🕯️ Traditions Canada's Woke Nightmare: A warning from the West. (Canada has become the "wokest" country)

bill c-11 only requires user-generated content to promote canadian content which is okay lang naman kasi nationalism yan eh

bill c-16 adds "gender identity or E×ρréššion" as a prohibited ground of discrimination which i strongly support

secondly, the bill makes it a criminal offense to incite or promote hatred (this is where intentional use of offending pronouns go) because of gender identity or gender E×ρréššion which i again strongly support
You're still reading on the surface.

Bill C-11, is a form of control sa media to "promote canadian content". You can promote your own media in many possible cases not forcing it on people. Even Google and Meta is reacting with it. Even youtubers from canada is reacting with it. Kasi yung mga content nila is "force" only to canada.

Bill C-16, gender E×ρréššion nga. But will force people even those not believing in this nonesense to use it. If not then they will recieved fines? Wait what? fines for this pronounce nonsense? that is against freedom of E×ρréššion. Then what if you will not pay the fines? Then Jail.
 
You're still reading on the surface.

Bill C-11, is a form of control sa media to "promote canadian content". You can promote your own media in many possible cases not forcing it on people. Even Google and Meta is reacting with it. Even YøùTùbérs from canada is reacting with it. Kasi yung mga content nila is "force" only to canada.
i still see nothing wrong in promoting the country's very own talents boss, nationalist din kasi ako eh, at kahit we look at the performance of the bill in the House of Commons it gained a majority of 196 votes against 112 that opposed it, voice of canadian people yan boss, sadly people like you is not very well represented in Canada
Bill C-16, gender E×ρréššion nga. But will force people even those not believing in this nonesense to use it. If not then they will recieved fines? Wait what? fines for this pronounce nonsense? that is against freedom of E×ρréššion. Then what if you will not pay the fines? Then Jail.
gender identity boss is also a form of E×ρréššion and by using offensive pronouns to them makes you the first one to infringe their freedom of E×ρréššion by promoting hate on the basis of gender
 
well wala kaming magagawa sayo kung hindi mo naiintindihan yung salitang "LAHAT"​
Naiintindihan ko. Based on kung ano ang nakasulat, lumalabas na "kami" or "sila" dapat mag-adjust para sa "ideal" niyo upang walang masagasaan. Ganerin ang lumalabas. E di as a result ay maka-old traditional patriarchal pa rin ang mga tao dito sa pilipinas na hino-hold on pa rin ang influenced ng spaniards (sinakop kase tayo ng 300 years) kung kaya, lumalabas na kung ang topic ilan dito ay nagcocomplain na keyso totalitarian ideology raw kamo mask by democratic , wala tayo ipinagkaiba sa kanila na ang ideology natin ay mala-theocratic ang dating mask by democratic which influenced by "spaniards".

Fear is an illusion po kase. Minsan yung fear natin ay wala naman fear sa ibang tao po dahil align sa kanila ang morality na tinatangkilik po nila.

Well, kung gusto niyo o ibang tao na sila ang masunod according sa ideal na hawak, fine, e di done. Natapos na po ang usapan. Kayo na po ang nalalo. That means hindi na mababago ang mga mentality ng mga tao dito sa bansang Pilipinas. Naka-fix na po siya. Wala na tayo magagawa pero iyon nga lang, expected talaga na meron ibang tao na mag-aayaw.

End na po. Bahala kayo. Iyan ang gusto ng mga tao. Walang pilitan. Basta ako , ayaw ko magconform kung anong meron kayo. Iyon lang iyon.​
 
Naiintindihan ko. Based on kung ano ang nakasulat, lumalabas na "kami" or "sila" dapat mag-adjust para sa "ideal" niyo upang walang masagasaan. Ganerin ang lumalabas. E di as a result ay maka-old traditional patriarchal pa rin ang mga tao dito sa pilipinas na hino-hold on pa rin ang influenced ng spaniards (sinakop kase tayo ng 300 years) kung kaya, lumalabas na kung ang topic ilan dito ay nagcocomplain na keyso totalitarian ideology raw kamo mask by democratic , wala tayo ipinagkaiba sa kanila na ang ideology natin ay mala-theocratic ang dating mask by democratic which influenced by "spaniards".

