Bill gates announced at Munich Security Conference that, Omicron was a type of vaccine all along.
Bill Gates was the Key Financier and producer of WHO and big pharmas Vaccines, he Support Anthony Fauci's works.
There's no such thing as misleading in what I've written, "type of vaccine" the phrase itself gave it away. And come on, you still don't know the guy? His track records are horrible, remember his mallaria experiment in africa? Well guess what, the omicron came from africa too. Anthony fauci created aids, it was one of his well known experiment. the mainstream media and the covid narrative are misleading tho' it was about control, not health, Illogical reasons are accepted with a settles science. The tyrrany nalang sa buong mundo, that should rang a bell as a red flag. Take example justin Trudeau's tyranny, our governments too. iATF tyranny discriminating the unvaxxed.. big red flagMisleading po yung thread title
"Omicron Came from a Vaccine"
Sabi ni Gates: "Sadly, the virus itself, particularly the variant called Omicron, is a type of vaccine."
Kumbaga sa tagalog, [parang] isang uri ng vaccine
Hindi nanggaling sa vaccine
"Bill Gates was the Key Financier"
Tama ito, pero mas accurate na "is a Key Financier" o kaya Contributor
Nasa 9.4% ang hati ni Bill Gates, #2 siya
US Govt ang #1, nasa 15.9% ang parte nila
Meron ngang pangangamba na baka sobra ang impluwensiya niya sa mga desisyon WHO (example: Covax)
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
[Bill Gates] "producer of WHO"
Contributor lang po si Gates, hindi founder
O parang producer ba sa pelikula, as in contributor ng pera ang ibig niyong sabihin dito?
Totoo na maaring may unfair influence si Gates, tulad sa Covax, kung saan hindi na-i-allow ang mga "public" vaccines, yung i-open yung I.P., para makagawa din sana ng vaccines ang mga developing countries
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Mas mabilis sana ang disctribution kung hindi monopolya at patent free ang vaccines
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Funding/Ownership ng Pfizer/BioNTech
"The [Gates] Foundation has been investing in big pharmaceutical companies or buying shares for decades now. Its investment in BioNTech is unrelated to the COVID-19 pandemic."
"to develop HIV and tuberculosis programs"
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Funding/Ownership ng Moderna
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
"Moderna's founding investor, Flagship Pioneering, is at the top of a list of Top 10 owners of Moderna Inc., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Noubar Afeyan, chief executive officer of Flagship Pioneering, co-founded the company with MIT professor You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., according to Flagship's You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Bill and Melinda Gates and the Gates Foundation are not listed as major shareholders by Nasdaq or as company founders by Flagship Pioneering."
OK naman pong suportahan si Fauci, na nakatulong na sa 3 epi/pandemics, AIDS, Ebola, at COVID
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
"With his signature blend of scientific acumen, candor and integrity, Dr. Anthony Fauci became America’s most unlikely cultural icon during COVID-19. A world-renowned infectious disease specialist and the longest-serving public health leader in Washington, D.C., he has valiantly overseen the U.S. response to 50 years’ worth of epidemics, including HIV/AIDS, SARS and Ebola. FAUCI is an unprecedented portrait of one of our most vital public servants, whose work saved millions while he faced threats from anonymous adversaries."
Baka para mas clear po sana sa thread title e "is a type of vaccine"There's no such thing as misleading in what I've written, "type of vaccine" the phrase itself gave it away.
Monopolist nga siya, lalo sa antitrust case dati ng MSAnd come on, you still don't know the guy? His track records are horrible, remember his mallaria experiment in africa?
Doon po unang na report, peroWell guess what, the omicron came from africa too.
Ang most probable na source ng AIDS ay na trace po sa chimps sa D.R. Congo bandang 1920sAnthony fauci created aids, it was one of his well known experiment.
Pwede po nating isantabi ang mainstream media, sige po.the mainstream media and the covid narrative are misleading tho' it was about control, not health, Illogical reasons are accepted with a settles science.
