Rodante Marcoleta charged with Plunder, Bribery at Ombudsman

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[KingSemreh]

Ang punto ko makipag usap ka gamit sarili mong isip, hindi pag promt sa AI, lmao.

Ano sa tingin mo? Malinaw nman pagkasabi. Para may masabi ka lang?

 

[KingSemreh]

You have 2 new Threads. Mapapanis lang yan. Walang pumapansin. Kasi dapat naman talaga hindi na kayo pinapansin kasi nagpapansin lang kayo.

 

[Meawii]

Ano sa tingin mo? Malinaw nman pagkasabi. Para may masabi ka lang?

You have 2 new Threads. Mapapanis lang yan. Walang pumapansin. Kasi dapat naman talaga hindi na kayo pinapansin kasi nagpapansin lang kayo.

Juskoday, awa nalang.

 

[musicacc727]

It’s not about whether you accept or reject who we are against. The point is your pattern of behavior. If you claim these are just 'relevant and timely topics,' then why are your threads exclusively targeting the Duterte team while completely ignoring the controversies of other political factions? Your selective definition of what is 'relevant' is exactly what proves your bias. The fish is caught by its own mouth.

Wait, could you perhaps the dates of these threads? Hindi ba itong thread mismo na 'to, released when Marcoleta earned a hot eye from the Ombudsman? Didn't the Batp vs ICC threads show up when Bato started hiding from the ICC? That's how news works. Kung may controversy man ang other factions, say,' yong quorum of 12, may Duterte supporter din naman na nagpost ng supposed illegality no'n, 'di ba? It's not on us that these threads gained more attention, especially if you're the one replying over and over again. And let me ask you, are these topics irrelevant for it to be biased? My Marcos megathread isn't gaining as much attention as this thread because it's not getting as much engagement, not because I control which threads get attention and what doesn't.

Also, like I've mentioned above, Duterte supporters are contributing to the relevance of this forum just as much as us who are against his, and his allies' actions. These threats started as issues from contemporary time. You engaged with it just as much as we did, maybe even more so it gained attention and perhaps overshadowed other topics. So, how can you say that the relevance of an issue is what makes it biased, when this issue started off as one among many perspectives and issues? At this point, aren't you just salvaging your arguments?

 

[musicacc727]

Ad hominem attacks and sarcasm won't change the facts. Pointing out your obvious bias across multiple threads doesn't make me a fanatic; it means I am calling out a clear double standard. Instead of deflecting by analyzing my supposed 'love' for a politician, why don't you answer the actual argument? You can't, which is exactly why you're resorting to personal attacks

Uy, you've been using ad hominem lots here, and we've called that out many times. One of your first replies when we first had a discussion was "Ikaw, ilan ba bayag mo? Anong napatunayan mo sa buhay? Enumerate it compare to Bato." How about that?

 

[musicacc727]

Mahirap ba maubusan ng magandang sasabihin pagka na corner ka na? Kung anti-DDS ka at walang kang paki sa gusto mo about sa pagiging biased at ayaw mo matawag na Troll. Ihinto mo na kahibangan mo kasi walang patutunguhang maganda ito para sayo.

You've once called me out for acting as if you need to learn from me and my beliefs. Now, you suddenly seem to be the same. Bakit naman kailangan ihinto ni Meawii ang pag-iingay niya kung sumasagot lang naman siya sa mga paratang mo? Bakit mo tatawaging kahibangan ang isang paniniwala, kung ikaw mismo ang ilang beses nang nagsabi na panghahawakan mo ang paniniwala mo? Refusing to have your statements criticized is just elitism, and refusing to consider points made by your opponent is being bias.

 

[Meawii]

You've once called me out for acting as if you need to learn from me and my beliefs. Now, you suddenly seem to be the same. Bakit naman kailangan ihinto ni Meawii ang pag-iingay niya kung sumasagot lang naman siya sa mga paratang mo? Bakit mo tatawaging kahibangan ang isang paniniwala, kung ikaw mismo ang ilang beses nang nagsabi na panghahawakan mo ang paniniwala mo? Refusing to have your statements criticized is just elitism, and refusing to consider points made by your opponent is being bias.

Agree, paulit uli sya sa "bias". basta against ka kay Duterte automatically bias and troll ka sa tingin nya lmao. Wag daw kasi i-criticize si Duterte and allies kasi mali yunnnn bias daw yun lmao.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Wag mo na e push sa akin ang Narrative mo kasi hindi uubra. Si musicacc727 lang ang may laman para sa akin kaso hindi daw siya biased at ako pa gustong mag share ng thought for Marcos.

It's your thing, not mine.

Hindi ko pinoprotektahan ang isang narrative; tinutukoy ko lang ang pattern na makikita natin sa lahat ng political fanatics, kahit anong partido pa yan. Kung hindi mo kayang i-call out ang sarili mong idol kapag nagkamali, iyon mismo ang point ko. Hindi iyon bias, iyon ay prinsipyo.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Hahahaha totoo, fanatics kasi sila and idol na idol yung mga politiko nila kahit na may nagawang mali.. imbis na kwestyunin ipagtatanggol pa nila.

Yes, marami na tayong nakausap na katulad nila dito sa phc simula dati pa.

Exactly! Parang may mental block. Kapag ang idol nila ang nagkamali, automatic defense mode agad. Yung kritisismo binabalik-balik sa ibang tao instead na harapin ang issue mismo. Sana matuto na tayo bilang voters na i-separate ang tao mula sa plataporma niya.

 

[Meawii]

Exactly! Parang may mental block. Kapag ang idol nila ang nagkamali, automatic defense mode agad. Yung kritisismo binabalik-balik sa ibang tao instead na harapin ang issue mismo. Sana matuto na tayo bilang voters na i-separate ang tao mula sa plataporma niya.

Blind supporter kasi karamihan sa mga DDS ehh haha! parang nagiging cult-like na talaga, kasi parang sinasamba na nila yung mga pulitiko.