NASA faked Apollo moon landings

[DiegoBigo_64]

so wala ka nga mapakita, ang meron lang dyan sa internet ay ang picture na galing sa studio as discuss sa first page links ng thread na to

maski capture nalang ng ibang bansa na may rover din dun like china or india, wala? or maski rover na rin ng US na capture ngayon ang footprints ni Neil A (aka A lieN)

yang sinasabi mong footprints ay hindi sa tao kundi sa rover, mukhang nauuto ka ng narrative nila, ang footprint na hinahanap ko ay yung sa footprint ng tao, di pa rin ba gets?

yang picture ng link mo na may parang sapatos ay hindi kuha ng LRO, galing yan sa archive ng NASA na kuha sa studio nila na niretouch, at covered na yan sa links sa first page

maski saan ka maghanap ngayon kung may authentic na high resolution na picture ng footprint, wala ka makikita, mga andyan ay reprocess na picture galing sa archive ng NASA sa kinuha sa studio nila dito sa earth, MABUTI pa ang planet mars may high resolution ng mga bato na ibat ibang hugis dun sa Mars, pero sa moon walang capture sa footprints ng tao

kaya hinamon kita kung may maipakita ka, i veverify ko rin syempre, dahil hindi ako uto uto

Hindi nga kaya ng camera ng LRO kasi 50 km taas nila sa buwan at yung optics ng camera nila hindi kaya mag-closeup at kung kaya man magcloseup idedeny nyo pa rin na 'fake'. Kung accepted mo na yung mga footprints ay gawa ng rover, e sino nag-drive ng rover all-around the area, e di astronaut din. Alangan nman magisa magpaikot-ikot yung rover ng walang nagmamaneho. Ganun din sabi ni NASAScam sa site nya na yung rover na "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance". e di kahit sya confirmed na may nagdadrive nung lunar rover.

Ngayon kung sabi mo gawa sa 'studio' yung mga footprints may ebidensya ka ba?

Wala ka pang naipapakitang mga scientific evidences na fake ang lunar landing e.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Hindi nga kaya ng camera ng LRO kasi 50 km taas nila sa buwan at yung optics ng camera nila hindi kaya mag-closeup at kung kaya man magcloseup idedeny nyo pa rin na 'fake'. Kung accepted mo na yung mga footprints ay gawa ng rover, e sino nag-drive ng rover all-around the area, e di astronaut din. Alangan nman magisa magpaikot-ikot yung rover ng walang nagmamaneho. Ganun din sabi ni NASAScam sa site nya na yung rover na "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance". e di kahit sya confirmed na may nagdadrive nung lunar rover.

Ngayon kung sabi mo gawa sa 'studio' yung mga footprints may ebidensya ka ba?

Wala ka pang naipapakitang mga scientific evidences na fake ang lunar landing e.

di mo kasi gets na gawa gawa lang yung script na yun at pati mga pctures nila inedit in a way na maloko ka nila, hindi sila b-o-bo

kita mo aminin walang maipakitang footprints, kung rover prints usapan meron din yan sa planet Mars

kung may evidensya ng pamemeke nila sa tingin mo di nila sisirain at itatago? mag isip ka din, critical thingking kelangan hindi evidensya

 

[Nami Raven]

maniniwala ako dito kapag Russia na nagsabi na fake ang moon landing ng Apollo. kaso hinde eh. dun pa lang talo ka na eh.

 

[rodey_lyf]

maniniwala ako dito kapag Russia na nagsabi na fake ang moon landing ng Apollo. kaso hinde eh. dun pa lang talo ka na eh.

haha, need mo din mag isip, eto basahin mo galing sa russia, alam nilang di totoo yun

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Nami Raven]

Just think about this ano. The moon landing occurs while the US and Soviet Union are on a cold space war. Historically, the Soviet is winning and the only way for US to redeem themselves will be the moonlanding. It is logical na if the moon landing is allegedly fake, the Soviets will be the one to expose it but NO, they also agreed to it.

mas mahusay kasi si TS kesa sa mga Soviets, meron si TS na tinatawag na google search kung saan nakikita nya yung mga ebidensya na hindi nakikita ng mga researchers. advance din google ni TS kasi incognito gamit nya para di daw sya ma detect ng mga indian häçkers kasi sobrang lakas ng ebidensya nya.

