Desisyon nga ng president ang pumirma o i-veto yung bill. Kung hindi sya pumirma, o hindi nya i-veto, magiging law yun automictically. Ikaw ang hindi nakakaintindi.haha ikaw na nga mismo nagsabing decision ng president tas ako pa rin ang mali? haha
if hindi siya pumirma, hindi niya decision yun? hahaDesisyon nga ng president ang pumirma o i-veto yung bill. Kung hindi sya pumirma, o hindi nya i-veto, magiging law yun automictically. Ikaw ang hindi nakakaintindi.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Paki-intindi yung word na "otherwise".
A president’s signature is not required based on the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. section of the Senate website.if hindi siya pumirma, hindi niya decision yun? haha
Ang linaw ng sinasabi ng constitution. The President has 30 days to either sign it into law or veto it, if the President does nothing within that period, the bill automatically becomes law without their signature. Ang labo ng pang-intindi mo. Uulitin ko, desisyon nyang pumirma or hindi. Desisyon nya ring i-veto ang bill. Pero, kung nag-decide syang hindi pumirma, at hindi nya rin i-veto, automatic na magiging law. Sinabi na nga ng constitution eh. Hindi ko alam kung nagpapanggap kang mahina ang kokote o sadyang mahina talaga ang kokote.if hindi siya pumirma, hindi niya decision yun? haha
yung point ko diyan is that the president needs to decide not to sign it before pa yan mangyariA president’s signature is not required based on the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. section of the Senate website.
ito nga kasi yun, hays hirap makipag argue and debate sayo
yes at klaro din na the president still needs to decide not to sign it before that can happenAng linaw ng sinasabi ng constitution. The President has 30 days to either sign it into law or veto it, if the President does nothing within that period, the bill automatically becomes law without their signature. Ang labo ng pang-intindi mo. Uulitin ko, desisyon nyang pumirma or hindi. Desisyon nya ring i-veto ang bill. Pero, kung nag-decide syang hindi pumirma, at hindi nya rin i-veto, automatic na magiging law. Sinabi na nga ng constitution eh. Hindi ko alam kung nagpapanggap kang mahina ang kokote o sadyang mahina talaga ang kokote.
Mali ka. The president needs to decide whether to sign and make it into a law immediately, or veto the bill.. not to "decide not to sign".yung point ko diyan is that the president needs to decide not to sign it before pa yan mangyari
yes at klaro din na the president still needs to decide not to sign it before that can happen
you're saying na destiny lang ng president na hindi mag sign? hahahaMali ka. The president needs to decide whether to sign and make it into a law immediately, or veto the bill.. not to "decide not to sign".
Hinangin ka naman.
Are you saying na, kapag nai-submit na sa president, dun na yun forever kung wala syang gagawin?you're saying na destiny lang ng president na hindi mag sign? hahaha
haha yun nga ang purpose ng time limit ng president to act on it, yung tinatanong ko sayo is hindi ba conscious decision ng president ang hindi pag pirma doon sa bill in front of himAre you saying na, kapag nai-submit na sa president, dun na yun forever kung wala syang gagawin?
Paulit-ulit na lang.. pilit mo kasing binabaligtad ang sinasabi ng constitution. Sabagay, ugali mo na yan. Walang saysay facts sa'yo kasi you don't want to abide with it.haha yun nga ang purpose ng time limit ng president to act on it, yung tinatanong ko sayo is hindi ba conscious decision ng president ang hindi pag pirma doon sa bill in front of him
haha klaro ang condition na inilatag, it still needs a president deciding not to sign it para maging law, hindi yan destiny but a conscious decision of a president na hayaang ma-forfeit ang pagka signatory niya sa bill, the president is still the one that is in control on whether to trigger or not the forfeiturePaulit-ulit na lang.. pilit mo kasing binabaligtad ang sinasabi ng constitution. Sabagay, ugali mo na yan. Walang saysay facts sa'yo kasi you don't want to abide with it.
FACT: If the President does nothing within that period, the bill automatically becomes law without their signature. Tsaka ka na mag-reply kapag maipapaliwanag mo nang hindi automatic na magiging law ang bill kapag walang ginawa ang president.
So, based on your previous statements, would you agree na mali ka?haha klaro ang condition na inilatag, it still needs a president deciding not to sign it para maging law, hindi yan destiny but a conscious decision of a president na hayaang ma-forfeit ang pagka signatory niya sa bill, the president is still the one that is in control on whether to trigger or not the forfeiture
sanaol magiging law kahit walang pirma ng presidente haha
you need to take note of the action and discretion of the president bossing, if he does not act on the bill after some time then "silence means yes" but if he acts on it whether a veto or signing there is no way for the bill to become a law without a sign
hindi yan automatic, need muna mag decide ang president not to act on it for some time, may condition yan, walang automatic diyan mali interpretation mo, control ng president yung action doon sa bill, ang even not acting on it is still the discretion of the president
paano naging mali if di naman ako yung nag claim na automatic hahaSo, based on your previous statements, would you agree na mali ka?
Automatic naman talaga.. within the period of 30 days, kung walang gagawin ang presidente, automatic na magiging law. Hindi mo talaga naiintindihan? Hahahahahahaha. Nakakatuwa talaga ang capacity ng pang-intindi mo. Mag-delete ka muna. Full storage na. Hahahahahahahahahahahapaano naging mali if naman ako yung nag claim na automatic haha
it still needs nga a president deciding not to sign it before it can happen hahaAutomatic naman talaga.. within the period of 30 days, kung walang gagawin ang presidente, automatic na magiging law. Hindi mo talaga naiintindihan? Hahahahahahaha. Nakakatuwa talaga ang capacity ng pang-intindi mo. Mag-delete ka muna. Full storage na. Hahahahahahahahahahaha
Within 30 days. Kung walang gagawin ang presidente, automatic na magiging batas.it still needs nga a president deciding not to sign it before it can happen haha
so asaan diyan ang automatic, ikaw na mismo nag latag sa condition or trigger, so the president still has the say, wag mo maliitin ang role ng president na as if taga pirma lang siyaWithin 30 days. Kung walang gagawin ang presidente, automatic na magiging batas.
So yung word na automatic naman ngayon ang hindi mo naiintindihan? Ang linaw ng statements ko. Juskoposo asaan diyan ang automatic, ikaw na mismo nag latag sa condition or trigger, so the president still has the say, wag mo maliitin ang role ng president na as if taga pirma lang siya

saan nga ang automatic if conditional naman pala bossing? automatic pa rin ba kahit naka depend naman pala sa discretion ng president ang lahat?So yung word na automatic naman ngayon ang hindi mo naiintindihan? Ang linaw ng statements ko. Juskopo
Hinangin na talaga ang kokote mo. It's obvious na walang kwenta sa'yo ang usapan kasi simpleng bagay hindi mo maintindihan. Bahala ka nga diyan.
This will be my last reply. Bahala ka na kung hindi mo pa rin maintindihan...saan nga ang automatic if conditional naman pala bossing? automatic pa rin ba kahit naka depend naman pala sa discretion ng president ang lahat?