🕯️ Traditions WHY DID GOD ASK THE ISRAELITES TO KILL THE CANAANITES.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 1523148
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet atheist are asking why God destroyed them... Sa mata ng mga nagmamahal sa kasalanan mukhang mas pabor pa sa kanila na manatiling buhay ang mga taong ganito..


Salamat sa info.. may natutunan ako..

walang silbi makipag talo sa mga yan sir

after all the atheists has no right to question the moral ground of God's action against the canaanite,

they dont have any standard of morality to ground on

for atheism all of human thoughts are just a byproduct of accidents, and blind forces - in that condition morality,free will, justice dont really exist

lets site an example on the mouth of the most dubious atheist and professional pseudo historian of the modern ages -Richard Dawkins

In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt,and other people are going to get lucky; and you won’t find any rhyme or reason to it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind pitiless indifference.. . . DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music
-Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden (New York: Basic Books, 1996), page 133


kaya walang karapatan ang mga atheist na mag reklamo tungkol sa moralidad dahil wala sila kunsepsyon nyan

in antheism: there is no conception of god and evil and everything is permitted
 
Pan laman ang utos noon , na pinamahalaan ng mga anghel, kaya hindi nakakasakdal sa kanila, bagkus naging dahilan pa ito ng kapalaluan at pagkukunwari kasi nga utos na pan laman lamang
Kaya dumating si Kristo at pinalitan ang kautusan, ang kautusan ni Kristo ay pansakdal na sa espiritu at kaluluwa, ito ay para sa atin sa mga gentil sa panahon natin
Iba ang utos sa atin paps at iba sa kanila kaya nga.may old testament at new testament .


Sinasabi ko nga sa iyo hindi parusa ang kamatayan ng laman ng tao dito sa lupa , kundi pagpapatigil sa kanilang kasamaan o di kaya pamamahinga habang naka himlay ang tao sa lupa ito ay naghihintay sa araw ng paghuhukom ,,doon na yong final destination ng tao. Hindi dito sa lupa o earth magaganap ang paghuhukom, kundi doon sa harapan ng hukuman ng Dios kasi aalisin muna ang lupa o earth bago humarap ang lahat ng tao sa hukuman.

Revelation 20: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.At nakita ko ang isang malaking luklukang maputi, at ang nakaluklok doon, na sa kaniyang harapan, ang lupa at ang langit ay tumakas; at walang nasumpungang kalalagyan nila. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.At nakita ko ang mga patay, malalaki at maliliit, na nangakatayo sa harapan ng luklukan; at nangabuksan ang mga aklat: at nabuksan ang ibang aklat, na siyang aklat ng buhay: at ang mga patay ay hinatulan ayon sa mga bagay na nasusulat sa mga aklat, ayon sa kanilang mga gawa.

Sa tingin mo, 2000 years or so in the future meron ilalabas na The super new testament na papalit sa new testament? Hindi ba kaya gumawa ng the final ultimate testament? Considering that the bible is word of god? So flawed and needs to be amended every what, 2000 or 3000 years or whenever he feels like it? There seems to be lacking on consistency and permanence on that regard.

Halimbawang mga "imoral" at mga azholes nga yung mga canaaites, so sa kamay ng tao dapat sila managot at lipulin?

By the way, marami ding grupo na gumagawa ng higit na kasalanan at imoralidad kagaya ng mga economic saboteurs, war mongerers, at mga nagpapayaman at the expense of the people. Nasaan na nga yung utos to stop them?
 
Yet atheist are asking why God destroyed them... Sa mata ng mga nagmamahal sa kasalanan mukhang mas pabor pa sa kanila na manatiling buhay ang mga taong ganito..


Salamat sa info.. may natutunan ako..
Psst. May ituturo ako mga makasalanan at imoral din. Yung mga economic saboteurs, war mongerers mga religious groups na nagpapayaman. Pwede ba paki-book sila for extermination?
 
walang silbi makipag talo sa mga yan sir

after all the atheists has no right to question the moral ground of God's action against the canaanite,

they dont have any standard of morality to ground on

for atheism all of human thoughts are just a byproduct of accidents, and blind forces - in that condition morality,free will, justice dont really exist

lets site an example on the mouth of the most dubious atheist and professional pseudo historian of the modern ages -Richard Dawkins

In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt,and other people are going to get lucky; and you won’t find any rhyme or reason to it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind pitiless indifference.. . . DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music
-Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden (New York: Basic Books, 1996), page 133


kaya walang karapatan ang mga atheist na mag reklamo tungkol sa moralidad dahil wala sila kunsepsyon nyan

in antheism: there is no conception of god and evil and everything is permitted
So atheism/agnosticism or anything that does not conform to your belief is equal to being IMMORAL? Ano classification mo sa mga buddhist, hindu and the like? Yes/No?
 