 

[rodey_lyf]

mas mahusay kasi si TS kesa sa mga Soviets, meron si TS na tinatawag na google search kung saan nakikita nya yung mga ebidensya na hindi nakikita ng mga researchers. advance din google ni TS kasi incognito gamit nya para di daw sya ma detect ng mga indian häçkers kasi sobrang lakas ng ebidensya nya.

basahin mo paps

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Nami Raven]

haha, need mo din mag isip, eto basahin mo galing sa russia, alam nilang di totoo yun

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

so ayan na facts mo? blog article? hirap makipagtalo sa utak munggo. tama ka na lang. fake nga talaga.

basahin mo paps

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

sabi ng tatay ko wag makipagtalo sa utak ipis. kaya agree ako sayo fake talaga ang moon landing.

 

[rodey_lyf]

so ayan na facts mo? blog article? hirap makipagtalo sa utak munggo. tama ka na lang. fake nga talaga.

hindi yan blog paps, chief ng space program ng Russia nagsabi nyan, meron pa isalng link backread lang

read and comprehend lang paps

so ayan na facts mo? blog article? hirap makipagtalo sa utak munggo. tama ka na lang. fake nga talaga.


sabi ng tatay ko wag makipagtalo sa utak ipis. kaya agree ako sayo fake talaga ang moon landing.

baka akala nya ipis ka paps at kaya mo makipagusap sa ipis

eto yung isang link na nasa page 2

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

magbasa ka ah para hindi ka pagkamalang ipis

 

[Nami Raven]

hindi yan blog paps, chief ng space program ng Russia nagsabi nyan, meron pa isalng link backread lang

read and comprehend lang paps


baka akala nya ipis ka paps at kaya mo makipagusap sa ipis

eto yung isang link na nasa page 2

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

magbasa ka ah para hindi ka pagkamalang ipis

tama ka paps fake nga

 

[mark_bhe_18]

fake talaga yan , at matagal na alam na ng marami ..

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

di mo kasi gets na gawa gawa lang yung script na yun at pati mga pctures nila inedit in a way na maloko ka nila, hindi sila b-o-bo

kita mo aminin walang maipakitang footprints, kung rover prints usapan meron din yan sa planet Mars

kung may evidensya ng pamemeke nila sa tingin mo di nila sisirain at itatago? mag isip ka din, critical thingking kelangan hindi evidensya

Ang Apollo 11 lang may recorded 19,000 hours of conversation from pre-launch - moon landing - and back to Earth. Apollo 11 pa lang yan ay may anim (6) na pumunta sa moon (Apollo 13 did not made it) imagine kung gaano kadami usapan iyon. Sinong magaling na writer ng script ang kayang gumawa ng mahigit two (2) years of technical and scientific conversation.

Kulang kalahating milyon na tao ang involved sa Apollo projects noon 50 yrs ago wala man lang nagsabi o whistle blower even in their 'death bed' na peke ang moon landing. At wala man lang nag-isip na pede i-blackmail ang NASA at maging instant millionare kung isisiwalat nya na peke ang lahat.

Kung may maipakita man sa iyo na close-up ng footprints na kuha ng LRO (na hindi naman talaga kaya ng optics) I'm pretty sure sasabihin mo din na 'fake' kasi kahit yung closeup ng footprint na kuha ni Aldrin sinabi nyo peke at kuha sa studio.

Ang Lunar Rover noong Apollo 11 ay hindi pa remote controlled from Earth to moon, hindi kagaya ng sa Mars rover na nakokontrol from Earth.

Again, 50 yrs ng mahigit ang Apollo projects at kung mayroon mang ebidensya na itinatago ay bakit hanggang ngayon wala? Ang daming malalaking TV network sa US at ibang bansa dapat pagpepyestahan na yan. Pansin mo si NASA scam walang pumapatol kasi insufficient ang mga allegations puro hinala lang wala namang proofs. At walang matibay na credentials at anonymous ang author, pati yung looks ng site na parang 'tabloid' ang dating.
At wala kang makikitang reliable o crediblesite na technically and scientifically convincing sites sa internet that the moon landing was faked.

BTW, pinagaaralan na ngayon sa National Libray of Medicine sa USA na ang 'Conspiracy theories' are harmful in the long run for perceivers' health and well-being. Research showing that conspiracy theories do not reduce, and may even increase, anxiety, uncertainty aversion, and feelings of existential threat. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.