Sa isang banda, naiintindihan ko na parang lugi ang unvaccinated, kasi less freedoms.The tyrrany nalang sa buong mundo, that should rang a bell as a red flag. Take example justin Trudeau's tyranny, our governments too. iATF tyranny discriminating the unvaxxed.. big red flag
Easy target kasi si Gates lods e, dating monopolist (hanggang ngayon kaya?), may aaleged seks offenses sa MSkawawang bill gates, lahat nang mga sinasabi nya binibigyan nang ibang meaning.
iba talaga mag isip mga silicon valley folks, advance mag isip. ahead sila mag isip, kaya sila yung palagi tinitira nang mga conspiracy theorist.


Easy target kasi si Gates lods e, dating monopolist (hanggang ngayon kaya?), may aaleged seks offenses sa MS
Pero hindi naman siya kawawa kasi may bilyones, dolyar pa
Iniwan nga lang ni Melinda
Pero may mga valid concern naman na hindi balanse ang influence ni Gates
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Dapat nag agree siya sa patent freeing ng vaccines para mas mabilis mabakunahan ang mas madaming tao
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
I think you are still blinded by the mainstream media, pragmatically some of your sources are wrong, the first HIV case was created in 1980's. Fauci was one of the people developing that for his entrance to the industry.Baka para mas clear po sana sa thread title e "is a type of vaccine"
Malaking pagkakaiba po kasi ang, [parang] isang uri ng vaccine sa nanggaling sa vaccine
Dapat lang po siguro na consistent ang title sa laman ng post
Monopolist nga siya, lalo sa antitrust case dati ng MS
Pero sa ngayon na outweigh na ng charitable causes niya ang past sins.
Siguro ang isang possible improvement dito ay ma distribute ang mga desisyon, hindi siya lang.
Doon po unang na report, pero
"it's unclear where the variant actually emerged, STAT News reports—and South Africa and Botswana's may have spotted it early on only because of the strength of those area's genetic sequencing networks. "
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Eto pa
"But there are now increasing signs that the variant was in circulation in other countries before South Africa’s health authorities alerted the world to its presence. There are a growing number of cases being discovered with no travel connection to the region, suggesting community transmission is taking place.
In Scotland in the U.K., for example, 9 cases have been detected that have been traced back to a “single private event” held on Nov. 20 and none of the individuals involved are believed to have any recent travel history to southern Africa."
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Ang most probable na source ng AIDS ay na trace po sa chimps sa D.R. Congo bandang 1920s
May source po ba kayo nitong " fauci created aids"?
1958 - Fauci graduated from High School
1959
The first verified case of HIV is from a blood sample taken in 1959 from a man living in what is now Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
1974 - Head, LCI's Clinical Physiology Section
1980 - Chief, NIAID Laboratory of Immunoregulation
1984 - Director of the NIAID
Paano po magagawa ni Fauci yung AIDS, e 1970s pa lang siya may possibility or capability na gawin, kasi nasa government laboratory na po siya? Or nung High School po ba siya kaya na create na niya?
Pwede po nating isantabi ang mainstream media, sige po.
Ngayon meron po ba kayong mai po propose na media na reliable?
Yun po sanang self correcting, nag fa fact check, nasa listahan ng Poynter.
Paki post po links nila para ma evaluate natin
Iwas na lang po sana sa SocMed, blogs, or mga anecdotes or kwento
Sa isang banda, naiintindihan ko na parang lugi ang unvaccinated, kasi less freedoms.
Pero mas makaka spread po kasi sa mga bata, matanda, at may ibang sakit ang unvaccinated.
Yun pong mga nag protest sa Canada, natapakan din po nila yung kalayaan ng taga Ottawa sa tahimik na buhay. Tapos naapektuhan pa nila ang auto industry na maraming empleyado, mga working men at women din lang na kailangan magtrabaho.
OK lang ang protesta kung hindi sagabal. Di ba ayaw niyong tinatapakan ang freedom niyo to stay unvaccinated? Bigyan niyo din ng freedom from COVID ang mga bata, matanda, at may ibang sakit. Bigyan niyo din ng freedom to travel ang mga nagtatrabaho, wag harangan ang daan. Bigyan niyo din ng right to peace ang mga polite na Ottawan, wag mag bubusina nang tuloy tuloy.
dapat kasi mag research sia, yung yumayaman dito ngayun yung my mga stockholder sa pfzeir at iba pang big pharma. Si Bill Gates pa mismo na break nang monopoly laban sa mga big pharma, kasi usad pagong yung monopoly sa pharma industry, ina-alala lang nila ay yung mga gains nila sa stock...pero eto si bill nag donate na nga nang billions for vaccine research at namigay nang libre vaccines kagaya nang anti rabies shot tapos sya pa yung my kasalanan.
