Same Playbook by the Marcoses

Ferdinand Marcos Sr. issued an EO on Feb 24, 1966 removing VP Fernando Lopez from the National Security Council.

Years later, he declared Martial Law and abolished the OVP.

With the Office of the Vice President abolished and the constitutional successor VP Lopez gone, FM Sr was free to declare himself ruler of this country for over 2 decades.

Where he plundered public coffers.
And where our rights and freedoms were taken away from us.

History repeating itself is the Universe asking us if we have learned the lessons we were supposed to learn the first time.

Marcos Sr destroyed our country.

Are you willing to see, in your lifetime, another Marcos destroy our country after we had painstakingly rebuilt it from the ashes of Marcos Sr’s plunder and lust for power?

Are you willing to die bequeathing such a country to your children?

Those are the burning questions we must answer.

 

[ZummerSoltice]

Martial D. Law Is waving.

 

[plhbg1]

hehe sana online martial law lang bossing

 

[BicycleHorse]

What's new? There's nothing new in here.

 

[plhbg1]

What's new? There's nothing new in here.

tama ka boss, walang bago dito kaya di na-post sa news kasi history repeats itself ang theme neto

 

[BicycleHorse]

tama ka boss, walang bago dito kaya di na-post sa news kasi history repeats itself ang theme neto

this was been done trice in our government, so nothing new.

 

[plhbg1]

this was been done trice in our government, so nothing new.

hehe you mean thrice na nag declare ng martial law after tinanggal?

 

[BicycleHorse]

hehe you mean thrice na nag declare ng martial law after tinanggal?

FYI: 2 martial law.

 

[plhbg1]

FYI: 2 martial law.

wow ayos yan interested ako sa source mo kung ganun

 

[ZummerSoltice]

Pero pag si leni naging presidente everything's new

wow ayos yan interested ako sa source mo kung ganun

 

[plhbg1]

Pero pag si leni naging presidente everything's new

may kumakalat kasi ngayon na tinanggal din daw ni digong sa NSC si leni noon pero via secret message lang daw haha walang executive order kundi nag whisper lang daw si digong kay leni haha

another thing is that yung tanggalan ay nangyari just before the arrival of the Afghans which is obviously a national security issue, malicious talaga ang EO No. 81

i also don't think na matutuloy pa ang US Visa ng mga Afghan na yan given na si Trump na president kaya tayo talaga kawawa dito

 

[UY Scuti]

The Dutertes are pro-China, which alone can cause much more damage to the Philippines. With this in mind, I can understand why the Marcos administration removed the two Dutertes and included others like FP Erap and Arroyo. The NSC is formed at the president's discretion, with invitations extended by the president. After all, this also happened during PDU30's term with Robredo, so it’s nothing new.

 

[plhbg1]

The Dutertes are pro-China, which alone can cause much more damage to the Philippines. With this in mind, I can understand why the Marcos administration removed the two Dutertes and included others like FP Erap and Arroyo. The NSC is formed at the president's discretion, with invitations extended by the president. After all, this also happened during PDU30's term with Robredo, so it’s nothing new.

pahingi ng Executive Order ni digong that removed VP Leni from NSC, wag kayo puro pa-trending ilapag niyo ang EO ni duterte haha

 

[UY Scuti]

pahingi ng Executive Order ni digong that removed VP Leni from NSC, wag kayo puro pa-trending ilapag niyo ang EO ni duterte haha

Yes, that’s the difference. PDU30 didn’t issue a formal order regarding this removal, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Erin Tañada has already made a statement about it, and none of the Dutertes or their allies have denied it. So yeah, you can play the 'no EO issued by PDU30, therefore, it didn't happen' all you want.

My main point is that You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., gives the President the power to add or remove NSC members. So I don’t see why pro-Dutertes and DDS are making a fuss about it.

Ex-president also excluded Robredo from NSC – Tañada to Duterte allies

 

[plhbg1]

Yes, that’s the difference. PDU30 didn’t issue a formal order regarding this removal, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Erin Tañada has already made a statement about it, and none of the Dutertes or their allies have denied it. So yeah, you can play the 'no EO issued by PDU30, therefore, it didn't happen' all you want.

hahahahahahahahahaha ayun, nakalimutan mo ata that anyone can claim it na tinanggal and mas vocal actually si duterte at sa pagiging vocal niya natakot siya magsabi sa public na tatanggalin niya kalaban niya sa NSC? hahahahaha i don't think itatago ni duterte sa public ang tanggalan given na kaliwa't kanan ang bash niya kay VP Leni, so all that is left is chismis

My main point is that You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., gives the President the power to add or remove NSC members. So I don’t see why pro-Dutertes and DDS are making a fuss about it.

haha nobody said it is îllégâl, wala îllégâl sa ginawang tanggalan, ang meron lang is doubts, malice and ill advice

