PH-
Welcome to PHCorner Forums! Sign up for free to unlock full access and exclusive privileges, including:
- Asking questions about computer and mobile issues
- Discovering internet tips for your mobile network and computer
Rodante Marcoleta charged with Plunder, Bribery at Ombudsman
- Thread starter Meawii
- Start date
BayanPH
- Thousands march in Philippines, demanding Marcos resign over fraud scandal
- Di tugma ang halaga sa SALN ni VP Sara Duterte vs. halaga ng mga transaksyon
- Anti Money Laundering Council flags (AMLC) Vice President Sara Duterte's suspicious transactions
- A Convo with DDS
- Ang isang utak ng DDS
- 3 pirma na lang ang kailangan
Nge, labo ng logic mo.
Yung nagbigay kay marcoleta ng pera ay humaharap din sa kasong Plunder and Bribery complaints. Hindi sila magnanakaw noh??
Aside from Marcoleta, his donors, namely former Rep. Mike Defensor and a certain Joseph Espiritu and Aristotle Viray are also facing plunder and indirect bribery complaints.
In January 2025, Defensor, Espiritu and Viray allegedly donated P30 million, P25 million and P20 million for Marcoleta’s senatorial bid, the complaint stated.
GIFT? ano yan? nireregalo na pala yung mga ninanakaw sa bayan ganun?
Tsaka bakit mo pinoprotektahan yung mga magnanakaw na to?
anlala tlaga ng utak nito "Labo ng logic" sign na wala talagang reading comprehension eh haha namo dika naman nakakaintindi
Silang tatlo mga businessman yan di sila convicted as magnanakaw may trabaho mga yan di tulad sayo
Nakasuhan sila ng plunder and bribery complaints kasi nagbigay sila ng malaking halaga as a GIFT para sa campaign ni Marcoleta, eh bawal yun. Di porket plunder and bribery ang kaso means nagnakaw sila UNDER yan, UNDER SA LAW na Plunder and Bribery Complain. Gets??? Magnanakaw ba???
Very Common makatanggap ng donations ang mga senators halos lahat sila nkakatanggap during campaign, pero inaatake nila si Marcoleta to Divert the flood control issue and patalsikin siya kasi yung daladala niyang witness na si Guteza totoo lahat sinabi na may nagdedeliver ng pera, eh threatened ang current admin dito kasi involved ang mga kaibigan nila sa flood control issue so ang solution nila patalsikin ang nagfofocus sa flood control issue. KUHA MO???
musicacc727
Established
Dito pa lang sa argument na 'to, you already admitted that he allegedly broke the law. Tumanggap siya ng "gift", okay let's give you that kung ganiyan mo gustong i-interpret, but even then it's îllégâl, kaya siya kinukuwestiyon at kinakasuhan. You also claim that this is small compared to the flood control and impeachment issues, pero ffs they're getting ρáíd to work on more than a single issue, hundreds of thousands ang suweldo ng mga 'yan, so why should they restrict themselves to only 2 topics that they can honestly work on concurrently, 'di ba? And it's impact? Mababawasan ang law breakers sa bansa, especially sa gobyerno, kasi sino ba naman ang may gustong i-lead ng kriminal?
musicacc727
Established
Common ≠ Just. Hindi por que common ay tama na agad. If they only focus on Marcoleta's case then maybe his is the most obvious. Tumawag ka sa 8888 and present them cases that you know about other senators kung "common" nga 'yan, because if you have the capacity to say that it's common, then you should be able to prove that there are other senators who are guilty too, right?
Bakit may sinabi ba ako na he did not broke the law? dinidefend ko ba ung violation niya? Saan banda sinabi ko na small yan compared sa flood control? Which is kung iisipin small naman tlaga yan compared sa flood control. Isa kapa sa tabingi comprehension eh.