Fear is an illusion po kase. Minsan yung fear natin ay wala naman fear sa ibang tao po dahil align sa kanila ang morality na tinatangkilik po nila.

Well, kung gusto niyo o ibang tao na sila ang masunod according sa ideal na hawak, fine, e di done. Natapos na po ang usapan. Kayo na po ang nalalo. That means hindi na mababago ang mga mentality ng mga tao dito sa bansang Pilipinas. Naka-fix na po siya. Wala na tayo magagawa pero iyon nga lang, expected talaga na meron ibang tao na mag-aayaw.

End na po. Bahala kayo. Iyan ang gusto ng mga tao. Walang pilitan. Basta ako , ayaw ko magconform kung anong meron kayo. Iyon lang iyon.​
you are a very confused child I pity you really.
 
you are a very confused child I pity you really.​
Hoy. Judgemental ka. Inend ko na nga at sabi ko na nga sige, palalo na kayo. Imbis pasalamatan mo ako. Ganyan ang sasabihin mo sa akin? Ganyan ang tingin mo sa akin dahil ayaw ko lang mag conform? Huwag mo ako ipilit sa gusto niyo. Me pa confused-confused ka pang nalalaman. You are very judgemental person. I really, really pity you.
 
Hoy. Judgemental ka. Inend ko na nga at sabi ko na nga sige, palalo na kayo. Imbis pasalamatan mo ako. Ganyan ang sasabihin mo sa akin? Ganyan ang tingin mo sa akin dahil ayaw ko lang mag conform? Huwag mo ako ipilit sa gusto niyo. Me pa confused-confused ka pang nalalaman. You are very judgemental person. I really, really pity you.
so 1+1=11? tas yung nag sabi ng 2 ay mali kasi judgemental sila sayo? yea you're a really confused and mentally ill child. we pity you we hope you get mentally check.
 
so 1+1=11? tas yung nag sabi ng 2 ay mali kasi judgemental sila sayo? yea you're a really confused and mentally ill child. we pity you we hope you get mentally check.​
Oo. Judgemental iyan. Pinagpipilitan niyo ako na confuse ako kahit hindi. Pinagpipilitan niyo ako na mentally ill dahil ang nakita ay post lang mismo. Lintik. Away na ba ito ha? Pagkatapos forum lang? Asan ang proof na mentally ill? Sige nga. Means judgemental iyan. It means tumatalon kayo sa conclusion na hindi niyo nakikita in person. Ano tawag diyan? Judgemental po. Ang nakita niyo lang ay post na sinabi ko lang na ayaw ko mag conform. Pinagpipilitan niyo ako maging katulad niyo ako mag isip para masabi lang na hindi mentally ill. Bwiset kayo. Sampilitan ang gusto na gawin sa akin ha kahit ayaw ko.

Sige nga. Explain niyo. Yung the way na pagsusulat ng tao , andoon ba ang proof para masabi na mentally ill ang tao po? Sa text on mobile phone , andoon din ba ang basehan para masabi na mentally ill ang tao? Sa the way na pagdradrawing ng tao na mahilig sa dark theme , andoon ba mapagbabasehan na mentally ill ang tao ha? Asan ang basehan doon? Based on nakikita ng mata , na fefeel niyo lang pero hindi niyo nakikita.

Sobrang shallow ang pagka judgement niyo uy. Walang katuturan!

Kapag hindi niya naipaliwanag na detail by detail po , KAYO ANG MAY SIRA SA ULO!! Nababaliw na kayo as in. Meron na kayo psychological issue.

At least , ako , tama ang parata ko na judgemental nga talaga.

Ano ngayon? Hindi niyo na maipaliwanag. See? Sasabi-sabi. Wala naman basehan.​
 
i still see nothing wrong in promoting the country's very own talents boss, nationalist din kasi ako eh, at kahit we look at the performance of the bill in the House of Commons it gained a majority of 196 votes against 112 that opposed it, voice of canadian people yan boss, sadly people like you is not very well represented in Canada
196 is not whole voice of Canada. Lol, di mo kasi gets kasi di ko don namumuhay. Marami akong kakila family related at kaibigan. Na naninirahan dun. At yung reaction nila is same sa mga youtuber canadian. At sa Google at Meta. You're not really reading between the lines.
gender identity boss is also a form of E×ρréššion and by using offensive pronouns to them makes you the first one to infringe their freedom of E×ρréššion by promoting hate on the basis of gender
What offensive pronouns? Di mo ata gets yung issue eh. Laliman mo pa at mag basa ng mabuti.
 
