🕯️ Traditions What is atheism - a common misconception

Status
Not open for further replies.
Like your not so critical of your co-theists who happens to believe in another god/s other than your "perfect" one.

You cant even agree on the meaning of one book.

And like your so welcoming to people of science when they present evidence opposing your supposedly "word of god".... Wats the name of that "heretic" who said that the sun was the center and not the earth as god-loving used to believe?

Oh..you dont just do that to science btw, you also do that to other "gospels" because they dont seem to align to your god's "good" character.

So dont say to just leave you to your beliefs, do that shit yourself.
Athiest na bininyagan sa Simbahan haha, kinasal ang magulang sa simbahan. Yan ang Pinoy Athiest hahahakakatawa
 
Yan ang problema ng mga theist kapag di nila alam yung sagot ginagamit agad ang word na "who" at "created" tapos "God" daw may gawa.
Parang ganito lang logic nila:
"Pumunta si Ed Caluag tapos may nambato at ang salarin daw engkanto"
Nag jump sa conclusion na engkanto agad ang dahilan 🤔

Hindi lahat ng simula may creator "it's called Natural Phenomenon or Phenomenon"

Two different views of Phenomena:
Scientist - Existence

Theist - Paranormal
 
Athiest na bininyagan sa Simbahan haha, kinasal ang magulang sa simbahan. Yan ang Pinoy Athiest hahahakakatawa
And ur point?? Like i said.. ang position can shift... Kung bulag bulagan ka sa mga nasa paligid mo eh choice mo yan... Faith over evidence.. pero kay god mo lang inaapply yan..kasi sa madameng aspeto sa daily life mo evidence-based ka...wag kang mag mataas na as if ang high ng standards mo.😁
 
Yung nagsasabi ng "realtalk" eh dapat may actual concept ng "reality" din... Done ka na nga. Paulit ulit ka ng sinasabi eh. REALTALK lang din.. may evidence din so its real as in. 😁
sinabi ko lang din ang reality na ang mga PINOY ATHIEST ay bininyagan din sa simbahan. di ba totoo yan?
 
sinabi ko lang din ang reality na ang mga PINOY ATHIEST ay bininyagan din sa simbahan. di ba totoo yan?
Not all,but true....pero baket yan ang sgot mo sa sinabi ko na
Like your not so critical of your co-theists who happens to believe in another god/s other than your "perfect" one.

You cant even agree on the meaning of one book.

And like your so welcoming to people of science when they present evidence opposing your supposedly "word of god".... Wats the name of that "heretic" who said that the sun was the center and not the earth as god-loving used to believe?

Oh..you dont just do that to science btw, you also do that to other "gospels" because they dont seem to align to your god's "good" character.

So dont say to just leave you to your beliefs, do that shit yourself.
????
 
Like your not so critical of your co-theists who happens to believe in another god/s other than your "perfect" one.

You cant even agree on the meaning of one book.

And like your so welcoming to people of science when they present evidence opposing your supposedly "word of god".... Wats the name of that "heretic" who said that the sun was the center and not the earth as god-loving used to believe?

Oh..you dont just do that to science btw, you also do that to other "gospels" because they dont seem to align to your god's "good" character.

So dont say to just leave you to your beliefs, do that shit yourself.
Kasi nag spread sila ng false doctrine minamali nila ang mga kasulatan, sinasadya nila na mag ligaw sa mga naniniwala. At ang mga magliligaw na iyan ay matagal ng nakasulat sa Bibliya na lilitaw talaga ang mga bulaang propeta na mamaliin ang mga kasulatan, Kaya ganun nalang ang labanan ng kapuwa thiest sa aming realm

Sa science naman sila lang naman ang naglalagay ng conflict sa nakasulat sa Bible, kahit alam naman siguro nila na walang conflict sana iyan, sinasadya lang nila na mag karoon ng conflict ang science at bible upang e push ang pagiging athiest nila gamit ang science, kahit na mismong mga scientist nila ang nagpapatunay ng mga accounts authenticity ng mga pangyayari at pati mga pisikal na ebidensya ng Bible.
 
Can anyone prove that a supernatural power is real?

According to some estimates, there are roughly 4,200 religions in the world.

Halos lahat yan naniniwala sa supernatural 🤔
 
Kasi nag spread sila ng false doctrine minamali nila ang mga kasulatan, sinasadya nila na mag ligaw sa mga naniniwala. At ang mga magliligaw na iyan ay matagal ng nakasulat sa Bibliya na lilitaw talaga ang mga bulaang propeta na mamaliin ang mga kasulatan, Kaya ganun nalang ang labanan ng kapuwa thiest sa aming realm

Sa science naman sila lang naman ang naglalagay ng conflict sa nakasulat sa Bible, kahit alam naman siguro nila na walang conflict sana iyan, sinasadya lang nila na mag karoon ng conflict ang science at bible upang e push ang pagiging athiest nila gamit ang science, kahit na mismong mga scientist nila ang nagpapatunay ng mga accounts authenticity ng mga pangyayari at pati mga pisikal na ebidensya ng Bible.
Exactly my point. Pagsspread ng maling info and declaring them as true.

