PHTara buklatin natin ang Constitution para jan!
Starting with :
Presumption of Innocence:
Article III, Section 14(2) of the 1987 Philippine Constitution states :
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved."This means that anyone accused of a crime is legally presumed innocent until proven guilty through a fair trial.
So, innocent po ba si Quiboloy?!
It is NOT a Declaration of Innocence
"Philippine courts adhere to the principle that a "not guilty" verdict is a result of insufficient evidence or failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, not an affirmation of the accused's innocence."So that means... He is not guilty, nor innocent yet...
So... bakit nga ba hindi nausad ang kaso ni Pasor ACQ???
Let's see what the "SENATORS OF THE PHILIPPINES HAS TO SAY"
"At least four senators have signed an objection letter that seeks to reverse a Senate panel’s decision to hold embattled doomsday preacher Apollo Quiboloy in contempt for not showing up during its continuing investigation into the alleged abuses committed against former workers of the Davao-based religious group Kingdom of Jesus Christ."
"Senator Robinhood Padilla, the first to object to the ruling, identified the others with him as senators Christopher Lawrence Go, Cynthia Villar, and Imee Marcos. He identified Senator Joseph Victor Ejercito to be with them, but the latter withdrew his signature later in the day."
4 senators who opposed the contempt order vs Quiboloy :
- Christopher Lawrence Go
- Cynthia Villar
- Robinhood Padilla
- Imee Marcos
So Bakit daw nag oppose itong mga Senators na ito?
Tignan natin kung anong sinabi ng mga SenatorsPadilla said he considers Quiboloy his friend and an ally in his advocacy against the communist rebellion since the Arroyo administration.
- “He is kind to us. I find the cases filed against him hard to believe,” - Villar
- “Hindi deserve para sa mga mata ko na ang isang taong tingin kong bayani sa pakikipaglaban niya sa komunista na naging kasama ko, e ganitong klase papayagan ko maiskandalo,” - Padilla
- "Ang helicopter pinahiram niya sa akin, ang mga ganoong klaseng pabor" - Padilla(Personal gain yarn?)
- “Senator Imee and I know him personally. It is not like him to do something like that,” - Villar added, referring to the sexual abuse allegations against the former spiritual adviser.
Ano nga bang ginawa nya?
"It is alleged that females were recruited to work as personal assistants, or “pastorals,” for Quiboloy and that victims prepared his meals, cleaned his residences, gave him massages and were required to have *** with Quiboloy in what the pastorals called “night duty.” Quiboloy was indicted by a federal grand jury in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana, California, for conspiracy to engagein *** trafficking by force, fraud and coercion and *** trafficking of children; *** trafficking by force, fraud and coercion; conspiracy; and bulk cash smuggling, andon November 10, 2021, a federal warrant was issued for his arrest."Si Bossing Quiboloy nasa "Most Wanted List ng FBI" kasi wala siyang ginawang masama.
magnuschase
source: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
"Hindi porket nsa wanted list ang isang tao, guilty na cya..."
Answer: "Philippine courts adhere to the principle that a "not guilty" verdict is a result of insufficient evidence or failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, not an affirmation of the accused's innocence."
Senators = CRIME PROTECTOS
"Guilty daw pero wala man lang court order"
Answer: "Philippine courts adhere to the principle that a "not guilty" verdict is a result of insufficient evidence or failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, not an affirmation of the accused's innocence."
NOT GUILTY, NOT INNOCENT... YET! Ang mga mismong mambabatas natin ang nagtutulak para hindi umusad, ang dahilan??? "Ang helicopter pinahiram niya sa akin"
This thread is open to critics, the statements are based on facts with supporting documents and statements. Ad Hominem Arguments are not open
