Si Atty. Harry Roque ang nasa likod ng video na 'yan

Vlogger Pebbles Cunanan claimed in a sworn affidavit submitted to the House Tri Comm that Atty. Harry Roque is behind the ‘polvoron’ video purportedly showing President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. doing drugs.

“Si Atty. Harry Roque ang nasa likod ng video na 'yan.”

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

1000002127.webp
1000002128.webp
 
panoorin mo nga and see it for yourself if dala nga ba niya yung results o wala sa live meeting niya with harry
Kase nga wala nga verification reports to backup her claims. Ni ayaw nga niya ishare thru social media.

yes of course, di mo alam ang non-refoulement principle?
Non-refoulement: Sa international law galing ‘to, part ng 1951 Refugee Convention. Meaning, bawal ibalik si Roque sa lugar kung saan baka ma-persecute, ma-torture, o ma-patay—grabehan yung risk, ‘di pwede i-deport habang inaaral pa ang kanyang asylum.

Immunity: Iba ‘to—parang legal shield, protektado ka sa kaso, kulong, o parusa, depende sa tipo. Usually pangmatagalan o kasama sa trabaho (e.g., for ambassadors under the Vienna Convention)

Kaya mali yung sinabi mo na may immunity si Roque.
 
panoorin mo nga and see it for yourself if dala nga ba niya yung results o wala sa live meeting niya with harry
If you watched it, of course ishare mo yang report or yung name ng expert that verify the video, but it seems that you don't have any interest to backup her claims or rather wala naman talaga.

Kelan pa ba nag sasabi ng totoo ang mga DDS? lol
 
If you watched it, of course ishare mo yang report or yung name ng expert that verify the video, but it seems that you don't have any interest to backup her claims or rather wala naman talaga.

Kelan pa ba nag sasabi ng totoo ang mga DDS? lol
no need nga ako mag back up sa kanya dahil siya mismo ang may back up docs, panoorin mo kasi haha
 
Hahaha ibig sabihin bogus talaga yung video from the start, it was just only for pure entertainment.
it doesn't matter na ngayon bossing whether fake or not yung results na dala ni maharlika, since immune na nga si Harry, binigyan ng worth yung results ng asylum personnel, at saka nanonood ako kay Harry now at nagpa-pasalamat siya sa affidavit ni pebbles dahil magagamit niya ulet ito to prove further na yung ngang polvoron video mismo ang dahilan ng kanyang political persecution
 
it doesn't matter na ngayon bossing whether fake or not yung results na dala ni maharlika, since immune na nga si Harry, binigyan ng worth yung results ng asylum personnel, at saka nanonood ako kay Harry now at nagpa-pasalamat siya sa affidavit ni pebbles dahil magagamit niya ulet ito to prove further na yung ngang polvoron video mismo ang dahilan ng kanyang political persecution
Non-refoulement not immune until Netherlands decide wether they accept his asylum. So, technically, no full immunity—just a delay tactic that’s holding for now. He just seek asylum because he shamefully release a bogus video againts the goverment.
 
Non-refoulement not immune until Netherlands decide wether they accept his asylum. So, technically, no full immunity—just a delay tactic that’s holding for now. He just seek asylum because he shamefully release a bogus video againts the goverment.
haha prohibited na nga ang pag return ng seeker sa country of origin, anu pa bang immunity ang hanap mo bossing? haha
 
haha hindi na nga pwede i-uwi sa country of origin, anu ngang immunity ang hinahanap mo? haha
Non-refoulement, from Article 33(1) of the 1951 Refugee Convention, stops a country from sending someone back to a place where they’d face danger due to race, religion, nationality, group, or politics. Pansamantala lang ‘to—hanggang matapos ang desisyon sa asylum—at pwede ma-cancel sa Article 33(2) if the person’s a security risk (like destabilizing the country) or their claim’s fake (like dodging justice, not real persecution). Para kay Roque, hindi pa siya pwedeng i-deport ng Netherlands, pero pwede kung magiging problema siya o sinungaling.
 