196 is not whole voice of Canada. Lol, di mo kasi gets kasi di ko don namumuhay. Marami akong kakila family related at kaibigan. Na naninirahan dun. At yung reaction nila is same sa mga YøùTùbér canadian. At sa Google at Meta. You're not really reading between the lines.
majority is always been the voice of a democratic society boss, the keyword is majority, don't confuse it with 100% sweep, kahit ano pang ngal-ngal mo diyan it still doesn't deny the fact that people like you is not well represented in Canada, you just belong to the minority
What offensive pronouns? Di mo ata gets yung issue eh. Laliman mo pa at mag basa ng mabuti.
all pronouns can become offensive boss if you use them intentionally to people who don't prefer to be called as such
 
majority is always been the voice of a democratic society boss, the keyword is majority, don't confuse it with 100% sweep, kahit ano pang ngal-ngal mo diyan it still doesn't deny the fact that people like you is not well represented in Canada, you just belong to the minority
Again, you only know how to read the surface. Beneath it nothing you see or you just blind. Why are you talking to me? Are you saying the Google Meta and the majority of the Canadian Youtubers who are directly affected the the rules are the "minority"? Di ka kasi nandun kaya all you know is the surface.
all pronouns can become offensive boss if you use them intentionally to people who don't prefer to be called as such
Panong all pronouns can be offensive? Read again
 
Again, you only know how to read the surface. Beneath it nothing you see or you just blind. Why are you talking to me? Are you saying the Google Meta and the majority of the Canadian YøùTùbérs who are directly affected the the rules are the "minority"? Di ka kasi nandun kaya all you know is the surface.
hehe youtube and meta pala yung standard representation boss? akala ko kasi the Parliament is the standard representation through the process of election, kasi if that is true then that would as well apply dito sa Pinas kasi ang dami din ninyo sa internet dito hehe
Panong all pronouns can be offensive? Read again
the "he" pronoun boss is harmless by itself, it only becomes offensive when it is used intentionally to a person who doesn't prefer to be called as such
 
hehe YøùTùbé and meta pala yung standard representation boss? akala ko kasi the Parliament is the standard representation through the process of election, kasi if that is true then that would as well apply dito sa Pinas kasi ang dami din ninyo sa internet dito hehe
Lol! Hahahahaha. San naba ang isip mo lods? Mag isip pa lods kasi kulang pa.
the "he" pronoun boss is harmless by itself, it only becomes offensive when it is used intentionally to a person who doesn't prefer to be called as such
So basically, you want to force to people's throats this gender pronounces nonsense na sila hindi naman nag sasang-ayon dun?
 
Lol! Hahahahaha. San naba ang isip mo lods? Mag isip pa lods kasi kulang pa.
di mo lang ma-argue boss kaya nag comment ka na lang sakin bwahahaha
So basically, you want to force to people's throats this gender pronounces nonsense na sila hindi naman nag sasang-ayon dun?
you are NOT in any way forced to say anything boss, you always have the option to keep your mouth shut juice ko lerd
 
di mo lang ma-argue boss kaya nag comment ka na lang sakin bwahahaha

you are NOT in any way forced to say anything boss, you always have the option to keep your mouth shut juice ko lerd
Na argue na boss. Di lang talaga gets yung punto.

force lods. Di ka ata nag basa sa Bill c 16 Lol!
 
Na argue na boss. Di lang talaga gets yung punto.
buti na lang walang voting rights si youtube and meta users or else mababaliktad yung democracy nila haha
force lods. Di ka ata nag basa sa Bill c 16 Lol!
ahaha sino may sabi? yung minority? yan yung ginamit nilang argument during the debate:

"Jordan Peterson, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, criticized the bill, saying that it would compel speech. Peterson argued that the law would classify the failure to use preferred pronouns of transgender people as hate speech."

sabi ko sayo people like you are only a minority in Canada
 
buti na lang walang voting rights si YøùTùbé and meta users or else mababaliktad yung democracy nila haha
Lol your still not reading between the lines. As I've had said over and over again. I know how democracy and the parliamentary works. What I always point out was the said laws are not in line with democracy. Because it controls.
ahaha sino may sabi? yung minority? yan yung ginamit nilang argument during the debate:

"Jordan Peterson, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, criticized the bill, saying that it would compel speech. Peterson argued that the law would classify the failure to use preferred pronouns of transgender people as hate speech."

sabi ko sayo people like you are only a minority in Canada
Hahahah. Lol!

