Pakipaliwanag ulit kung hindi ko naintindihan. Ang intindi ko sa sinabi mo is hindi nag rally ang conservatives > therefore ang liberal (or woke ay nagrally > therefore it is tyranny. Kahit basahin ko ulit, yan ang intindi ko sa sinabi mo. (Misunderstanding is not cherry picking. I guess you are not familiar with the cherrypicking concept. You are using the word wrong)Sinabi ko ba na rally is a form of tyranny. Lol! Magbasa kasi ng mabuti bago mag chery pickers. Back read anong mga example ko.
It's cherry picking since you never address the issues I said. You only reply some of it.Pakipaliwanag ulit kung hindi ko naintindihan. Ang intindi ko sa sinabi mo is hindi nag rally ang conservatives > therefore ang liberal (or woke ay nagrally > therefore it is tyranny. Kahit basahin ko ulit, yan ang intindi ko sa sinabi mo. (Misunderstanding is not cherry picking. I guess you are not familiar with the cherrypicking concept. You are using the word wrong)
Because those are cherry picked issues you picked.It's cherry picking since you never address the issues I said. You only reply some of it.
Lol! Answer me then I will answer those question. You don't just ask question then never answer my own. That is not how it worksBecause those are cherry picked issues you picked.
How about address the issues that you do not say? Like gay children mentally, emotionally or physically abused by their parents due to their parent's miseducation on gender? The normalized harassment they experience growing up? The use of their identity as an insult? These things are not sensational for news but they are more prevelent to the point of being socially accepted.
Wala nga point sagutin ung sayo dahil cherry picked yan and it is not representative of reality. Not all conservative professors are stripped of their license. All issues you mentioned cannot be generalized as reality dahil baka hindi p umabot sa dami ng daliri ang similar cases. They are only sensational. They are not enough proof for your claim like you thought they were.Lol! Answer me then I will answer those question. You don't just ask question then never answer my own. That is not how it works
Then I will not entertain your question also. Since bingibingian ka same sa mga woke clowns when they are presented with facts.Wala nga point sagutin ung sayo dahil cherry picked yan and it is not representative of reality. Not all conservative professors are stripped of their license. All issues you mentioned cannot be generalized as reality dahil baka hindi p umabot sa dami ng daliri ang similar cases. They are only sensational. They are not enough proof for your claim like you thought they were.
Well, I expected na wala ka nmn maisasagot, kasi ung argument mo ay nakadepnde sa emotional response jan sa mga cases na yan.Then I will not entertain your question also. Since bingibingian ka same sa mga woke clowns when they are presented with facts.
Well, I expected same to you gaya ng mga coward delusional woke clowns.Well, I expected na wala ka nmn maisasagot, kasi ung argument mo ay nakadepnde sa emotional response jan sa mga cases na yan.
Last time I checked, conservatives ang takot na takot dahil matatanggap na ng mga tao ang rights na deserved nila. If that wasnt true, this discussion board would not exist.Well, I expected same to you gaya ng mga coward delusional woke clowns.
Last time I checked, you simps and the woke clowns don't accept reality, and that is why you compete to womens sports. How weak can you be?Last time I checked, conservatives ang takot na takot dahil matatanggap na ng mga tao ang rights na deserved nila. If that wasnt true, this discussion board would not exist.
Another unsubtantiated claim relying on ignorance and fueled by sensationalism.Last time I checked, you simps and the woke clowns don't accept reality, and that is why you compete to womens sports. How weak can you be?
Yeah, I get it, woke simps are denying the facts and call it sensationalism to escape the reality.Another unsubtantiated claim relying on ignorance and fueled by sensationalism.
These people might be wrong, but at least they are trying to solve problems conservatives don't want to acknowledge are problems.
You are clearly demonstrating what it is like when you consume too much sensationalism. Along with the inability to question your ideas, yung cognitive dissonance pa between these idea and your moral compass.Yeah, I get it, woke simps are denying the facts and call it sensationalism to escape the reality.
You basically also demonstrating what is like to be consume by so much woke ideology that when men compete with womans sports you are so blinded by those facts.You are clearly demonstrating what it is like when you consume too much sensationalism. Along with the inability to question your ideas, yung cognitive dissonance pa between these idea and your moral compass.
Such is the dangers of oversimplifying complex ideas.
I felt more consumed when I was on the conservative side. I used the same hollow arguments you used. There was so much cognitive dissonance. I had to actively be apathetic in arguments, yet I claim to be empathetic in person. The worst part, all I was really doing was complain about society, without thinking how I would change society if I had the power.You basically also demonstrating what is like to be consume by so much woke ideology that when men compete with womans sports you are so blinded by those facts.
Don't pretend that you where once a conservative. That thing don't exist or you are just pretending to be kasi kuno cognitie dissonance. Sabihin mo yan sa mga woke simp mo, kasi delusionals pretending to be somebody which in reality in practical science do not.I felt more consumed when I was on the conservative side. I used the same hollow arguments you used. There was so much cognitive dissonance. I had to actively be apathetic in arguments, yet I claim to be empathetic in person. The worst part, all I was really doing was complain about society, without thinking how I would change society if I had the power.
Wala na akong mgagawa. You are deep in dogma at this point natural you would accuse me of lying.Don't pretend that you where once a conservative. That thing don't exist or you are just pretending to be kasi kuno cognitie dissonance. Sabihin mo yan sa mga woke simp mo, kasi delusionals pretending to be somebody which in reality in practical science do not.
Don't make me laugh. As if, ang left yung san kana ngayon na hindi always complaining sa society, ikaw nga nag nag complain against conservative? So your point? Lol
Of course, dogma is important. I have much respect unto those who are firm on what they believe not those who are just swaying according to the wave of the society or what we call bandwagons. I was not saying you where lying, I was saying you where never was a conservative to begin with.Wala na akong mgagawa. You are deep in dogma at this point natural you would accuse me of lying.
If something, yan mga tinatawag mong woke, they have the right to complain dahil many of them are a part of the marginalized group in status quo. And they are not all talk as they do their work, such as going to schools to spread awareness. Sino ulit nag aattempt gumagamit ng legislations to silence them? By your definition, hindi ba yan ang oppression?
PH