There are thousands of publicly available photos from the Apollo Moon missions. The Apollo 11 mission alone had 1,408 usable images na kuha ng dala nilang 70MM Hasselblad cameras.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Ang Apollo 11 lang may recorded 19,000 hours of conversation from pre-launch - moon landing - and back to Earth. Apollo 11 pa lang yan ay may anim (6) na pumunta sa moon (Apollo 13 did not made it) imagine kung gaano kadami usapan iyon. Sinong magaling na writer ng script ang kayang gumawa ng mahigit two (2) years of technical and scientific conversation.

marami magaling na sriptwriter paps

Kulang kalahating milyon na tao ang involved sa Apollo projects noon 50 yrs ago wala man lang nagsabi o whistle blower even in their 'death bed' na peke ang moon landing. At wala man lang nag-isip na pede i-blackmail ang NASA at maging instant millionare kung isisiwalat nya na peke ang lahat.

marami din whistler blower hindi mo lang alam, at kung nakita mo man sasabihin mo lagi conspiracy, haha

Kung may maipakita man sa iyo na close-up ng footprints na kuha ng LRO (na hindi naman talaga kaya ng optics) I'm pretty sure sasabihin mo din na 'fake' kasi kahit yung closeup ng footprint na kuha ni Aldrin sinabi nyo peke at kuha sa studio.

wala ka talaga maipakita paps, kahit after 100 years wala pa rin yan, antayin ko yung maipapakita mo

There are thousands of publicly available photos from the Apollo Moon missions. The Apollo 11 mission alone had 1,408 usable images na kuha ng dala nilang 70MM Hasselblad cameras.

madami talaga sila pictures paps dahil ilang taon sila nagpipicture sa studio nila, ako nga yung one minute lang daming camera capture na

Ang Lunar Rover noong Apollo 11 ay hindi pa remote controlled from Earth to moon, hindi kagaya ng sa Mars rover na nakokontrol from Earth.

yun ang sabi sayo, pero alam mo ba na ang russia ay may rover na sa moon nuon pang 1970s, now you know, research ka pa ah

Again, 50 yrs ng mahigit ang Apollo projects at kung mayroon mang ebidensya na itinatago ay bakit hanggang ngayon wala? Ang daming malalaking TV network sa US at ibang bansa dapat pagpepyestahan na yan. Pansin mo si NASA scam walang pumapatol kasi insufficient ang mga allegations puro hinala lang wala namang proofs. At walang matibay na credentials at anonymous ang author, pati yung looks ng site na parang 'tabloid' ang dating.
At wala kang makikitang reliable o crediblesite na technically and scientifically convincing sites sa internet that the moon landing was faked.

dahil gusto nila itago paps, di mo ba na gegets??? madami na ebidensya pero tulad mo sumasagot sila ng may kalabuan at nagiimbento ng counter argument kahit mahuli mo silang nagsisinungaling, babaguhin nila ebidensya nila tulad ng pagbura nila ng madaming records at pictures, yung iba naman pinapalitan nila

BTW, pinagaaralan na ngayon sa National Libray of Medicine sa USA na ang 'Conspiracy theories' are harmful in the long run for perceivers' health and well-being. Research showing that conspiracy theories do not reduce, and may even increase, anxiety, uncertainty aversion, and feelings of existential threat. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

another biased study yan paps, alam mo bang shutdown na nila ang USAID dahil criminal organization cya, maski ibat ibang health org sa US tulad ng CDC at NIH, pero smokescreen lang lahat, dahil gumagawa ulit sila ng mga bagong planong panloloko

Conclusion: Nasagot ko na ulit ng isa isa mga panlilinlang nila sayo at pagtatanggol mo, pero nasa iyo na yan kung patuloy kang papauto sa mga kasinungalingan ng mundong ito, basta ako relax lang dito paps, kung wala kang maipakita na footprints na kuha ngayon nagsasayang ka lang ng oras dahil hindi mo ako ma uto

antayin mo yung artemis 2, pupunta daw sila sa moon by april 2026, hingi ka ng capture ng footprints at ilapag mo dito, pag meron at verified then saka ako maniwala