Ex-president also excluded Robredo from NSC – Tañada to Duterte allies

haha ang galing naman netong source mo, chismis haha

 

[UY Scuti]

hahahahahahahahahaha ayun, nakalimutan mo ata that anyone can claim it na tinanggal and mas vocal actually si duterte at sa pagiging vocal niya natakot siya magsabi sa public na tatanggalin niya kalaban niya sa NSC? hahahahaha i don't think itatago ni duterte sa public ang tanggalan given na kaliwa't kanan ang bash niya kay VP Leni, so all that is left is chismis

Okay, Robredo wasn’t formally removed as a member, but she was asked to stop attending crucial meetings, which is why no formal order was issued. The reason given was 'irreconcilable differences,' the same reason why VP Sara was removed. So again, nothing new—there were differences, and the President has the authority to remove anyone.

haha nobody said it is îllégâl, wala îllégâl sa ginawang tanggalan, ang meron lang is doubts, malice and ill advice

Yeah, it’s all doubt, malice, and bad advice when they’re personally affected. Also, do you think being in cahoots with China, being corrupt, or being involved in an assassination plot aren’t enough reasons to be removed?

haha ang galing naman netong source mo, chismis haha

Yep, if the narrative isn't in your favor, it's considered gossip or the report isn't credible, lol.

 

[plhbg1]

Okay, Robredo wasn’t formally removed as a member, but she was asked to stop attending crucial meetings, which is why no formal order was issued. The reason given was 'irreconcilable differences,' the same reason why VP Sara was removed. So again, nothing new—there were differences, and the President has the authority to remove anyone.View attachment 3391167

hahahaha hindi yan about NSC jusko lerd kung anu anu na lang pino-post mo jusko, about yan sa pagiging housing secretary ni VP Leni, ayaw ni digong na siya mismo magtatanggal kay Leni as housing secretary kaya yung nangyari is advised to resign instead of appointment termination in which nag resign nga si VP Leni, this is completely irrelevant to NSC

Yeah, it’s all doubt, malice, and bad advice when they’re piersonally affected. Also, do you think being in cahoots with China, being corrupt, or being involved in an assassination plot aren’t enough reasons to be removed?

not for me since given na inilabas yung EO just days before the Afghans arrived which is an obviously national security issue, pinigilan mag check and balance ang NSC to house the Afghans

Yep, if the narrative isn't in your favor, it's considered gossip or the report isn't credible, lol.

haha the media didn't even care to ask Tañada for a source haha magsama kayo ng media na yan

 

[UY Scuti]

hahahaha hindi yan about NSC jusko lerd kung anu anu na lang pino-post mo jusko, about yan sa pagiging housing secretary ni VP Leni, ayaw ni digong na siya mismo magtatanggal kay Leni as housing secretary kaya yung nangyari is advised to resign instead of appointment termination, this is completely irrelevant to NSC

Bro, I swear, you're too shallow. Imagine, your boss telling you not to attend meetings because you have differences, do you think you'd still attend any meetings? Whether it's the NSC or a Cabinet meeting? Come on, you're being really naive.

haha the media didn't even care to ask for a source haha magsama kayo ng media na yan

Yeah, thanks for proving my point. If the story doesn’t fit your narrative, then DDS won’t believe it, lol.

Ultimately, DDS making a fuss about removing VP Sara from NSC like it's the end of the world, for Christ's sake, stop being a fanatic.

 

[plhbg1]

Bro, I swear, you're too shallow. Imagine, your boss telling you not to attend meetings because you have differences, do you think you'd still attend any meetings? Whether it's the NSC or a Cabinet meeting? Come on, you're being really naive.

haha sino kalaban mo niyan? sinabi ko na na advice to resign na nga ang nangyari hahahahahaha and it still doesn't change the fact the digong did not re-organize NSC

Yeah, thanks for proving my point. If the story doesn’t fit your narrative, then DDS won’t believe it, lol.

Ultimately, DDS making a fuss about removing VP Sara from NSC like it's the end of the world, for Christ's sake, stop being a fanatic.

thanks also for confirming na nakiki-sabay ka lang sa trends and you don't care about the quality of information that comes to you

 

[UY Scuti]

haha sino kalaban mo niyan? sinabi ko na na advice to resign na nga ang nangyari hahahahahaha and it still doesn't change the fact the digong did not re-organize NSC

I don’t see anything wrong with reorganizing the NSC, especially since two of the removed members were pro-China, and China is the biggest national threat to our country right now. If you're having trouble connecting the dots, then that's your problem. Given that, DDS aren't exactly known for their critical thinking.

thanks also for confirming na nakiki-sabay ka lang sa trends and you don't care about the quality of information that comes to you

As I've said multiple times, if the narrative doesn't suit the Dutertes, then it's not considered quality information. You guys aren't for the country; after all, you were called DDS for a reason.