🕯️ Traditions Can Men get pr3gnant?

Sure you did not mention religion. This is because you are actively distancing yourself from it knowing it will weaken your position. Pero all you had was assertion.

Frankly, i understand how difficult it is aminin sa sarili how brainwash one is. It is blissful to pretend that your thoughts were a product of free thinking.

Anyways, let us go to biology. Saan sa biology ang nagsabi na msama sa lalake mag palda? Mag make up? O makipagtalik sa kapwa lalake? Go... bigyan mo naman kami ng maayos na reasoining other than what you feel about the issue.
Do dig some rabbit whole not gonna go down with it. And quite some assumption as if vaid yung points nyo about religion.

Bakit kayo free thinker kuno kayo? Lol! don't make me laugh. As if hindi kayo brainwashed by modern view of gender ideology.

Where talking about can men be prëgnant. Anong connection jan sa question mo so OP? And those are personal preference not a question of biology. (not against palda and make up)

Let me answer the makipagtalik sa kapwa lalaki. We all know according to science that only biological men and woman can produce another life. The reason conservative is against it since we value families is that if we stop to produce life then it will be our extinction someday. We are meant to reproduce that's the nature we have.
 
Ah. Now. I get it. Ang OA ng fear ng mga conservatives. Families extinction raw kuno. E kung totoo ang sinasabi, malamang, wala na tayo ngayon dahil dati, hindi naman uso ang "procreation", ayan oh, marami pa tayo ngayon.

Ang ganyan gender ideologies ay hindi mawawaglit na align siya sa concept ng procreation ng a man and a woman in the bible po e and yet, sinasabi kuno na walang kilalaman sa relihiyon.

Tingnan niyo nga sa Paganism na naka survive noon at ngayon though hindi nga lang mainstream, hindi naman na extinct ang families po. Iyon nga lang, marami nga lang sila as a family dahil nga polyamorous silang lahat. Mix po sila, minsan ang asawa nila ay lalake at lalake then meron din wife at anak. May mga gays na andoon po. Tatlo sila na nagmamahalan. Minsan pa nga tatlong babae sa isang lalake. May mga lesbian din sa family na andoon po. Mix kung baga. Tinawag nga sila egalitarian relationship.

Property and ownership nga lang tayo ngayon kaya lalake at babae na po siya at naging procreation na po. Iyan ang ipinaglalaban ng ibang tao dahil nakatutok po siya sa procreation.

Actually, totoo nga na biology ang gender as in. Science nga po, pero hindi maiiwasan na malakas pa rin ang influence ng relihiyon po dahil hindi mag eexist ang gender issue kung hindi sa relihiyon.

Ang science, ginagamitan na po siya for justification na lang po siya para you know? Masabi na objective at nasa physical reality dahil kung hindi rin sila na influence ng relihiyon, malamang, they would not use science para mag back up na gender binary is objective po.

Ganun lang ka simple iyon.

Minsan ang fear natin ay illusion ika nga. Hindi totoo ang kinakatakutan natin.​
 
Unfortunately, religion may have influence, but science is the all deciding factor since it studies physical reality. So it go against your delusions.

But she was born a female. It was here biology that made prégnancy possible.


To spread the simple reality that men can never be prëgnant.
lalaki yan oi anung she 🤣 he was born a male and make a baby not to carry a baby inside his body kc nd sya BABAE wla syang poke , with the help of science meron na kea naging posible
 
images (14).webp
 
plhbg1 Kaplok Kaplok

point all the religion all you want. But won't go down with that rabbit hole. Since hindi ako gumamit ng religion.

So science never talk about biology?
hehe meron ako biology subjects but they all never say something about homose̾xuality and homophobia, never naging topic ng biology ang homose̾xuality and yet biology pa din daw haha
 
hehe meron ako biology subjects but they all never say something about homose̾xuality and homophobia, never naging topic ng biology ang homose̾xuality and yet biology pa din daw haha
exactly, since biology only studies the physical realities. And to me yung physical realities what ultimately influence our gender.