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

marami magaling na sriptwriter paps


marami din whistler blower hindi mo lang alam, at kung nakita mo man sasabihin mo lagi conspiracy, haha


wala ka talaga maipakita paps, kahit after 100 years wala pa rin yan, antayin ko yung maipapakita mo


madami talaga sila pictures paps dahil ilang taon sila nagpipicture sa studio nila, ako nga yung one minute lang daming camera capture na


yun ang sabi sayo, pero alam mo ba na ang russia ay may rover na sa moon nuon pang 1970s, now you know, research ka pa ah


dahil gusto nila itago paps, di mo ba na gegets??? madami na ebidensya pero tulad mo sumasagot sila ng may kalabuan at nagiimbento ng counter argument kahit mahuli mo silang nagsisinungaling, babaguhin nila ebidensya nila tulad ng pagbura nila ng madaming records at pictures, yung iba naman pinapalitan nila


another biased study yan paps, alam mo bang shutdown na nila ang USAID dahil criminal organization cya, maski ibat ibang health org sa US tulad ng CDC at NIH, pero smokescreen lang lahat, dahil gumagawa ulit sila ng mga bagong planong panloloko

Conclusion: Nasagot ko na ulit ng isa isa mga panlilinlang nila sayo at pagtatanggol mo, pero nasa iyo na yan kung patuloy kang papauto sa mga kasinungalingan ng mundong ito, basta ako relax lang dito paps, kung wala kang maipakita na footprints na kuha ngayon nagsasayang ka lang ng oras dahil hindi mo ako ma uto

antayin mo yung artemis 2, pupunta daw sila sa moon by april 2026, hingi ka ng capture ng footprints at ilapag mo dito, pag meron at verified then saka ako maniwala

Yung mga comments mo puro sariling palagay lang at wala ka man lang mailagay na ebidensya. Ibig mong sabihin yung mahigit two (2) years na conversation recordings ay scripted lahat? Hindi naman sa magaling na writer pinaguusapan dito kung gaano kadaming script yon.
An average movie script ranges from 90 to 120 pages say 100 pages na lang at one (1) page per minute of a movie.
Apollo script (if written nga ng magagaling writers) would be around 1,140,000 pages.

A stack of 1,000,000 sheets of standard copy paper would be approximately 130 meters high, which is roughly the height of a 43-story building.
I-transcribed mo lang lahat iyon into writings un-imaginable na kung gaano kadami e yung isulat pa to start with.

At bakit mo nasasabing may nanguuto sa akin e wala namang kumakausap sa akin, sariling pangunawa ko ito dahil ito ang 'norm' knowledges. There are informations all-around us and there are a lot of false info but if you smart enough you can filter which is right.
E ikaw pinanghawakan mo agad yung writer ng NASASCAM na yun e hindi naman credible at authoritative source.
At yung website nya na You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. ang ginamit nya na You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. ay 'free web hosting' lang.
Ngayon sino uto-uto.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Yung mga comments mo puro sariling palagay lang at wala ka man lang mailagay na ebidensya. Ibig mong sabihin yung mahigit two (2) years na conversation recordings ay scripted lahat? Hindi naman sa magaling na writer pinaguusapan dito kung gaano kadaming script yon.
An average movie script ranges from 90 to 120 pages say 100 pages na lang at one (1) page per minute of a movie.
Apollo script (if written nga ng magagaling writers) would be around 1,140,000 pages.

A stack of 1,000,000 sheets of standard copy paper would be approximately 130 meters high, which is roughly the height of a 43-story building.
I-transcribed mo lang lahat iyon into writings un-imaginable na kung gaano kadami e yung isulat pa to start with.

At bakit mo nasasabing may nanguuto sa akin e wala namang kumakausap sa akin, sariling pangunawa ko ito dahil ito ang 'norm' knowledges. There are informations all-around us and there are a lot of false info but if you smart enough you can filter which is right.
E ikaw pinanghawakan mo agad yung writer ng NASASCAM na yun e hindi naman credible at authoritative source.
At yung website nya na You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. ang ginamit nya na You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. ay 'free web hosting' lang.
Ngayon sino uto-uto.

diba sabi mo may footprints na evidencya ang LRO? oh di nauto ka nila. tapos hinamon kita maglapag ng footprints, may nilagay kang link ng footprint, yun pala ay reprocess at hindi kuha ng LRO, nauto ka ulit nila. kulang pa ba? lastyear naman napagusapan natin ang ALSJ at napatunayan ko na binabago talaga nila scripts lalo na kung may questionable script na di tugma sa dugtung dugtung na kuento nila, hay, hirap naman mag enumerate, basahin mo nalang ulit mula page 1 etong thread na to

aminin walang maipakitang footprints, at nagulat ka din na may rover na pala ang russia doon noon pa, hahaha

andami mong palusot, alam mo ba na ang chandrayaan-2 mission ng india ay may 4years and counting communication recordings na pero hindi naman yun proof na merong indiano na naglakad sa moon, hahaha

lahat ng sinasabi ko dito ay hindi lang basta palagay, backed by evidence at critical thinking yan paps, hindi tulad ng mga reply mo na based sa deception at palagay ng na-uto