"I follow the science, not the scientist" pero pina-follow mo sina Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, "1000+ doctors all agreed that the vaccines are not working", etc.?I think you are still blinded by the mainstream media, pragmatically some of your sources are wrong, the first HIV case was created in 1980's. Fauci was one of the people developing that for his entrance to the industry.
The latter cases from 1920's are just hypothesis of so called doctors.
And dude, you just lost credibility by saying, mas nakaka pag spread ang mga bata or unvaccinated ??? That's big wrong dude! Walang sciences jan, 1000+ doctors all agreed that the vaccines are not working, just look at israel, they're the first fully vaccínated country, yet they're had the most cases sky rocketed. And not to mention, this vaccines are CLINICAL TRIALS, IT WAS STILL A EXPERIMENT. Which many doctors around the world are against this. Again you sounded like a mainstream media. You are blinded with SETTLED SCIENCE. i'll give you one special doctor who's against it, Ever heard of Dr. Robert Malone? He's the inventor of Mrna Vaccine, yet he's against the narrative.
And Dr. Peter McCullough
Again not to mention the adverse effects na hindi binabalita, and i know you yourself noticed those changes in your body.
I follow the science, not the scientist, cause scientist can be sold to the highest bidder or the random dudes who wrote those links u shared, wikipedias. not to mention those are ρáíd and sponsored by these greedy companies.
My resource are the good doctors and lawyers, you can look them up, they have weekly huddle, having a healthy debate about the danger of these vaccines, which the narrative lacks, cause the covid narrative is settled. You can search these channels in fb they're spreading truth, pls. Look them up they have strong figures and datas.
CONCERNED DX and CX of Philippines.
&
CCH 1333 Covid Call To Humanity
Di ko pa sinasabi yung mga malalalim na agenda ng organization na ito hah. I'm just at the tip of the iceberg, levelling with your knowledge level.
And don't rely much to the mainstream medias, they're biased and ρáíd, napapansin mo naman siguro na they're not trying to be opposition about this clinical trial.
At halos wala sa mga news network na ito na binalita ang tungkol sa Canadian freedom truckers. Dahil against ito sa covid narrative. Dapat ang balita neutral, dapat binabalita nila ang different sides.
And don't be surprised if the HIV cases rise these following months,
Coz'the vaccine and booster targeted our immune system. It is MRNA vaccine!
If you're not still aware, 1000 doctors, scientist are against the narrative, let that sink in.
Nahh, he's just being greedy, that's it. He wants to be everywhere, alam mo ba asawa nya ay importanteng tao sa FDA at WhO? No wonder he's experiments are easily manufactured.
He created microsoft, then he created a virus and creates a antivirus for it, ir strengthen his fortune. Jan palang sa analogy na yan red flag na eh. mag research ka sa mga kabulastugan na ginawa nya sa africa.
OrangeMoon cosmic wanderer
Dr. John Capmbell analyzed the silver bullet( bill gates omicron claims)
View attachment 1832052
Actually chinicheck ko po lahat ng sources ko nang mabutiI think you are still blinded by the mainstream media,
Pwede po bang paki specify aling source ang mali, para ma evaluate ko din, baka nga naman mali talagapragmatically some of your sources are wrong,

Again po, any proof na "created" ang AIDS?the first HIV case was created in 1980's.
Again, any source or proof for these statements? Or opinions po ba ito or conjecture (haka-haka)?Fauci was one of the people developing that for his entrance to the industry.
The latter cases from 1920's are just hypothesis of so called doctors.
