🕯️ Traditions Reasons to Trust the Bible: Scientific Accuracy

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gentleman007

Forum Expert
Science has made great strides in modern times. As a result, old theories have given way to new ones. What was once accepted as fact may now be seen as myth. Science textbooks often need revision.

THE Bible is not a science textbook. Yet, when it comes to scientific matters, the Bible is noteworthy not only for what it says but also for what it does not say.
Free of unscientific views.
Many mistaken beliefs gained wide acceptance in ancient times. Views about the earth ranged from the idea that it was flat to the notion that tangible substances or objects held it aloft. Long before science learned about the spread and prevention of disease, physicians employed some practices that were ineffective at best, lethal at worst. But not once in its more than 1,100 chapters does the Bible endorse any unscientific views or harmful practices.
Scientifically sound statements.
Some 3,500 years ago, the Bible stated that the earth is hanging “upon nothing.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) In the eighth century B.C.E., Isaiah clearly referred to “the circle [or, sphere] of the earth.” (You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.) A spherical earth held in empty space without any visible or physical means of support—does not that description sound remarkably modern?
Written about 1500 B.C.E., the Mosaic Law (found in the first five books of the Bible) contained sound laws regarding quarantining of the sick, treatment of dead bodies, and disposal of waste.—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Partly as a result of turning powerful telescopes toward the heavens, scientists have concluded that the universe had a sudden “birth.” Not all scientists like the implications of this explanation. One professor noted: “A universe that began seems to demand a first cause; for who could imagine such an effect without a sufficient cause?” Yet, long before telescopes, the very first verse of the Bible plainly stated: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”—You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Far ahead of its time, the Bible correctly stated that the earth is circular and hangs “upon nothing”
Even though it is an ancient book and touches on many subjects, the Bible contains no scientific inaccuracies. Does not such a book merit, at the very least, our consideration?You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
I disagree. Bible contradicts common sense and scientific facts. Talking snake, talking donkey, v1rg1n birth, the great flood, people living for hundreds of years, Jesus' magic tricks, creation myth, etc. Not so fun fact: Christians used to torture and kill people during the dark ages because the scientific discoveries didn't match the bible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 5
    Replies
  • 354
    Views
  • 5
    Participants
Last reply from:
c8n_666

Online now

Members online
1,010
Guests online
715
Total visitors
1,725

Forum statistics

Threads
2,276,956
Posts
28,973,326
Members
1,229,664
Latest member
genuinekeys
Back
Top