You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

interesting ngayon ko lang nakita, eto yung picture na nilapag mo na footprint, haha, tignan mo yang link

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - collection of videos
https:// vimeo.com/ user137005829 remove spaces pag ayaw yang link

tapos eto yung vimeo, mga videos na now ko lang din naopen, although nabrowse ko yan, di ko pa pinanuod dahil alam ko naman na na fake yung man on moon nila, pero kung interested ka malaman ang totoo why not watch them

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

diba sabi mo may footprints na evidencya ang LRO? oh di nauto ka nila. tapos hinamon kita maglapag ng footprints, may nilagay kang link ng footprint, yun pala ay reprocess at hindi kuha ng LRO, nauto ka ulit nila. kulang pa ba? lastyear naman napagusapan natin ang ALSJ at napatunayan ko na binabago talaga nila scripts lalo na kung may questionable script na di tugma sa dugtung dugtung na kuento nila, hay, hirap naman mag enumerate, basahin mo nalang ulit mula page 1 etong thread na to

aminin walang maipakitang footprints, at nagulat ka din na may rover na pala ang russia doon noon pa, hahaha

andami mong palusot, alam mo ba na ang chandrayaan-2 mission ng india ay may 4years and counting communication recordings na pero hindi naman yun proof na merong indiano na naglakad sa moon, hahaha

lahat ng sinasabi ko dito ay hindi lang basta palagay, backed by evidence at critical thinking yan paps, hindi tulad ng mga reply mo na based sa deception at palagay ng na-uto



You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

interesting ngayon ko lang nakita, eto yung picture na nilapag mo na footprint, haha, tignan mo yang link

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - collection of videos
https:// vimeo.com/ user137005829 remove spaces pag ayaw yang link

tapos eto yung vimeo, mga videos na now ko lang din naopen, although nabrowse ko yan, di ko pa pinanuod dahil alam ko naman na na fake yung man on moon nila, pero kung interested ka malaman ang totoo why not watch them

Diniscuss na ni Johnny Harris yang si Bill Kaysing at allegations lang talaga.
IF HE’S TELLING THE TRUTH:
Well, as someone who’s clearly had high security military and AEC jobs, he’d clearly have to have been under TOP SECURITY clearance to have worked on one of the most closely guarded secret in world history…the faking of the Moon landings.

Remember - the USA was involved in the Cold War against the Soviet Union at that time. If he’d been working on Apollo fakery - and subsequently told the world what he knew - he’d be rotting in the deepest secret dungeon the world have ever seen! Dapat nabulok na sya sa isolation prison.

There is no way he’d have gotten his book into print. Not one chance in a billion.
If he’d truly wanted to expose this to the world, he’d have had to (at the very least) absconded to Russia and published it under a false name.

At the very least, he’d have have had the sense to use the federal whistle-blower laws to get some protection.

But this would be the highest crime in the USA imaginable. There is absolutely no way it would have seen the light of day if it were remotely true.

CONCLUSION:

This is a very, very, VERY clear example of someone who is saying things that they don’t believe in order to sell more books.

The evidence that the Apollo landings really happened is overwhelming.

Not one single piece of evidence AGAINST them is provable.

BTW, sana una pa lang si Bill Kaysing na references mo dumaan ka pa kay NASASCAM.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Diniscuss na ni Johnny Harris yang si Bill Kaysing at allegations lang talaga.
IF HE’S TELLING THE TRUTH:
Well, as someone who’s clearly had high security military and AEC jobs, he’d clearly have to have been under TOP SECURITY clearance to have worked on one of the most closely guarded secret in world history…the faking of the Moon landings.

Remember - the USA was involved in the Cold War against the Soviet Union at that time. If he’d been working on Apollo fakery - and subsequently told the world what he knew - he’d be rotting in the deepest secret dungeon the world have ever seen! Dapat nabulok na sya sa isolation prison.

There is no way he’d have gotten his book into print. Not one chance in a billion.
If he’d truly wanted to expose this to the world, he’d have had to (at the very least) absconded to Russia and published it under a false name.

At the very least, he’d have have had the sense to use the federal whistle-blower laws to get some protection.

