aldrian1234
Eternal Poster
Ipaliwanag sa Tagalog at magbigay ng halimbawa
1.Code of Hammurabi. Oldest known code for thousand years ago dating from 2270 B.C used by society to regulate behavior and at the same time punish those who disobeyed the rules. It established a social order based on individual rights. It is the origin of the legal principle of "Lex Talionis" or "Lex Taliones", that is, an "Eye for an Eye". During this times, in 1641, General Court of Massachusetts passed the Stubborn Child Law, which stated that children who disobeyed their parents could be put to death.
2. Roman Law and Canon (Church) Law. Approximately two thousand years ago, made distinction between juveniles and adults based on the notion Age of Responsibility..
3.Ancient Jewish Law. The Talmud specified condition under which immaturity was to be considered in imposing punishment. There was no corporal punishment prior to puberty, which was considered to be the age of twelve for females and thirteen for males. In addition, no capital punishment is to be imposed on those offenders under twenty years of age.
4. Codification of Roman Law. In 5th century B.C., this law resulted in the Twelve Tables which made it clear that children were criminally responsible for violation of law and were to be dealt with by same criminal justice system as adults. Under this law, children came to be classified as "Infans,. or "Proximus Infantiae.. In general. .infans. (7 years old below) were not held criminally responsible, but those approaching puberty (above 7 to 14 for boys and above 7-12 for girls) liability was based on their capacity to understand the difference between right and wrong.
5. Anglo Saxon Common Law (Law based on custom or usage)- The distinction made between ãdül† and juvenile offenders in England at this time are most significant. Under common law, children under the age of 7 were presumed incapable of forming criminal intent and therefore were not subject to criminal sanctions. Children between 7-14 were not subject to criminal sanctions unless it could be demonstrated that they had formed criminal intent, understood the consequences of their actions, and could distinguish right from wrong (Blackstone 1803, 22-24). Children over 14 were treated much the same as adults.
1.Code of Hammurabi. Oldest known code for thousand years ago dating from 2270 B.C used by society to regulate behavior and at the same time punish those who disobeyed the rules. It established a social order based on individual rights. It is the origin of the legal principle of "Lex Talionis" or "Lex Taliones", that is, an "Eye for an Eye". During this times, in 1641, General Court of Massachusetts passed the Stubborn Child Law, which stated that children who disobeyed their parents could be put to death.
2. Roman Law and Canon (Church) Law. Approximately two thousand years ago, made distinction between juveniles and adults based on the notion Age of Responsibility..
3.Ancient Jewish Law. The Talmud specified condition under which immaturity was to be considered in imposing punishment. There was no corporal punishment prior to puberty, which was considered to be the age of twelve for females and thirteen for males. In addition, no capital punishment is to be imposed on those offenders under twenty years of age.
4. Codification of Roman Law. In 5th century B.C., this law resulted in the Twelve Tables which made it clear that children were criminally responsible for violation of law and were to be dealt with by same criminal justice system as adults. Under this law, children came to be classified as "Infans,. or "Proximus Infantiae.. In general. .infans. (7 years old below) were not held criminally responsible, but those approaching puberty (above 7 to 14 for boys and above 7-12 for girls) liability was based on their capacity to understand the difference between right and wrong.
5. Anglo Saxon Common Law (Law based on custom or usage)- The distinction made between ãdül† and juvenile offenders in England at this time are most significant. Under common law, children under the age of 7 were presumed incapable of forming criminal intent and therefore were not subject to criminal sanctions. Children between 7-14 were not subject to criminal sanctions unless it could be demonstrated that they had formed criminal intent, understood the consequences of their actions, and could distinguish right from wrong (Blackstone 1803, 22-24). Children over 14 were treated much the same as adults.