🕯️ Traditions A DEBATE BETWEEN HUGH ROSS (Christian Astrophysicist PhD) and PETER ATKINS (Atheist Chemist PhD) ABOUT THE ORIGINS OF THE LAW OF NATURE.

[Deleted member 1523148]

Watch this..
It's a very interesting debate..

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. tube.com/wa tch?v=hVC Vt-dvVOc
(remove the spaces)

Enjoy..

 

[Candy-candy]

NIIIICE! <3

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

NIIIICE! <3

Dito ako na proud na Christian ako..
Ung comparison ng attitude nung 2..
Ung pure confidence and humility vs pure arrogance and deceit..

 

[fabbriche]

God of the gaps na naman. Basta hindi pa nadidiscover ng science, god daw ang cause sabi ng mga religionist.

Nadisprove na ng science lahat ng nakasulat sa bibliya (e.g. creationism, global flood, Adam and Eve, Noah, Moses, Abraham, exodus, Jewish exile in Egypt). Kahit wala pang coherent theory of everything lalo na sa questions of origin, 0% ang likelihood na diyos ang cause nun lalo na ng universe. Ang "god" ay low effort explanation ng mga unscientific people. Hindi naiintindihan ng mga mangmang ang mechanism ng universe kaya diyos ang ginagawa nilang explanation. Pero hindi totoo ang diyos.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

God of the gaps na naman. Basta hindi pa nadidiscover ng science, god daw ang cause sabi ng mga religionist.

Nadisprove na ng science lahat ng nakasulat sa bibliya (e.g. creationism, global flood, Adam and Eve, Noah, Moses, Abraham, exodus, Jewish exile in Egypt). Kahit wala pang coherent theory of everything lalo na sa questions of origin, 0% ang likelihood na diyos ang cause nun lalo na ng universe. Ang "god" ay low effort explanation ng mga unscientific people. Hindi naiintindihan ng mga mangmang ang mechanism ng universe kaya diyos ang ginagawa nilang explanation. Pero hindi totoo ang diyos.

Kaparehong kapareo mo magsalita si Atkins..
Nakakatawa kasi puro lang sya theory na "naprrove" na daw..
Medyo nakakahiya na to the extent na kahit ung moderator natatawa na...at binbago nalang ung topic para iligtas sya sa kahihiyan..

Anyways, goodluck on being a haters....

 

[fabbriche]

Kaparehong kapareo mo magsalita si Atkins..
Nakakatawa kasi puro lang sya theory na "naprrove" na daw..
Medyo nakakahiya na to the extent na kahit ung moderator natatawa na...at binbago nalang ung topic para iligtas sya sa kahihiyan..

Anyways, goodluck on being a haters....

Pinagsasabi mo jan? Disproven na lahat ng scientific at historical claims sa bibliya. Walang ebidensya ng creationism at intelligent design. Evolution ang most widely accepted at substantiated theory sa science, mas matibay pa kesa theory of gravity ni Einstein. Naka depende sa theory of evolution ang biology. Walang biology at medicine kung walang evolution.

Ung iba pang biblical claims gaya ng flat earth at global flooding disproved na matagal na. Kahit historical claims gaya ng exodus at Jewish slavery sa Egypt ZERO evidence.

Walang CREDIBILITY ang bibliya. Literary work of fiction lang siya.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

Pinagsasabi mo jan? Disproven na lahat ng scientific at historical claims sa bibliya. Walang ebidensya ng creationism at intelligent design. Evolution ang most widely accepted at substantiated theory sa science, mas matibay pa kesa theory of gravity ni Einstein. Naka depende sa theory of evolution ang biology. Walang biology at medicine kung walang evolution.

Ung iba pang biblical claims gaya ng flat earth at global flooding disproved na matagal na. Kahit historical claims gaya ng exodus at Jewish slavery sa Egypt ZERO evidence.

Walang CREDIBILITY ang bibliya. Literary work of fiction lang siya.

Coming from someone without educational background.

 

[fabbriche]

Coming from someone without educational background.

No. Coming from 97% of the scientific community who accept evolution and reject creationism and intelligent design.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

No. Coming from 97% of the scientific community who accept evolution and reject creationism and intelligent design.

You know what. I've been looking kung San mo nakuha ung idea mo na 97% ng scientific community Ang naniniwala dyan (kasi ilang beses mo na sinasabi).