You have to know yourself po why iyon ang ipinaglalaban. Sabi mo kasi, magkakaroon ng family extinction kaya based on science, nagsasabi ka ng facts about biological ng gender about nature ng procreation.​
yun nga pinalalaban ko. And nothing sa sinabi ko that those are my fears of conservatism.
 
exactly, since biology only studies the physical realities. And to me yung physical realities what ultimately influence our gender. yun nga pinalalaban ko. And nothing sa sinabi ko that those are my fears of conservatism.​

Ah. Okay. Ganito. Ang ipinaglalaban ay gender ng biologically lamang na lalake at babae sapagkat sila ito meron abilidad na mag procreate ng buhay. For me, kung wala silang fear sa mangyayari sa society, e bakit ipinaglalaban pa nila na gender binary lamang mag-adapt ang mga tao po? But disregard na lang ang katagang fear dahil lahat ng tao ay meron fear.

Katulad mo at ang ilan tao na katulad mo rin po na ayaw at ipinaglalaban na gender binary lamang eadapt ng mga tao dahil meron biologically at meron kakayahan mag procreate ng buhay and so bale, ang na peperceive ko po is ini-aangat ng mga tao ang gender binary bilang importante at mas mahalaga sa loob ng lipunan. Bale, kung sino man ang hindi magkomporme sa gender binary na dapat tangkilik o dapat na eadapt, less important na siya o not valueble ika nga.

And so, kung eaanalyze ng mabuti, ang mga tao na meron concept na gender binary lamang ang meron prejudice at meron diskriminasyon towards sa mga tao na hindi po katulad nila. Ngayon para ma solusyon ang problema, dapat ang mga tao ang magbago ng pananaw patungkol sa mga non binary po. Dapat sila.

Gets niyo yun? Dapat sila. Dapat ma open ang mind nila na parte din po bilang norms ang mga non binary po. Ang nakikita ko po kasi na it seems like ginagawa ng mga tao as high above ang heterosexuality bilang normal sa lahat ng normal and so all the people in the whole universe must adapt sa gender binary as preferred sexual orientation.

So ang lumalabas, kayo at ang ibang tao ang meron prejudice at diskriminasyon towards sa non-binary po and ang mga nasa group ng non-binary ay humihingi ng rights o meron din silang ipinaglalaban at ang gusto lang naman nila is to get rid of prejudice and discrimination po.

Hindi naman po kasi pwede ipagpilitan ang mga non-binary na sila ang mag-adapt sa kagustuhan ng mga tao na ang preferred biologically lamang ng men at women ang tangkilikin. The reason is a homosexuality ay matagal na po existing noon hanggang ngayon. Iyon ang naturaliza na hindi pwede ma prevent. Naturaliza na kung ano ang meron sa human.

So kung gusto ng tao ma solve ang gender issue, for me, sila dapat mag-adjust. Ma open ang mind po nila sa non-binary po dahil kung hindi, malamang sa malamang, hanggang ngayon, andiyan pa rin po ang issue hanggang the end of time.

Iyon lang ang insights ko.​
 
plhbg1 Kaplok Kaplok

point all the religion all you want. But won't go down with that rabbit hole. Since hindi ako gumamit ng religion.

So science never talk about biology?


pwde kang mag contribute lods. Hahahaha
I actually don't want to get too much into this, but for me, I think that we should let people do what they want and just let them be. Afterall may iba iba naman tayong problema sa buhay so why kalabanin sila right?

"Can men get *******t", I think the answer is no, for now, but who knows? There's an infinite possibility of how future will change humanity, you know what i mean.
 
Do dig some rabbit whole not gonna go down with it. And quite some assumption as if vaid yung points nyo about religion.
Then invalidate it. Assert ka ng assert na invalid, pero you can't explain why?

Let me answer the makipagtalik sa kapwa lalaki. We all know according to science that only biological men and woman can produce another life. The reason conservative is against it since we value families is that if we stop to produce life then it will be our extinction someday. We are meant to reproduce that's the nature we have.

That is actually a good point. Now, do humans only do it for procreation like animals do? Then second, what about a gay couple devalues family, ano kinalaman nun sa extinction? Gay couples can raise families too, despite your prejudice.. saka, Hindi ba problema din ang overpopulation, hunger at inequality? Frankly, that is a more relevant problem if you look around..

Maybe you are unknowingly subscribing to the old priotioties meant for colonization sa ancient (biblical) times where bigger families are desired because they work in fields and go to war.. or are you still going to deny your religious basis?
 
