🕯️ Traditions Tanong na wala pang nakasagot tungkol sa bibliya

[Ace106]

Sa mga artifacts at mga bagay na nagtagouan makakatulong din yan na ma proof na totoo ang mga tao sa bible, ang history kung saan may timeline lahat examples ginamit ni jesus ang sulat nang prophet kung saan malayo sa panahon at pwede mo ito mabasa ngayun eksakto sa sinabi niya, ang mga hula sa pagkasira nang Jerusalem na sinulat pa ni Isaias at Jeremias na nagkatotoo ito kahit subrang layo nang agwat, at btw may mga hula rin ang bibliya sa modern time, sa ngayun, na nagkatotoo pero subrang lalim na nito para pag usapan pero kung gusto mo you can ask.


History and Bible baka makatulong
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Gentleman007]

[XX='tepok4, c: 749932, m: 368837'][/XX] at kung talagang si Jesus ang Diyos na makapangyarihan sa lahat bakit nakita sya ng mga tao? Gayong binanggit sa verse 18 sa chapter na yan na walang sinumang tao ang nakakita sa Diyos?

 

[Ace106]

Ito pa sir mga lugar at bagay na connected sa bible
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[S I R J]

Sir Ace106 di mo na tinapos basahin yung theoretical article no hehe okay lang naman lodi, actually iba kasi yung punto ng dununu principle, hindi niya kinukwestyon yung existence ni Jesus as human and being part of the history. Kasi history per se is a valid evidence. But dununu principle attacked the existing teaching that Jesus is God.

 

[Gentleman007]

[XX='tepok4, c: 749982, m: 368837'][/XX] ok, so sino garod yung arcangel na binanggit dyan?

The prefix "arch," means "chief" or "principal," You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.)
and implies that there is only ONE Archangel, the chief angel; in the Scriptures. Further implying that there is only one Archangel is that the word "Archangel" is never found in the plural.

 

[tepok4]

iba naman ang Diyos Ama sa kristo diba.. ang alam kong tinutukoy na almighty God ay ang Ama.. kasi hindi naman sinabi ng Kristo na sya ay Diyos talaga..

kasi kung sa panahon na nangaral ang kristo umiiral pa ang mga kautusan ni moises.. maari syang mahatulan ng kamatayan "blasphemy"..

ang kadakilaan naman ay nasa Diyos Ama

 

[Ace106]

Aw yun pala sorry sir, like ano sir pwede mo ma pa short dito sir?

 

[dieharsh]

Ang tanong inangkin pa niyo jesus na ang kanyang relihiyon ang kristianismo

 

[S I R J]

actually medyo may kahabaan yang dunno, 26 pages, excluding the citation in cse format. Mainly ang point ng researcher dyan ay if Jesus is God then it breaks the dununu principle or the "stupidity principle" because God per se cannot die (Mboti 2017). Naglagay in text citation baka madali ako ng plagiarism hahaha

 

[Gentleman007]

Kapag tinanong ka ng tanong na sino ang Diyos automatic yung Ama ni Jesus yung Diyos na makapangyarihan sa lahat ang sagot dun.. at sa bible ipinakilala si Jesus hindi bilang Diyos kundi Anak ng Diyos... kaya malaki ang pagkakaiba nila.. sinabi mismo ni Jesus na mas Dakila ang Ama kaysa sa kanya at ang ginagawa nya hindi nya kagustuhan kundi kung ano ang kagustuhan ng kanyang ama.. Kaya napakalabong maging equal sila at sabihing iisa.

 

[Rectify]

fyi, si Jesus ang pasimula ng kristianismo

 

[Ace106]

Totoo sir kasi imortal ang god pero ang tanong kung si jesus nga ba ang totoong diyos? Si jesus diyos sabi sa ibang verse pero di sya ang totoo o makapangyarihan sa lahat kaya walang rin point kung yan lang pala laman nang paradox niya kasi nag base sila seguro sa trinity kung di ako nagkakamali?

 

[Gentleman007]

[XX='tepok4, c: 749926, m: 368837'][/XX] gumamit ka ng unawa

 

[Gentleman007]

Where does it show in the Bible that Jesus is Michael the archangel?​

Scriptural evidence indicates that the name Michael applied to God's Son before he left heaven to become Jesus Christ AND ALSO after his return.

Archangel means "chief angel," or "principal angel" indicating that there is only one. Michael is the only one said to be "the archangel". Jude 9 says: "Michael THE archangel had a difference with the Devil and was disputing about Moses' body."

To illustrate that Michael is another name for Jesus, at 1 Thessalonians 4:16 the voice of the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ is described as being that of an "archangel", suggesting that he is, in fact, himself the archangel. If the designation "archangel" applied, not to Jesus Christ, but to other angels, then the reference to "an archangel's voice" would not be appropriate. In that case it would be describing a voice of lesser authority than that of the Son of God.

Also, Daniel, after making the first reference to Michael (Da 10:13), recorded a prophecy reaching down to "the time of the end" (Da 11:40) and then stated: "And during that time Michael will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of the sons of [Daniel's] people." (Da 12:1) Michael's `standing up' was to be associated with "a time of distress such as has not been made to occur since there came to be a nation until that time." (Da 12:1) In Daniel's prophecy, `standing up' frequently refers to the action of a king, either taking up his royal power or acting effectively in his capacity as king. (Da 11:2-4, 7, 16b, 20, 21) This supports the conclusion that Michael is Jesus Christ, since Jesus is Jehovah's appointed King, commissioned to destroy all the nations at Har–Magedon. (Rev. 11:15; 16:14-16)

Also, the book of Revelation (12:7, 10, 12) specifically mentions Michael in connection with the establishment of God's Kingdom and links this event with trouble for the earth. Since the Son of God (Jesus) is to fight the nations, it is only reasonable that he was the one (also known as Michael) who with his angels earlier battled against the superhuman dragon, Satan the Devil, and his angels.

 

[Ace106]

Bibigyan na lang kita sir nang articles hope maka tulong kung may tanong ka sa articles tanong mo lang


You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.


You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[S I R J]

[XX='Ace106, c: 750071, m: 1382361'][/XX] Correct if I am wrong, pero ang dating ay pinapaboran mo na tama na hindi siya Diyos? "Si jesus diyos sabi sa ibang verse pero di sya ang totoo o makapangyarihan" tama ba ko ng pagkakaintindi?

 

[Gentleman007]

Pm sent bro hahaha

 

[Rectify]

[XX='- srj -, c: 750096, m: 1596530'][/XX] pwede ba sir ung example na pwede po bang manganak ang kambing ng kabayo, di ko po tinutukoy o kinukumpara ang living matter sa Diyos, parang obvious lng po na kapag ang Ama ay Diyos.. may lahing Diyos din ang anak nito? tama po ba ko? hehe

 

[Ace106]

Yes sir, diyos si jesus sir pero di sya kapantay nang kanyang ama bakit sya tinawag na Diyos? Dahil mas mataas ang position niya sa langit or sa all type of angel

Si jesus mismo nag sabi ang different nila
"This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only " true God", and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ" -John 17:3

 

[pumark_01]

ano po ang pinaka unang kasalanan.