🔒 Closed My take on Telco expropriation by Duterte

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fried Rice
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sa ngayon hirap si Dennis Uy sa pagpatayo ng infrastructure ng DITO ngayon. Delayed sila dahil 300 out of 1300 cell sites lang ang naggawa nila. Dapat July 8 this year na technical launch nila.
May mga unverified na balita about sa pricing ng DITO na mas cheap sila compared sa smart at globe.


Ano mangyayari if expropriated na talaga sila by december?
- If expropriated yung mga mga assets ni globe at smart, makukuha ni DITO ang mga cell sites nila.
edit: di pala mabibigay kay DITO yung assets ni globe at smart, pwede lang ilagay si DITO sa mga cell sites nila. Credits to Berto Pogi.
Which means Dito would have the same quality of service sa internet ni globe at smart.
That would be the same bad service ngayon. Possibly the same price and quality. (cell sites ang batayan ng quality ng internet nila.)
  • DITO monopoly(depende sa range ng expropriation, oh wala nang competition congrats)
    edit: may monopoly pa rin, close daw eh.
  • China Telco would have access to our internet infrastructure(possible censorship at compromised na privacy natin, no choice tayo sila na lng ISP natin)
  • Government controlled yung internet natin.(kung idol niyo si duterte ngayon ok kayo, pero ano na mangyayari pag bumaba na siya? magugustuhan niyo kaya yung bagong presidente at ang kontrol nito?)

ano yung dapat na action natin?
  • tell the president to extend the date of his expropriation threat by next year, ideally some time pagkatapos ng march 2021(bagong date yan sa pag launch ni DITO), para ma judge natin yung quality ni DITO.
  • kung mababa rin yung quality of service ni DITO, it would stop the president from expropriating the two telcos. It would prove na mahirap maging ISP dito sa Pilipinas or not.
 
Wow, grabi kailangan pa bigyan ng fund globe at pldt para lang magimprove sila. Pagusapang pera marami nayan tagal na nilang isp ng pinas, kaya wag nila irason pera
 
Permit permit pa bago naman takutin yang globe at pldt nagpapatayo na sila ng cell site, kung di pa talaga magkaroon 3rd isp walang improvement yan
 
Nakita ko dun sa comment ni sir, ifund daw globe at pldt. Bakit ifufund pa eh 2 lang sila naglalaban na isp, busog lusog na sa pera mga yan, kung di pa takutin ni duterte di yan magiimprove.
Pag sa permit naman, bago takutin ninduterte yan nagpagawa na globe at pldt ng mga bagong tower kaya wag nila irason permit, kung di pa dadating telco, di na magiimprove yan

Pagusapang security, nakakatakot din usa at singapore di lang china.
 
[XX='Fried Rice, c: 197107, m: 671488'][/XX] malalaman pa matin yan kung operational na ng Dito telecoms. malalaman din natin ko totoo o hindi yung conapiracy na pini-piga ngaba tayo ni globo at talino or talagang mahirap at malaki yung operational cost nagpag patayo nang mga telecom infrastructure.
 
[XX='Cosmic_Ray_MutagenesisX, c: 199917, m: 262490'][/XX] yup, yan kasi yung pinag uusapan ng mga IT prof sa college last time about sa pagpabilis ng internet natin at kung bakit mabagal ito.
yung problema lang paps, december yung warning sa closure ni globe at smart, kung mangyayari yan di natin malalaman kung mas maganda si DITO dahil march pa yung launch nito at kung mahirap nga ba talaga mag patayo ng internet sa pinas.
 
Hi magkokoment ako but this is not against you! Our Telcos right now are not gaining money or profits in their business, cause they install more Towers every location to provide you a better service. As far as I know Telcos are improving when in terms of Internet but there are so many îllégâl repeaters who interact TELCOS connections which cause some location's towers congested or unstable in providing connections to everyone!!

Salute to our fastest internet in the universe. Philippines!
 
Puro conspiracy theories haha alam mo ba gano kahirap magtayo ng isang tower dito sa atin ? Idagdag mo pa yung hiwa hiwalay na isla na nagpapahirap sa pagtransport ng materials, di lang kasalanan ng providers kung bakit mahal at pangit serbisyo nila. May blame din dito ang government na pagkamahal ng singil bago makapag tayo ng isang tower
 
[XX='Syenderr, c: 200273, m: 1369445'][/XX] pagusapang budget di kapanipaniwala talaga.
Pag samin conspiracy theories tawag mo, pag sayo hindi 😅
Kung ayaw nila mageffort magimprove, parating naman DITO, panigurado marami lilipat.
 
[XX='el Punisher, c: 200386, m: 1751710'][/XX] anong sarcasm diyan?
problema yan ngayon
 
[XX='el Punisher, c: 200384, m: 1751710'][/XX] di nga matapos ni DITO yung 1300 cell sites nila, na delay yung launch nila dahil 300 pa lang yung naggawa, tapos sasabihin mo yan.
 
[XX='evanzron, c: 200897, m: 670920'][/XX] nga eh hahaha, kakaumay talaga mga taong ganyan.
 
