🕯️ Traditions Hardcore Christian Conservatives: This is for you!

[plhbg1]

Jesús de María and Wowza!

This might rattle some hard core, Christian conservatives that only believe in two genders. It seems that when old Adam and Eve got their butts and se̾x organs kicked out of the Garden of Eden, they took along some DNA with them that wasn’t just male and female only identified. Those two pesky little, God fearing rascals! Shame on them for ruining things for the Bible literalists!

Oh, wait…

What’s weird is that you won’t find any reference to these Hebrew and Greek terms in the King James Bible. They were edited out. So full speed ahead on that man, woman only thing, you guys and gals! And you still have all the unedited, begatting and having knowlege of to tickle your fancy.

 

[Frustrated Burger]

Mga imbento ng anti Bible folks

 

[plhbg1]

Mga imbento ng anti Bible folks

hehe wala kang ma-argue boss? you think reading the translated bible is awesome?

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

I don't know if all those term really exist. Pero ung androgynos, that term definitely existed in the origins of Genesis.
Plato in Separation of the Genders

During a dialogue as Plato writes in Symposium, Aristophanes proposed this myth above. Then Plato redacted the male-male pair and the female-female pair, only keeping the Androgyne (male-female pair) when he wrote in his other book, Statesman. He is a known to be against homosexuality.

From this, he created a similar myth kung saan pinaghiwalay ni Zues ung dalawang gender as a punishment, and they are cursed to look for their missing other half (explaining the reason for marriage).

[Also note that it was a punishment for a sin of androgynes stacking mountains to reach the heaven, similar to tower of Babel]

So kung si Plato tlga ang source ng references ng Genesis, anti-homosexuality was just an opinion adapted from him. If he was not against it, creation of gay would be accounted for on the Bible.

Mga imbento ng anti Bible folks

Imbento lang din ng tao ang Bibliya..

 

[plhbg1]

I don't know if all those term really exist. Pero ung androgynos, that term definitely existed in the origins of Genesis.
Plato in Separation of the Genders
View attachment 2767731


During a dialogue as Plato writes in Symposium, Aristophanes proposed this myth above. Then Plato redacted the male-male pair and the female-female pair, only keeping the Androgyne (male-female pair) when he wrote in his other book, Statesman. He is a known to be against homosexuality.

From this, he created a similar myth kung saan pinaghiwalay ni Zues ung dalawang gender as a punishment, and they are cursed to look for their missing other half (explaining the reason for marriage).

[Also not that it was a punishment for a sin of androgynes stacking mountains to reach the heaven, similar to tower of Babel]

So kung si Plato tlga ang source ng references ng Genesis, anti-homosexuality was just an opinion adapted from him. If he was not against it, creation of gay would be accounted for on the Bible.

kahit isa lang diyan sa 6 ang ma-confirn it will already collapse the male & female only gender drama ng mga hardcore christian conservatives, anu pa kaya if kompirmado lahat iyan

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

kahit isa lang diyan sa 6 ang ma-confirn it will already collapse the male & female only gender drama ng mga hardcore christian conservatives, anu pa kaya if kompirmado lahat iyan

Logically speaking, we don't have to prove anything, as both are just myth. If we base on what we know scientifically, behaviors attached to genders is only normalized due to cultural pressure (e.g. Exclusively dating the opposite ***, being limited to behaving a certain way etc)

They would argue that "females" are the one's capable of carrying children. That much is true. But that is the end of gender differences. Every rules derived from this are NOT scientific anymore. (ex. women must not involve in physical activities, women are weaker, men are more logical)

Yun nga lng, current societies believe them to be TRUTH without any further questioning. They just accept the convention. And wether they are religious or not, these ideas are all undeniable influence of religious belief aka judeo-christian belief systems. That's all there is to it.

 

[plhbg1]

Logically speaking, we don't have to prove anything, as both are just myth. If we base on what we know scientifically, behaviors attached to genders is only normalized due to cultural pressure (e.g. Exclusively dating the opposite ***, being limited to behaving a certain way etc)

They would argue that "females" are the one's capable of carrying children. That much is true. But that is the end of gender differences. Every rules derived from this are NOT scientific anymore. (ex. women must not involve in physical activities, women are weaker, men are more logical)

Yun nga lng, current societies believe them to be TRUTH without any further questioning. They just accept the convention. And wether they are religious or not, these ideas are all undeniable influence of religious belief aka judeo-christian belief systems. That's all there is to it.

hehe siyempre andun pa din yung pinaka burden nila of proving the bible, pero we can piss them more if we can also argue that even if magka totoo nga yung bible ay magko collapse pa din yung core doctrines nila

 

[hardcorepoetry]

Just like another AI thread