🕯️ Traditions God's Existence

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually may mga NABUHAY after Death.
Sobrang dami..
Sa iba't-ibang parte ng mundo..


Here's what is very interesting...
Lahat sila same ng nakita...
Same "manly voice".
Same "guy".
Ang nakakaamaze, kahit mga EX-ATHEIST ganun nakikita.


Try mo makipag-usap sa kanila...







 
Nasaksihsn ba nila ang theory of evolution ,para sabihin mo sa akin na di sila gumagamit ng Faith? Sa title pa lang ng kanilang sinasampalatayanan , nangangailangan na ito ng faith. Look mo word THEORY , at ang theory na iyan ay has never been proved hanggang ngayon , kaya nga ang tawag ay theory parin sa kanyang kabuuan.

Ano ba ang nilalaman ng faith, diba trust?
Sir. ang evolution po ay possibly takes atleast 100,000 of years or even a million of years, so if you are suggesting it to observe, i guess you have a wrong understanding about evolution.
now there are numerous way para malaman, ma-test na ang isang organism ay nag-evolve (ex. Fossils, Embryology.. nakalimutan ko na iba) .

now regarding sa theory, actually pinagtatalunan na lang nila is kung tatawagin pa siyang theory or tatawagin na siya as objective truth because of the overwhelming number of evidence about it.

Lets be clear about Faith (you are playing semantics).
Faith(religious side) is believing something without evidence/proof.
now if you are referring to Faith(Trust) then i might say you are right.

and uunahin na po kita. hindi po sila pareho.
 
Sir. ang evolution po ay possibly takes atleast 100,000 of years or even a million of years, so if you are suggesting it to observe, i guess you have a wrong understanding about evolution.
now there are numerous way para malaman, ma-test na ang isang organism ay nag-evolve (ex. Fossils, Embryology.. nakalimutan ko na iba) .

now regarding sa theory, actually pinagtatalunan na lang nila is kung tatawagin pa siyang theory or tatawagin na siya as objective truth because of the overwhelming number of evidence about it.

Lets be clear about Faith (you are playing semantics).
Faith(religious side) is believing something without evidence/proof.
now if you are referring to Faith(Trust) then i might say you are right.

and uunahin na po kita. hindi po sila pareho.
Basura lhat ng sinsabi mo, hindi ito lahat na proved ng science, magpakita ka sa akin ng katunayan na ang isang legit na scientist sa panahon ngayon na proved ang theory of evolution? Lahat ng sinasabi mo bias puro sa side lang ng pinapaniwalaan mo sarili mo lang opinyon, look mo ginagamit mong salita para ipaliwanag sa akin ang evoluttion puro atleast something like blah blah , bakit di mo masabi straight sa amin na ito nga ay fact at na proved na? Tapos pinagtatalunan ang isang bagay kung gagawing fact o theort parin dahil sa dami ng evidence ? Ano sino niloloko mo sa pangangatuwiran mo na iyan? Di pagtatalunan ang isang bagay kung ito ay totoo nga at marami daw kamong evidences ganun lang ka simple
 
Basura lhat ng sinsabi mo, hindi ito lahat na proved ng science, magpakita ka sa akin ng katunayan na ang isang legit na scientist sa panahon ngayon na proved ang theory of evolution? Lahat ng sinasabi mo bias puro sa side lang ng pinapaniwalaan mo sarili mo lang opinyon, look mo ginagamit mong salita para ipaliwanag sa akin ang evoluttion puro atleast something like blah blah , bakit di mo masabi straight sa amin na ito nga ay fact at na proved na? Tapos pinagtatalunan ang isang bagay kung gagawing fact o theort parin dahil sa dami ng evidence ? Ano sino niloloko mo sa pangangatuwiran mo na iyan? Di pagtatalunan ang isang bagay kung ito ay totoo nga at marami daw kamong evidences ganun lang ka simple
OK. before ako magbigay, what does it take para mapatunayan sayo nang isang scientist na totoo ang evolution?

and bias po in favor kanino side? bias po ba pag sinabing in favor of science? and please dont get wrong na ang paniniwala ko ay gaya ng paniniwala ninyo.
 
