Patulan Ko Pa Ba Sya?

Obvious namang wala syang alam. Sayang lang oras sa kanya. Wag na lang...

 

[PHC - Raijin-X]

Soul Calibre Next Post Please!., He's A Waste Of Time, And Look's Liked A Beggar Who's Trying To Fooled Someone Whom Not A Worthy As Him! ...

 

[Soul Calibre]

Soul Calibre Next Post Please!., He's A Waste Of Time, And Look's Liked A Beggar Who's Trying To Fooled Someone Whom Not A Worthy As Him! ...

Hindi yata sya nag-review ng script nila kaya hindi nya alam ang sinasabi nya. Hahahahahahahaha

 

[PHC - Raijin-X]

Hindi yata sya nag-review ng script nila kaya hindi nya alam ang sinasabi nya. Hahahahahahahaha

Kaya NGA Master., Pwede Skipped Ko Na Po! ...

 

[Soul Calibre]

Kaya NGA Master., Pwede Skipped Ko Na Po! ...

Sige lang.. Ako nga hindi ko na pinatulan. Tinawanan ko na lang. Hahahahahahaha

 

[Lelouch Lamperouge]

Sige lang.. Ako nga hindi ko na pinatulan. Tinawanan ko na lang. Hahahahahahaha

Morning sa kapatid kong pogi jan sa norte Soul Calibre . Masyado akong busy sa pagpapa sarap ng katawan ko para magbasa ng mga bad news kaya auto skipped talaga yan..

Abangann mo pa give aways ko nxt month yan ay kung may jikas ka diba wala

 

[p4up4u]

Pwede na pang standup comedian mga banat nan master. hahahaha

 

[Soul Calibre]

Morning sa kapatid kong pogi jan sa norte Soul Calibre . Masyado akong busy sa pagpapa sarap ng katawan ko para magbasa ng mga bad news kaya auto skipped talaga yan..

Budburan ng magic sarap yan. Hahahahahaha

Abangann mo pa give aways ko nxt month yan ay kung may jikas ka diba wala

Ako na ang panalo. Automatic na. Hahahaha

Pwede na pang standup comedian mga banat nan master. hahahaha

Kaya nga. Hindi nag-review ng script nila. Ahahahaha

 

[Lerold]

bat yan papatulan mo, dito nasa forum open mo ulit

 

[plhbg1]

sige nga tingnan naten if wala siyang alam, on what grounds na napasabi kang obviously wala siyang alam? pwede mo bang sabihin anung basehan mo dun sa conclusion mo?

 

[dee-u]

sige nga tingnan naten if wala siyang alam, on what grounds na napasabi kang obviously wala siyang alam? pwede mo bang sabihin anung basehan mo dun sa conclusion mo?

Ayon kay ᑕᕼᗩTGᑭT:

The distinction lies in the legal and jurisdictional aspects of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and how cases are brought before it. The ICC primarily investigates and prosecutes cases of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity when national governments are unable or unwilling to do so.

Here are key differences regarding the situations you mentioned:

Hacienda Luisita Massacre (2004)

This was a violent dispersal of protesting farmers that resulted in several deaths.

It was handled within the Philippine legal system and was not referred to the ICC.

No international body investigated, and it was not classified as a crime against humanity.

Dengvaxia Controversy

This involved allegations of negligence in the government’s dengue vaccination program.

No formal ruling classified it as an intentional crime against humanity.

The issue was investigated by local courts, and ICC jurisdiction did not apply.

Maguindanao Massacre (2009)

This was a politically motivated mass killing of journalists and civilians.

The Philippine courts prosecuted the case, and the perpetrators were convicted.

Since the government addressed it judicially, it did not fall under ICC jurisdiction.

Why did the ICC investigate the Duterte administration?

The ICC intervened in the Duterte administration's "War on Drugs" because:

It was alleged to be a systematic and widespread attack on civilians, meeting the threshold for crimes against humanity under ICC rules.

The Philippine government was perceived as unwilling or unable to investigate the killings independently.

The ICC had jurisdiction at the time (until the Philippines withdrew in 2019).

Key Difference:

The ICC steps in only if a state is unwilling or unable to prosecute grave crimes. In the cases under previous administrations, investigations and trials occurred within the country. However, for the drug war, the ICC sees a lack of accountability, prompting its probe.

 

[plhbg1]

Ayon kay ᑕᕼᗩTGᑭT:

The distinction lies in the legal and jurisdictional aspects of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and how cases are brought before it. The ICC primarily investigates and prosecutes cases of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity when national governments are unable or unwilling to do so.

Here are key differences regarding the situations you mentioned:

Hacienda Luisita Massacre (2004)

This was a violent dispersal of protesting farmers that resulted in several deaths.

