🕯️ Traditions EVERYTHING WRONG WITH EVOLUTION

[ken_rebirth]

Your grace, what i find very appealing is this.

1. Are you referring to "STRANGE NOTION"? If so, instead of asking why that site was "founded" by theism, WHY CANT YOU JUST ASK, WHY DID TIM WROTE AN ARTICLE ON THAT SITE? NOT JUST ONE ARTICLE BUT TWO PARTS??

I AM STILL WAITING FOR THAT "FRIEND" OF YOURS (IF HE REALLY IS "A SEPARATE" FRIEND OF YOURS"), AN ACTUAL STATEMENT FROM TIM SAYING "I AM NOT THE ONE WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE"...........
AND IF YOU MAY, MAYBE YOU CAN SEND US SOME SCREENSHOT OF A STATEMENT FROM HIM SAYING HE DID NOT DO IT..

Because if you guys cant, WE THEIST WILL CONTINUE TO BELIEVE THAT HE WROTE IT...
And it will be very silly to "DENY" a work of SOMEONE.
SPECIALLY IF HE HAVE AN ACTUAL DEGREE...


BTW, in other Country your Grace, Strange Notion can be sued if they will MISQUOTE someone.......But that article is still in there.......WHY DO YOU THINK???

2. And about ICR..... Your Grace, Will you just DISCREDIT a work of someone with PH.D, REGARDLESS OF HIS BELIEF??
JEFFREY P. TOMPKINS = PhD in GENETICS
ERIN WAYMAN = M.A in Anthropology.

IM SO SORRY YOUR GRACE, But:

Anthropologists are scientists who study the development and behaviors of human beings throughout the world, present and past, to help better understand humanity as a whole. They examine biological, archaeological, linguistic or sociocultural traditions, depending on their area of expertise.

Geneticist is a biologist who studies genetics, the science of genes, heredity, and variation of organisms.

WHO BARES MORE WEIGHT??


3. "I cant value their opinion (because they are deliberately bias)"
ISN'T IT THAT SMITHSONIAN SITE A PURE ATHEIST SITE????? I THINK THAT IS CALLED BEING "BIASED"??
Don't you think, Your Grace??

We are only on #2........
There are still 5 more...
Hope you keep up..]
Please Keep Up..
We are yet to talk about good stuff..



PS, Please be careful with your replies Your Grace... I can easily spot a "duplicate"...
And I think it will be "funny" to know that I am only dealing with an alter.

You posted the article of Jeffrey Tompkins to defend your statement regarding the difference of CHROMOSOMES of Humans and Chimpanzees (am i correct?).

on the other hand, on a DIFFERENT TOPIC, I posted the content of Smithsonian.com to support 'HOW HUMANS ARE PRIMATES' and the author of that content is named Erin Wayman.

The purpose of sharing the two article are differ. i did not post the article of 'HUMANS are PRIMATES' to defend against your article of 'Chromosomes of Humans and Chimpanzees'. I hoped you followed this.

Then, all of a sudden you compare them and asked who bares more weight, this is ILLOGICAL or NONSENSE.
You even posted their profession and explain what is the meaning of their profession.

Look, i think your brain is derailed. You cant follow your own statement, you cant follow story line. this happens if you posted out of 2nd hand information without even READING and DIGESTING it. I may accuse you of 'mema lang?'.

'Please keep up?' (smh)

 

[homer_simpson]

With all due respect..
As this post stated, THIS IS ONLY FOR ME AND KEN_REBIRTH..

WE DONT NEED OTHER PEOPLE COMMENTING HERE..


Pangalawa ka na sa mga atheist dito na di marunong sumunod sa rules..
Common ba yan sa inyo??

Pakidelete tong pos mo, salamat...

Why don't engage in a private conversation then?

Let me remind you, you started a thread in a PUBLIC forum. If you can point us to ANY rules suggesting that posting in a public forum is not allowed, that would be appreciated.

By the way, what's your point? To flaunt all your BIBLICAL ENCYCLOPEDIC knowledge? Is that the true way to salvation? Why don't you just stick to the very basic such as the Golden Rule? Extremely simple yet practical.

The topics that you raised are becoming more academic that you probably need a PhD in order to comprehend all your mumbling?

What can you say, bb_aglessqueen?

