The Real Issue...

The Supreme Court ๐˜Œ๐˜ฏ ๐˜‰๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค, during its session today, February 4, 2025, acted on the Petition for ๐˜Š๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ช and Prohibition in G.R. No. 277975, ๐˜๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜‹. ๐˜™๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ถ๐˜ฆ๐˜ป, ๐˜๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ ๐˜›. ๐˜œ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ, ๐˜™๐˜ฐ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ ๐˜ˆ. ๐˜”๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ป๐˜ข ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ญ. ๐˜ท. ๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ด, ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜š๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜™๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ป; ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜—๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜Œ๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ; ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜“๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ.

Victor D. Rodriguez and several others (Petitioners) are challenging the constitutionality of Republic Act No. 12116 or the ๐˜Ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ˆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ 2025 (๐˜Ž๐˜ˆ๐˜ˆ).

Petitioners argue that the GAA is unconstitutional for failing to allocate mandatory funding for PhilHealth, unlawfully increasing appropriations beyond the Presidentโ€™s recommendations, and allocating the highest budget to infrastructure over education. They add that the GAA is unconstitutional since the Bicameral Committee Report on the General Appropriations Bill contained blank items.

The Court directed respondents House of Representatives, Senate, and Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin to comment on the petition within a non-extendible period of 10 days from receipt of notice.

A copy of the available pleadings may be accessed at the Public Pleadings section of the #SupremeCourtPH website at You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Read the Press Briefer at You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

1000539459.webp
 
Hahahaha hindi namna ako umiiyak dito...Natutuwa pa nga ako at umaksyon ang supreme court sa ginawa ng mga senatong, tongresista at bangag na pinggulo ng bansa sa BISCAM report ๐Ÿคฃ
Well explanation lang naman yun at it doesn't mean na titigil sila sa ginagawa nila.

Kaya nga sabi ko...makinig...magbasa... intindihin ang nakasulat para di maging mangmang๐Ÿคฃ
Kaso mangmang yung nag susulat kaya mangmang rin yung nagbabasa at naniniwala sa wlang kabuluhang pianglalaban nila.

Ikaw nga yung umiiyak kasi di sinipot ng mga vloggers ang mga contempt creator๐Ÿคฃ
Bakit naman ako iiyak kung tunay na wala talagang bayag at tapang yung mga nagpapakalat ng fake news? Patunay dito yung di nila pag sipot sa congress ngayon.
 
Well explanation lang naman yun at it doesn't mean na titigil sila sa ginagawa nila.


Kaso mangmang yung nag susulat kaya mangmang rin yung nagbabasa at naniniwala sa wlang kabuluhang pianglalaban nila.


Bakit naman ako iiyak kung tunay na wala talagang bayag at tapang yung mga nagpapakalat ng fake news? Patunay dito yung di nila pag sipot sa congress ngayon.
Ganun ba???๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ
So mangmang yung released statement ng supreme court?๐Ÿฅด
 

About this Thread

  • 23
    Replies
  • 903
    Views
  • 2
    Participants
Last reply from:
ZummerSoltice

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
1,078
Guests online
1,138
Total visitors
2,216

Forum statistics

Threads
2,277,458
Posts
28,976,757
Members
1,228,955
Latest member
MarkJade
Back
Top