The Supreme Court ๐๐ฏ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ค, during its session today, February 4, 2025, acted on the Petition for ๐๐ฆ๐ณ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ณ๐ข๐ณ๐ช and Prohibition in G.R. No. 277975, ๐๐ช๐ค๐ต๐ฐ๐ณ ๐. ๐๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ช๐จ๐ถ๐ฆ๐ป, ๐๐ด๐ช๐ฅ๐ณ๐ฐ ๐. ๐๐ฏ๐จ๐ข๐ฃ, ๐๐ฐ๐จ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ฐ ๐. ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ป๐ข ๐ฆ๐ต ๐ข๐ญ. ๐ท. ๐๐ฐ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ฆ๐ด, ๐ข๐ด ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐บ ๐๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ณ๐ต๐ช๐ฏ ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ป; ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐ข๐ด ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐บ ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ช๐ด ๐๐ด๐ค๐ถ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฐ; ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐๐น๐ฆ๐ค๐ถ๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ณ๐ฆ๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐๐ถ๐ค๐ข๐ด ๐๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด๐ข๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ.
Victor D. Rodriguez and several others (Petitioners) are challenging the constitutionality of Republic Act No. 12116 or the ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด ๐๐ค๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ช๐ด๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ 2025 (๐๐๐).
Petitioners argue that the GAA is unconstitutional for failing to allocate mandatory funding for PhilHealth, unlawfully increasing appropriations beyond the Presidentโs recommendations, and allocating the highest budget to infrastructure over education. They add that the GAA is unconstitutional since the Bicameral Committee Report on the General Appropriations Bill contained blank items.
The Court directed respondents House of Representatives, Senate, and Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin to comment on the petition within a non-extendible period of 10 days from receipt of notice.
A copy of the available pleadings may be accessed at the Public Pleadings section of the #SupremeCourtPH website at You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Read the Press Briefer at You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Victor D. Rodriguez and several others (Petitioners) are challenging the constitutionality of Republic Act No. 12116 or the ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ช๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด ๐๐ค๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ช๐ด๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ 2025 (๐๐๐).
Petitioners argue that the GAA is unconstitutional for failing to allocate mandatory funding for PhilHealth, unlawfully increasing appropriations beyond the Presidentโs recommendations, and allocating the highest budget to infrastructure over education. They add that the GAA is unconstitutional since the Bicameral Committee Report on the General Appropriations Bill contained blank items.
The Court directed respondents House of Representatives, Senate, and Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin to comment on the petition within a non-extendible period of 10 days from receipt of notice.
A copy of the available pleadings may be accessed at the Public Pleadings section of the #SupremeCourtPH website at You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Read the Press Briefer at You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..





