Rodante Marcoleta charged with Plunder, Bribery at Ombudsman

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Meawii]

Siguro pag si Jesus nag against sa mga Duterte sasabin din ng DDS nabayaran si Jesus HAHAHHA

 

[kenzkie]

Mag research muna kayo halata namang nalilinlang kayo ng mga manlilinlang ngayon.

Matagal ng nakikita yan sa ibang mga media di pa rin napaghahalata ng iba. Kawawa naman kayo.

 

[kenzkie]

GIFT yung punto mo sa Donated na 75million ni Marcoleta diba??

View attachment 4193787
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

​

Naniniwala ka dito? O gusto lang nilang gumanti dahil napatunayan ni Marcoleta na sila ay tax evader?

 

[Meawii]

Naniniwala ka dito? O gusto lang nilang gumanti dahil napatunayan ni Marcoleta na sila ay tax evader?

How about plunder & bribery case ni Marcoleta, ipagtatanggol mo yun?

 

[KingSemreh]

How about plunder & bribery case ni Marcoleta, ipagtatanggol mo yun?

The allegations against Marcoleta are still at the complaint stage. Meaning, the Ombudsman will still conduct further probe and decide later whether or not to charge Marcoleta before the anti-graft court Sandiganbayan.

The questions on Marcoleta’s campaign donation reached the Commission on Elections (Comelec) because he declared a net worth of P51 million in 2025, yet spent P112 million for his senatorial campaign. He had no declared poll contributions.

However, he later confirmed he had gotten P75 million in campaign donations but clarified that he had received them before the start of the campaign period.

Marcoleta said he did not include the amount in his Statement of Contributions and Expenditures because he was not yet a candidate when he received it.

In its decision, the Comelec ruled in favor of Marcoleta, saying that he did not violate election rules.

“Under Section 262 of the OEC (Omnibus Election Code), violation of Section 109 constitutes an election offense. However, due to the later law passed by Congress, it is one of the sections in the OEC that a violation of which will no longer constitute an election offense,” the Comelec said in March.

 

[Meawii]

The allegations against Marcoleta are still at the complaint stage. Meaning, the Ombudsman will still conduct further probe and decide later whether or not to charge Marcoleta before the anti-graft court Sandiganbayan.

The questions on Marcoleta’s campaign donation reached the Commission on Elections (Comelec) because he declared a net worth of P51 million in 2025, yet spent P112 million for his senatorial campaign. He had no declared poll contributions.

However, he later confirmed he had gotten P75 million in campaign donations but clarified that he had received them before the start of the campaign period.

Marcoleta said he did not include the amount in his Statement of Contributions and Expenditures because he was not yet a candidate when he received it.

In its decision, the Comelec ruled in favor of Marcoleta, saying that he did not violate election rules.

“Under Section 262 of the OEC (Omnibus Election Code), violation of Section 109 constitutes an election offense. However, due to the later law passed by Congress, it is one of the sections in the OEC that a violation of which will no longer constitute an election offense,” the Comelec said in March.

View attachment 4221062

Bigla lumabas yung tagapagtanggol ng mga may kasong korapsyon haha!!

 

[KingSemreh]

Bigla lumabas yung tagapagtanggol ng mga may kasong korapsyon haha!!

Yan problema sayo. Hindi ka anti-DDS kuno pero mahilig kang magparatang. Gawain ng Pinklawan, dilawan at Kain-suka. Trolls in short.

 

[Meawii]

Yan problema sayo. Hindi ka anti-DDS kuno pero mahilig kang magparatang. Gawain ng Pinklawan, dilawan at Kain-suka. Trolls in short.

Ows? ba't nag reply ka agad para depensahan si Marcoleta kahit may kinakaharap syang kasong Plunder and Bribery? HAHAH

tapagatanggol ng mga may kasong korapsyon HAHHAAH!

 

[KingSemreh]

Ows? ba't nag reply ka agad para depensahan si Marcoleta kahit may kinakaharap syang kasong Plunder and Bribery? HAHAH

tapagatanggol ng mga may kasong korapsyon HAHHAAH!

Hindi ko pinagtatanggol. Galing rappler yan mismo, na kilalang anti-dds media.

