🕯️ Traditions DO YOU BELIEVE GUYS IF THERES NO RELIGION NO CRIME

[Denski101]

no

 

[fabbriche]

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Lederman explains in the book why he gave the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. the nickname "The God Particle":


ung another book is book of genesis.


You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Hindi nga sabi yan god particle at wala yang kinalaman sa diyos. Media lang ang nagpauso ng god particle. Goddamn particle ang original colloquial term ng Higgs Boson. Mura o swear o cuss word ang "goddamn." Parang "holy shit." Hindi evidence ng diyos yang goddamn particle.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Hindi nga sabi yan god particle at wala yang kinalaman sa diyos. Media lang ang nagpauso ng god particle. Goddamn particle ang original colloquial term ng Higgs Boson. Mura o swear o cuss word ang "goddamn." Parang "holy shit." Hindi evidence ng diyos yang goddamn particle.

ikaw lang nag sabi yan eh nakalagay na nga sa link na binigay ko na di daw kasi sila pinayagan ng publisher nya kaya nag isip na lang sya ng mas malapit at ung pinaka malapit is the book of genesis. pipilit mo pa gusto mo eh.

 

[fabbriche]

ikaw lang nag sabi nyan at mga religious scientist ang mga nag sasabi nun halos lahat ng athiest na scientist at naniniwala sa evolution sang ayon sa cannibalism.

Ikaw lang ang nagsasabi na halos lahat ng scientist sangayon sa cannibalism. Lahat ng medical articles tungkol sa cannibalism sinasabing harmful un.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Ikaw lang ang nagsasabi na halos lahat ng scientist sangayon sa cannibalism. Lahat ng medical articles tungkol sa cannibalism sinasabing harmful un.

oo ung mga religious at conservative na scientist pero ung mga naniniwala sa evolution hindi kagaya ni richard dawkins at mga scientist nyang kasama.

 

[fabbriche]

ikaw lang nag sabi yan eh nakalagay na nga sa link na binigay ko na di daw kasi sila pinayagan ng publisher nya kaya nag isip na lang sya ng mas malapit at ung pinaka malapit is the book of genesis. pipilit mo pa gusto mo eh.

Magaral kang mabuti dahil halata kang walang alam. Walang connection sa diyos yang Higgs Boson. Ang Higgs Boson ay ang elementary particle na nagbibigay ng mass sa matter. Kasamahan un ng electrons, protons, neutrons, photons at quarks. Anong kinalaman ng mga ito sa diyos?

 

[fabbriche]

oo ung mga religious at conservative na scientist pero ung mga naniniwala sa evolution hindi kagaya ni richard dawkins at mga scientist nyang kasama.

Un mismo ang medical at scientific consensus na harmful ang cannibalism. Majority ng mga scientists ay atheist. Iilan lang ang religious.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Magaral kang mabuti dahil halata kang walang alam. Walang connection sa diyos yang Higgs Boson. Ang Higgs Boson ay ang elementary particle na nagbibigay ng mass sa matter. Kasamahan un ng electrons, protons, neutrons, photons at quarks. Anong kinalaman ng mga ito sa diyos?

ikaw mag basa napaghahalataan ka na si google no read ka sa pag bibigay na mga source mo ito galing to sa source ko kung di ka mukang mangmang sa pinag sasabi mo

his book, continuing: "Why God Particle? Two reasons. One, the publisher wouldn’t let us call it the Goddamn Particle, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing. And two, there is a connection, of sorts, to another book, a much older one. . . .” The Higgs was a concept of almost Biblical proportions.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

san ung source mo puro ka salita wala kang source eh.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Un mismo ang medical at scientific consensus na harmful ang cannibalism. Majority ng mga scientists ay atheist. Iilan lang ang religious.

wow onti lang daw ang religious na scientist ito ung poll o

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. yan ah base yan sa amerika kung di ka bulag

41 percent ang athiest at 33 percent ang gnostic + 18 percent agnostic + 7 percent not sure. so ano ung pinag sasabi mo na onti ha?

