🕯️ Traditions Secret Service

[plhbg1]

*** is binary dalawa lang
yung mga hermaphrodite naman its not a mutation its a defect
genetic code naman its dna natural di lang gender ang nandun its a genetic make up ng race mo
hirap no pag madaming big words di mo na na iintindihan

haha wala ka ngang alam about X & Y chromosomes boss, at saka out of context ka din since the topic is 23rd chromosome pair

so we're clear you cannot claim that there's more than 2 segs right?

i can actually, you just can't agree on what i claim hehe

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

i can actually, you just can't agree on what i claim hehe

sure but not factual. it is only your claim not based on science. and science dont agree with you.

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

*** is binary dalawa lang
yung mga hermaphrodite naman its not a mutation its a defect
genetic code naman its dna natural di lang gender ang nandun its a genetic make up ng race mo
hirap no pag madaming big words di mo na na iintindihan

Yan ang maling idea mula sa western thinking na imbento ng greeks, at basis din ng religion ngayon. Yung pagclassify ng defective dahil sa maling ideya ng perfect. There was a point na may ideya sila na ang babae ay defective man.. it took thousand of years, dala padin natin ang bulok na ideya na yan kaya hindi pantay ang tingin sa babae't lalake. Next, we classify intersex as a defect, when in reality, every person's sexuality is really in a spectrum of how much male and female hormones their bodies produce.

It is a case of mistaken thought due to the western thinking's desire to put distinctions between things.

 

[plhbg1]

sure but not factual. it is only your claim not base on science. and science dont agree with you.

haha existence lang din naman ang claim ko which is recognize ng science, there are four se̾xual configurations that exist, i don't care if iko-consider sila as third or fourth but yung existence lang ang pino-punto ko hehe binary means "two" not "four"

 

[bugz331]

Yan ang maling idea mula sa western thinking na imbento ng greeks, at basis din ng religion ngayon. Yung pagclassify ng defective dahil sa maling ideya ng perfect. There was a point na may ideya sila na ang babae ay defective man.. it took thousand of years, dala padin natin ang bulok na ideya na yan kaya hindi pantay ang tingin sa babae't lalake. Next, we classify intersex as a defect, when in reality, every person's sexuality is really in a spectrum of how much male and female hormones their bodies produce.

It is a case of mistaken thought due to the western thinking's desire to put distinctions between things.

so pag pinanganak kang kulang daliri dalawa ulo or liit ang isang braso di defect un at diba sa western thinking din galing ang spectrum spectrum na yan para sa mga feeling special yung pinag sasabi niyong kabaklaan its preference fooking preference sexual orientation is different

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

so pag pinanganak kang kulang daliri dalawa ulo or liit ang isang braso di defect un at diba sa western thinking din galing ang spectrum spectrum na yan para sa mga feeling special yung pinag sasabi niyong kabaklaan its preference fooking preference sexual orientation is different.

Bago ang mga ideya na yan, ang tao ay tao. There us no such thing as a perfect man or human. I think we can establish that diba? So if there is no such thing as a perfect human, ano a ng basis mo para sabihin defective ang isang tao?
None of these traits truly matter unless it impedes the person's quality of life. That is the only time a mutation is considered a disease or "defect" as you put it.

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

haha existence lang din naman ang claim ko which is recognize ng science, there are four se̾xual configurations that exist, i don't care if iko-consider sila as third or fourth but yung existence lang ang pino-punto ko hehe binary means "two" not "four"

if science truly says it exist, then why you think it is not still considered as another segs? that is because it doesnt matter if they have different types of chromosomes than a regular human. segs is distinguished by gen1tals nothing more. it is only your interpretation that when a person has a different or mutated chromosomes, it is a different segs. but in science, segs is only binary. i thought you base your arguments on facts?

 

[plhbg1]

Bago ang mga ideya na yan, ang tao ay tao. There us no such thing as a perfect man or human. I think we can establish that diba? So if there is no such thing as a perfect human, ano a ng basis mo para sabihin defective ang isang tao?
None of these traits truly matter unless it impedes the person's quality of life. That is the only time a mutation is considered a disease or "defect" as you put it.

dagdag ko din that perfection in this context is relative, it is not absolute, it means what is considered perfect is just the usual conditions, pag meron usual conditions kino-consider yan agad as disorder or defect or impurity, so disorder is relative to what is considered in order, but they are all conditions or phenomenons, mas frequent or usual lang yung isa kesa iba

if science truly says it exist, then why you think it is not still considered as another segs? that is because it doesnt matter if they have different types of chromosomes than a regular human.

ang sabi ko it is because of the frequency of occurrence, masyadong diluted ang presence in the society

segs is distinguished by gen1tals nothing more. it is only your interpretation that when a person has a different or mutated chromosomes, it is a different segs. but in science, segs is only binary. i thought you base your arguments on facts?