 

[Meawii]

Hindi ko pinagtatanggol. Galing rappler yan mismo, na kilalang anti-dds media. View attachment 4221417

rappler lang? ang funny mo naman.

 

[KingSemreh]

rappler lang? ang funny mo naman.
View attachment 4221423View attachment 4221424

Bring it on. Para kang si Atty. Falcis. Kinasuwan ng iba tapos kay Duterte gumagante. Haha

 

[Meawii]

Bring it on. Para kang si Atty. Falcis. Kinasuwan ng iba tapos kay Duterte gumagante. Haha

Geh, oo nalang kung ano man yang sinasabi mo. dika nauubusan ng sasabihin eh HAHAHHA

 

[kenzkie]

rappler lang? ang funny mo naman.
View attachment 4221423View attachment 4221424

Naku naman halos lahat naman dyan bayaran at may iba pa dyan na ang journalist at may-ari may involvement pa sa corruption sa flood control. Ang totoo naisama pa nga sa binanggit kahapon. Tingin mo paniniwalaan pa yan ng mga matatalinong kababayan natin?

 

[Meawii]

Naku naman halos lahat naman dyan bayaran at may iba pa dyan na ang journalist at may-ari may involvement pa sa corruption sa flood control. Ang totoo naisama pa nga sa binanggit kahapon. Tingin mo paniniwalaan pa yan ng mga matatalinong kababayan natin?

Nakakatawa ka naman para hindi paniwalaan mga reliable News outlets natin, saan mo gusto mag rely ng informations? sa mga FB vloggers? DDS pages?

 

[BicycleHorse]

Naku naman halos lahat naman dyan bayaran at may iba pa dyan na ang journalist at may-ari may involvement pa sa corruption sa flood control. Ang totoo naisama pa nga sa binanggit kahapon. Tingin mo paniniwalaan pa yan ng mga matatalinong kababayan natin?

May matatalinong kababayan ba tayo na naniniwala sa mga rabid DDS vloggers? Yung mga bumabase lang sa chimis ng iba na wala namang maipakitang substantial evidence? Nagpapatawa ka eh.

 

[kenzkie]

Nakakatawa ka naman para hindi paniwalaan mga reliable News outlets natin, saan mo gusto mag rely ng informations? sa mga FB vloggers? DDS pages?

Gusto mo kami mag rely sa mga bayaran at may involvement sa corruption?

 

[kenzkie]

May matatalinong kababayan ba tayo na naniniwala sa mga rabid DDS vloggers? Yung mga bumabase lang sa chimis ng iba na wala namang maipakitang substantial evidence? Nagpapatawa ka eh.

Yan ang laging sinasabi ng mga nasa kapangyarihan ngayon. Di porket walang substantial evidence ay hindi na totoo. Sino ba ang gagawa ng kasamaan na mag-iiwan ng ebidensya? In due time lalabas din ang katotohanan. Maghintay lang kayo. Mapapahiya ka rin.

 

[BicycleHorse]

Yan ang laging sinasabi ng mga nasa kapangyarihan ngayon. Di porket walang substantial evidence ay hindi na totoo. Sino ba ang gagawa ng kasamaan na mag-iiwan ng ebidensya? In due time lalabas din ang katotohanan. Maghintay lang kayo. Mapapahiya ka rin.

Palibhasa sanay kayo sa palusot at hinala. Pero kung ebidensya ang usapan, mas marami nang naiuugnay na ρáíd vloggers at organized disinformation campaign kaysa sa sinasabi ninyong ‘one-sided’ na outlet. Kapag lumabas ang tunay na katotohanan, hindi lahat ng sigaw n’yo ay magiging depensa.

 

[Meawii]

Gusto mo kami mag rely sa mga bayaran at may involvement sa corruption?

Wala namang evidence or involvement ng mga News outlets natin na nabayaran, malamang DDS vloggers din nagsabi nyan HAHHAHA

Ang tunay na bayaran yung SMNI HAHAHAH

 

[Meawii]

Dati tawag nyo sa nag ki-criticize sa mga Duterte NPA/Terorista. ngayon mga News outlets naman sasabihan nyong bayaran or nabigyan ng maleta lmao.