sa claim mo? haha

Basahin at intindihin mo yung mga sinabi mo.

yung sinabi mo nga na Rome Statute no longer applies ang magiging reason ng icc para mag hintay

Wala sa timeline ang claim mo, and you can't even provide a proof to support it. Kailan nga ba nag-submit ng withdrawal from the Rome Statue of ICC si Duterte? Oooh.. 2018, effective 2019. Naghintay ba sila before sila mag-investigate? Maglabas ka ng pruweba mo.

 

[plhbg1]

Basahin at intindihin mo yung mga sinabi mo.

so ayaw mo na may mag agree sayo?

Wala sa timeline ang claim mo, and you can't even provide a proof to support it. Kailan nga ba nag-submit ng withdrawal from the Rome Statue of ICC si Duterte? Oooh.. 2018, effective 2019. Naghintay ba sila before sila mag-investigate? Maglabas ka ng pruweba mo.

you mean aamin si icc na naghintay sila? yung claim mo nga ang magpapa-igting sa doubt na naghintay nga sila

 

[borokot]

The ICC already issued an arrest warrant to Putin, the reason kung bakit hindi pa sya nahuhuli ay dahil nagtatago sya, and sometimes nasa non-member country sya.

Asan nga proof mo?

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

pumunta pa ng mongolia pero di namam hinule . yan ba ang nagtatago

 

[Soul Calibre]

so ayaw mo na may mag agree sayo?

Do you even understand your own statement?

you mean aamin si icc na naghintay sila? yung claim mo nga ang magpapa-igting sa doubt na naghintay nga sila

See? You're trying to manipulate what I stated, again. Buti sana kung may pruweba kang inilalabas. I will ask you for the last time, asan proof mo?

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

pumunta pa ng mongolia pero di namam hinule . yan ba ang nagtatago

He did, but Mongolia did not comply kaya hindi sya na-aresto.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Lelouch2]

Aminin na kasi ts, na double standard karin. Politicians is considered as high profile. Bias ka towards the Duterete. There is nothing wrong with admitting such biases.

 

[borokot]

Do you even understand your own statement?

See? You're trying to manipulate what I stated, again. Buti sana kung may pruweba kang inilalabas. I will ask you for the last time, asan proof mo?


He did, but Mongolia did not comply kaya hindi sya na-aresto.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

takot tlga sila maiipit . di nila kyang ipagkalulo di naman kase desperado ang pangulo ng mongol . haha

 

[Lelouch2]

He did, but Mongolia did not comply kaya hindi sya na-aresto.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Ang sabi mo kasi nag tatago diba? The guy simple said, na panong nag tago e pumunta naman sa Mongola. That's the point. Proof kapa ng proof sa iba eh di naman katutuhanan pinagsasabi mo. LMAO.

If hindi sya nahuli, syempre. No one can mess around against this superpower nation. Eh America ka mismo, withdraw themselves with this self proclaim justice of the ICC.

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

nakakain na ba ang lahat? hehehe

I said "file a case", why jump into a conclusion na lawsuit? Ibabalik ko ang sinabi mo... medyo komedyante ang datingan mo.

so anong case ba sinasabi mo boss?
paki basa yung definition boss para maliwanagan ka

in legal terms, a "case" can be synonymous with a "lawsuit," particularly in the context of civil court where one party (the plaintiff) files a complaint against another (the defendant) seeking a remedy for an alleged wrong.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Case: In a legal context, a "case" refers to a legal matter that is brought before a court for adjudication.

• Lawsuit: A "lawsuit" is a legal action initiated by a plaintiff (the person or entity bringing the claim) against a defendant (the person or entity being sued) in a court of law.
• Civil Case: A civil case is a lawsuit that involves disputes between individuals or businesses over money or some injury to personal rights, according to LawHelp.org [3].
• Criminal Case: A criminal case is a lawsuit where the government (the prosecution) brings charges against an individual accused of violating criminal laws.
• Litigation: A case, controversy, or lawsuit
  

 

[plhbg1]

Do you even understand your own statement?

haha you mean di ko alam na nag agree na pala ako sa claim mo?

See? You're trying to manipulate what I stated, again. Buti sana kung may pruweba kang inilalabas. I will ask you for the last time, asan proof mo?

haha nag bigay ka ng opinion pero ayaw mo tumanggap din ng opinion ko sa opinion mo?