haha ayos yan antayin mo ko diyanHello, out of context but I need your opinion on this post:
Trivia - Which religion is better?
If you care to share.
Try me make me look the other wayIf I can “destroy beloved beliefs” just by living my life happily without them, are they really that beloved?
Or are they just a convenient preference that can't tolerate the presence of any alternative?
Is asking this question “destroying” them?
actually you're already pissed off by me living my life happily without your beloved beliefs, that already shows how are you affectedTry me make me look the other way
Labas mo lahat ng kademonyohan mo, tingnan natin kung ma convert mo ko,
You're just a speck of dirt
Hang tagal, baket? trouble summoning your demons?
It would be nice if everyone's opinion were equal. Ang problema, religion is not even an opinion dahil wala naman pinagdaanan deductive reasoning para maniwala ang tao dito. Mga paniniwala lang ito na isinaksak sa kukote mula pagkabata o sa panahon ng kahinaan through fear and control tactics. Atheism is the only true opinion out of all of them, dahil based ito sa deductive reasoning ng isang tao base sa karanasan niya.do atheists like destroying people's belief(?) then what about those people's that destroying the atheists belief? kasi every people have their own opinions and belief so kahit balik-baliktaran mo yan, ang atheists may masasabi sa mga naniniwala at ang mga naniniwala ay may masasabi sa mga atheists. at this point hindi na siguro destroying beloved belief ang tawag baka different opinions na
Ibig mong sabihin, kung naging theist ang isang atheist dahil sa kayang karanasan sa bhuay ay hindi ito "true opinion"?It would be nice if everyone's opinion were equal. Ang problema, religion is not even an opinion dahil wala naman pinagdaanan deductive reasoning para maniwala ang tao dito. Mga paniniwala lang ito na isinaksak sa kukote mula pagkabata o sa panahon ng kahinaan through fear and control tactics. Atheism is the only true opinion out of all of them, dahil based ito sa deductive reasoning ng isang tao base sa karanasan niya.
If it came from their deductive reasoning, then maybe. Meaning, kung HINDi ito dulot lamang nangg dahil ito ang relihiyon ng magulang nila, o ung dominant sa bansa nila, o dahil ito ang compatible para maachieve isang goal nila. Like all other opinions ganito ang logical flow.Ibig mong sabihin, kung naging theist ang isang atheist dahil sa kayang karanasan sa bhuay ay hindi ito "true opinion"?
So, ganito?If it came from their deductive reasoning, then maybe. Meaning, kung HINDi ito dulot lamang nangg dahil ito ang relihiyon ng magulang nila, o ung dominant sa bansa nila, o dahil ito ang compatible para maachieve isang goal nila. Like all other opinions ganito ang logical flow.
Reason is true - therefore - religion
Rather than:
Religion - therefore - reason is true
Theism is never through deductive reasoning. Wag mo lokohin sarili mo.So, ganito?
If theism through deductive reasoning then maybe.
If atheism through deductive reasoning then true.
LOL, hehe. Nag-claim ka na naman without proof or evidence. Actually, huwag mong lokohin ang sarili mo na alam mong "Theism is never through deductive reasoning".Theism is never through deductive reasoning. Wag mo lokohin sarili mo.

theism is a philosophical concept kaya, for me, i still consider the existence of reasoning there being the core of philosophy, we learn to reason through philosophy especially regarding our existenceLOL, hehe. Nag-claim ka na naman without proof or evidence. Actually, huwag mong lokohin ang sarili mo na alam mong "Theism is never through deductive reasoning".![]()
Well, this is common knowledge na nagbubulagbulagan lng tayo. Alam nmn natin na lahat ng theism ay itinuro ng ibang tao o ng institutions. No one will discover religious belief by themselves.LOL, hehe. Nag-claim ka na naman without proof or evidence. Actually, huwag mong lokohin ang sarili mo na alam mong "Theism is never through deductive reasoning".![]()
Bigotry yan paps kung close-minded ka sa opposite idea. Try mo basahin ito, position ng isang scientist na theist: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.Well, this is common knowledge na nagbubulagbulagan lng tayo. Alam nmn natin na lahat ng theism ay itinuro ng ibang tao o ng institutions. No one will discover religious belief by themselves.
Bigotry ba? Hahaha.. yan ka nnmn gumagamit ng salitang hindi mo alam.Bigotry yan paps kung close-minded ka sa opposite idea. Try mo basahin ito, position ng isang scientist na theist: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Hehe, bigotry nga, sa way pa lang ng pagsabi mo ng "alam" mo paps.Bigotry ba? Hahaha.. yan ka nnmn gumagamit ng salitang hindi mo alam.
Ano kinalaman ng opinion ni Francis Collins sa sinabi ko? Totoo lng naman ang sinasabi ko, at alam nyo din yan. Ang source ng lahat ng religious belief ay tao (parents or peers) o kaya institutions (church or country), at never yan nakuha sa deductive reasoning and experimentation.
Anyway, I think alam nating walang patutunguhan itong diskusyon natin, dahil "alam" mo na at sa pagkaka-alam mo ay "alam din namin" ang mga claim mo, so walang point na ituloy pa natin ito. Carry on.Talagang walang point. Nag double down ka pa sa maling depinisyon mo ng bigotry e. Nililihis mo ang topic sa punto na sinabi patungo sa pag atake sakin, because you can't falsify the point given. Naka focus ka na igiit na bigotry ako, but my point still stands.Hehe, bigotry nga, sa way pa lang ng pagsabi mo ng "alam" mo paps.Anyway, I think alam nating walang patutunguhan itong diskusyon natin, dahil "alam" mo na at sa pagkaka-alam mo ay "alam din namin" ang mga claim mo, so walang point na ituloy pa natin ito. Carry on.