So atheism/agnosticism or anything that does not conform to your belief is equal to being IMMORAL? Ano classification mo sa mga buddhist, hindu and the like? Yes/No?

all religion has a conception of morality of good and evil

ikaw saan mo binase ang moral standard mo?

daldal ka ng daldal dito nakita ko puro iyan ang pinuputok mo tungkol sa moralidad wala naman kunsepto ang atheism nyan

ngayon uulitin ko yun tanong saan mo binase ang moral standard mo ang pagkaka kilala mo ng good and evil?
 
all religion has a conception of morality of good and evil

ikaw saan mo binase ang moral standard mo?

daldal ka ng daldal dito nakita ko puro iyan ang pinuputok mo tungkol sa moralidad wala naman kunsepto ang atheism nyan

ngayon uulitin ko yun tanong saan mo binase ang moral standard mo ang pagkaka kilala mo ng good and evil?
Ako? Simple: The Golden Rule.

Madaldal talaga ako parang ikaw. Oks ba? What is morality, how do you define it? How can you say an action is moral or not?

By the way the concept of good and evil, right or wrong amongst many other things is... relative.
 
there is historical and archeological evidences that cannaanites sacrificed their children on their God moloch and baal


just imagine if hindi napigilan ang canaanite religious practices at sila ay naging malakas na political forces
actually they are once, even after the israelite removed them in the land of israel they remmnant survived and their horrible religious practice continued under the carthagenian empire, nagapi lang sila sa punic wars ng roman empire

pano pala kong sila ang nanalo sa punic war at sila ang kumontrol sa mediterrenean? mananakop sila ng ibang bansa, dala dala ang disgusting religious practice nila

imagine kung nangyari yan at nagpatuloy yan until this day, what kind of moral standard meron ngayon ang mga bansa sa mediterenean teritories at iba pa bansa na maiimpluwensyahan nila?

the answer is: by canaanite moral standard - human/children sacrifice is a common practice today
I agree nA any form of human sacrifice to a deity is really disgusting.... (Although may isang super famous na human sacrifice na alam ko..)

Anw..did god really need to kill children as well?? Anong pinagkaiba non sa pagsacrfice ng bata???

Imagine this...u heard that occupants of your promised lang are sacrificing their children for a deity u dont believe in.. nakakagalit talaga diba...

Then nagpunta ka dun..napasok mo village nila...pinagpapatay mo ung mga adults dun..thats fair...
Then nakita mo ung mga bata...naiiyak na sa takot... Nakita mo ung sanngol nakatitig lang sau... Walang mga capacity na lumaban... ni hindi makapagsalita para makiusap sayo...Go lang na patayin mo?? U think thats just??
 
Ako? Simple: The Golden Rule.

Madaldal talaga ako parang ikaw. Oks ba? What is morality, how do you define it? How can you say an action is moral or not?

By the way the concept of good and evil, right or wrong amongst many other things is... relative.




bilis mo mag quote ng statement ko pero ang hindi ka makasagot sa simpleng tanong

hayaan mo turuan kita tungkol sa moralidad na paborito mo iputok kahit saan thread


saan ilalagay ng atheism ang kanilang moral standard?

lets put it in the context of darwinian morality - dyan nababagay ang moral standard ng mga atheists na tulad mo

The Darwinian Survival of The Fittest Ethics

according to the morality of darwinism human has no value like other species
in other words in darwinism human is the same status of animal

tulad ito ng pagsasabi ang tao ay pweding gawin laboratory test halimbalawang a human with disease to be given in the lion for food to test if ang sakit ay pwedi makasama o makahawa sa leon :D

and many atheists denied the darwinian concept of morality, but some of them atleast admitted that they are anti darwinian when it comes to morality and how to organize our society

ayaw nyo tanggapin o gawin moral standard ang Darwinism? why?

