🕯️ Traditions Masasabi bang sa Demenyo ang mga Ateyista Dahil hindi sila naniniwala n my Dios??

[Juan Carlos23]

Masasabi bang sa Demenyo ang mga Ateyista Dahil hindi sila naniniwala n my Dios??

 

[Under_Score]

parang hindi sigoro brother,, kac ang demons sa bible eh alam nila na may Dios, pero kino contradict parin nila, while being an atheist is anothier deffrent thing, if they dont done bad thing as demon did who we are to judge them.,, .

 

[worldzero]

Hindi po paps. Technically. Humans din mga atheist. Hindi demons (different creature, so to speak).

 

[fabbriche]

Mas mabubuting mga tao ang mga atheist. Mas maraming religious people na demonyo kesa atheist. Mga religious people ang kadalasang gumagawa ng krimen at nagpapagulo sa mundo.

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

Si Richard Dawkins yung demonyo nang mga atheist, dami na mga scientist at intellectuals na ayaw sa kanya dahil napapansin nila yung mga hidden motives nya. Isa syang imposter pagdating sa theory nang evolution.

 

[homer_simpson]

Masasabi bang sa Demenyo ang mga Ateyista Dahil hindi sila naniniwala n my Dios??

Masasabi bang nasa row-4 itong poster dahil hindi makapag-spell ng maayos, and yet he is stating a very bold claim?

 

[worldzero]

Mas mabubuting mga tao ang mga atheist. Mas maraming religious people na demonyo kesa atheist. Mga religious people ang kadalasang gumagawa ng krimen at nagpapagulo sa mundo.

May statistics ka po ba dito showing the correlation of religion (categorized into each major ones we have in the world) and criminal offenses? Pahingi ng copy.

 

[fabbriche]

May statistics ka po ba dito showing the correlation of religion (categorized into each major ones we have in the world) and criminal offenses? Pahingi ng copy.

The statistics are readily available by just a simple google search. I'm not going to spoonfeed it to you. Theists make up ALMOST all of the prison population while atheists make up barely 1%.

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

Wag kayo padadala sa troll, selection bias yung tira nya tapos sabay change topic kapag na corner.

 

[fabbriche]

Wag kayo padadala sa troll, selection bias yung tira nya tapos sabay change topic kapag na corner.

Selection bias ka jan. Marami ng studies ang nagpapakita na intellectually at morally superior ang mga atheist kesa religious people.

Mga bansang atheist mas mauunlad at mapayapa kesa mga bansang relihiyoso.

Mga atheist mas matatalino kesa mga religious people.

Karamihan ng mga scientists at philosophers puro atheist.

Halos lahat ng mga kriminal puro mga naniniwala sa diyos.

Masama epekto ng religion sa mundo. Ginagawang mangmang at bayolente ang mga tao.

 

[worldzero]

The statistics are readily available by just a simple google search. I'm not going to spoonfeed it to you. Theists make up ALMOST all of the prison population while atheists make up barely 1%.

There is no correlation. Google it.

 

[fabbriche]

There is no correlation. Google it.

To ignore the correlation between violence and religion is to ignore the massive current and historical statistical evidence closely linking the two. Religious ideologies are more likely to conduce violence, racism, xenophobia, misogyny and terrorism than atheism does hence why peaceful countries have more atheists and fewer regular worshippers whereas dysfunctional societies are the most religious ones.

Philippines, India, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Nigeria, Congo, Uganda, Jamaica, Honduras, Brazil, United States

Japan, South Korea, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, Czech Republic, Australia, New Zealand, Canada

Tell me which group of countries is the most religious and crime-ridden, and which group is atheistic and peaceful.

The United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands used to be violently imperialistic when they used to be religious. Only after the Western secularization which began in the 1960s that these countries have become peaceful and peace-loving. Not to mention the homophobic laws imposing brutal death penalty for homosexuality and other sexual activities deemed immoral by Christianity were directly influenced by said religion. Guess what, same-*** marriage are now legal in these countries which has only become possible after the religion's once huge influence waned.