 

[fabbriche]

ikaw mag basa napaghahalataan ka na si google no read ka sa pag bibigay na mga source mo ito galing to sa source ko kung di ka mukang mangmang sa pinag sasabi mo

his book, continuing: "Why God Particle? Two reasons. One, the publisher wouldn’t let us call it the Goddamn Particle, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing. And two, there is a connection, of sorts, to another book, a much older one. . . .” The Higgs was a concept of almost Biblical proportions.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

san ung source mo puro ka salita wala kang source eh.

Matagal ko ng alam yang Higgs Boson. Hindi ko kelangan ng source. At kahit yang source mo hindi mo naiintindihan ang nakasulat. Ang sabi jan hindi sila pinayagang tawaging "goddamn particle" ang Higgs Boson, hindi god particle. Iba ang "goddamn" sa "god." Mura ang goddamn. Parang "pu ta" at "ta e." Media ang nagpauso ng god particle.

At ang "biblical proportions" ay isang figure of speech o tayutay sa Filipino na nangangagulugang "malaki." Wala rin ung kinalaman sa bibliya.

O eto ang Higgs Boson. Nasan jan ang diyos mo?

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[fabbriche]

wow onti lang daw ang religious na scientist ito ung poll o

View attachment 651285
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. yan ah base yan sa amerika kung di ka bulag

41 percent ang athiest at 33 percent ang gnostic + 18 percent agnostic + 7 percent not sure. so ano ung pinag sasabi mo na onti ha?

Konti nga lang ang 33% theist scientists kumpara sa 67% na hindi theist at religious. Minority lang ang mga scientists na naniniwala sa diyos at pakonti ng pakonti na sila kada taon. 97% ng mga scientists naniniwala sa evolution maging ung mga religious scientists.


Nearly all (around 97%) of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity.[1][2] Scientific associations have strongly rebutted and refuted the challenges to evolution proposed by intelligent designproponents.[3]

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Matagal ko ng alam yang Higgs Boson. Hindi ko kelangan ng source. At kahit yang source mo hindi mo naiintindihan ang nakasulat. Ang sabi jan hindi sila pinayagang tawaging "goddamn particle" ang Higgs Boson, hindi god particle. Iba ang "goddamn" sa "god." Mura ang goddamn. Parang "pu ta" at "ta e." Media ang nagpauso ng god particle.

At ang "biblical proportions" ay isang figure of speech o tayutay sa Filipino na nangangagulugang "malaki." Wala rin ung kinalaman sa bibliya.

O eto ang Higgs Boson. Nasan jan ang diyos mo?

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

While media use of this term may have contributed to wider awareness and interest,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. many scientists feel the name is inappropriateYou do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. since it is sensational You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and misleads readers;You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. the particle also has nothing to do with You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., leaves open numerous You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and does not explain the ultimate You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., an You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., was reported to be displeased and stated in a 2008 interview that he found it "embarrassing" because it was "the kind of misuse... which I think might offend some people".You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. The nickname has been satirised in mainstream media as well.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. Science writer Ian Sample stated in his 2010 book on the search that the nickname is "universally hate[d]" by physicists and perhaps the "worst derided" in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., but that (according to Lederman) the publisher rejected all titles mentioning "Higgs" as unimaginative and too unknown.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Lederman begins with a review of the long human search for knowledge, and explains that his tongue-in-cheek title draws an analogy between the impact of the Higgs field on the fundamental symmetries at the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and the apparent chaos of structures, particles, forces and interactions that resulted and shaped our present universe, with the biblical story of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in which the primordial single language of early You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. was You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and cultures.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Today ... we have the standard model, which reduces all of reality to a dozen or so particles and four forces. ... It's a hard-won simplicity [...and...] remarkably accurate. But it is also incomplete and, in fact, internally inconsistent... This boson is so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our final understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive, that I have given it a nickname: the God Particle. Why God Particle? Two reasons. One, the publisher wouldn't let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing. And two, there is a connection, of sorts, to You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., a much older one...
— Leon M. Lederman and **** Teresi, The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the QuestionYou do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.p. 22

mag basa minsan kung di ka marunong ung mga displeased ung mga athiest na katulad mo pero si lederman hindi at kinumpara pa nga nya sa story of babel ung higgs kung di ka nagbabasa ng source mo na ako kumuha ha baka may masabi ka pa.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Konti nga lang ang 33% theist scientists kumpara sa 67% na hindi theist at religious. Minority lang ang mga scientists na naniniwala sa diyos at pakonti ng pakonti na sila kada taon. 97% ng mga scientists naniniwala sa evolution maging ung mga religious scientists.