because all atheists know that is a ruthless, and brutal moral standard


so saan nyo ngayon ibabase ang moralidad ninyong mga atheists sa pagkakakilala ng mabuti at masama?


wala kayo iba mapupuntahan, you have no choice but to ground your moral standard on God and Religion.


ikaw homer tanggapin mo man o hindi alam mo ang morality the concept of Good and Evil
dahil dati ka believer at natutunan mo ang masama at mabuti dahil sa patnubay sayo ng mga magulang mo - at ang patunay ng ama at ina mo sa paguturo sayo ng mabuti at masama ay ang Diyos at Religion


ngayon kung hindi mo tatanggapin na natutunan mo yan sa Religion at sa Diyos

ay itigil mo ang pagputak mo tungkol sa moral standard and moral ground ng Diyos sa bibliya

dahil wala kayo pinagbabasehan ng moral ground wala kayo konsepto nyan - meron man the darwinian morality ay ayaw nyo i apply



so ang gagawin nyo na lang ay to s†éál the conception of morality from theism
 
I agree nA any form of human sacrifice to a deity is really disgusting.... (Although may isang super famous na human sacrifice na alam ko..)

Anw..did god really need to kill children as well?? Anong pinagkaiba non sa pagsacrfice ng bata???

Imagine this...u heard that occupants of your promised lang are sacrificing their children for a deity u dont believe in.. nakakagalit talaga diba...

Then nagpunta ka dun..napasok mo village nila...pinagpapatay mo ung mga adults dun..thats fair...
Then nakita mo ung mga bata...naiiyak na sa takot... Nakita mo ung sanngol nakatitig lang sau... Walang mga capacity na lumaban... ni hindi makapagsalita para makiusap sayo...Go lang na patayin mo?? U think thats just??

mag sight ka nga sa bibliya ng verse na may mga bata na canaanite na pinatay ang mga israelita?

ang purpose noon ay

upang alinisin ang mga canaanite sa israel at mapasakamay ng mga rightful na tao
at matigil ang ginagawa nila human sacrifice

hindi upang patayin lahat ang mga canaanite at idamay ang mga bata

katunayan ay nag survive ang karamihan sa kanila

kaya nga nakapag regroup sila under carthagenian empire the mortal enemy of rome at historical fact yan
the carthagenian is canaanite language speaking people
 
bilis mo mag quote ng statement ko pero ang hindi ka makasagot sa simpleng tanong

hayaan mo turuan kita tungkol sa moralidad na paborito mo iputok kahit saan thread


saan ilalagay ng atheism ang kanilang moral standard?

lets put it in the context of darwinian morality - dyan nababagay ang moral standard ng mga atheists na tulad mo

The Darwinian Survival of The Fittest Ethics

according to the morality of darwinism human has no value like other species
in other words in darwinism human is the same status of animal

tulad ito ng pagsasabi ang tao ay pweding gawin laboratory test halimbalawang a human with disease to be given in the lion for food to test if ang sakit ay pwedi makasama o makahawa sa leon :D

and many atheists denied the darwinian concept of morality, but some of them atleast admitted that they are anti darwinian when it comes to morality and how to organize our society

ayaw nyo tanggapin o gawin moral standard ang Darwinism? why?

because all atheists know that is a ruthless, and brutal moral standard


so saan nyo ngayon ibabase ang moralidad ninyong mga atheists sa pagkakakilala ng mabuti at masama?


wala kayo iba mapupuntahan, you have no choice but to ground your moral standard on God and Religion.


ikaw homer tanggapin mo man o hindi alam mo ang morality the concept of Good and Evil
dahil dati ka believer at natutunan mo ang masama at mabuti dahil sa patnubay sayo ng mga magulang mo - at ang patunay ng ama at ina mo sa paguturo sayo ng mabuti at masama ay ang Diyos at Religion


ngayon kung hindi mo tatanggapin na natutunan mo yan sa Religion at sa Diyos

ay itigil mo ang pagputak mo tungkol sa moral standard and moral ground ng Diyos sa bibliya

dahil wala kayo pinagbabasehan ng moral ground wala kayo konsepto nyan - meron man the darwinian morality ay ayaw nyo i apply



so ang gagawin nyo na lang ay to s†éál the conception of morality from theism
Alam mo itigil mo na yang sangkatutak na basura at banggit ka ng banggit ng kung sinu-sinong tao. Wag mong gawing word circus ito.

