🕯️ Traditions Secret Service

Hindi ko ini-equate ang work to strength, ang sinasabi ko, may mga work na need ng strength.
Not necessarily. Hindi mo ba napapansin na sobrang limited ang mga uri ng trabaho na gingamit nyong example para reinforce yung mysogyny nyo? Isipin mo trabaho ng lahat ng miyembro ng pamilya mo, ilan dyan ang kailangan tlga lalake ang gumagawa? I will not be surprised kung wala kahit isa.
 
Hindi sya binary because its either XX or XY.. what makes *** binary is the Y chromosomes.. its about the absence or the presence of it.

1. with Y chromosome
2. without Y chromosome
i don't know saan mo yan nakuha boss but i'll stick to my lessons in biology where binary refers to how se̾xes are classified rather than presence or absence of Y
Thats it. Sguro narinig mo lang sa iba yan na either XX or XY lang ang ***.. that is partly true.. pero kung titingnan pa mabuti ang ibig sabihin talaga nean eh kung may Y chromosome or wala…thats wat makes it binary.
yes narinig ko yan sa lessons ko in biology, wait ko na lang muna ma-include at ma-recognize yang findings mo sa biology bossing kasi it appears that you don't understand the functions of X and Y chromosomes, parang kino-consider mo lang sila as codes kesa chromosomes haha
Bukod pa sa sinabi mo eh meron pang iba like XXXY, tripleX etc..may ibat ibang mutations din.. exception lang nman jan eh ung swyer syndrome na despite XY eh female sila kasi ung Y mismo ang may mutation sa kanila hence mas active ung X kaya nadedevelop ang female organs nila though may kasamang disorders pa din
hehe never heard about triple X hehe if you can provide a document for that, much better
Labas nmn pala ang gender then why did u bring it up nga in response dito:
Then sana jan palang sinabi mo na biology has nothing to do with gender db?
it is because homophobics always argue that official genders are based on biology, so i destroyed the binary se̾xes: XX and XY as the only genetic se̾xual configurations
 
it is because homophobics always argue that official genders are based on biology, so i destroyed the binary se̾xes: XX and XY as the only genetic se̾xual configurations
you said you destroyed the binary segs and yet we only see male and female gen1tals still. 2 kinds of gen1tals... isnt it be called binary??
 
you said you destroyed the binary segs and yet we only see male and female gen1tals still. 2 kinds of gen1tals... isnt it be called binary??
ehehe hindi lang ge̾nitals ang saklaw ng genes bossing, hormonal activities are still coded in the genes, gaya nga ng sabi ko they have ovaries but no eggs and they have testicles but no spe̾rm
 
ehehe hindi lang ge̾nitals ang saklaw ng genes bossing, hormonal activities are still coded in the genes, gaya nga ng sabi ko they have ovaries but no eggs and they have testicles but no spe̾rm
pero quote ko lang yung sinabi mong " you destroyed binary segses"
 
kahit saang mga fill-up forms wala pa kong nakitang iba maliban sa male and female sa pagpipilian ng segs. so you mean mali silang lahat? govt, private sectors, banks etc... may nakita ka na bang ibang pagpipiliang segs sa forms nila?
 
kahit saang mga fill-up forms wala pa kong nakitang iba maliban sa male and female sa pagpipilian ng segs. so you mean mali silang lahat? govt, private sectors, banks etc... may nakita ka na bang ibang pagpipiliang segs sa forms nila?
gaya na ng sinabi ko boss, it is still occurring in 1 out of 1,500 births kaya di pa siya recognized, emerging variations pa lang
 
gaya na ng sinabi ko boss, it is still occurring in 1 out of 1,500 births kaya di pa siya recognized, emerging variations pa lang
not recognized even though its occurrence is 1 is to 1500? isnt it strange?? in science community, even a 1 is to 10 million is already recognized like super rare desease or condition. why is then a 1 is to 1500 not??
 
not recognized even though its occurrence is 1 is to 1500? isnt it strange?? in science community, even a 1 is to 10 million is already recognized like super rare desease or condition. why is then a 1 is to 1500 not??
the occurence is still recognized bossing hehe pero masyado pa siyang diluted to be recognized as third and fourth se̾x
 
isnt it because there is still only two seges even though theres now some mutations on genes?
it is not boss, yung problem is yung presence niya in which insignificant masyado, at given na din na walang spe̾rm and eggs yung XXY and XO ay malabo siyang ma-reproduce
 
it is not boss, yung problem is yung presence niya in which insignificant masyado, at given na din na walang spe̾rm and eggs yung XXY and XO ay malabo siyang ma-reproduce
and still, you are calling it different segs from male and female? but cant reproduce? they have gen1tals that cant reproduce. their gen1tals is same with male and female.. so meaning they only have abnormalities but not different segs. that is why science dont recognize it as different segs. and i hope it is now clear to you.
 
and still, you are calling it different segs from male and female? but cant reproduce? they have gen1tals that cant reproduce. their gen1tals is same with male and female.. so meaning they only have abnormalities but not different segs. that is why science dont recognize it as different segs. and i hope it is now clear to you.
ehehe i said the occurrence is recognized, it is also considered as disorder because it's not yet included in what is considered to be in order, it is possible that the evolutionary mutation is not yet completed since these mutations is still towards survival of life
 
ehehe i said the occurrence is recognized, it is also considered as disorder because it's not yet included in what is considered to be in order, it is possible that the evolutionary mutation is not yet completed since these mutations is still towards survival of life
noon pa merong ganyan mutation even sa mga animals at hanggang ngayun dadalawa pa din ang gen1tals na makikita mo even sa mga may mutated genes. so when you think it would be complete?
sayo na din nang galing na it is only considered as disorder nothing more. so your claim na its a different segs is ikaw lang ang may sabi not science.
 
noon pa merong ganyan mutation even sa mga animals at hanggang ngayun dadalawa pa din ang gen1tals na makikita mo even sa mga may mutated genes. so when you think it would be complete?
ang sabi ko hindi lang ge̾nitals ang nasa genetic codes
sayo na din nang galing na it is only considered as disorder nothing more. so your claim na its a different segs is ikaw lang ang may sabi not science.
as of the moment lang yan boss, but the point is it already exist
 
*** is binary dalawa lang
yung mga hermaphrodite naman its not a mutation its a defect
genetic code naman its dna natural di lang gender ang nandun its a genetic make up ng race mo
hirap no pag madaming big words di mo na na iintindihan
 
and so you accept the fact that for now you cannot call it as different segs. until science tells us so and up until now, there's only male and female.
ehehe existence lang kasi importante sa akin boss, so yun lang din point ko diyan, it is up to the reader if iko-consider niya or not as long as na-point out ko lang that there are four se̾xual configurations that exist instead of the old binary
 
ehehe existence lang kasi importante sa akin boss, so yun lang din point ko diyan, it is up to the reader if iko-consider niya or not as long as na-point out ko lang that there are four se̾xual configurations that exist instead of the old binary
so we're clear you cannot claim that there's more than 2 segs right?
 

About this Thread

  • 231
    Replies
  • 8K
    Views
  • 17
    Participants
Last reply from:
Chongks

Online now

Members online
1,156
Guests online
1,051
Total visitors
2,207

Forum statistics

Threads
2,274,037
Posts
28,953,298
Members
1,235,032
Latest member
ksbshdbdb
Back
Top