🔒 Closed Mga pseudo-historians

Bakit kaya ang daming nagkeclaim na historians daw sila pero ang alam lang naman nilang history ay yung martial law and panahon ni Pnoy. Like WTF???

 

[XxAccursedxX]

Rephrase ko statement mo ts ha sa ibang paraan:

Bakit kaya ang daming nagkeclaim na doktor daw sila pero ang alam lang naman nilang expertise ay sa mga bata lang. Like WTF???

Makes sense diba?

Ano sa tingin mo, tama ba ako?

 

[FaveGG]

You can't compare social science sa natural science. Tsaka dami daming doctor na may "specialization". For Example OB-GYNE, pediatrician, etc. kasi natural science is more complicated than social science.

 

[XxAccursedxX]

At ano nmn akala mo sa mga historians, isang sangay lang?

 

[FaveGG]

Tsaka doctor sila kasi meron silang lisensya and degree holder sila.

 

[XxAccursedxX]

I'll leave you to your opinions ts...

 

[FaveGG]

Here's the thing, I agree with you na hindi lang iisang sangay ang history kasi meron tayong tinatawag na historians na nagfofocus sa history ng particular place. EG, Asia. Europe, etc. at ng isang partikular na sibilisasyon. EG. Sumerian, Egyptian, American, etc. at ng isang partikular na tema, EG. Chemical Science, Biology, Anthropology, etc. pero the thing here is that "lahat" sila ay based on facts proven by numerous evidences backed by recognized institution. And also mababaw ang "legitimacy" ng mga "pseudo-historians" na tinutukoy ko kasi their theories are more of conspiracy. Also, this historians have some degree and recognition from legitimate institutions.

I apologize kung naging vague yung caption ko.

 

[plhbg1]

lolz history itself is false, it is just a fiction written by anybody who wants to write and get accepted better than all other writers, hinihintay ko nga yung nag promise na i-re-write ang history e until now wala pang nabago kahit sa wikipedia man lang

 

[awinahe]

Like those ? ​

 

[dee-u]

láρág mo kung sino yang mga yan ts.