Ikaw ano putak mo?

Ikaw kups, ano ang moral sa iyo?

Bigyan kita ng maganda ehemplo para masupalpal ka.

Kung operator ka ng rail at may 2 rails pa pwedeng daanan yung incoming train. Nataon na yung anak mo naglalaro sa gitna ng 1 train. Yung isang rail ay sira at anuman train na dumaan duon ay siguradong disaster. Ano ang pipillin mo? Which action is moral? Which is right and which is wrong?

Get off you effing high horse!
 
By the way the concept of good and evil, right or wrong amongst many other things is... relative.

natawa ko sa huling tinuran mo na ito haha

when we put morality as relative in your context - eating baby and human sacrifice isnt merely immoral

can you baby? no you cant base on your moral ground you s†éáling from God

but you and atheists can eat baby anyway its not immoral base on their relative morality :D
 
Alam mo itigil mo na yang sangkatutak na basura at banggit ka ng banggit ng kung sinu-sinong tao. Wag mong gawing word circus ito.

Ikaw ano putak mo?

Ikaw kups, ano ang moral sa iyo?

Bigyan kita ng maganda ehemplo para masupalpal ka.

Kung operator ka ng train at may 2 rails pa pwedeng daanan yung incoming train. Nataon na yung anak mo nasa gitna ng 1 train. Yung isang rail ay sira at anuman train na dumaan duon ay siguradong disaster. Ano ang pipillin mo? Which action is moral? Which is right and which is wrong?

Get off you effing high horse!


mas kups ka

puro ka putak sa morality hindi mo naman alam pinagsasabi mo hahaha

noon ay nag prepreno ko sayo dahil bago lang ako dito but silent no more

of course hindi ko gagawin yan example mo na itutulad ko yung tao

theist know the conception of good and evil we moral standard to ground


ikaw by your concept of morality ay pwedi mo itulak ang tao sinsabi mo and there is nothing wrong with it because u have no moral standard you can ground


now ngayon sayo ko itatanong ano gagawin mo itutulak mo o hindi?

kung hindi mo itutulak? anong moral standard ang pinag basehan mo
ilabas mo dito ang moral ground mo :D
 
Alam mo itigil mo na yang sangkatutak na basura at banggit ka ng banggit ng kung sinu-sinong tao. Wag mong gawing word circus ito.

Ikaw ano putak mo?

Ikaw kups, ano ang moral sa iyo?

Bigyan kita ng maganda ehemplo para masupalpal ka.

Kung operator ka ng train at may 2 rails pa pwedeng daanan yung incoming train. Nataon na yung anak mo nasa gitna ng 1 train. Yung isang rail ay sira at anuman train na dumaan duon ay siguradong disaster. Ano ang pipillin mo? Which action is moral? Which is right and which is wrong?

Get off you effing high horse!

alam mo hilig mo kasi makipag debate puro basura naman pangangatwiran mo

wanna be ka masyado

nakikipag debate ka gamit ang laway mo

otoy ang tamang pakikipag debate you must support your argument with refference

in a debate you cannot use your saliva as refference dahil istup lang gumagawa nyan na tulad mo at halang halata sayo
 
alam mo hilig mo kasi makipag debate puro basura naman pangangatwiran mo

wanna be ka masyado

nakikipag debate ka gamit ang laway mo

otoy ang tamang pakikipag debate you must support your argument with refference

in a debate you cannot use your saliva as refference dahil istup lang gumagawa nyan na tulad mo at halang halata sayo
Natural laway ang gamit ko alangan naman paa. Ikaw ba paa ba gamit mo?

Otoy, ang tamang pakikipag-debate, you use your own words rather than rely on other people's words. Lumilitaw ka tuloy na ano nga yun? Wannabe at copy-cat.

Hindi mo na nasagot yung ehemplo ko. Confused ka ano?
 
By the way the concept of good and evil, right or wrong amongst many other things is... relative.

natawa ko sa huling tinuran mo na ito haha

when we put morality as relative in your context - eating baby and human sacrifice isnt merely immoral

can you baby? no you cant base on your moral ground you s†éáling from God

but you and atheists can eat baby anyway its not immoral base on their relative morality :D
Tsalap yata ng baby chicken a.k.a. balot at day-old. Om nom nom nom. In that same token, you can call me mass murderer of chickens (or pigs) for that matter.