Jordan Peterson is against this gender pronounce. Di mo ata kilala si JP eh.

"Jordan Peterson, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, criticized the bill, saying that it would compel speech. Peterson argued that the law would classify the failure to use preferred pronouns of transgender people as hate speech."
- Pati pa tong quote nato di mo gets, di mo kasi binabasa ang buong context.

Link: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
Lol your still not reading between the lines. As I've had said over and over again. I know how democracy and the parliamentary works. What I always point out was the said laws are not in line with democracy. Because it controls.
ilang beses ko ding sinabi na minority lang ang nagsasabi na hindi in line with democracy yung laws, argument yan ng minority so babalik pa din tayo sa people like you are only a minority
Hahahah. Lol!

Jordan Peterson is against this gender pronounce. Di mo ata kilala si JP eh.

"Jordan Peterson, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, criticized the bill, saying that it would compel speech. Peterson argued that the law would classify the failure to use preferred pronouns of transgender people as hate speech."
- Pati pa tong quote nato di mo gets, di mo kasi binabasa ang buong context.

Link: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
so ngayon mo lang na-gets na he is an example of people like you? bwahaha proof ko yan siya that your argument is just a minoriy with him being the counterpart of you in Canada
 
ilang beses ko ding sinabi na minority lang ang nagsasabi na hindi in line with democracy yung laws, argument yan ng minority so babalik pa din tayo sa people like you are only a minority
Lol! The minority argument is nowhere near the very point I am trying to convey. You missed the details. Even then YouTubers are not a minority because they are part of the modern media. And they are indirectly influenced by these laws. Meta and Google are not minorities since they are one of the big tech giants on the planet.
so ngayon mo lang na-gets na he is an example of people like you? bwahaha proof ko yan siya that your argument is just a minoriy with him being the counterpart of you in Canada
JP is nowhere near the so-called minority that you mention. Lol! The Canadian Association of Psychology would not threaten him if He was not influential. He is a psychologist and knows that this gender ideology movement is a sham.
 
Lol! The minority argument is nowhere near the very point I am trying to convey. You missed the details. Even then YøùTùbérs are not a minority because they are part of the modern media. And they are indirectly influenced by these laws. Meta and Google are not minorities since they are one of the big tech giants on the planet.
no boss, they still need to comply if they want their services to be consumed by Canadians

secondly, the law does not only cover the companies but their users as well if they want their content to be consumed by Canadians

the second one is what i am talking about na buti na lang wala silang voting rights at hindi si youtube at meta mismo juice ko lerd
JP is nowhere near the so-called minority that you mention. Lol! The Canadian Association of Psychology would not threaten him if He was not influential. He is a psychologist and knows that this gender ideology movement is a sham.
ahaha not a minority daw but he can't even convince the majority of the parliament with his super duper awesome argument haha as i've said your argument is just being represented by the minority
 
no boss, they still need to comply if they want their services to be consumed by Canadians

secondly, the law does not only cover the companies but their users as well if they want their content to be consumed by Canadians

the second one is what i am talking about na buti na lang wala silang voting rights at hindi si YøùTùbé at meta mismo juice ko lerd
Lol! Ang layo pa rin ng sagot mo lods. Anong ginagawa mo. Basa ulit lods. You're going circles without addressing the issue.

ahaha not a minority daw but he can't even convince the majority of the parliament with his super duper awesome argument haha as i've said your argument is just being represented by the minority
The majority of the parliament is Left Wing Woke Bastard. What do you expect? Lol! The point is your argument of this so-called "minority argument" does not change the fact that Canada is going downhill with the said laws.
 

About this Thread

  • 197
    Replies
  • 7K
    Views
  • 19
    Participants
Last reply from:
mutagenesisx

Online now

Members online
1,030
Guests online
950
Total visitors
1,980

Forum statistics

Threads
2,272,762
Posts
28,945,112
Members
1,236,401
Latest member
killerfrost
Back
Top