Hindi nakapag-tataka na atrasado pa din ang Pinas...

Di hamak na mas maraming "matalino" sa relihiyon kesa sa syensya.

Habang ang mga mauunlad na bansa, ang pinag-uubusan ng utak ay quantum mechnics, artificial intelligence, nanotech. Eh ang pinas? May plano si lord, malapit na ang rapture, just put your trust to god, ganito ang mangyayari sa hinaharap: bababa si jesus sa alapaap kasama ang tropang trumpo este engels pala. To the point that they sound like no different from fortune-tellers.
 
Dear ts bossdavs

sino po dito ang makapag trace saan nagmula DNA nila?
sino pp dito ang nakaranas na namatay at muling nabuhay?

WALA

Medyo nakakatawa naman yung intro ginawa mong tao yung invisible na Diyos

Malamang kung nagtatanong ka kung sino sa phc ang namatay at muling mabuhay iilan lang naka hidden pa sila

Pero kung yang tanong mo sakop buong mundo meron ng nag claim niyan marami na about naman sa dna DNA ni God lololol nagpapatawa ka po ba? Sino na ba naka meet kay God na buhay na tao? Wala pa bago mo siya ma meet kailangan mo munang mamatay si kristo papang nakaka meet kay God wala pang dna nuon kaya yung tanong na yan ka anuhan alam mo yun yung word na sinasabi sa taong na name ay 1 at mahal niya si 2 pero si 2 ay hindi mahal si 1 at si 2 din pinaglalaruan lang si 1 bawal kasi yung word na yun dito kaya lang gusto kong sabihin kaya napunta tayo dito xP
 
Ayon sa mga napanuod ko ang mga ninuno natin sinasamba nila yong mas makapangyarihan sakanila at yong mga bagay na nagagawa ng mas makapangyarihan sakanila na di nila na i intindihan at sa tingin ko mga aliens siguro bumisita sa earth natin at yon yung sinasamba nila nagaling sa itaas at makapangyarihan na hangang ngayon napasa na satin . Ewan kolang napanuod kolang naman .✌
 
Hindi nakapag-tataka na atrasado pa din ang Pinas...

Di hamak na mas maraming "matalino" sa relihiyon kesa sa syensya.

Habang ang mga mauunlad na bansa, ang pinag-uubusan ng utak ay quantum mechnics, artificial intelligence, nanotech. Eh ang pinas? May plano si lord, malapit na ang rapture, just put your trust to god, ganito ang mangyayari sa hinaharap: bababa si jesus sa alapaap kasama ang tropang trumpo este engels pala. To the point that they sound like no different from fortune-tellers.

Ano ang kinalaman ng pananampalataya sa pag unlad ng.Pilipinas?
 
Ano ang hindi kinalaman sa pag unlad ng Pilipinas sa pananampalataya?

Are you for real? Pwede po ba sagutin mo muna ang tanong ko. Can you connect religion/faith/belief in a country's progress?

Just tell me if you cant answer and I will quickly drop this shenanigans.
 
Are you for real? Pwede po ba sagutin mo muna ang tanong ko. Can you connect religion/faith/belief in a country's progress?

Just tell me if you cant answer and I will quickly drop this shenanigans.
Why don't you backread my posts and tell me I'm not for real? If you would notice I no longer posts into this section because I am getting tired of people regurgitating the inherited crap.

Enyweys, to answer your question. I believe that religion (or obsession of it) stunts critical thinking. If you would notice, the things that preoccupy pinoys minds are: religion, gossip and entertainment. This becomes more apparent due to social media.

How many pinoy have you heard talk about what's going on in society, with the environment. How many people or posts have you seen on social media that mentions "god is good", "bahala is lord" or something along those lines.

Now let me reverse the question. Paano mo nasabi na hindi correlated ang obsession sa religion sa nation's progress?
 
Why don't you backread my posts and tell me I'm not for real? If you would notice I no longer posts into this section because I am getting tired of people regurgitating the inherited crap.