Eto po ang sinabi ko, take note po na "sa mga bata", hindi "ang mga bata"And dude, you just lost credibility by saying, mas nakaka pag spread ang mga bata or unvaccinated ??? That's big wrong dude! Walang sciences jan,

1000+ doctors all agreed that the vaccines are not working,
Ang isa daw possible factor dito ay yung increased testing noong January, tsaka yung pagpasok ng Omicronjust look at israel, they're the first fully vaccínated country, yet they're had the most cases sky rocketed.
Dito po sa tracker tapos na sa Phase 3 angAnd not to mention, this vaccines are CLINICAL TRIALS, IT WAS STILL A EXPERIMENT.
Again, hindi po credible itong mga doctors na ito. Kung mabanggit po sana niyo names nila, for sure may nag di disagree or nag di discredit sa kanila.Which many doctors around the world are against this.
Kung ang mainstream media na ibig sabihin niyo ay yung nag che check kung credible ang sources ko, then, thanks, sa tingin ko compliment ito. Gusto ko, kaya kong mag self correct, mag fact check ng mga sinasabi ko, at umamin pag may mali at i adjust sa mas bago o mas tama.Again you sounded like a mainstream media.
Wala pong nag e exist na "settled science", kasi ang science laging pwedeng ma disprove.You are blinded with SETTLED SCIENCE.
Last year pa po, may galit po sya kasi na "write out of history" po siya, pero hindi po siya ang inventor, sya na mismo nagsabii'll give you one special doctor who's against it, Ever heard of Dr. Robert Malone? He's the inventor of Mrna Vaccine, yet he's against the narrative.
Unfortunately, kilala na siya, isa po siya sa mga nag le-lead sa pag spread ng disinformationAnd Dr. Peter McCullough
Kung meron po, kailangan i report sa DOHAgain not to mention the adverse effects na hindi binabalita, and i know you yourself noticed those changes in your body.
Alin po doon yung Wikipedia link? Ni review ko po wala naman po kahit isang WikipediaI follow the science, not the scientist, cause scientist can be sold to the highest bidder or the random dudes who wrote those links u shared, wikipedias.
Proof? Any documents? Or anecdotal na naman ba ito, kwento? Haka-haka?not to mention those are ρáíd and sponsored by these greedy companies.
Ang SocMed po again ang worst possible source of information dahil sa false claims at incorrect argumentsMy resource are the good doctors and lawyers, you can look them up, they have weekly huddle, having a healthy debate about the danger of these vaccines, which the narrative lacks, cause the covid narrative is settled. You can search these channels in fb they're spreading truth, pls. Look them up they have strong figures and datas.
CONCERNED DX and CX of Philippines.
&
CCH 1333 Covid Call To Humanity
Nasa taas po yung sagot ko, sana may proof po kayo na ρáídAnd don't rely much to the mainstream medias, they're biased and ρáíd, napapansin mo naman siguro na they're not trying to be opposition about this clinical trial.
Nasa news naman po yung truckers, kaya nga nabalitaan ko din, headline pa nga sila lagi eAt halos wala sa mga news network na ito na binalita ang tungkol sa Canadian freedom truckers. Dahil against ito sa covid narrative. Dapat ang balita neutral, dapat binabalita nila ang different sides.
Sige po lods, abangan natin, although don't hold your breathAnd don't be surprised if the HIV cases rise these following months,

Yan po talaga ang target ng vaccine, kumbaga pino "provoke" niya ang immune system para gumawa ng atibodies. MRNA nga yung Pfizer 'n' Moderna, tama.Coz'the vaccine and booster targeted our immune system. It is MRNA vaccine!
Again names or a link to the list of names po sanaIf you're not still aware, 1000 doctors, scientist are against the narrative, let that sink in.