Sino nagsabi sayo na sa god mo galing morality? Teka, ilang atrocious acts na uli yung ginawa ng god mo? Is that moral?
 
Warning: Avoid sms type text, all capital letters, jejemon style posts are considered as spam
ALAM MO TS YANG PANGINOON MO NAPALAKING HIPOKRITO. . . . DIBA SYA ANG PINAKA UNANG MASS MURDERER,
PINAPASA BA NAMAN LAHAT NG KASAMAAN KAY LUCIFER EH KUNG SA TOTOUSIN SYA DIN NAMAN NAGBIGAY PAHINTULOT SA MGA PINAGGAGAWA NI LUCIFER SA MGA TAO DIBA? PINAYAGAN NYA SI LUCIFER KASI DAW MALAKI TIWALA NYA SA MGA TAO, LOL. MERON BANG AMA NA HAHAYAAN ANG POSIBILIDAD NA KAPAHAMAKAN SA MGA ANAK NYA?
PARANG NAG-EENJOY SYA SA NAKIKITA NYANG PAGDUDUSA NG MGA TAO, SYEMPRE MATIK NA PAGLUGMOK NA ANG ISANG TAO DIBA TATAWAG YUNG SA KANYA,.
MAY SAVIOR FETISH ATA ANG PANGINOON O ATTENTION SEEKER LANG TALAGA SYA?
NABITIN ATA SYA SA ATTENTION NA BINIBIGAY NANG MGA ALIPURIS NYANG MGA ANGEL.


CONCERN LANG AKO SA INYO SA MATAUHAN NA KAYO. . . .
 
walang silbi makipag talo sa mga yan sir

after all the atheists has no right to question the moral ground of God's action against the canaanite,

they dont have any standard of morality to ground on

for atheism all of human thoughts are just a byproduct of accidents, and blind forces - in that condition morality,free will, justice dont really exist

lets site an example on the mouth of the most dubious atheist and professional pseudo historian of the modern ages -Richard Dawkins

In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt,and other people are going to get lucky; and you won’t find any rhyme or reason to it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind pitiless indifference.. . . DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music
-Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden (New York: Basic Books, 1996), page 133


kaya walang karapatan ang mga atheist na mag reklamo tungkol sa moralidad dahil wala sila kunsepsyon nyan

in antheism: there is no conception of god and evil and everything is permitted
View ko sa morality is the preservation of the well-being..

Ikaw nga...based sa morality na turo ni god mo tama nga pumatay ng bata??

And how about ur god?? Ur bible?? Can u say with certainty na every believer shud based their morality jan??
 
puro ka daldal tungkol sa moralidad napaka dakilang immoral brain dead mo


uulitin ko ang tanong with elaboration

we theists, how to know our moral standard (epistomology), and the existence of our moral standard (ontology)

we know it, we know it exist,

we know our moral standard because of the scriptures we following which is the ground of our moral
our moral standard exist because we know good and evil because we believe in God

may basehan kami, may moral ground kami


ngayon ikaw saan mo binbabase gina ground ang moral standard mo?
meron ba? ilabas mo at sabhin mo samin
 
View ko sa morality is the preservation of the well-being..

Ikaw nga...based sa morality na turo ni god mo tama nga pumatay ng bata??

And how about ur god?? Ur bible?? Can u say with certainty na every believer shud based their morality jan??

tinitignan nyo kasi moral ground ng bibliya pero wala kayo moral ground

at hindi mo pa sinasagot yung tanong ko back again

saan verse sa bible nabanggit na pinatay ng mga israelita o dinamay nila ang mga batang canaanite?
 
tinitignan nyo kasi moral ground ng bibliya pero wala kayo moral ground

at hindi mo pa sinasagot yung tanong ko back again

saan verse sa bible nabanggit na pinatay ng mga israelita o dinamay nila ang mga batang canaanite?
Tanong mo sa TS. Yun ang may katakut-takot na text about that.

Hindi mo na sinagot yung tanong ko about sa train example ko.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 209
    Replies
  • 4K
    Views
  • 15
    Participants
Last reply from:
homer_simpson

Online now

Members online
1,127
Guests online
991
Total visitors
2,118

Forum statistics

Threads
2,274,711
Posts
28,957,777
Members
1,233,406
Latest member
Jo477
Back
Top