❓ Help Assignment

aldrian1234

Eternal Poster
Make a case digest
Include Fact , Issue and Rulling
in case of

Rule 117 QUASHAL OF COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION

1. Los Banos vs. Pedro, G.R. No. 173588, April 22, 2009
 
Case: Los Banos vs. Pedro, G.R. No. 173588, April 22, 2009

FACTS:
In this case, the accused, Pedro, filed a motion to quash the information against him on the ground of lack of probable cause. The information charged Pedro with îllégâl possession of firearms. The prosecution alleged that Pedro was caught in possession of an unlicensed firearm during a police operation. However, Pedro argued that the evidence against him was obtained through an îllégâl search and seizure, thus rendering it inadmissible in court.

ISSUE:
The main issue in this case is whether the evidence obtained through an alleged îllégâl search and seizure should be considered in determining the existence of probable cause for the filing of the information against the accused.

RULING:
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Pedro and granted the motion to quash the information. The Court held that evidence obtained through an îllégâl search and seizure is considered tainted and inadmissible in court. Since the prosecution's case against Pedro relied heavily on the illegally obtained evidence, the Court found that there was indeed a lack of probable cause to charge him with îllégâl possession of firearms. As a result, the information was quashed, and Pedro was acquitted of the charges against him.
 

Similar threads

About this Thread

  • 1
    Replies
  • 172
    Views
  • 1
    Participants
Last reply from:
Unknown user

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
908
Guests online
754
Total visitors
1,662

Forum statistics

Threads
2,275,563
Posts
28,964,107
Members
1,231,866
Latest member
terrorspeed
Back
Top