Because they do healthy debates, and does it never occurred to you na this is a EXPERIMENTAL CLINICAL TRIAL??? IF THERE'S A RISK, THERE'S A CHOICE. sa tingin mo ba mabuting mag pa bakuna na hindi mo ni research ng mabuti ano ang nasa loob ng bakuna??? Nabalitaan mo ba na ang israel ay binasura na ang restrictions dahil HINDI effective at mas nakakapinsala ang bakuna covid??? AT WALA KA BANG NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM??? na kinakailangan mo ng bakuna para mabuhay??? Isipin mo, nag pa bakuna ka, tapos kelangan mo pa ng booster??? Sa palagay mo ba di hihina natural na IMMUNITY mo??? As i said, FOLLOELW THE SCIENCE, NOT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AT BAYARANG DOCTORS. Alam mo ba maraming adverse effects ang dulot ng bakunang ito??? Sa FB nalang marami kang makikita na nag popost, nanghihingi ng tulong dahil sa side effects. Sa nakikita ko mas pabor ka na mag bakuna ng kada buwan kaysa sa natural immune system na meron ka, may balita ako sayo, dahil na compromised na ang natural immune system mo, so kelangan mo na talaga ng bakunang oang maintenance, boosters. Sinabi ni duque na di na applicaplble ang immunity herd sa mga bakunado"I follow the science, not the scientist" pero pina-follow mo sina Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, "1000+ doctors all agreed that the vaccines are not working", etc.?
Sa tingin mo mas mabuting hindi na lang nagpabakuna ang mga tao? Mas naging maganda ba kaya ang chances nating matapos itong pandemic ng mas maaga kung hindi tayo nagpabakuna?
Unfortunately your baseless sources is dead end for you, i suggest for to visit the CONCRRNED DX & CX of the Philippine, meron silnag livestream huddle, it is a healthy debate, mga doctors at lawyers ito, they try reaching these mainstream doctors to debate about the vaccine, guess what, never, none of these so called doctors of DOH or FDA ever attend the healthy debates, so that's is a great example of SETTLESLD SCIENCE.Actually chinicheck ko po lahat ng sources ko nang mabuti
Based sa post niyo po so far, ang main sources niyo mg info ay 2 na FB groups
Well established na po na source of disinformation ang mga SocMed, di ko na siguro kailangan i explain
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Pwede po bang paki specify aling source ang mali, para ma evaluate ko din, baka nga naman mali talaga
Alin ang mali, at bakit po kaya mali?
Again po, any proof na "created" ang AIDS?
Ang mas probable origin po ay SIV to HIV-2 to HIV-1 (chimps to humans)
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Tapos sa timeline po, detected siya ng 1980s, yun ang tama
Ang oldest verified po na HIV-1 ay galing sa isang 1959 blood sample
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
So ginawa po kaya ni Fauci yung AIDS nung 1st year college siya? (1959 banda)
Ang most probable at accepted po na origin ay 1920s pa sa D.R. Congo, galing po sa avert.org ang info
Reliable po ang avert.org na source
Why should I trust Avert.org?
- We are accredited by the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. We have the ‘PIF TICK’ quality mark, which means that our editorial processes have been reviewed by an independent body to make sure that the health information we produce is of the highest quality, clear and accurate.
- We are verified and green rated by You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., an internet trust tool that provides detailed trust ratings for 6,000+ news websites that account for 95% of online engagement with news.
- All our information is reviewed by subject matter experts. Our expert peer reviewers check to ensure all information is accurate and up-to-date.
- We only use the highest-quality data and evidence sources which are vetted by robust internal processes. We provide references for all of our content.
- We are led by research. We conduct weekly reviews of all the new research and developments that happen in HIV and sexual health. This means that our information is always up-to-date with the latest information.
- We regularly review and update our content. We have rigorous internal systems to ensure that our content is regularly reviewed and updated with the latest evidence from HIV and sexual health. We tell you when our pages were last reviewed and when they are next due to be updated.
- We have over 30 years’ experience in producing the highest quality information on HIV and sexual health, giving our users the knowledge, skills and confidence to take control of their sexual health. Our staff have decades of international experience across the HIV and sexual health sectors.
- We are signatories of the Patient Information Forum’s You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., which aspires to make it easier for people to navigate, understand, and use information and services to take care of their health. We have also endorsed the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., which are guidelines designed to help integrate best practices into digital programmes.
Again, any source or proof for these statements? Or opinions po ba ito or conjecture (haka-haka)?
Eto po yung Science (mag) paper kung saan naka state yung 1920s
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Eto po ang sinabi ko, take note po na "sa mga bata", hindi "ang mga bata"
"Pero mas makaka spread po kasi sa mga bata, matanda, at may ibang sakit ang unvaccinated."
