💡 Trivia Bible Contradiction: God's rules keep changing

[KumaKuma]

God made an “everlasting covenant” with Abraham, but then he tore that one up and made another one with Moses.

The New Testament continues the confusion. It can’t decide whether to look backward and honor existing law or to tear it up yet again because it says both. First, Jesus commits to the existing law:

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

But then the book of Hebrews weaves a legal case that argues that Jesus is a priest in the line of Melchizedek, which ought to take priority over the existing priesthood in the line of Aaron. Here it quotes an Old Testament declaration of God to justify a new covenant.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Jesus is a dramatic change to Judaism, and there must be some logic to justify Christians changing their worship day, dropping the sacrifices, worshiping a new guy in addition to Yahweh, and so on. That rationalizes away one problem, but the overall problem—the various sub stories don’t fit together in the overall plot—remains.

 

[Nikola Tesla]

dont read the bible out of your own understing pre. the center of the Bible is about Christ not us (readers) so reading from our own perspectives will always have contrdictions and misallignment ganyan din ako nung una puro questions.

 

[KumaKuma]

dont read the bible out of your own understing pre. the center of the Bible is about Christ not us (readers) so reading from our own perspectives will always have contrdictions and misallignment ganyan din ako nung una puro questions.

Pano po ba magbasa ng bible? Dapat po maging braindead ka o braindead ka dapat? At wag gumamit ng common sense at critical thinking po dapat master?