Hey everyone,
I’ve been thinking about something that’s honestly been bugging me for a while — and I wanted to open it up for real discussion.
In the Philippines, traditional engineers (Civil, Electrical, Mechanical, etc.) are allowed to use the title “Engr.” because they pass PRC board exams and get licensed. Fair enough — I respect that.
But here’s my question:
Why are software engineers — who often build critical systems, power entire industries, and innovate at global scale — still excluded from this recognition?
Let’s face it:
The title “Engineer” shouldn’t just be about passing a decades-old licensure exam — it should reflect the actual work, complexity, and impact of what someone builds.
Software engineering is not less than traditional engineering. It’s just a different battlefield — and honestly, one that’s shaping the future faster.
So why does the system still treat us like second-class builders?
Would love to hear your thoughts:
— A software engineer who builds, not just codes.
I’ve been thinking about something that’s honestly been bugging me for a while — and I wanted to open it up for real discussion.
In the Philippines, traditional engineers (Civil, Electrical, Mechanical, etc.) are allowed to use the title “Engr.” because they pass PRC board exams and get licensed. Fair enough — I respect that.
But here’s my question:
Why are software engineers — who often build critical systems, power entire industries, and innovate at global scale — still excluded from this recognition?
Let’s face it:
- Many civil engineers are licensed, but end up working outside their field.
- Some mechanical or electrical engineers have the title “Engr.” but haven’t built or innovated in years.
- Meanwhile, software engineers are:
- Building apps used by millions
- Creating AI, cloud, cybersecurity, and real-time platforms
- Learning new tools every year to keep up with fast-moving tech
- Working in high-paying, high-impact roles both here and abroad
- And yet, no protected title. No board. No formal recognition.
The title “Engineer” shouldn’t just be about passing a decades-old licensure exam — it should reflect the actual work, complexity, and impact of what someone builds.
Software engineering is not less than traditional engineering. It’s just a different battlefield — and honestly, one that’s shaping the future faster.
So why does the system still treat us like second-class builders?
Would love to hear your thoughts:
- Should the Philippines create a board or licensing body for software engineers?
- Should we fight to reclaim the word “engineer” and modernize its meaning?
- Have you ever used “Engr.” as a software engineer — and what kind of feedback did you get?
— A software engineer who builds, not just codes.