Siguro para mas clear, eto po rephrase, pero same meaning pa din
Ang mga unvaccinated, mas makaka spread po kasi sa mga bata, matanda, at may ibang sakit
Speaking of credibility, mga reliable sources naman po lahat ng sources ko
I compare niyo po ito pag ang source ay 2 Facebook groups na may false claims at incorrect arguments
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Pati po yung mismong founder, Ortho, hindi Infectious Diseases ang specialty
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Nag po promote pa ng Ivermectin, which is a true red flag
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
"Although some early clinical studies suggested the potential efficacy of ivermectin in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19, these studies had methodologic weaknesses."
To be continued po ang haba e
Ang isa daw possible factor dito ay yung increased testing noong January, tsaka yung pagpasok ng Omicron
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
"Government statistics show that in the last nine days, per 100,000 people unvaccinated there were on average 1.65 deaths per day, versus a rate of 0.33 for the vaccinated population. Seriously ill hospital cases were seen at an average rate of 20.03 per day for the unvaccinated compared to 3.7 per day among the vaccinated"
Dito po sa tracker tapos na sa Phase 3 ang
Pfizer, Moderna, Sputnik V, AstraZ, Janssen, Sinovac
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Aling vaccine po ba yung clinical trial or experiment?
Again, hindi po credible itong mga doctors na ito. Kung mabanggit po sana niyo names nila, for sure may nag di disagree or nag di discredit sa kanila.
Kung ang mainstream media na ibig sabihin niyo ay yung nag che check kung credible ang sources ko, then, thanks, sa tingin ko compliment ito. Gusto ko, kaya kong mag self correct, mag fact check ng mga sinasabi ko, at umamin pag may mali at i adjust sa mas bago o mas tama.
Wala pong nag e exist na "settled science", kasi ang science laging pwedeng ma disprove.
Pag may bagong concept or explanation, at yun ang tama, at pwedeng i test experimentally, itatapon yung lumang concept at papalitan ng bago.
Mas accurate at safe pong sabihin na "the latest science says..."
Last year pa po, may galit po sya kasi na "write out of history" po siya, pero hindi po siya ang inventor, sya na mismo nagsabi
UPDATE: Malone reached out to Logically, stating that he did not invent the mRNA vaccines, but instead the "vaccine technology platform." He also presented us with copies of nine patents – none of which showed that he invented the mRNA vaccines.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Katunayan, malungkot ang story nito, kasi hindi siya inventor, pero fundamental yung nagawa niya, kaso mukhang abrasive po siya at hindi madaling maka trabaho. Sayang, baka makasama pa sana siya sa future Nobel.
"It is Dr. Katalin Karikó and her collaborator Dr. Drew Weissman who are more commonly credited with laying the groundwork for mRNA vaccines."
Unfortunately, kilala na siya, isa po siya sa mga nag le-lead sa pag spread ng disinformation
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Kung meron po, kailangan i report sa DOH
Or baka naman anecdotal na naman yan or kwento
Or baka naman po sourced ito sa VAERS, na kung saan kahit sino pwede mag report
Pero ang reports po ay ivi-verify muna ng CDC dapat
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Alin po doon yung Wikipedia link? Ni review ko po wala naman po kahit isang Wikipedia
Proof? Any documents? Or anecdotal na naman ba ito, kwento? Haka-haka?
Ang SocMed po again ang worst possible source of information dahil sa false claims at incorrect arguments
Yun pong mga dangers are well documented at stated, yung possible side effects, di naman tinatago
Nasa taas po yung sagot ko, sana may proof po kayo na ρáíd
At naka list po sa taas yung Phase 3 trials na tapos na
Isa pa, would you suggest any media na hindi ρáíd, at reliable ang info?
Kasi mag be benefit tayo lahat sa media na yan as a good source of credible info
Nasa news naman po yung truckers, kaya nga nabalitaan ko din, headline pa nga sila lagi e
Sinong news network po ba specifically ang hindi nagbalita nung truckers?