Enyweys, to answer your question. I believe that religion (or obsession of it) stunts critical thinking. If you would notice, the things that preoccupy pinoys minds are: religion, gossip and entertainment. This becomes more apparent due to social media.

How many pinoy have you heard talk about what's going on in society, to the environment. How many people or posts have you seen on social media that mentions "god is good", "bahala is lord" or something along those lines.

Now let me reverse the question. Paano mo nasabi na hindi correlated ang obsession sa religion sa nation's progress?

1. What if you created dozens or hundred of posts here? Am I then supposed to shut up because I failed to see something? If you think your posts answered my question, l am worried that I think otherwise. Besides, I asked you by me/myself/I and not those people (or in behalf) you are having discussions lately.

2. What is the necessary connect among religion, gossip and entertainment?
How religion stunts critical thinking?
What if someone says "God is good"? Is that person stupid or unthinking?

3. I think you are not reversing a question. You are in a wrong term. I am yet in exploration mode. You think you made your case? Where? What?? Where is your analysis and I see none. All I see is jumping to conclusion.
 
1. What if you created dozens or hundred of posts here? Am I then supposed to shut up because I failed to see something? If you think your posts answered my question, l am worried that I think otherwise. Besides, I asked you by me/myself/I and not those people (or in behalf) you are having discussions lately.

2. What is the necessary connect among religion, gossip and entertainment?
How religion stunts critical thinking?
What if someone says "God is good"? Is that person stupid or unthinking?

3. I think you are not reversing a question. You are in a wrong term. I am yet in exploration mode. You think you made your case? Where? What?? Where is your analysis and I see none. All I see is jumping to conclusion.

What if nothing comes from people's mouth except "god is good", gossip and entertainment? What does it imply to you?

If you see other societies which are preoccupied with different thoughts (science, arts, technology, literature) vs our country which is preoccupied with what I have stated, what do you make of it?

Which one would choose for your people to be obsessed with? Me, I know what I would choose.

Analysis??? What analysis do you want? Look at the abysmal situation of our society, which is dominated by god-fearing, god-loving people. Does it looks blessed to you? Don't play smarty-pants on me.

As per your pointer 1: if you think that me or anyone in this forum have an obligation to answer you. You are mistaken.
 
What if nothing comes from people's mouth except "god is good", gossip and entertainment? What does it imply to you?

If you see other societies which are preoccupied with different thoughts (science, arts, technology, literature) vs our country which is preoccupied with what I have stated, what do you make of it?

Which one would choose for your people to be obsessed with? Me, I know what I would choose.

As per your pointer 1: if you think that me or anyone in this forum have an obligation to answer you. You are mistaken.


Who are these people you are referring? You are making a sweeping claim which is absurd and unclear.

I could just smile when you thought Im obliging anyone else here to answer my questions.

However, your arguments are incomplete. I see lot of holes. I don't challenge you as if whether you are an atheist or agnostic. I am just questioning how progress or wealth necessarily connected to a system of belief or ideology. To be honest, all I can see are assumptions without analytic.and extensive logical.backing.
 
Who are these people you are referring? You are making a sweeping claim which is absurd and unclear.

I could just smile when you thought Im obliging anyone else here to answer my questions.

However, your arguments are incomplete. I see lot of holes. I don't challenge you as if whether you are an atheist or agnostic. I am just questioning how progress or wealth necessarily connected to a system of belief or ideology. To be honest, all I can see are assumptions without analytic.and extensive logical.backing.
You may call it jumping to conclusion or something. I don't really care. What I care is what I observe and experience.

If you want to find logical, extensive, analytic backing - go back to the very beginning of our country. Read 100s or 1000s of history books, talk to hundred of historians, political scientists. And finally make up your mind. Can you do that? That will satisfy your bullshit.

Me, I'm pragmatic. I see it as it is.

Now, let me ask you few questions (which you may or may not answer as it is your prerogative):
- do you agree that our country is one of the most religious in the world?
- based on the premise that religion shapes man's character for the better. Do see it in our society?
- do you see pinoys as creative, critical thinkers?
 
You may call it jumping to conclusion or something. I don't really care. What I care is what I observe and experience.

