Sinabi mo na. Komunista siya. Communism ang violent hindi atheism.Mao zedong isang atheist na mamamatay tao milyon ang pinatay ng kumunistang iyon, maraming namatay noong nag take over ang communism sa china
Sinabi mo na. Komunista siya. Communism ang violent hindi atheism.Mao zedong isang atheist na mamamatay tao milyon ang pinatay ng kumunistang iyon, maraming namatay noong nag take over ang communism sa china
Despite China as emerging superpower and booming economy still lacking in people's freedom to E×ρréšš because of when the ruler is both authoritarian and atheist. Their political atheistic viewpoint leads to Authoritarianism.But your clueless attempt to paint atheism in a negative light massively fails because, as aforementioned, China today is not a dysfunctional, crime-ridden, poverty-stricken society, which are attributes positively and strongly correlated with religious societies. China is so much better off now that it is atheist than it used to be religious. Violent rebellions and revolutions have always been historically prevalent in China which claimed millions of lives. If anything the decades of peace and prosperity China is currently experiencing is unprecedented in its history and only began after the communist takeover. I'm just not including China in the examples of peaceful and successful atheist societies because it obviously still has issues and the confounding attributive factor for those issues is authoritarianism not atheism.
It's patently clear and it came from you already. Authoritarianism is the one to blame for China's abysmal human rights record, not atheism. Atheism in virtually universal instances is positively correlated with intelligence, education, economic development, wealth, social progress, happiness and peace. The only factor that could possibly stunt development (North Korea) and curtail freedom and happiness (NK, China) in atheistic societies if they're placed under authoritarian rule.Despite China as emerging superpower and booming economy still lacking in people's freedom to E×ρréšš because of when the ruler is both authoritarian and atheist. Their political atheistic viewpoint leads to Authoritarianism.
walang gumawa sa kanya pero ikaw ginawa nya basa ka buong aklat ng genesis para masagot yung tanong mo..tsaka kung may diyos sinong gumawa sa kanya?
saan mo naman nakuha yan sa roma at sa ibang parte ng mundo amerika at iba pa sure ako may atheist dun pero sa china lahat yan kay bhuda may dyos sila panong naging atheist yan.. sa pagkakalaam ko ang salitang atheist ay galing sa salitang walang dyos.. pano yun eh dyos nila si bhuda....walang buda kapag sinalin mo sa china yan...may hamog karin sa ulo...Despite China as emerging superpower and booming economy still lacking in people's freedom to E×ρréšš because of when the ruler is both authoritarian and atheist. Their political atheistic viewpoint leads to Authoritarianism.
i could agree with you but it doesn't mean that an atheist country is always be peaceful especially an authoritarian leader is concern.It's patently clear and it came from you already. Authoritarianism is the one to blame for China's abysmal human rights record, not atheism. Atheism in virtually universal instances is positively correlated with intelligence, education, economic development, wealth, social progress, happiness and peace. The only factor that could possibly stunt development (North Korea) and curtail freedom and happiness (NK, China) in atheistic societies if they're placed under authoritarian rule.
baka ikaw ang may hamog sa utak.. Buddhism is considered as an atheistic religion di ba fabbriche?saan mo naman nakuha yan sa roma at sa ibang parte ng mundo amerika at iba pa sure ako may atheist dun pero sa china lahat yan kay bhuda may dyos sila panong naging atheist yan.. sa pagkakalaam ko ang salitang atheist ay galing sa salitang walang dyos.. pano yun eh dyos nila si bhuda....walang buda kapag sinalin mo sa china yan...may hamog karin sa ulo...
ahh ganun ba kung ganon paanong naging mapayapa ang mga yan eh kumunista yan anjan nga lahat ng kaguluhan di mo paba nalalaman pati nga yung bansa mo pinipirwisyo ng mga yan kaya kung may religion ay believe na magiging mapayapa ang tao sa totoon religion ha pero kung relihiyon na katulad ng alam mo atheist eh walang kapayapaan yan..baka ikaw ang may hamog sa utak.. Buddhism is considered as an atheistic religion di ba fabbriche?
