🔒 Closed H.acking, are you in favor or not? (for educational purpose only)

[BeefBrisket01]

on point!

What kind of häçking?

 

[ChronoHallaoun]

It's a double-edged sword. You can't entirely use it for good without equivalent consequence/risk.

 

[capslocked]

TS the title itself is like a preposition for a debate so expect an argument in reply section.

H.acking has been put on a dark light, it connotes bad activities. but itt depends on the intention of a person either to exploit the weakness of site, files, etc or just learn something about it. Somehow it had helped the people the IT industry such as tracing the vulnerability of the sites and the likes.

Is it tolerable in many aspects?
Yes, if the involve people are not bad( you know what i mean).

 

[Ishkyousuke]

Siguro for educational purposes ok lang kasi nawiwitness nila kung gano kafrangile yung security ng www

 

[dummy01]

häçking, in general, is a form of s†éáling. Whether one's intention is good, it is considered a crime, hence not okay.

With the exception, we have white hat häçkers today whose main purpose is to look for vulnerabilities in gaining unauthorized access, with very clear consent to do no harm, and reinforced the system(s) they're to häçk. These could be the okay-häçkers we can consider, doubtly speaking.

There is a saying in the häçking world which is so ironic that ''you couldn't be that great white hat if you had no experience of being black hat''. And because of this, white hats are virtually non-existence. Most are either gray or black hats.

So as for those who are saying for educational purposes only, just make sure you have consent when doing the activity because anything that is non-consensual is considered a crime, regardless your intention is good.

 

[rexelens]

ang ha.cking may ibat' ibang level yan o porpose...may tinatawag na whitehat,blackhat etc... di lahat masama