But this would be the highest crime in the USA imaginable. There is absolutely no way it would have seen the light of day if it were remotely true.

CONCLUSION:

This is a very, very, VERY clear example of someone who is saying things that they don’t believe in order to sell more books.

The evidence that the Apollo landings really happened is overwhelming.

Not one single piece of evidence AGAINST them is provable.

BTW, sana una pa lang si Bill Kaysing na references mo dumaan ka pa kay NASASCAM.

i even dont know him paps, sabi ko nga i havent watch those, pero these are people with differing opinions, to each his own. anyway tinignan ko ulit yung link and just counted the number of videos, more than 40 pala yun, and yung first video lang may rebuttal ka? how about the other 40+ videos? again since alam ko na na fake ang moon landing, i dont have to watch those, but i will be happy to read your rebuttals kung meron

basta ako antay ko ilalapag mo dito na footprints, ala ba bago na pag-uto mo dyan? wala ka ba rebuttals sa point ko na nauto ka at naenumerate ko pa

kahit na gaano kaoverwhelming evidence nila if they miss the most important piece or part, walang kuenta yan paps, gets mo?

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

i even dont know him paps, sabi ko nga i havent watch those, pero these are people with differing opinions, to each his own. anyway tinignan ko ulit yung link and just counted the number of videos, more than 40 pala yun, and yung first video lang may rebuttal ka? how about the other 40+ videos? again since alam ko na na fake ang moon landing, i dont have to watch those, but i will be happy to read your rebuttals kung meron

basta ako antay ko ilalapag mo dito na footprints, ala ba bago na pag-uto mo dyan? wala ka ba rebuttals sa point ko na nauto ka at naenumerate ko pa

kahit na gaano kaoverwhelming evidence nila if they miss the most important piece or part, walang kuenta yan paps, gets mo?

Bill Kaysing was just a technical writer for the Rocketdyne (sub-contractor of NASA) pero wala syang engineering or technical know-how about rockets or space technologies. He was just a former US Navy and book author, so magaling siyang sumulat.
Bago pa man mabuo ang spaceship papunta sa buwan inamin nya na skeptical na sya about moon landing, palagay nya imposible kasi konti lang kakayahan (daw) sabi ng mga engineers na nakausap daw nyo noon. Pessimistic na sya sa umpisa pa lang na kahit na ilang beses ng nakalanding ang tao sa buwan di pa rin nya pinaniwalaan.
Kaya nasulat nya libro nya about moon landing hoax. Pero that time marami na syang books about topics different topics na medyo mababa ang benta. Yung libro nya about that hoax ang bumenta at kinagat ng maraming theories na ginamit din ni NASASCAM kasi yung din ang content ng book ni Kaysing at lahat ng mga issues doon ay na-debunked na lahat.
Yung anak nya na si Wendy L. Kaysing,has stated that she hopes na sana makapagsulat sya ng libro about her father Kaysing's nephew, Dietrich von Schmausen, not to reiterate Kaysing's hoax claims, (ayaw nya nang maulit ang claims ng tatay nya) rather to talk about her father as a person.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Bill Kaysing was just a technical writer for the Rocketdyne (sub-contractor of NASA) pero wala syang engineering or technical know-how about rockets or space technologies. He was just a former US Navy and book author, so magaling siyang sumulat.
Bago pa man mabuo ang spaceship papunta sa buwan inamin nya na skeptical na sya about moon landing, palagay nya imposible kasi konti lang kakayahan (daw) sabi ng mga engineers na nakausap daw nyo noon. Pessimistic na sya sa umpisa pa lang na kahit na ilang beses ng nakalanding ang tao sa buwan di pa rin nya pinaniwalaan.
Kaya nasulat nya libro nya about moon landing hoax. Pero that time marami na syang books about topics different topics na medyo mababa ang benta. Yung libro nya about that hoax ang bumenta at kinagat ng maraming theories na ginamit din ni NASASCAM kasi yung din ang content ng book ni Kaysing at lahat ng mga issues doon ay na-debunked na lahat.
Yung anak nya na si Wendy L. Kaysing,has stated that she hopes na sana makapagsulat sya ng libro about her father Kaysing's nephew, Dietrich von Schmausen, not to reiterate Kaysing's hoax claims, (ayaw nya nang maulit ang claims ng tatay nya) rather to talk about her father as a person.