SOLOMONIC NOT SOMORONIC SOLUTION



By Philip M. Lustre jr.

CONGRESSIONAL leaders knew it was patently wrong. Rodrigo Duterte could not expropriate the assets of the two major telcos – PLDT Group and Globe Telecom – and give them to the favored third telecom – Dito Telecommunity.
While the cash register kept on ringing in their ears over the possibility of bigger takes from the two telcos, the more cerebral congressional leaders have understood it would be untenable, or even suicidal, for Congress to legislate the demise of two telcos to favor an upstart, which has yet to establish a track record in the local market.
In brief, Congress could not enact an expropriation law to take away the assets of the two telcos and give them to Dito Tel. A robust and competitive telecommunications industry does not operate on the basis of presidential rants that when the two telcos could not provide what Duterte perceives as sufficient service, he could take away their assets and give them to another telecommunications player.
To enable Duterte to escape from the sticky and embarrassing situation, congressional leaders have added a provision in the proposed Bayanihan To Heal as One Act – Part 2, suspending for three years the submission of most permits needed to build new cell towers nationwide to improve telecommunications services. According to Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon between 29 to 35 permit and documentary requirements have to be issued by local government units (LGUs) before a telco could get a permit to build a cell tower.
The relaxation of the regulatory environment under the Bayanihan Act -2 opens the burgeoning cell tower construction business to open competition, enabling private non-telco firms to join and build cell towers for rent to telcos. It gives the third telco the chance to catch with the rollout of its infrastructures to start its commercial operations in March 2021 and slug it out in the open telecommunications market. It does away the planned expropriation law, which has become irrelevant.
Lawmakers have said Congress would ratify on Monday (Aug. 24) the proposed Bayanihan Act -2, putting in place the second law to enable the Duterte administration to respond adequately to the pandemic caused by the China-Duterte Virus. It provides a total budget of P140 billion to include doleout to poor families, mass testing and contact tracing, and doleout to affected tourism-related businesses, among others.
In his July 26 SONA, Duterte has threatened the two telcos of expropriation mainly because of “poor service” and indicated he would give their assets to his Chinese friends, who are having a hard time putting up Dito Tel.
Camouflaging his intention of their expropriation by saying “the people wanted improvement of the services” of the two telecommunications giants, Duterte appeared bent to deliver the coup de grace in 2021 by strongly hinting to Congress that it would play a role in the enactment of a major legislation that could lead to their expropriation.
Expropriation is the act of a government to claim privately owned property against the wishes of the owners, ostensibly to be used for the benefit of the general public.
Dito Tel is behind schedule on the rollout of its infrastructure. It is near to impossible to meet its obligations, commitments, and requirements in its Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN), which serves as the contract between the government and the telco.
Addressing a Senate public hearing on July 1, Adel Tamano, chief administrative officer, said Dito Tel was having a hard time fulfilling its CPCN. Tamano cited the adverse effects of the pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus for Dito Tem’s inability to meet its commitments in the CPCN. He blamed the delay to movement restrictions caused by strict lockdown measures from mid-March until the end of May 2020.
“The COVID-19 and lockdowns prevented us from our full rollout. With the subsequent easing of different lockdown situations, we are doing our best to get back on track,” Tamano said. Also, the pandemic has affected China, which is Dito Tel’s main source of technological knowhow and raw materials, including the rolling stocks for its construction and infrastructure works.
Under its CPCN, Dito Tel’s “technical launch” was scheduled on July 7 this year, but it has to be postponed in November this year. No date has been fixed. Its CPCN requires Dito Tel to build initially at least 1,300 cell towers nationwide and provide digital service at a speed of 27 Mbp. According to Tamano, Dito Telecom has built 300 cell towers, or a backlog of 1,000 cell sites.
Concerning the legal basis of the envisioned expropriation of Globe and PLDT assets , the 1987 Constitution allows expropriation of private landholdings and ill-gotten assets, but is quiet on private assets to be given to another private entity, specifically a favored one.
The Constitution allows expropriation proceedings on landholdings for public use under its power of eminent domain. In fact, RA 10729, or the Right of Way Act, has been enacted during the incumbency of Benigno Aquino III mainly to hasten construction of road projects and other infrastructures.
Expropriation proceedings for PLDT and Globe Telecom assets could not be invoked because they have been rightfully acquired and do not in any way constitute ill-gotten wealth. Acquiring their assets mainly because they have failed to provide “adequate services” is a weak argument and does not rest on solid legal, albeit moral, grounds.


https://philipjrlustre.phc.onl/#forbidden#/2020/08/solomonic-not-somoronic-solution.html?spref=tw
 
do you think they can still expropriate them kahit may ganitong batas?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 147
    Replies
  • 3K
    Views
  • 18
    Participants
Last reply from:
Unknown user

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
1,097
Guests online
1,072
Total visitors
2,169

Forum statistics

Threads
2,271,524
Posts
28,936,155
Members
1,238,648
Latest member
grgmoves
Back
Top