Then invalidate it. Assert ka ng assert na invalid, pero you can't explain why?



That is actually a good point. Now, do humans only do it for procreation like animals do? Then second, what about a gay couple devalues family, ano kinalaman nun sa extinction? Gay couples can raise families too, despite your prejudice.. saka, Hindi ba problema din ang overpopulation, hunger at inequality? Frankly, that is a more relevant problem if you look around..

Maybe you are unknowingly subscribing to the old priotioties meant for colonization sa ancient (biblical) times where bigger families are desired because they work in fields and go to war.. or are you still going to deny your religious basis?
they can raise a family, but can't reproduce creation of a child.

you can easily counter overpopulation look at Japan what they do.

Did I even say I would deny my religious background? No, what I am saying is I am not going to that kind of debate since you people are not religious in the first. It's pointless.
 
Bakit kayo free thinker kuno kayo? Lol! don't make me laugh. As if hindi kayo brainwashed by modern view of gender ideology.
It is easy to see everything as ideology when you yourself are emotionally attached in it. Biruin mo, a movement for equality from compassion, nagagawa mong i-demonize... that is how ideologies work. Just like how the Germans were convinced to gënocide. Ideologies tend to shut down compassion by elaborate narratives, and cognitive dissonance.
 
I actually don't want to get too much into this, but for me, I think that we should let people do what they want and just let them be. Afterall may iba iba naman tayong problema sa buhay so why kalabanin sila right?

"Can men get *******t", I think the answer is no, for now, but who knows? There's an infinite possibility of how future will change humanity, you know what i mean.
you have the right to do so. But with all what is happening in the west that this gender ideology movement is targeting minors specially kids. Not gonna shot my mouth about it.
 
Did I even say I would deny my religious background? No, what I am saying is I am not going to that kind of debate since you people are not religious in the first. It's pointless.
That is actually more reason to for you to invalidate my claim that religion is not your basis. Because of us not being religious, you should defend your position by not appealing to religious thinking. It seems to me na ung parin basis mo.

So napunta tayo sa Japan. One of the most underpopulated. So what does gender E×ρréššion have anything to do with their under population? Wait... are saying you see tolerance of the lgbt means we all have to be lgbt ourselves.. slippery slope naman yata yan brad.. unless you believe homosexuality is a transmittable disease. Which is another homophobic propaganda again by religion.
 
It is easy to see everything as ideology when you yourself are emotionally attached in it. Biruin mo, a movement for equality from compassion, nagagawa mong i-demonize... that is how ideologies work. Just like how the Germans were convinced to gënocide. Ideologies tend to shut down compassion by elaborate narratives, and cognitive dissonance.
Kasi nga sayo kuno equality yung sinasabi nila. But only applies to them at sa mga simp nila. You only see the surface sa anong pinaglalaban nila. Di mo makita ang broader scope sa gender ideology movement. At di mo makita san ito nanggaling, and what made it to what it is today.

The movement is more than just gay/lesbian people to have equal rights. Marami ngang mga transgender or even part of the LGBTQ spectrum against sa movement nato. Example na jan ang nonsense na pronounce. They even have the whole month of June. At yung mga delusionals na gender identity as wolf, animals, etc.. They are producing people and glorifies fantasies. And much more targeting children minors.

Do you want drag queens to teach your children, wearing revealing clothes and acting like perverse around your own children?

That is actually more reason to for you to invalidate my claim that religion is not your basis. Because of us not being religious, you should defend your position by not appealing to religious thinking. It seems to me na ung parin basis mo.

So napunta tayo sa Japan. One of the most underpopulated. So what does gender E×ρréššion have anything to do with their under population? Wait... are saying you see tolerance of the lgbt means we all have to be lgbt ourselves.. slippery slope naman yata yan brad.. unless you believe homosexuality is a transmittable disease. Which is another homophobic propaganda again by religion.
Lol! I was just mentioning japan to counter overpopulation. It has nothing to do with the lgbtq+++
 

About this Thread

  • 178
    Replies
  • 7K
    Views
  • 16
    Participants
Last reply from:
Kaplok Kaplok

New Topics

Online now

Members online
534
Guests online
1,561
Total visitors
2,095

Forum statistics

Threads
2,274,157
Posts
28,953,924
Members
1,235,103
Latest member
North005
Back
Top