🔒 Closed Moon landing fake???

Status
Not open for further replies.

mak2x123

Eternal Poster
090716-01-moon-hoax-flag-waving_big.jpg


You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the American flag appears to be flapping as if "in a breeze" in videos and photographs supposedly taken from the airless lunar surface.

The fact of the matter is ... "the video you see where the flag's moving is because the astronaut just placed it there, and the inertia from when they let go kept it moving," said spaceflight historian Roger Launius, of the Smithsonian's You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.in Washington D.C.




090716-02-reflections-no-camera_big.jpg


You can tell Apollo was faked because ... only two astronauts walked on the moon at a time, yet in photographs such as this one where both are visible, there is no sign of a camera. So who took the picture?

The fact of the matter is ... the cameras were mounted to the astronauts' chests, said astronomer Phil Plait, author of the award-winning blog You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and president of the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

090716-03-no-dust-from-landing_big.jpg


You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the astronauts made no such exclamation while on the moon, and the black backgrounds of their photographs are curiously devoid of stars. (See more You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..)

The fact of the matter is ... the moon's surface reflects sunlight, and that glare would have made stars difficult to see. Also, the astronauts photographed their lunar adventures using fast exposure settings, which would have limited incoming background light.

090716-04-no-crater-under_big.jpg


You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the module is shown sitting on relatively flat, undisturbed soil. According to skeptics, the lander's descent should have been accompanied by a large dust cloud and would have formed a noticeable crater. (Explore an You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..)
The fact of the matter is ... the lander's engines were throttled back just before landing, and it did not hover long enough to form a crater or kick up much dust, the Smithsonian's Launius said.

090716-05-strange-lighting_big.jpg


You can tell Apollo was faked because ...Aldrin is seen in the shadow of the lander, yet he is clearly visible. Hoax subscribers say that many shadows look strange in Apollo pictures. Some shadows don't appear to be parallel with each other, and some objects in shadow appear well lit, hinting that light was coming from multiple sources—suspiciously like studio cameras.
The fact of the matter is ... there were multiple light sources, Launius said. "You've got the sun, the Earth's reflected light, light reflecting off the lunar module, the spacesuits, and also the lunar surface."

090716-06-footprints-wet-sand_big.jpg

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the astronauts' prints are a bit too clear for being made on a bone-dry world. Prints that well defined could only have been made in wet sand
The fact of the matter is ... that's nonsense, said Bad Astronomy's Plait. Moon dust, or regolith, is "like a finely ground powder. When you look at it under a microscope, it almost looks like volcanic ash. So when you step on it, it can compress very easily into the shape of a boot." And those shapes could stay pristine for a long while thanks to the airless vacuum on the moon.

090716-07-objects-should-be-visible_big.jpg


You can tell Apollo was faked because ... with instruments such as the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. capable of peering into the distant recesses of the universe, surely scientists should be able to see the various objects still on the moon. But no such pictures of these objects exist.
The fact of the matter is ... no telescope on Earth or in space has that kind of resolving power. "You can calculate this," Plait said. "Even with the biggest telescope on Earth, the smallest thing you can see on the surface of moon is something bigger than a house."

090716-08-strange-lights-studio_big.jpg


You can tell Apollo was faked because ...those mysterious reflections come from studio lights on a production set.
The fact of the matter is ... it's highly unlikely NASA would make such an obvious blunder if they had spent millions of dollars to fake the moon landing, Plait said.

01-moon-walk-714.jpg

may reflection din dito galing sa helmet na mayroon daw nakitang lights na kagaya ng studio at mayroon din picture ng bato na may guhit C. kagaya ng mga props sa movies

c-rock-actual-c.webp

 
Pwede, para sabihin kunwari nitong mga Americano na sila ang unang naka pag padala ng tao sa buwan. At maka lamang sa space race nila ng mga Russo.
 
Ang russia ang advance sa technology noon,at dahil sa cold war,gusto ng america na makalamang sa space race,sa analysis ko fake talaga ang moon landing,hindi pa kaya ng technology noon na makapunta sa moon,
 
Tama kayo mga paps, gusto kasi ng kano mahigitan ang russia, kung totoo man bakit di na naulit sa mkabagong panahon na high tech.. na na pumunta ang tao sa moon.
 
alam nyo guys. your opinions have a point. pero isipin din natin na kulang pa tayo sa kaalaman. fake ang moon landing o hindi. ehh yun yung nakasulat sa mga textbook. which is generally accepted. those theories are of conspiracies. besides it is still a theory.

remember that NASA is an agency of great minds. sa akin lang. bat sila gagawa ng video with a mistake sufficient to destroy their integrity? diba. ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About this Thread

  • 15
    Replies
  • 1K
    Views
  • 9
    Participants
Last reply from:
DoNotDisturb

Trending Topics

Online now

Members online
537
Guests online
914
Total visitors
1,451

Forum statistics

Threads
2,273,600
Posts
28,950,528
Members
1,235,851
Latest member
djilali21
Back
Top