It was handled within the Philippine legal system and was not referred to the ICC.

No international body investigated, and it was not classified as a crime against humanity.

Dengvaxia Controversy

This involved allegations of negligence in the government’s dengue vaccination program.

No formal ruling classified it as an intentional crime against humanity.

The issue was investigated by local courts, and ICC jurisdiction did not apply.

Maguindanao Massacre (2009)

This was a politically motivated mass killing of journalists and civilians.

The Philippine courts prosecuted the case, and the perpetrators were convicted.

Since the government addressed it judicially, it did not fall under ICC jurisdiction.

Why did the ICC investigate the Duterte administration?

The ICC intervened in the Duterte administration's "War on Drugs" because:

It was alleged to be a systematic and widespread attack on civilians, meeting the threshold for crimes against humanity under ICC rules.

The Philippine government was perceived as unwilling or unable to investigate the killings independently.

The ICC had jurisdiction at the time (until the Philippines withdrew in 2019).

Key Difference:

The ICC steps in only if a state is unwilling or unable to prosecute grave crimes. In the cases under previous administrations, investigations and trials occurred within the country. However, for the drug war, the ICC sees a lack of accountability, prompting its probe.

haha "perceived" as unwilling? perception lang pala ang basis how stupid that argument is

 

[dee-u]

haha "perceived" as unwilling? perception lang pala ang basis how stupid that argument is

Sabi ni AI, hehe:

"Calling it ‘just perception’ is either ignorance or intentional misrepresentation. ‘Perceived as unwilling or unable’ is a legal standard under Article 17 of the Rome Statute, not some random opinion. The ICC doesn’t act on gut feelings—it reviews evidence, reports, and the government’s own actions. If the justice system was actually doing its job, there would be no need for ICC intervention. Instead of laughing it off, try understanding how international law actually works."

 

[Soul Calibre]

Sabi ni AI, hehe:

"Calling it ‘just perception’ is either ignorance or intentional misrepresentation. ‘Perceived as unwilling or unable’ is a legal standard under Article 17 of the Rome Statute, not some random opinion. The ICC doesn’t act on gut feelings—it reviews evidence, reports, and the government’s own actions. If the justice system was actually doing its job, there would be no need for ICC intervention. Instead of laughing it off, try understanding how international law actually works."

Bakit mo naman sila ginagamitan ng AI? Magmukmok yang mga yan sa sulok kasi binabato mo sila ng kagaya ng bato na ginagamit nila. Hindi nila ma-take yan. Mamaya bibirahin ka ng mga yan ng “name-calling”. Ganun palagi ang nasa pattern nila. Last resolve nila ay name-calling.

Kulang pa nga sinabi ng AI… hindi nya inilagay na “manipulative”. Wahahahahahaha

 

[plhbg1]

Sabi ni AI, hehe:

"Calling it ‘just perception’ is either ignorance or intentional misrepresentation. ‘Perceived as unwilling or unable’ is a legal standard under Article 17 of the Rome Statute, not some random opinion. The ICC doesn’t act on gut feelings—it reviews evidence, reports, and the government’s own actions. If the justice system was actually doing its job, there would be no need for ICC intervention. Instead of laughing it off, try understanding how international law actually works.

the AI assumed na meron evidence sa unwillingness, so asaan na evidence mo ng unwillingness ngayon?

Bakit mo naman sila ginagamitan ng AI? Magmukmok yang mga yan sa sulok kasi binabato mo sila ng kagaya ng bato na ginagamit nila. Hindi nila ma-take yan. Mamaya bibirahin ka ng mga yan ng “name-calling”. Ganun palagi ang nasa pattern nila. Last resolve nila ay name-calling.

Kulang pa nga sinabi ng AI… hindi nya inilagay na “manipulative”. Wahahahahahaha

lol hanggang comment sa person ka lang, wala ka namang ma-contribute sa discussion

 

[Xirvana]

Bakit mo naman sila ginagamitan ng AI? Magmukmok yang mga yan sa sulok kasi binabato mo sila ng kagaya ng bato na ginagamit nila. Hindi nila ma-take yan. Mamaya bibirahin ka ng mga yan ng “name-calling”. Ganun palagi ang nasa pattern nila. Last resolve nila ay name-calling.

Kulang pa nga sinabi ng AI… hindi nya inilagay na “manipulative”. Wahahahahahaha

Boy wag ka na naman mag coclose ng thread ha? research lang ako kunti dito

Baka kasi di mo na naman sagutin katulad ng sabi na "broken justice system natin"

 

[Soul Calibre]

Boy wag ka na naman mag coclose ng thread ha? research lang ako kunti dito

Baka kasi di mo na naman sagutin katulad ng sabi na "broken justice system natin"

Sana all nagre-research. Sabihan mo rin kaya yung iba diyan.