well i dont know him paps, better email him, im sure kaya nya sagutin yang mga concerns mo sa kanya, i dont think nabasa mo or naintindihan mo ang website ni nasascam, because the way you talk does not add up, wala ka namang nadebunk dun sa website nya, and malalala ko lang na rebuttal mo ay yung picture na kamo di mo makita tapos nilapag ko mismo yung alsj site tapos nagulat ka, then kamo iba ang words, then sabi ko pinalitan na ng ALSJ yung mga captions at inamin nila mismo, so anu ang nadebunk mo dun

i hope makapaglapag ka na ng footprints dito galing sa LRO or space rover ng NASA, or yung artemis project nila

well well i look again at nasascam site and this is the only part na meron si bill kaysing and to quote

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

"In 1980, long time sceptic of the Apollo Moon missions, Bill Kaysing appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show, detailing how NASA had conned the American people into believing that they had landed men on the Moon. A national survey at the time by the program makers showed a staggering 60% of Americans believed the Moon landings were faked. We have moved on a further 45 years, and still there are those who believe NASA lies

Bill Kaysing had offered to appear on a live TV debate with any of the Apollo astronauts, NASA officials, or even the lot of them together, verses him on his own, to answer questions, and debate the authenticity of Apollo. Think about this, if these astronauts had indeed been to the Moon, and NASA truly landed men on the Moon as they claim, then they had absolutely nothing to fear, and could have demolished Kaysing's theory in less than 5 minutes. Not only that, but they would have made him look ridiculous in front of millions of people. However both astronauts and NASA continually declined for any such meeting/debate on television.

That just about sums it up in a nutshell, they could not answer his questions. Bill Kaysing has now passed away, however he did accuse NASA of murdering the 3 astronauts in the Apollo 1 fire because they would not go along with any faking of Moon missions. This was a very libellous statement to make if it were untrue. Did NASA taken any legal action to sue Kaysing for labelling them as murderers? No of course not because (A) The statement may be true, (B) If it were not true, any legal action would bring into question the authenticity of the alleged Moon landings, and that is something that NASA did not want."

-sad, dead na pala cya, so anyone arguing him now cant debate him, pero nuon pala hinahamon nya mga astraunaut mismo sa debate

sikat pala cya in fairness

so ano ano na naman ang pang uto nila sayo about bill kaysing? ngbebenta ng book? eh dead na nga eh, bakit nga ba ayaw nila cya kadebate nuon? hmmm

o cya, inaantay ko reply mo eh, tagal, logout muna ako, monday na kita balikan

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

well i dont know him paps, better email him, im sure kaya nya sagutin yang mga concerns mo sa kanya, i dont think nabasa mo or naintindihan mo ang website ni nasascam, because the way you talk does not add up, wala ka namang nadebunk dun sa website nya, and malalala ko lang na rebuttal mo ay yung picture na kamo di mo makita tapos nilapag ko mismo yung alsj site tapos nagulat ka, then kamo iba ang words, then sabi ko pinalitan na ng ALSJ yung mga captions at inamin nila mismo, so anu ang nadebunk mo dun

i hope makapaglapag ka na ng footprints dito galing sa LRO or space rover ng NASA, or yung artemis project nila

1. No evidence of the surface being disturbes beneath the engine muzzle of lunar lander.
Answer:
While a lunar landing does cause some disruption to the lunar surface due to the rocket exhaust, it doesn't create large craters or significant damage because of the Moon's low gravity and the composition of its regolith (lunar dust), which is very loose and easily displaced by the relatively low thrust of the landing engines; essentially, the exhaust plume readily disperses the surface material without digging deep craters.
Low gravity:
The Moon's gravity is only about 1/6th of Earth's, meaning the force of the rocket exhaust has less impact on the surface. Hindi kailangan malakas na rocket para magkaroon ng landing crater.

2. No stars
Answer:
The reason why there are no visible stars in the photos from the lunar landings is because the camera settings were adjusted to capture the bright lunar surface, meaning the faint light from stars was simply too dim to register on the film, similar to how you can't see stars in a brightly lit daytime sky on Earth; this is a common misconception used in moon landing conspiracy theories, but is scientifically explained by the camera settings used during the missions.

Ilan ito sa mga allegations ni Bill Kaysing na ginamit din ni NASASCAM: na nadebunked naman lahat.