wait ko na lang na i-recognize at i-include yang se̾x based on *******s mo sa biology boss, meantime stick lang muna ako sa lessons ko were se̾x is still based on chromosomal configurations: XX, XY, XXY, and XO

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

dagdag ko din that perfection in this context is relative, it is not absolute, it means what is considered perfect is just the usual conditions, pag meron usual conditions kino-consider yan agad as disorder or defect or impurity, so disorder is relative to what is considered in order, but they are all conditions or phenomenons, mas frequent or usual lang yung isa kesa iba

Yep that is the point, uncommon, does not equate to a defect or wrong in the grand scale of things. Yan nga distinction na yan ang naging ugat ng maraming atrocities sa mundo because to many people do not understand that it is merely relative and unable to recognize social constructs. Jan galing ang racism, homophobia, at mysogyny.

 

[bugz331]

human is race kahit pinanganal kang lumpo human ka parin
gender ay sexual orientation kung ano ka pinanganak
kabaklaan is a preference which is LGB yan lang yung T+ optimus prime is sa mental illness na

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

wait ko na lang na i-recognize at i-include yang se̾x based on *******s mo sa biology boss, meantime stick lang muna ako sa lessons ko were se̾x is still based on chromosomal configurations: XX, XY, XXY, and XO

so if your argument is segs is based on chromosomal configurations not on gen1tals, then why we still have 2 segs until now? these clearly suggests that your science is wrong dude. dont you agree? there is something wrong with your science.

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

human is race kahit pinanganal kang lumpo human ka parin
gender ay sexual orientation kung ano ka pinanganak
kabaklaan is a preference which is LGB yan lang yung T+ optimus prime is sa mental illness na

Ignorance at its finest. Gender is always a preference. It is all but a behavior. It is not biological at all.

Here is a thought experiment. If a man is born and raised in isolation.. would this man automatically behave "manly" according to societal standard?

 

[plhbg1]

so if your argument is segs is based on chromosomal configurations not on gen1tals, then why we still have 2 segs until now? these clearly suggests that your science is wrong dude. dont you agree? there is something wrong with your science.

ok lang din if wrong since yun lang din naman itinuro ng biology classes ko hehe hindi naman ako nag-imbento ng XX, XY, XXY, and XO, science pa rin naman so no problem

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

ok lang din if wrong since yun lang din naman itinuro ng biology classes ko hehe hindi naman ako nag-imbento ng XX, XY, XXY, and XO, science pa rin naman so no problem

well, you still have common sense to tell if you're being fed with wrong information. use it dude.

 

[plhbg1]

well, you still have common sense to tell if you're being fed with wrong information. use it dude.

ahaha who are you compared to the professors here? what's your highest educational attainment boss?

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

ahaha who are you compared to the professors here? what's your highest educational attainment boss?

hahaha there's nothing wrong with what they teach you about chromosome configuration. the problem is, you mislead yourself thinking that if a human has different chromosome configuration, it can be identified as another segs. and we all know, science doesnt agree with you. and you are very wrong based on all facts. but sure.. you can disagree with me in this.. but disagree with facts not pseudo science.

 

[bugz331]

tska bakit ayaw aminin na that having an extra chromosome is a defect Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome

 

[plhbg1]

hahaha there's nothing wrong with what they teach you about chromosome configuration. the problem is, you mislead yourself thinking that if a human has different chromosome configuration, it can be identified as another segs. and we all know, science doesnt agree with you. and you are very wrong based on all facts. but sure.. you can disagree with me in this.. but disagree with facts not pseudo science.

haha ngayon ko lang narinig that se̾x is based on ge̾nitals boss, ang turo dito se̾x has always been based on chromosomal configurations, in fact, the 23rd chromosome pair is labeled as "se̾xual chromosomes" haha

 

[HowSoonIsNow]

haha ngayon ko lang narinig that se̾x is based on ge̾nitals boss, ang turo dito se̾x has always been based on chromosomal configurations, in fact, the 23rd chromosome pair is labeled as "se̾xual chromosomes" haha

and yet 2 lang ang segs na meron ka pagpipilian kahit sa lahat ng fill-up forms no? strange? thats when the time we have to use our common sense dont you think?

 

[plhbg1]

tska bakit ayaw aminin na that having an extra chromosome is a defect Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome

haha sinabihan ka na that disorders are relative to what is considered "in order," it is not absolute, it is relative jusko lerd, tinawag lang yan na disorder due to it's frequency of occurrence but they are both conditions / phenomenons

and yet 2 lang ang segs na meron ka pagpipilian kahit sa lahat ng fill-up forms no? strange? thats when the time we have to use our common sense dont you think?

ang sabi ko "existence" lang ang claim ko, i don't care whether they are included in forms or be labeled as third and fourth se̾x, i am only pointing out the fact that "four" chromosomal configurations exist: XX, XY, XXY, and XO