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

You posted the article of Jeffrey Tompkins to defend your statement regarding the difference of CHROMOSOMES of Humans and Chimpanzees (am i correct?).

on the other hand, on a DIFFERENT TOPIC, I posted the content of Smithsonian.com to support 'HOW HUMANS ARE PRIMATES' and the author of that content is named Erin Wayman.

The purpose of sharing the two article are differ. i did not post the article of 'HUMANS are PRIMATES' to defend against your article of 'Chromosomes of Humans and Chimpanzees'. I hoped you followed this.

Then, all of a sudden you compare them and asked who bares more weight, this is ILLOGICAL or NONSENSE.
You even posted their profession and explain what is the meaning of their profession.

Look, i think your brain is derailed. You cant follow your own statement, you cant follow story line. this happens if you posted out of 2nd hand information without even READING and DIGESTING it. I may accuse you of 'mema lang?'.

'Please keep up?' (smh)

I think this is exactly what you've said Your Grace..

That is why I replied with their DEGREE because as for you, I NEED TO VALIDATE THE SITE / Which includes the EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF THE WRITERS..

Is that wrong Your Grace??


BTW, Your Grace... I appreciate you saying this kind words...

I also think this is VERY appropriate for a HARMONIOUS, FRUITFUL and MEANINGFUL DEBATE..



I am still waiting these things from you, Your Grace:

1. You posting a screenshot of Tim denying his works in Strangenotion site.
2. You denying that Smithsomian site is pure atheist site.
3. You assuring me that I am not dealing with an alter.

Can I have at least answers for each?
Or shall we just continue with the rest of those "LIES" I posted??

PLEASE KEEP UP..
PLEASE DONT SHAKE YOUR HEAD, IT WILL BE VERY BAD FOR YOUR NUMBERED BRAIN CELLS..

 

[jayendecastro]

Miron lang...makikiraan

 

[jayendecastro]

7. The GROWING numbers of Scientist disproving Evolution.

Did you know that there are more than 1,000 (and are still growing) SCIENTIST who signed a petition to "Carefully Examine the Evidence of Evolution" because they are Skeptical? YOU CAN FREELY DOWNLOAD THE LIST OF THOSE SCIENTIST WHO DONT SUPPORT EVOLUTION. Don't wory, most of them have Ph.D Your Grace. Most of them are not as stupid as me. ☺


You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.?You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now./
(remove that ONE "?")

It took them 15years to collect 1000+ signatures.


Shady credentials and quite a small portion lang ng scientific community


Project Steve - as of March 2017 got 1,412 signatures from scientist whose first name is Steve.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - gathered 7,733 signatures from scientists in FOUR FREAKING DAYS...FOUR!!!

 

[ken_rebirth]

I think this is exactly what you've said Your Grace..
View attachment 684343
That is why I replied with their DEGREE because as for you, I NEED TO VALIDATE THE SITE / Which includes the EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND OF THE WRITERS..

Is that wrong Your Grace??


BTW, Your Grace... I appreciate you saying this kind words...
View attachment 684347
I also think this is VERY appropriate for a HARMONIOUS, FRUITFUL and MEANINGFUL DEBATE..
View attachment 684362


I am still waiting these things from you, Your Grace:

1. You posting a screenshot of Tim denying his works in Strangenotion site.
2. You denying that Smithsomian site is pure atheist site.
3. You assuring me that I am not dealing with an alter.

Can I have at least answers for each?
Or shall we just continue with the rest of those "LIES" I posted??

PLEASE KEEP UP..
PLEASE DONT SHAKE YOUR HEAD, IT WILL BE VERY BAD FOR YOUR NUMBERED BRAIN CELLS..

ok..

'WHO BARES MORE WEIGHT?? '
so what does this sentence mean btw? isn't that a form of comparison? do we need someone with a PhD to validate that this sentence is a form of comparison? why even bother to put that if your intention is just to support your claim and add the meaning of their degree?

You have the ability to duck on the main point don't you think?
at the very least concede that it is ILLOGICAL to compare the two person.

about your list.
1. why would i post SS from that O'Neill? and deny? i dont get you.
2. smithsonian is not an PURE atheist site as you accuse.
i posted that site just to backup WIKIPEDIA from my point of 'HUMANS are PRIMATES'.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Read carefully, and find the word atheist there. and atleast give a comment on WIKIPEDIA saying 'HUMANS are PRIMATES' and not just on smithsonanmag.
3. You are getting PARANOIA.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

ok..