ayaw kung makipag argumento sa kampon ni Quiloboy na gaya mo.. waste of time..ahh ganun ba kung ganon paanong naging mapayapa ang mga yan eh kumunista yan anjan nga lahat ng kaguluhan di mo paba nalalaman pati nga yung bansa mo pinipirwisyo ng mga yan kaya kung may religion ay believe na magiging mapayapa ang tao sa totoon religion ha pero kung relihiyon na katulad ng alam mo atheist eh walang kapayapaan yan..
mali ka di ako kampon ng lolo mo baka ikaw kampon k nyan lam kona manalista ka nho...ayaw
ayaw kung makipag argumento sa kampon ni Quiloboy na gaya mo.. waste of time..
wala ka kasing panalo sa paniniwala mo mag sama kayo ni pacq. quibulok isama mo pa yung tatay mo si manalo parehong hunggang yan di alam ang relihiyon sinama pa ang china pilipinas nga di maunawaan nag china pa.. hamog to parang si Q at M....ayaw
ayaw kung makipag argumento sa kampon ni Quiloboy na gaya mo.. waste of time..
There are no atheist terrorists. People don't commit terrorism or any other forms of violence in the name of atheism. There are violent communists who just happen to be atheist. Their violence, thus, can be blamed on specific ideologies overriding their atheism. Furthermore, atheism doesn't perpetuate homophobia, misogyny and racism unlike religious ideologies do. Almost all cases of homophobia that exist currently stem from and found justification in religion. Misogyny and vehement opposition to women's right to abortion are also almost exclusively tied to religion. The world would be far from perfect without religion but many of the pressing social issues we have today would vanish without religion.i could agree with you but it doesn't mean that an atheist country is always be peaceful especially an authoritarian leader is concern.
Walang masama sa communism theoretically. Noble ang intention ng communism. Mas noble pa kesa capitalism. Naging masama lang ang outcome ng communism dahil idealistic xa hindi realistic. Communism has never been tried ever so any attempt to make it work is doomed to fail.Pagiging athiest pinaka ugat niyan bakit nabuo ang communism na binuo ni marx na isang atheist
Kagaya ni stalin ,mao zedong at kim jong un kung di sila atheist di sila abusado at e adapt ang communism siempre,
Ganun lang ka simple
wehhh eh pano naman yung mga pinatay noong chinese emperial or yung dynassty noon ng mga chinaWalang masama sa communism theoretically. Noble ang intention ng communism. Mas noble pa kesa capitalism. Naging masama lang ang outcome ng communism dahil idealistic xa hindi realistic. Communism has never been tried ever so any attempt to make it work is doomed to fail.
At mas masasama at mas maraming napatay na tao ang mga religious colonialists at imperialists kesa mga atheist communists. Sa Amerika palang 150 million na ang namatay dahil sa pagpapalaganap ng mga Christian colonialists ng religion nila. Hindi pa kasama jan ang 60 million na inalipin at pinatay nila sa Africa at 80 million sa India.
100x worse ang religious colonialism/capitalism kesa atheist communism lalo na sa number of death toll.
Hindi atheist ang imperial China kundi religious. Violent ang China kahit nung unang panahon pa man. Milyon milyon ang namamatay kada revolution at collapse ng dynasty nila.wehhh eh pano naman yung mga pinatay noong chinese emperial or yung dynassty noon ng mga china
ay uu nga pla mali ako soweeeeHindi atheist ang imperial China kundi religious. Violent ang China kahit nung unang panahon pa man. Milyon milyon ang namamatay kada revolution at collapse ng dynasty nila.
Sinosino at anoano ang paniniwala ng mga nanggugulo at nagpapagulo sa mundo?
Racists/white supremacists = White Christians
Homophobes = Christians, Muslims
Misygonists = Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus
Rapists in India = Hindus
Ethnic cleansers in Myanmar = Buddhists
Most terrorists = Muslims, Christians
Religion of most criminals in the US = Christian
There are no atheist terrorists. People don't commit terrorism or any other forms of violence in the name of atheism. There are violent communists who just happen to be atheist. Their violence, thus, can be blamed on specific ideologies overriding their atheism. Furthermore, atheism doesn't perpetuate homophobia, misogyny and racism unlike religious ideologies do. Almost all cases of homophobia that exist currently stem from and found justification in religion. Misogyny and vehement opposition to women's right to abortion are also almost exclusively tied to religion. The world would be far from perfect without religion but many of the pressing social issues we have today would vanish without religion.