Sige po lods, abangan natin, although don't hold your breath
Sana naman hindi tumaas
Yan po talaga ang target ng vaccine, kumbaga pino "provoke" niya ang immune system para gumawa ng atibodies. MRNA nga yung Pfizer 'n' Moderna, tama.
Or ang ibig niyo ba sabihin ay na we-weaken yung immune system?
Again names or a link to the list of names po sana
Para ma evalute po natin at baka naman may credible dyan
FB groups which have already been caught spreading misinformation are the definition of "baseless sources"Unfortunately your baseless sources is dead end for you,
First of all, if they're still debating it, then it's not even "SETTLESLD SCIENCE". Settled by definition means something is not being debated anymore.healthy debates, so that's is a great example of SETTLESLD SCIENCE.
SocMed is not a credible source for news. More often than not, these cons apply to SocMed.i suggest for to visit the CONCRRNED DX & CX of the Philippine, meron silnag livestream huddle, it is a healthy debate, mga doctors at lawyers ito
Wala nang sense yang gas lighting mo ng overwhelming sources mo, walang science jan, outdated na rin mga yan, tumingin ka sa tunay datas, at alam mo bang ayaw mag labas ng datas at results ng CDC ng america?? At alam mo sa sarili mo na kalokohan ang baksin, dahil mas nag kakasakit ang mga bakunado at may mga adverse effects na nag sisilabasan, nasaksihan ko din yan personally, mga kaibigan ko na bakunado na panay positive parin at panay ubo, nanghihina at mas lumala ang kani kanilang sakit gaya ng arthritis, hearth problems at iba pa, mas healthy pa ko na hindi bakunado at di pa nag papa pcr dahil alam ko na scum lang lahat ng ito. Alam ko alam mo ang nangyari nakarang taon, nung nag ka ubusan ng gamot sa botika at humaba ang pila dahil sa trangkaso na mabilis na na apektuhan ang lahat, na halos bakunado lahat. Again, di kami tinablang mga pure blooded(unvaccinated)FB groups which have already been caught spreading misinformation are the definition of "baseless sources"
If these are the only sources we will rely on, then that is the definition of being on a "dead end"
Based on this thread alone, you've already made at least 12 baseless claims without any credible proof or source to back these claims up.
1 thread title: "Omicron Came from a Vaccine"
2 "[Bill Gates] producer of WHO and big pharmas Vaccines"
3 "Anthony fauci created aids, it was one of his well known experiment."
4 "the first HIV case was created in 1980's"
5 "The latter cases from 1920's are just hypothesis of so called doctors."
6 "this vaccines are CLINICAL TRIALS, IT WAS STILL A EXPERIMENT"
7 "Dr. Robert Malone? He's the inventor of Mrna Vaccine"
8 "scientist can be sold to the highest bidder or the random dudes who wrote those links u shared, wikipedias"
9 "those are ρáíd and sponsored by these greedy companies."
10 "mainstream medias, they're biased and ρáíd"
11 "At halos wala sa mga news network na ito na binalita ang tungkol sa Canadian freedom truckers."
12 "the HIV cases rise these following months"
First of all, if they're still debating it, then it's not even "SETTLESLD SCIENCE". Settled by definition means something is not being debated anymore.
2nd, science is not static and is never "finished" or "settled". It's dynamic and adjusts itself when new information refutes old and incorrect ones.
"Science is never 100% settled - science is about narrowing uncertainty. Different areas of science are understood with varying degrees of certainty."
"Science is not about absolute proofs. It never reaches 100% certainty. This is the domain of mathematics and logic. Science is about improving our understanding by narrowing uncertainty."
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
SocMed is not a credible source for news. More often than not, these cons apply to SocMed.
-no accountability
-no editorial method
-no journalistic ethics
-not checked by an indepedent body
-not by reviewed by subject matter experts
-not peer reviewed
-not self checking or correcting
-does not cite sources
"[Social media] ...users are exposed to content of questionable accuracy, including conspiracy theories, clickbait, hyperpartisan content, pseudo science and even fabricated "fake news" reports."
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
"How social media makes it difficult to identify real news
Jumbling of content makes viewers less likely to check sources"
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
"Information Overload Helps Fake News Spread, and Social Media Knows It"
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.