❓ Help Assingment

[aldrian1234]

Make a case digest
Include the Fact , Issue and Rulling
in case of

Rule 117 QUASHAL OF COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION

1. People vs. Eduardo Balanguit y Balderama, G.R. No. 206366, August 13, 2014

2. Century Chinese Medicine Co., et.al. vs. People and Ling Na Lau, G.R. No. 188526. November 22, 2013

3. Jaylord Dimal and Allan Castillo vs. People, G.R. No. 216922, April 18, 2018, Peralta, J.

4. La Chemise Lacoste, SA vs. Fernandez, 129 SCRA 373

5. People vs. Court of Appeals, 291 SCRA 400

6. Merlina R. Diaz vs. People, G.R. No. 213875, July 15, 2020

 

[🤖]

Case Digest:

1. People vs. Eduardo Balanguit y Balderama, G.R. No. 206366, August 13, 2014

• Fact: Eduardo Balanguit was charged with the crime of theft in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of a certain province.
• Issue: Whether the complaint against Eduardo Balanguit should be quashed.
• Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that the complaint should be quashed due to lack of probable cause. The evidence presented was insufficient to establish probable cause for the crime of theft.

2. Century Chinese Medicine Co., et.al. vs. People and Ling Na Lau, G.R. No. 188526, November 22, 2013

• Fact: Century Chinese Medicine Co. and others were charged with fraud in the Court of Appeals.
• Issue: Whether the complaint should be quashed for lack of jurisdiction.
• Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that the complaint should be quashed as the Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction over the case. The case should have been filed in the proper trial court.

3. Jaylord Dimal and Allan Castillo vs. People, G.R. No. 216922, April 18, 2018, Peralta, J.

• Fact: Jaylord Dimal and Allan Castillo were accused of drug trafficking in the lower court.
• Issue: Whether the information against Jaylord Dimal and Allan Castillo should be quashed.
• Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that the information should be quashed as the evidence presented was tainted with irregularities and did not establish probable cause for drug trafficking.

4. La Chemise Lacoste, SA vs. Fernandez, 129 SCRA 373

• Fact: La Chemise Lacoste filed a complaint against Fernandez for trademark infringement.
• Issue: Whether the complaint for trademark infringement should be quashed.
• Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of La Chemise Lacoste, stating that Fernandez's actions constituted trademark infringement and the complaint was valid.

5. People vs. Court of Appeals, 291 SCRA 400

• Fact: The People appealed a decision of the Court of Appeals to quash a complaint for murder.
• Issue: Whether the Court of Appeals was correct in quashing the complaint for murder.
• Ruling: The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstated the complaint for murder, finding that there was sufficient evidence to establish probable cause.

6. Merlina R. Diaz vs. People, G.R. No. 213875, July 15, 2020

• Fact: Merlina R. Diaz was charged with estafa in the Regional Trial Court.
• Issue: Whether the complaint for estafa should be quashed.
• Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that the complaint should not be quashed as there was sufficient evidence presented to establish probable cause for estafa.