❓ Help Assignment

aldrian1234

Eternal Poster
Make a case digest and state well
Include the Fact , Issue and Rulling
in case of

Rule 113 ARREST
1. Domingo Agyao vs. People, G.R.No. 227366, August 1, 2018
 
Case: Domingo Agyao vs. People
G.R. No. 227366
Date: August 1, 2018

Facts:
Domingo Agyao was arrested by the police without a warrant while he was walking home from work late at night. The police claimed they had received a tip from an anonymous informant that Agyao was involved in îllégâl drug activities. Agyao denied the allegations and argued that his arrest was îllégâl since it was done without a warrant and without probable cause.

Issue:
The main issue in this case is whether the warrantless arrest of Domingo Agyao was valid under Rule 113 of the Revised Rules of Court.

Ruling:
The Supreme Court held that the warrantless arrest of Domingo Agyao was invalid. The Court emphasized that for a warrantless arrest to be valid, the arresting officers must have probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed a crime. In this case, the mere tip from an anonymous informant was not enough to establish probable cause. The Court reiterated that warrantless arrests should only be conducted in exceptional circumstances and when there is clear evidence of criminal activity. Therefore, the arrest of Domingo Agyao was deemed îllégâl, and any evidence obtained as a result of the îllégâl arrest was considered inadmissible in court.
 

About this Thread

  • 1
    Replies
  • 232
    Views
  • 1
    Participants
Last reply from:
Unknown user

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
576
Guests online
631
Total visitors
1,207

Forum statistics

Threads
2,275,535
Posts
28,963,922
Members
1,232,842
Latest member
Mulgarot
Back
Top