Today, who are most likely to bomb abortion clinics? Pro-life Christians. Discriminate based on skin color? White Christians. Stone and throw gays off the building? Muslims. Carry out terrorism and other heinous acts? Muslims, Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists.

Where are the atheist terrorists? Virtually none. Because atheists are much better educated and more well-behaved. They don't turn to and rely on 2,000 year-old outdated and erroneous holy books for morality and other facts about life.

 

[lSlash]

Hindi paps.

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

See selection bias yan, madami pang factors kung titingnan mo kung bakit yung isang country ay maunlad or peaceful. Nandun din yung geographic location, natural resources, how old is the culture, war thorn country?, what is the source of its GDP, how high is the rate of corruption, what type of economic policy, what type of government and the list goes on.

 

[fabbriche]

See selection bias yan, madami pang factors kung titingnan mo kung bakit yung isang country ay maunlad or peaceful. Nandun din yung geographic location, natural resources, how old is the culture, war thorn country?, what is the source of its GDP, how high is the rate of corruption, what type of economic policy, what type of government and the list goes on.

Geographic location is irrelevant. Uruguay is located just next to Brazil but Brazil is one of the most murderous countries in the world, and it's not just coincidence that it's also homophobic and extremely religious. In fact, Brazilians have just elected a far-right president just like the religious Americans and Filipinos.

Brazil's neighbor, Uruguay, OTOH is one of the most peaceful countries in Latin America and unsurprisingly it is also the most atheistic country in that violent region.

South Korea is, well, just south of North Korea but the former is a safe country while the latter is dangerous.

How do you make a connection between natural resources and peace/violence? Japan, South Korea, Belgium and Switzerland have no to little natural resources and they're among the most peaceful countries in the world. Conversely, Jamaica, Burundi, Burkina Faso, Belarus and Moldova also have negligible natural resources and they're violent countries. Also, there are resource-rich countries that are peaceful (e.g. Norway, Canada, Australia, UK) and resource-rich countries that are violent (most of Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America).

Age of culture is an irrelevant factor. It's not the age of culture but the culture itself is the one that is directly responsible for violence.

Scandinavian/Germanic cultures are just as old as African and Islamic cultures yet they're polar opposites when it comes to peace/violence. Germanic cultures are secular and enlightened which make them peaceful whereas African and Islamic cultures still mirror antiquated and medieval religious ideals hence their propensity for violence.

You also brought up GDP, corruption rate and government type when these things can also be correlated to religion. A country's level of religiosity tracks closely with a nation's GDP per capita. Corruption is highest in religious countries and least in secular/atheistic countries. The more religion has influence over government the more absurd, violent and oppressive its laws like the barbaric laws in Islamic theocracies. Secular democracies in comparison are pro-human and pro-civil rights. Most of the threats against human rights have always been far-right/religious governments.

You keep ignoring and denying the direct correlation and close link between religion and violence and keep accusing me of selection bias when the relationship between the two can be cogently demonstrated almost universally.

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

Geographic location is irrelevant. Uruguay is located just next to Brazil but Brazil is one of the most murderous countries in the world, and it's not just coincidence that it's also homophobic and extremely religious. In fact, Brazilians have just elected a far-right president just like the religious Americans and Filipinos.

Brazil's neighbor, Uruguay, OTOH is one of the most peaceful countries in Latin America and unsurprisingly it is also the most atheistic country in that violent region.

South Korea is, well, just south of North Korea but the former is a safe country while the latter is dangerous.

How do you make a connection between natural resources and peace/violence? Japan, South Korea, Belgium and Switzerland have no to little natural resources and they're among the most peaceful countries in the world. Conversely, Jamaica, Burundi, Burkina Faso, Belarus and Moldova also have negligible natural resources and they're violent countries. Also, there are resource-rich countries that are peaceful (e.g. Norway, Canada, Australia, UK) and resource-rich countries that are violent (most of Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America).

Age of culture is an irrelevant factor. It's not the age of culture but the culture itself is the one that is directly responsible for violence.