Imagine kokontrahin nila yung nagfocus sa BIGGEST ISSUE FLOOD CONTROL just because of a violation na tumanggap lng ng malaking gift, gusto mo patalsikin yung nagfocus sa BIGGEST ISSUE in the Philippines na pwede naman yan e open after ma solved ang BIGGEST ISSUE. Ganon kayo ka_o_o.
musicacc727
Established
Binasa mo ba 'yong sinabi ko?
"they're getting ρáíd to work on more than a single issue, hundreds of thousands ang suweldo ng mga 'yan, so why should they restrict themselves to only 2 topics that they can honestly work on concurrently, 'di ba? And it's impact? Mababawasan ang law breakers sa bansa, especially sa gobyerno, kasi sino ba naman ang may gustong i-lead ng kriminal?"
So ano dapat, pardoned siya kasi nagfocus siya sa flood control? If you recognize that he broke the law, then even better, you recognize na dapat tumuloy ang kaso niya.
Also, how is it small kung law-breaking pa rin? Gusto niyo mag-stay ang isang kriminal sa puwesto kasi lumalaban siya sa mga kapwa niya kriminal? Is that your justification? Hindi ba dapat patalsikin lahat ng kriminal sa gobyerno? Just the mere fact na gusto mong i-set aside ang kaso niya for something else would shatter the integrity of those in position.
HUH??? PCIJ na mismo nagsabi very common yan ano akala mo own money nila ginagamit para sa campaign nila??? lmao ang mali lang ni Marcoleta MALAKI ung nareceived niya and di ata siya nag submit sa SOCE ng statement.
Very common makatanggap ng donations ang senate lol may capped ata yan.
so jinajustify mo pagiging lacking of reading comprehension mo sa quoted statement na yan? lmao try harder
Rare lang ang senador na magfocus sa BIGGEST ISSUE na yan tas gusto mo tanggalin??? Okay ka lang ba?? Gusto mo bang tumandang di maeexperience tax mo?
So kung guilty at mapatalsik si Marcoleta sa senado ano? okay lang sayo stuck parin ang BIGGEST ISSUE ng pinas? okay lang 190+ billion each year mawawala basta lng mawala ung nagfocus sa issue na yan?
Base sa logic mo Risa should also not stay kasi criminal siya she violated wiretapping law, diba? kuha mo pagiging hypokrito mo?
Matagal na yatang cleared si Marcoleta sa issue na yan. Huwag basta magpapaniwala sa mga bias na network.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Its all about politics, conquer and control, di b yn lng ang mahalaga sa mga namumuno ngyon? D mahalga kung dds, kakampink or pro gov k p, in the end of the day, pinoy prin ang talo...
kimimaru23
Eternal Poster
Regardless ng kulay, meron palang namimigay ng 30M na walang kapalit. no strings attached. pulboron lang daw kinuha sabi ni MD. hahahaha.
Kung talgang flood control ang gustong itackle ni Marcoleta bossing, bakit may panig sya? dba dapat wala. kasi ang pinakamalaking problema ng pilipinas hindi nmn flood control. PROPAGANDA selective facts. distorted truth.
tgnan mo sa narratives nila at social agenda, nahati ang Pilipinas. hindi na yan about sa flood control na lang at sa nwalang pera. ang pinag lalabanan na nila jan kung sino ang cocontrol ng susunod na termino at papano ikekeep ang control. let's be real here. BS yang iinvestigate nila flood control tapos pag ka alyado, lilihis?
Mpa pula mpa pink. mpa yellow. Pare parehas yang my agenda.
sasabihin ng iba lesser evil.BS Ulit.pwd nmn no evil at all. bakit magsesettle tayo for less. maging mka PIlipinas sna ang lahat.
Kung talgang flood control ang gustong itackle ni Marcoleta bossing, bakit may panig sya? dba dapat wala. kasi ang pinakamalaking problema ng pilipinas hindi nmn flood control. PROPAGANDA selective facts. distorted truth.
tgnan mo sa narratives nila at social agenda, nahati ang Pilipinas. hindi na yan about sa flood control na lang at sa nwalang pera. ang pinag lalabanan na nila jan kung sino ang cocontrol ng susunod na termino at papano ikekeep ang control. let's be real here. BS yang iinvestigate nila flood control tapos pag ka alyado, lilihis?