Nearly all (around 97%) of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity.[1][2] Scientific associations have strongly rebutted and refuted the challenges to evolution proposed by intelligent designproponents.[3]

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Nearly all (around 97%) of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.Scientific associations have strongly rebutted and refuted the challenges to evolution proposed by You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. proponents.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

There are religious sects and denominations in several countries for whom the theory of evolution is in conflict with creationism that is central to their beliefs, and who therefore reject it: in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., with smaller followings in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

how magbasa ka ha wag ka assuming kase iba ung accepted sa views over if god is true or not kung di ka nangliligaw ng tao sa pinag sasabi mo kung di ka mangmang eh study yan ng evolution at 97 percent ng scientist nag accept di naniniwala kung di ka mang mang. pero marami rin scientist na kagaya ni physicist and dr.michio kaku na ang big bang ang isang theory parin at di facts. iba ang studies at beliefs gunggong.

 

[fabbriche]

While media use of this term may have contributed to wider awareness and interest,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. many scientists feel the name is inappropriateYou do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. since it is sensational You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and misleads readers;You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. the particle also has nothing to do with You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., leaves open numerous You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and does not explain the ultimate You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., an You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., was reported to be displeased and stated in a 2008 interview that he found it "embarrassing" because it was "the kind of misuse... which I think might offend some people".You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. The nickname has been satirised in mainstream media as well.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. Science writer Ian Sample stated in his 2010 book on the search that the nickname is "universally hate[d]" by physicists and perhaps the "worst derided" in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., but that (according to Lederman) the publisher rejected all titles mentioning "Higgs" as unimaginative and too unknown.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Lederman begins with a review of the long human search for knowledge, and explains that his tongue-in-cheek title draws an analogy between the impact of the Higgs field on the fundamental symmetries at the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and the apparent chaos of structures, particles, forces and interactions that resulted and shaped our present universe, with the biblical story of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in which the primordial single language of early You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. was You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and cultures.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.


mag basa minsan kung di ka marunong ung mga displeased ung mga athiest na katulad mo pero si lederman hindi at kinumpara pa nga nya sa story of babel ung higgs kung di ka nagbabasa ma source mo na ako kumuha ha baka may masabi ka pa.

Kung may kinalaman yan sa diyos mawawalan ng atheist na scientists. Sige ipaliwanag mo kung anong connection ng Higgs Boson sa diyos mo? Hindi mo binabasa nang mabuti yang pinopost mo. Analogy o ikinumpara lang kung paano nilikha ng Higgs Boson ang structure, particles at forces sa universe sa kwento ng Babel at kung paano nagkaroon ng ibat ibang mga wika at kultura sa mundo. Analogy lang un analogy. Basahin mong mabuti. Nakalagay na mismo sa bolded quote mo.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Kung may kinalaman yan sa diyos mawawalan ng atheist na scientists. Sige ipaliwanag mo kung anong connection ng Higgs Boson sa diyos mo? Hindi mo binabasa nang mabuti yang pinopost mo. Analogy o ikinumpara lang kung paano nilikha ng Higgs Boson ang structure, particles at forces sa universe sa kwento ng Babel at kung paano nagkaroon ng ibat ibang mga wika at kultura sa mundo. Analogy lang un analogy. Basahin mong mabuti. Nakalagay na mismo sa bolded quote mo.

tanong mo kay lederman sya nag sabi nun eh kung di ka bugok

Lederman begins with a review of the long human search for knowledge, and explains that his tongue-in-cheek title draws an analogy between the impact of the Higgs field on the fundamental symmetries at the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and the apparent chaos of structures, particles, forces and interactions that resulted and shaped our present universe, with the biblical story of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in which the primordial single language of early You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. was You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and cultures

dagdag mo pa ung paniniwala di stephen hawkins sa god of gaps tanong mo rin sakanya di naman ako sila eh kung di ka gunggong di naman ako nag sabi nyan sila ung nag sabi nun.

