Legal or îllégâl okay lang yan

Former President Rodrigo Duterte reiterated that he took full responsibility for his administration's bloody war on drugs.

During the eleventh public hearing of the House Quad Committee on Wednesday, November 13, House Assistant Minority Leader and Gabriela Women's Party Rep. Arlene Brosas questioned Duterte on his accountability for the controversial anti-drug campaign.

"Sinabi niya po na full responsibility, so totoo ba 'yan?" Brosas asked.

In response, Duterte firmly asserted his stance: "Very correct. Since I was the president and there was this, until now, serious problem about drugs, I had to issue or make a policy statement about drugs. And all that happened, 'yung nangyari pursuant to my order to stop the drug problem in this country—akin 'yun, akin na akin 'yun. Ako ang nagbigay ng order, kese ginawa nila îllégâl or legal, akin 'yun. I take full responsibility for it."

 

[BicycleHorse]

nope, both of them depend on each other, tanggalin mo lang isa both of them gets affected, ang problema bossing limited lang ang resources ng government, and there has been no successful operation against drug lords kahit pa i-militarize ang operation just like what happened in Mexico, yung resources ng government ang bottleneck

Wala rin naman naging successful operation sa pag papatay ng mga drug addicts, yes mababawasan sila pero hindi pa rin mawawala yan hanggat may mga drug lords na mag susupply ng mga îllégâl drugs at mga politiko na nag proprotekta sa kanila.

 

[plhbg1]

Wala rin naman naging successful operation sa pag papatay ng mga drug addicts, yes mababawasan sila pero hindi pa rin mawawala yan hanggat may mga drug lords na mag susupply ng mga îllégâl drugs at mga politiko na nag proprotekta sa kanila.

repeat ulet ako, zero addicts is unnecessary, minimization is the key and is already enough to make streets safer, at saka hindi rin efficient if yung drug lords ang i-minimize since liligaya lang yung surviving drug lords dahil nawala na ang competitors nila, it is either lots of small cartels or 1 big cartel, there will still be enough supply in both case, the best way is to kill the demand side so the supply side can follow, take note that we are after for safer streets here

 

[BicycleHorse]

repeat ulet ako, zero addicts is unnecessary, minimization is the key and is already enough to make streets safer, at saka hindi rin efficient if yung drug lords ang i-minimize since liligaya lang yung surviving drug lords dahil nawala na ang competitors nila, it is either lots of small cartels or 1 big cartel, there will still be enough supply in both case, the best way is to kill the demand side so the supply side can follow, take note that we are after for safer streets here

And is it okay for you to suppport these drug lords to thier îllégâl business to destroy the lives of the normal people?

 

[ZummerSoltice]

And is it okay for you to suppport these drug lords to thier îllégâl business to destroy the lives of the normal people?

Pilit mo pa baluktot mong pag-iisip.
Kala ko ba for the EJK ka at bigla kang naging concerned sa mga adik?Di naman siguro porket hindi nauubos eh wala na tayong gagawin kaya nga anjan yung war on drugs na isa kana dun sa nakabenepisyo. Pagpatuloy mo pa yan. Panindigan mo nalang kahit wala ka naman talagang alam sa nangyayaring sinasabi ng nanay nyo na laylayan.

 

[plhbg1]

And is it okay for you to suppport these drug lords to thier îllégâl business to destroy the lives of the normal people?

repeat ulet ako, it is because you don't believe na walang adik wala ring drug lords

 

[oOkunTV]

nakakatawa talaga tong mga nakaupo eh noh? nagiimbestiga d naman imbestigador tapos pag sinagot ayaw tanggapin gusto nila marinig yung gusto nilang sagot kalokohan hahah