U proclaimed urself to be an agnostic db??
So those people should agree with u, drop their labels, post some ideas from attached to those labels that should’ve drop so people can have something to talk about…
Nawawala na pagkascientific mo… nagmumuka ka nmang theistic ngayon
i tagged myself as agnostic for sake of tagging since for me pinaka malapit ang agnostic sa mga stand ko but that doesn't mean i am re-arranging myself to fit into the agnostic idea
nagkataon lang na meron ganoong feature ang atheism but that doesn't mean na intention ko talagang kopyahin ang mga atheistic features
ows? are you sure a theist ay naghahanap ng reason?Nawawala na pagkascientific mo… nagmumuka ka nmang theistic ngayon
Iwas na iwas ka talaga sa atheism eh noh…
Nag agree ka self-affirming lang stand mo eh… ur just confirming ur biases…un lang iaaccept mo kamo… most theists think that way as well…
actually ok lang sa akin tawagin atheist, doesn't matter naman, but i still prefer calling myself agnostic hehe iba iba kasi preference natin, kung tawagin mo ako atheist yes tawagin mo lang ako but don't force me to call myself as one
of course i strengthen what i am holding, kaya nga yung reason must be convincing muna before i change my mind kasi matitibay na itong hinahawakan kong mga info ang dami ko nang nahanap na confirmation of my biases
Anong reason must be convincing eh nag agree ka nga na ang iaaccept mo lang ung nag-aagree sa current paniniwala mo… eh di reject ka lang reject sa mga bagay na di nagcoconform sa paniniwala mo… gusto mo lang pala ng consistent pat in the back…
Hindi k "finoforce". Binibigyan ka lng ng information kung ano ang technical definition ng ideas na sinasabi mo. Ikaw din nagsabi na labels are not a big deal, pero seems like a big deal to you na tawagin agnostic ang sarili mo kahit hindi pasok ang ideas mo to what it means.
ehehe i still have differences with agnostic idea, i don't agree sa pre-judging nila na "cannot be known", so tama ka di nga ako pasok sa agnostic kaya yung reason ko to call myself agnostic is just the closeness instead of fitness
it's just a bias or tendency, i tend to reject those hindi aligned but their details still come to my attention and are not exempted from being analyzed, and it already happened many times, even you have corrected me back then
It is not close. What you are saying is the complete opposite. Kung closeness ang usapan, then why not atheist? Atheism is simply disbelief in god.. or a simply being unconvinced by the so-called "evidence".
nope, it is not about you, it is about my standard of closeness and not yours, kaya nga sabi ko call me whatever you want and not force me to do the same to myself
Anong not about me? Did i say it is about me? These word have their objective definition.. it is not "my definition"
alright let's edit, it is not about the objective definition
So you are intending to stick to your misunderstood definition of the words kahit sabihan ka what they really mean? That is counterproductive in learning and growing intellectually imho...
yup, i manipulate my own learning, that's correct i manipulate it to appear counterproductive to all of you and that maximizes my control over my self that even convention cannot dictate me
This is going nowhere… mr scientific agnostic here operates via his own personal standards and definitions… lagi na lang may special pleading sa ideas na meron na sya at sa pagkakaintindi nea sa ideas na yun… na kesyo lagi na lang “I” is different from “you” or “yours”… mentality nea is like that of a theist eh.. pero syempre hindi sya aagree kasi iba na nmn ung personal interpretation at definition nea.. tssss… next topic na ko
yeah it is going nowhere kasi di ako masyadong compliant sa community katulad ninyo, what you want me to do i can't do it lalo na yung mga compliance to convention, but if you wanna debate still andito lang din ako heheThis is going nowhere… mr scientific agnostic here operates via his own personal standards and definitions… lagi na lang may special pleading sa ideas na meron na sya at sa pagkakaintindi nea sa ideas na yun… na kesyo lagi na lang “I” is different from “you” or “yours”… mentality nea is like that of a theist eh.. pero syempre hindi sya aagree kasi iba na nmn ung personal interpretation at definition nea.. tssss… next topic na ko
And thats the problem.. hindi nman pd na ang isang discussion eh mag ooperate lang based on an individual’s idea.. u contradict other ideas at sasabihin na this group is like this and this one is like that… that science is like this or that.. pero pag ideas mo nacriticize using that same logic eh ang iaassert mo namn eh iba kasi ung “personal” na ideas mo etc… you just keep on shifting the goal post where it would benefit u eh… walang mapupuntahan yan
yup pag hindi na scientific ang topic then wala na talagang kinalaman si science doon, pag philosophy na pinag-uusapan talagang self ko yung basis ko at hindi yung turo ng philosophers
Agreeing on word definition is not about being compliant. It is just how communication works.
There is nothing philosophical about words' definition. And what is wrong with referring to a philosopher? It is not as if our ideas are unique. You probably are just not too well read with these philosophers that is why you think your ideas are unique. But if you are, you would realize that no idea is truly unique.
PH