 

[fabbriche]

Nearly all (around 97%) of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.Scientific associations have strongly rebutted and refuted the challenges to evolution proposed by You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. proponents.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

There are religious sects and denominations in several countries for whom the theory of evolution is in conflict with creationism that is central to their beliefs, and who therefore reject it: in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., with smaller followings in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

how magbasa ka ha wag ka assuming kase iba ung accepted sa views over if god is true or not kung di ka nangliligaw ng tao sa pinag sasabi mo kung di ka mangmang eh study yan ng evolution at 97 percent ng scientist nag accept di naniniwala kung di ka mang mang. pero marami rin scientist na kagaya ni physicist and dr.michio kaku na ang big bang ang isang theory parin at di facts.

Magkaiba ang acceptance at belief. Walang puwang ang belief o paniniwala sa science. Hindi kelangang paniwalaan ng mga scientists ang evolution dahil may ebidensya ang evolution. Tinatanggap na lang nila un dahil un ang sinasabi ng ebidensya. Hindi mo na kelangan pang paniwalaan ang isang bagay na totoo.

Sa religion lang na walang evidence lang relevant ang paniniwala. Kaya nga "faith". Paniniwala kahit walang ebidensya.

 

[Lets-All-Love-Lain]

Magkaiba ang acceptance at belief. Walang puwang ang belief o paniniwala sa science. Hindi kelangang paniwalaan ng mga scientists ang evolution dahil may ebidensya ang evolution. Tinatanggap na lang nila un dahil un ang sinasabi ng ebidensya. Hindi mo na kelangan pang paniwalaan ang isang bagay na totoo.

Sa religion lang na walang evidence lang relevant ang paniniwala. Kaya nga "faith". Paniniwala kahit walang ebidensya.

bugok ka pala eh nag bigay na nga ako ng poll na nag sasabi na di lahat ng scientist ay athiest kung di ka bugok talaga ang bulok utak mo mag bibigay ka pa ng counter argument tungkol naman sa evolution at di sa paniniwala ng scientist kung di ka panaman sabog ung utak mo.

 

[fabbriche]

tanong mo kay lederman sya nag sabi nun eh kung di ka bugok

Lederman begins with a review of the long human search for knowledge, and explains that his tongue-in-cheek title draws an analogy between the impact of the Higgs field on the fundamental symmetries at the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and the apparent chaos of structures, particles, forces and interactions that resulted and shaped our present universe, with the biblical story of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in which the primordial single language of early You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. was You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and cultures

Yan na nga mismo ung sinasabi ko. Tinagalog ko lang sau dahil hindi mo naiintindihan yang nakasulat jan.

his tongue-in-cheek title draws an analogy

Tounge-in-cheek = walang ibig sabihin

Analogy = paghahalintulad

Inihalintulad ang paglikha ng Higgs sa mga particles at forces sa universe sa paglikha ng mga wika at kultura sa Babel. Hindi nangangahulugan na diyos ang lumikha sa universe. Walang ibig sabihin ung "god particle" na name.

 

[fabbriche]

bugok ka pala eh nag bigay na nga ako ng poll na nag sasabi na di lahat ng scientist ay athiest kung di ka bugok talaga ang bulok utak mo mag bibigay ka pa ng counter argument tungkol naman sa evolution at di sa paniniwala ng scientist kung di ka panaman sabog ung utak mo.

Ikaw ang bulok ang utak. Post ka ng post ng mga article quotes di mo naman naiintindihan mga pinopost mo. May term lang na "god" at "biblical" akala mo ebidensya na ng diyos mo ung god particle.

Ung mga theist scientists na sinasabi mo hindi mo un katulad. Hindi un naniniwala sa pinaniniwalaan mo. Walang scientists kahit religious ang hindi naniniwala sa evolution at naniniwala sa bibliya na nilikha ng diyos ang mundo sa loob ng 7 days lang at nagmula sa alikabok ang tao. Mga mangmang lang ang naniniwala sa ganun.

 

[fabbriche]

67% ng mga scientists hindi naniniwala sa diyos.

73% ng mga academic philosophers hindi rin naniniwala sa diyos.

Sila ang higit na nakakaalam kung totoo ang diyos o hindi. Kung totoo ang diyos at kung may ebidensyang may diyos bakit 7 out of 10 scientists/philosophers hindi naniniwala na may diyos? Mas marunong pa kau kesa mga scientists at philosophers?