Scandinavian/Germanic cultures are just as old as African and Islamic cultures yet they're polar opposites when it comes to peace/violence. Germanic cultures are secular and enlightened which make them peaceful whereas African and Islamic cultures still mirror antiquated and medieval religious ideals hence their propensity for violence.

You also brought up GDP, corruption rate and government type when these things can also be correlated to religion. A country's level of religiosity tracks closely with a nation's GDP per capita. Corruption is highest in religious countries and least in secular/atheistic countries. The more religion has influence over government the more absurd, violent and oppressive its laws like the barbaric laws in Islamic theocracies. Secular democracies in comparison are prô-human and prô-civil rights. Most of the threats against human rights have always been far-right/religious governments.

You keep ignoring and denying the direct correlation and close link between religion and violence and keep accusing me of selection bias when the relationship between the two can be cogently demonstrated almost universally.

Again my amnesia si TITA, kung nanalo sa WWII ng Germany sa tingin mo makaka survive pa a yung race mo na Malay? Sa tingin mo kung ilalagay mo yung Norway, Iceland at Sweden sa bandang middle east makaka survive ba sila kagaya nang Israel kahit na puro atheist sila?

Corruption = religion? akala ko ba dati ayaw mo sa seperation of state and church? my amnesia kana ata?

 

[fabbriche]

Again my amnesia si TITA, kung nanalo sa WWII ng Germany sa tingin mo makaka survive pa a yung race mo na Malay? Sa tingin mo kung ilalagay mo yung Norway, Iceland at Sweden sa bandang middle east makaka survive ba sila kagaya nang Israel kahit na puro atheist sila?

Corruption = religion? akala ko ba dati ayaw mo sa seperation of state and church? my amnesia kana ata?

Anong relevance ng pagkapanalo ng Germany sa WW2 at survival ng Malay race sa pagiging peaceful ng mga atheist at violent ng mga religious countries?

Peaceful ang Israel kumpara sa mga Islamic neighbors nya maliban na lang sa counterterrorist activities niya laban sa Palestine.

Heavily influenced ng religion ang gobyerno ng Pilipinas kahit secular xa on paper. Sa buong mundo Pilipinas na lang ang NAG-IISANG bansang hindi legal ang divorce. Ang dahilan, religion. Kahit nga ibang religious countries legal na ang divorce. Abortion hindi rin legal. Religion din ang dahilan. Kung hindi rin lang secular, mas mabuti pang mga obispo na lang ang maging leaders ng bansa kesa relihiyoso, corrupt at abusadong mga buwaya gaya ni Duterte

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

Anong relevance ng pagkapanalo ng Germany sa WW2 at survival ng Malay race sa pagiging peaceful ng mga atheist at violent ng mga religious countries?

Peaceful ang Israel kumpara sa mga Islamic neighbors nya maliban na lang sa counterterrorist activities niya laban sa Palestine.

Heavily influenced ng religion ang gobyerno ng Pilipinas kahit secular xa on paper. Sa buong mundo Pilipinas na lang ang NAG-IISANG bansang hindi legal ang divorce. Ang dahilan, religion. Kahit nga ibang religious countries legal na ang divorce. Abortion hindi rin legal. Religion din ang dahilan. Kung hindi rin lang secular, mas mabuti pang mga obispo na lang ang maging leaders ng bansa kesa relihiyoso, corrupt at abusadong mga buwaya gaya ni Duterte

Yan yung assignment mo, bukas check ko.

 

[fabbriche]

Tse! Pati paglobo ng populasyon ng Pilipinas religion din ang may kasalanan. 70 million lang ang mga Pilipino nung 1990s, ngaun lampas 100 million na. 30 million ang nadagdag sa loob ng 20 years lang. Mas marami pa kesa buong populasyon ng Scandinavia. Bakit? Dahil un ang aral ng religion. Bawal family planning. At dahil overpopulated ang Pilipinas, kasing laki lang ng Italy pero doble ang populasyon, sobrang gulo, hirap at daming krimen.

Religion ang ugat ng problema. Hindi ko pa isinasama jan ang mga creationist at history-deniers na puro mga relihiyoso rin.

 

[Cute-Piggy]

sa tingin ko po hindi