Beforehand sinabi ko nung una na hindi kayang makunan ng camera ng LRO yung footprints sa buwan ng closeup
at kung makunan man nila di mo rin tatanggapin na totoo kasi kahit yung kuha ni Aldrin na di pa uso Photoshop di nyo matanggap e. At kung gusto nga nilang pekein yung footstep e di sana naglabas na sila ng pictures. Yung tracks ang importante kasi kita ang traversions nila unlike sa closeup na pede nyong sabihin na sa studio lang kinunan.

Si NASASCAM ang nagpalit ng kontexto tungkol sa LR approahing LM.

Eto refresh ko di ba sulat ni NASASCAM yan?

Eto yung original transcription ng recordings tungkol dyan. Paano mo sasabihin ineit ito e nakasequence yang mga events na yan.

Looks like you still trust NASASCAM, kung may estudyante kang anak yan ba gusto matutunan nya yung turo ni NASASCAM. NASASCAM is phony.
There are ways to know if site is crediible:

1. Look for Established Institutions.
2. Look for Sites with Expertise. ...
3. Steer Clear of Commercial Sites. ...
4. Beware of Bias. ...
5. Check the Date. ...
6. Consider the Site's Look. ...(web bad design)
7. Avoid Anonymous Authors. ...
8. Check the Links. (ung mga links nya sya rin ang author)

Ito dapat: NASA FACTS: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[rodey_lyf]

1. No evidence of the surface being disturbes beneath the engine muzzle of lunar lander.

saan yan sa site ni nasascam paps? kelangan may reference ka para hindi ka uto uto

2. No stars

andun ba sa nasascam yan paps, reference link agad ah

eto yung nasascam site, at meron dyan another 10 links sa bottom ng page, ituro mo saan yan number 1 at 2 mo
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Si NASASCAM ang nagpalit ng kontexto tungkol sa LR approahing LM.
View attachment 3500645
Eto refresh ko di ba sulat ni NASASCAM yan?
View attachment 3500650
Eto yung original transcription ng recordings tungkol dyan. Paano mo sasabihin ineit ito e nakasequence yang mga events na yan.

"did ALSJ change their scripts in ther website always

Yes, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal (ALSJ) has undergone numerous updates and changes to its scripts over time"

eto sagot ni copilot paps, deepseek sana pero baka dika maniwala kaya copilot nalang ginamit ko

copy paste ko lang ulit to, parang dimo nabasa eh

well well i look again at nasascam site and this is the only part na meron si bill kaysing and to quote

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

"In 1980, long time sceptic of the Apollo Moon missions, Bill Kaysing appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show, detailing how NASA had conned the American people into believing that they had landed men on the Moon. A national survey at the time by the program makers showed a staggering 60% of Americans believed the Moon landings were faked. We have moved on a further 45 years, and still there are those who believe NASA lies

Bill Kaysing had offered to appear on a live TV debate with any of the Apollo astronauts, NASA officials, or even the lot of them together, verses him on his own, to answer questions, and debate the authenticity of Apollo. Think about this, if these astronauts had indeed been to the Moon, and NASA truly landed men on the Moon as they claim, then they had absolutely nothing to fear, and could have demolished Kaysing's theory in less than 5 minutes. Not only that, but they would have made him look ridiculous in front of millions of people. However both astronauts and NASA continually declined for any such meeting/debate on television.

That just about sums it up in a nutshell, they could not answer his questions. Bill Kaysing has now passed away, however he did accuse NASA of murdering the 3 astronauts in the Apollo 1 fire because they would not go along with any faking of Moon missions. This was a very libellous statement to make if it were untrue. Did NASA taken any legal action to sue Kaysing for labelling them as murderers? No of course not because (A) The statement may be true, (B) If it were not true, any legal action would bring into question the authenticity of the alleged Moon landings, and that is something that NASA did not want."

-sad, dead na pala cya, so anyone arguing him now cant debate him, pero nuon pala hinahamon nya mga astraunaut mismo sa debate

sikat pala cya in fairness

so ano ano na naman ang pang uto nila sayo about bill kaysing? ngbebenta ng book? eh dead na nga eh, bakit nga ba ayaw nila cya kadebate nuon? hmmm (ps. madami palang book si bill kaysing, at yung about moon ang bestselling nya kaya kung ang pang uto nila sayo ay para makabenta ng book, well hindi yun ang hanap nya, debate hanap nya)


-may time pa ako konti kaya maglatag pa ako

Ito dapat: NASA FACTS: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

ano yan paps parang religion? like kung INC dapat pasugo lang basahin, pag Saksi dapat watchtower lang basahin, need ng wall para hindi masilip ang totoo?