Pero Wala akong Makita na site..

Penge ng link...

 

[fabbriche]

You know what. I've been looking kung San mo nakuha ung idea mo na 97% ng scientific community Ang naniniwala dyan (kasi ilang beses mo na sinasabi).

Pero Wala akong Makita na site..

Penge ng link...

There's no need for a link. It's common sense that a legitimate and heavily substantiated SCIENTIFIC theory such as the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection will garner universal acceptance among SCIENTISTS. Did you really expect otherwise? The only things that are rejected in SCIENCE are those that absolutely lack evidence such as RELIGION. But if you insist for an external corroboration, here are some.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

There's no need for a link. It's common sense that a legitimate and heavily substantiated SCIENTIFIC theory such as the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection will garner universal acceptance among SCIENTISTS. Did you really expect otherwise? The only things that are rejected in SCIENCE are those that absolutely lack evidence such as RELIGION. But if you insist for an external corroboration, here are some.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

So basically WALA KANG PROOF na 97% ang nagsasabing bible is unreal..
FANTASY ata tawag sa ganyan..

 

[fabbriche]

So basically WALA KANG PROOF na 97% ang nagsasabing bible is unreal..
FANTASY ata tawag sa ganyan..

Pinagsasabi mo jan! Ung 97%, figure un ng mga scientists na naniniwala sa evolution. Pseudoscience ang creationism at intelligent design. Walang scientists na naniniwala dun.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

Pinagsasabi mo jan! Ung 97%, figure un ng mga scientists na naniniwala sa evolution. Pseudoscience ang creationism at intelligent design. Walang scientists na naniniwala dun.

so asan nga ung statistic dyan sa sinasabi mo??
bigay ka ng site about sa stat na yan..

 

[jayendecastro]

Ugggh...an old earth creationist vs an a

Kaparehong kapareo mo magsalita si Atkins..
Nakakatawa kasi puro lang sya theory na "naprrove" na daw..
Medyo nakakahiya na to the extent na kahit ung moderator natatawa na...at binbago nalang ung topic para iligtas sya sa kahihiyan..

Anyways, goodluck on being a haters....

Ikaw ba agree kay Hugh Ross??

Agree ka ba with his idea of old-earth creationism??

 

[jayendecastro]

so asan nga ung statistic dyan sa sinasabi mo??
bigay ka ng site about sa stat na yan..

Makademand to eh..pag binibigyan ka stats at site sa iba mong thread iniiwan mo na at start na bago topic..

 

[jayendecastro]

Pinagsasabi mo jan! Ung 97%, figure un ng mga scientists na naniniwala sa evolution. Pseudoscience ang creationism at intelligent design. Walang scientists na naniniwala dun.

so asan nga ung statistic dyan sa sinasabi mo??
bigay ka ng site about sa stat na yan..

Took me...errr.... 3minutes .. and i found na ung statistics..dunno ano ginagamit na search engine ni ts at di nea makita....

 

[Hisilicon]

E pano un mga unggoy kung galing tayo don bat madami padin unggoy di nageevolve? Tanong lang po

 

[fabbriche]

Hindi galing sa unggoy ang tao kundi sa bacteria.

 

[ken_rebirth]

E pano un mga unggoy kung galing tayo don bat madami padin unggoy di nageevolve? Tanong lang po

hindi po tayo galing sa unggoy.
hindi tayo nag evolve from unggoy.
this is the common MISCONCEPTION about monkeys and humans.

WE JUST SHARE COMMON ANCESTOR. WE BELONG TO THE SAME EVOLUTIONARY TREE.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

hindi po tayo galing sa unggoy.
hindi tayo nag evolve from unggoy.
this is the common MISCONCEPTION about monkeys and humans.

WE JUST SHARE COMMON ANCESTOR. WE BELONG TO THE SAME EVOLUTIONARY TREE.

Pffffttttt.. WAHAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

sorry Your Grace pero.... WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHSHSHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHSHS....



Noong una sabi mo "Evolution is Fact" tapos dinepensahan mo si Darwin, Sabi mo "He is not a liar."

YOUR GRACE, SI DARWIN ANG NAGPROPOSE NG EVOLUTION OF MAN NA GALING TAYO SA UNGGOY.


WAHHAHAHAHA..

Forgive me Your Grace, pero pfftttt..