'WHO BARES MORE WEIGHT?? '
so what does this sentence mean btw? isn't that a form of comparison? do we need someone with a PhD to validate that this sentence is a form of comparison? why even bother to put that if your intention is just to support your claim and add the meaning of their degree?

You have the ability to duck on the main point don't you think?
at the very least concede that it is ILLOGICAL to compare the two person.

about your list.
1. why would i post SS from that O'Neill? and deny? i dont get you.
2. smithsonian is not an PURE atheist site as you accuse.
i posted that site just to backup WIKIPEDIA from my point of 'HUMANS are PRIMATES'.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Read carefully, and find the word atheist there. and atleast give a comment on WIKIPEDIA saying 'HUMANS are PRIMATES' and not just on smithsonanmag.
3. You are getting PARANOIA.

Your Grace, those "kind" words of yours....

Would you still want to continue with this "harmonious" , "meaningful" and "fruitful" debate??

BTW, Wikipedia dont bare much weight on a debate because it can be edited by anyone...
Dont you know that?



You can do better than that, Your Grace...

 

[ken_rebirth]

Your Grace, those "kind" words of yours....
View attachment 685192
Would you still want to continue with this "harmonious" , "meaningful" and "fruitful" debate??

BTW, Wikipedia dont bare much weight on a debate because it can be edited by anyone...
Dont you know that?



You can do better than that, Your Grace...

Yep, i think you're DONE.
all you did so far is duck on the main point.

'BTW, Wikipedia dont bare much weight on a debate because it can be edited by anyone...
Dont you know that?'

i'm aware with this, that's why WIKIPEDIA is so reliable and a good source for information.
but can be edited FOOLISHLY? MALICIOUSLY? its not.
but if you can DEMONSTRATE IT. if you can edit my shared post, added YOUR NAME there and put 'EVERYTHING IS WRONG IN EVOLUTION' and accepted, YOU WIN this debate.
but until not, kindly stop spreading WRONG INFORMATION about Evolution and keep your mouth shut about it.

 

[jayendecastro]

Yep, i think you're DONE.
all you did so far is duck on the main point.

'BTW, Wikipedia dont bare much weight on a debate because it can be edited by anyone...
Dont you know that?'

i'm aware with this, that's why WIKIPEDIA is so reliable and a good source for information.
but can be edited FOOLISHLY? MALICIOUSLY? its not.
but if you can DEMONSTRATE IT. if you can edit my shared post, added YOUR NAME there and put 'EVERYTHING IS WRONG IN EVOLUTION' and accepted, YOU WIN this debate.
but until not, kindly stop spreading WRONG INFORMATION about Evolution and keep your mouth shut about it.

He accepts everything at face value... His sarcasm wud've been effective if he was actually right....hahahaha

Maybe he can demonstrate by editing this thread as "EVERYTHING WRONG WITH PHC-NERDYFTW" ..or bbaglessqueen ...which ever he prefers.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

Yep, i think you're DONE.
all you did so far is duck on the main point.

'BTW, Wikipedia dont bare much weight on a debate because it can be edited by anyone...
Dont you know that?'

i'm aware with this, that's why WIKIPEDIA is so reliable and a good source for information.
but can be edited FOOLISHLY? MALICIOUSLY? its not.
but if you can DEMONSTRATE IT. if you can edit my shared post, added YOUR NAME there and put 'EVERYTHING IS WRONG IN EVOLUTION' and accepted, YOU WIN this debate.
but until not, kindly stop spreading WRONG INFORMATION about Evolution and keep your mouth shut about it.

Your Grace, Wikipedia is NEVER a reliable source....
Have you ever tried doing Research Papers? Colleges DON'T accept Wikipedia as a Source...

How come you don't know that?

PROFESSIONALS DON'T USE WIKIPEDIA AS A SOURCE YOUR GRACE...
AREN'T YOU PRO??? I BET YOU ARE...
I WISH YOU ARE..
ARE YOU??



Wait? We are done? Really?
I mean, WE ARE ONLY ON NUMBER 2??
There are still 5 more??

We are yet to tackle the good stuff....

Why quit so early, Your Grace?


PS. These Public Debate reached 210+ views already Your Grace.....
Your LEGACY (of name calling me and degrading my intelligence) will be tainted if you will quit now...
I think it will be a shame if people will start comparing you to me??
I mean, YOU who owns "higher intelligence" against ME a "lowly stupid illogical" being??