Mpa pula mpa pink. mpa yellow. Pare parehas yang my agenda.
sasabihin ng iba lesser evil.BS Ulit.pwd nmn no evil at all. bakit magsesettle tayo for less. maging mka PIlipinas sna ang lahat.
Uy may ddh dito hahaha
Alam naman natin na panggigipit yan ng Admin ni bangag tsaka naipaliwanag na nya ng paulit ulit yan.
Tama po. Tayo na mga mamamayan ang talo. Kasi imbes na unahin ang mga mahahalagang issue ayan ang nangyayari- siraan dito siraan dun, walkout dito pasaring don, hays
BicycleHorse
Elite
Nararapat ba nating kunsintihin ang alam nating mali? Yung ginawa dati ng administrasyong Duterte laban sa mga ayaw sa kanya, hindi ba yun panggigipit rin?
napaka obvious ang knilang political agenda, laging nagkakainitan at nagbabangayan, imbes na magapruba at gumawa ng batas, placing na sa 2028 ang inaatupag.. iboboto nio p b ang mga yan? we must change the whole rosters of our government! pagbigyan nmn nila yung mga baguhan at may nagawa kesa 10 years na sa senate ni matinong batas walang naipasa... sayang lang ang pasahod magnanakaw p , awit tlga sa pilipinas
yung mga diehard fans dyan ng politikong puro pamumulitika? bulag prin kau sa mga kulay? bayaan nio ang batas ang umiral hindi yung mag papauto kau kung sino ang tama sino ang mali? Pilipinas muna hindi kulay.... khit punuin nio pa ng mga article ang page nato in the end wala nmang makukulong, tayo lng ang kawawa at nag papakapagod sa pabibigay ng buwis sa mga buwaya, kung may malasakit sila unahin nila yung flood control, dahil bilyon bilyon ang nwawala nakapagtataka at pautay utay ang pag abante...
musicacc727
Established
Saw this late but let me reply anyway.
The flood control case has been, although slowly, rolling overtime. The Blue Ribbon Committee partial report lacks 3 more signatures for the case to start rolling more rapidly, so why not question that, too?
Also, by your logic, we should also hail Marcos and ignore whatever wrongdoings he has currently because this flood control issue stemmed from one of his SONAs, but that doesn't seem right, right? Do you see the point now?
Marcoleta, assuming that your claims are true, is NOT the only reason that this case is moving, and not in any way the Trump card to prosecuting those at fault. And comes the question here that who in their right minds would support a criminal for trying another criminal? They're one in the same. Again, why should we pardon this criminal for prosecuting another criminal?
IF you choose to remain confined in your political bias, please don't frame it in ways as if the Filipino people is benefiting with such great benefit, because no, we're not at all benefiting from anything.
Also, Risa's case has been closed. They filed an almost half-decade case against her which she bailed out of; reason for it to not being further investigated. Honestly, Marcoleta can do that too if he wanted to, but it seems like he won't be able to bail out from the complaints.
You shoot at me for hypocrisy and reading comprehension, yet the way you speak seems to very much be siding on one concept that you stand for, one very fragile piece of observation that has not even brought fruit. Seems like hypocrisy, right? Also, comprehension is about understanding a point, but the very first line you wrote "so jinajustify mo pagiging lacking of reading comprehension mo sa quoted statement na yan? lmao try harder", is both grammatically and syntax-wise incorrect, so how would your statement be even comprehensible?
Kilala mo yata si Marcoleta na para bang alam mo pinaggagawa niya? Fact-check muna please nakakalungkot naman ngayon ang panahon wala nang panahon na tiyakin muna ang mga bagay-bagay.