If you want to find logical, extensive, analytic backing - go back to the very beginning of our country. Read 100s or 1000s of history books, talk to hundred of historians, political scientists. And finally make up your mind. Can you do that? That will satisfy your bullshit.

Me, I'm pragmatic. I see it as it is.

Now, let me ask you few questions (which you may or may not answer as it is your prerogative):
- do you agree that our country is one of the most religious in the world?
- based on the premise that religion shapes man's character for the better. Do see it in our society?
- do you see pinoys as creative, critical thinkers?


This shows that you can't stand scutiny.

Don't redirect me to other references or sources when you are full of bias and oblivious to the truths. I am not saying here about God or belief. What I am after this is you are too incomplete to make a claim. You argue like this like that...and this..and that and you can not even dig deeper on why a family, society or state can progress. Albeit, your thought is clouded from the very.beginning with bias.

I dont care of your BS questions when in the first place, you are full of fallacies and too much incomplete and shallow assumptuions. You have no idea why things corrupt, degrade, society crumbles or rise..


I don't care to answer your question too because my ego is still intact even if you have your last gobbledygook verbiage. So long.
 
This shows that you can't stand scutiny.

Don't redirect me to other references or sources when you are full of bias and oblivious to the truths. I am not saying here about God or belief. What I am after this is you are too incomplete to make a claim. You argue like this like that...and this..and that and you can not even dig deeper on why a family, society or state can progress. Albeit, your thought is clouded from the very.beginning with bias.

I dont care of your BS questions when in the first place, you are full of fallacies and too much incomplete and shallow assumptuions. You have no idea why things corrupt, degrade, society crumbles or rise..


I don't care to answer your question too because my ego is still intact even if you have your last gobbledygook verbiage. So long.
Of course I am bias! So are you and everyone else! We have our own standards.

What makes a claim complete? NONE! Because at the end of the day, even the smartest person has incomplete information. All he can do is provide more depth and breadth compared to others and make conclusion based on what he has observed or tested.

So no answer to my questions? Yet you are asking for this and that "analysis" crap.

You? Do you have full, complete, logical, and what not analysis to why a society crumbles. Or what contributes to the degeneration of a society?

This shows you are full of word acrobatics.

I don't care to answer your question too because my ego is still intact even if you have your last gobbledygook
You now becoming a grammar nazi? Ok you started with me and noticed that homer_simpson wrote incomprehensible english. That is because, ma'am - I just happen to learn a bit about it. Now you can start trawling this forum and start nazi'ng thousands more. If that makes you feel superior.
 
Of course I am bias! So are you and everyone else! We have our own standards.

What makes a claim complete? NONE! Because at the end of the day, even the smartest person has incomplete information. All he can do is provide more depth and breadth compared to others and make conclusion based on what he has observed or tested.

So no answer to my questions? Yet you are asking for this and that "analysis" crap.

You? Do you have full, complete, logical, and what not analysis to why a society crumbles. Or what contributes to the degeneration of a society?

This shows you are full of word acrobatics.


You now becoming a grammar nazi? Ok you started with me and noticed that homer_simpson wrote incomprehensible english. That is because, ma'am - I just happen to learn a bit about it. Now you can start trawling this forum and start nazi'ng thousands more. If that makes you feel superior.


Your reading comprehension is questionable.
I don't care if I say you are biased and you will reply too that I am.biased. Yet you cant stand scrutiny as we start the .analysis.

I am done with you. Hold fast to your fragile assumptions of things.

As for your accusations aside from the real issue, again I don't care. Just upon hearing the word 'ego', you become incredulously apprehensive.
Note that I started with exploring questions and supposed to start the.analytic exchange of ideas and yet what..you answer me with questions?


Now my ego says to me I dont care of your last say. End of discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 62
    Replies
  • 2K
    Views
  • 18
    Participants
Last reply from:
ChristianNaitsirhc

Online now

Members online
1,013
Guests online
905
Total visitors
1,918

Forum statistics

Threads
2,274,666
Posts
28,957,428
Members
1,233,395
Latest member
mikmik012218
Back
Top