Nakakahiya nmn pala sa katulad ni galileo na tinawag na heretic when he presented na ang SUN ANG CENTER NG SOLAR SYSTEM AND NOT THE EARTH .. eh di ba sya ang tama don??

And dont say na walang conflict dapat.. kung kaya ng theist na tumangap ng ebidensya eh di sana nga walang conflict. Kaso hinde db?? Ang alam nyo lang na totoo eh ang nasa libro nyo...
 
Like your not so critical of your co-theists who happens to believe in another god/s other than your "perfect" one.

You cant even agree on the meaning of one book.

And like your so welcoming to people of science when they present evidence opposing your supposedly "word of god".... Wats the name of that "heretic" who said that the sun was the center and not the earth as god-loving used to believe?

Oh..you dont just do that to science btw, you also do that to other "gospels" because they dont seem to align to your god's "good" character.

So dont say to just leave you to your beliefs, do that shit yourself.

Wheres your evidence?
 
Let me correct you a bit. What's the difference between the words 'asocial' vs 'antisocial'? The word asocial is pertaining to a person or a character that is simply not inclined into social gatherings or masses of people. It does not imply that an asocial person is someone who is hateful to or against society. However, an antisocial is.
Sorry but i don't know what your point is? Are you trying to connect the "a" of asocial to "a" of atheist? Because if so, there is no big difference between that. They are both negative prefixes.
 
Wheres your evidence?
Evidence of which one are you asking?

Well the divide between different religions is no secret,multiple christian denominations is also another.

Second one, im specifically talking bout galileo.

Last one, is about the bible..how some books were declared heresy as well...and the bible that currently exist which have undergone many alterations
 
no, the reason I'm an athiest is because someone told me that god exist and I questioned it, the answer was not convincing
humans feared nature because they did not understand it at that time and created a higher being , zues for example.

so am I standing on a belief that god didn't exist? or I wasn't convinced that your claim is believable.

and it still revolves around the idea of a god.
i'm not also convinced in your answer either. You know if you're not convinced on something you probably have standard criteria as your bases to believe on something. Like for example, someone told you that lebron james is the goat and then you're not convinced. Why? The reason is because lebron james didn't meet your standard as the goat.

It is impossible to someone to be not convinced if he dont have reason at all. You have something in your mind and that is the reason why you're not convinced. Whatever reason is that it is your claim to not believe in God.

Afraid of nature and then created God in their minds? Kung takot ako sa nature, matatakot lang ako sa nature period. It is impossible for someone to create a super being in their minds unless it was already in their minds.

Parang isang blankong papel. Lahat ng isinusulat natin jan ay naka depende sa kung ano ang nakita, experiences at nararamdaman natin. Imposbeng maitala natin jan ang bagay na hindi natin alam. Kaya nakaka pag taka na matakot sila sa isang nilalang na hindi naman nila nakita at nakasalamuha. Nakakapag taka diba? Ikaw hindi kaba nag tataka kung bakit ang dami mong tanong sa kanya sa mantalang hindi kanaman naniniwala sa kanya?
 
...

Parang isang blankong papel. Lahat ng isinusulat natin jan ay naka depende sa kung ano ang nakita, experiences at nararamdaman natin. Imposbeng maitala natin jan ang bagay na hindi natin alam. Kaya nakaka pag taka na matakot sila sa isang nilalang na hindi naman nila nakita at nakasalamuha. Nakakapag taka diba? Ikaw hindi kaba nag tataka kung bakit ang dami mong tanong sa kanya sa mantalang hindi kanaman naniniwala sa kanya?
Problem is... you are solely relying on human perceptions. And how many times did your senses have deceived you? For example, ilang pagkakataon na may nakita ka na akala mo yun na yun nun pala ay anino lang? O may nakita ka na akala mo ay yung taong kakilala mo nun pala ay may resemblance lang.

Read Plato's Allegory of the Cave.

Cogito ergo sum.
 
Sorry but i don't know what your point is? Are you trying to connect the "a" of asocial to "a" of atheist? Because if so, there is no big difference between that. They are both negative prefixes.
You are equating 2 different things. That's the point.

How can an asocial person be negative? He just doesn't want to mingle. That's it. Perhaps, he is not used to wearing masks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 734
    Replies
  • 17K
    Views
  • 65
    Participants
Last reply from:
Fight me

New Topics

Online now

Members online
649
Guests online
712
Total visitors
1,361

Forum statistics

Threads
2,274,580
Posts
28,956,967
Members
1,234,320
Latest member
adobwbiyyy
Back
Top