Non-refoulement, from Article 33(1) of the 1951 Refugee Convention, stops a country from sending someone back to a place where they’d face danger due to race, religion, nationality, group, or politics. Pansamantala lang ‘to—hanggang matapos ang desisyon sa asylum—at pwede ma-cancel sa Article 33(2) if the person’s a security risk (like destabilizing the country) or their claim’s fake (like dodging justice, not real persecution). Para kay Roque, hindi pa siya pwedeng i-deport ng Netherlands, pero pwede kung magiging problema siya o sinungaling.
it still doesn't change the fact na as of now hindi na talaga siya pwede i-deport pa, at yung mga ginagawa ng triCom gaya nung affidavit ni pebbles ay mas lalo pang magpapa tibay ng kanyang approval by netherlands
 
hindi nga gusto mag comply ng timor sa red notice ng interpol so saan yung huling baraha na sinasabi mo

haha hindi ako verifier bossing, but even if wala ako capacity mag verify i can just rely on third party verifiers so it's not me after all, it's them
Wala namang red notice si teves haha,extradition ang ginawa ng gobyerno,kaya lang nag file ng legal remedy ang kampo ni teves,at nag labas ng Tro ang judge pabor kay Teves,until now legal battle parin sila,pero c teves under costudy ng Govt.ng Temor,kulong parin sya
 
Wala namang red notice si teves haha,extradition ang ginawa ng gobyerno,kaya lang nag file ng legal remedy ang kampo ni teves,at nag labas ng Tro ang judge pabor kay Teves,until now legal battle parin sila,pero c teves under costudy ng Govt.ng Temor,kulong parin sya
1744279064891.webp

oo nga wala nga palang red notice bwahahaha
 
it still doesn't change the fact na as of now hindi na talaga siya pwede i-deport pa, at yung mga ginagawa ng triCom gaya nung affidavit ni pebbles ay mas lalo pang magpapa tibay ng kanyang approval by netherlands
And it doesn't change the fact that he is just stalling and avoiding the law in the Philippines because of his misdeed that he do during and after the Duterte Administration for his personal gain.
 
And it doesn't change the fact that he is just stalling and avoiding the law in the Philippines because of his misdeed that he do during and after the Duterte Administration for his personal gain.
it doesn't matter actually, what matters is what the netherlands would believe, our beliefs don't matter in the asylum bossing, obvious naman na once na-accept ang application magsisimula na yung immunity right away while the rest of the procedure unfolds
 
si ex prrduterte wala talaga alam dyan, si roque masyado lang talaga sipsip kay Digong , pag naupo kasi si Sarah sa pagkapresidente balik Malacañang palace si roque, 🤣 kaya gusto ipasipa si bbm sa palasyo, eh mga duterte silaw na din talaga sa kapangyarihan, at lahat naman ng tao ganun, kahit si bbm, kaya ganun talaga, eh basta ako kung sino nakaupo moral support na lang ako, ke duterte man yan o bbm
 
si ex prrduterte wala talaga alam dyan, si roque masyado lang talaga sipsip kay Digong , pag naupo kasi si Sarah sa pagkapresidente balik Malacañang palace si roque, 🤣 kaya gusto ipasipa si bbm sa palasyo, eh mga duterte silaw na din talaga sa kapangyarihan, at lahat naman ng tao ganun, kahit si bbm, kaya ganun talaga, eh basta ako kung sino nakaupo moral support na lang ako, ke duterte man yan o bbm
the intention of every politician will not matter actually, kahit pa pagnanakaw ang intention di pa rin yan mauupo sa pwesto if walang intention ang tao na paupo-in sila, so if binoto sila ng tao tayo magagawa since that's how democracy works, intention ng tao will dominate regardless of candidate's intentions
 

About this Thread

  • 58
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 8
    Participants
Last reply from:
plhbg1

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
1,211
Guests online
1,163
Total visitors
2,374

Forum statistics

Threads
2,273,990
Posts
28,952,944
Members
1,235,020
Latest member
umuauay
Back
Top