🕯️ Traditions Thoughts About This?

[plhbg1]

The thread is like 1+1=2, and you are forcing your way to say it's 1+1=11. The purpose of this thread is to share the idea and take a factual idea, not some biases as you call it.

haha so bakit nasa beliefs section ang thread mo bossing if you are just stating facts naman pala? haha at nag title ka pa talaga ng "our thoughts" haha ang saya

 

[Soul Calibre]

haha so bakit nasa beliefs section ang thread mo bossing if you are just stating facts naman pala? haha at nag title ka pa talaga ng "our thoughts" haha ang saya

There's no other sub-forum where I can post it. Didn't you see the tag "trivia"? The title alone seconded what I stated.. factual idea for a factual idea. It's clearly the separation of facts and biases. Though both are related, all facts can have biases, but not all biases are facts.

 

[plhbg1]

There's no other sub-forum where I can post it. Didn't you see the tag "trivia"? The title alone seconded what I stated.. factual idea for a factual idea. It's clearly the separation of facts and biases. Though both are related, all facts can have biases, but not all biases are facts.

seconded? the title is actually inviting differing thoughts about a topic, but since thread mo nga ito then mali ako na ganun ang interpretation ko sa title mo, akala ko lang naman na open for any thoughts itong thread mo but it turns out na aligning thoughts lang pala ang ibig mong sabihin haha

 

[Soul Calibre]

seconded? the title is actually inviting differing thoughts about a topic, but since thread mo nga ito then mali ako na ganun ang interpretation ko sa title mo, akala ko lang naman na open for any thoughts itong thread mo but it turns out na aligning thoughts lang pala ang ibig mong sabihin haha

Aligning thoughts? Again, FACTS, not thoughts.

 

[plhbg1]

Aligning thoughts? Again, FACTS, not thoughts.

haha then you correct yourself haha nagbabasa lang ako sa title mo haha

 

[Asherah Goddess]

You've been saying all this time na hindi mo sya kilala, yet you're saying na naka-focus ka sa feelings (nya). That means you share the same feelings. You share the same behavior. Walang kinalaman kung kilala mo sya personally or hindi. The point is, you both share the same behavior and principle when it comes to this topic. That's why I have been telling you na, if normal para sa inyo, huwag nyong sabihing normal kasi hindi talag normal ang ganyan.​

Same behavior? Eh... no? Papaano ka nakapag judge na same kami ng behavior huh? Hindi accurate na gawin assessment in the online forum po. Hindi kami kambal tuko pero same beliefs katulad ng how we perceived homosexuality, yes po.

Ano po ba kasi hindi normal ang itinutukoy mo? Hindi normal ang beliefs ng lalake on how homosexuality should be treated po kung kaya, hindi mo magawa ma appreciate ang feelings and emotions ng mismong lalake or hindi dapat enormalize dahil nakisawsaw siya dahil nagdefend siya... na the way na papaano ejudge na mali ang pag act niya is rooted din siya subconsciously sa beliefs na its not quite favorable to homosexuality po?

Kung ang lalake na itinutukoy mismo is hindi lang nag defend or nag salita siya pero same sila ng na peperceived nila when it comes to homosexual, I have a feeling kasi na hindi mo siya makikitaan ng flaws eh. Hindi ka matritrig at hindi ka magiging focus sa kung ano ang tama at mali dapat e behave ng lalake. Bagkus maiintindihan mo sila at magkakaroon ka rin ng understanding based on feelings at emotions nila.

Nagkataon kasi na iba kasi ang ipinahahawakan niya paniniwala patungkol doon, kaya ka nakakapag react din at nakitaan mo siya ng flaws kung ano para sayo na tama at mali na ebehave ng tao po, lalo na nagdefend siya.​

 

[Soul Calibre]

haha then you correct yourself haha nagbabasa lang ako sa title mo haha

Hindi mo ba alam na hindi lahat ng thoughts ay facts, pero lahat ng facts ay thoughts?

 

[plhbg1]

Hindi mo ba alam na hindi lahat ng thoughts ay facts, pero lahat ng facts ay thoughts?

haha so you believe na need mo pa i-think ang facts? haha ang saya na talaga bossing

 

[Soul Calibre]

Same behavior? Eh... no? Papaano ka nakapag judge na same kami ng behavior huh? Hindi accurate na gawin assessment in the online forum po. Hindi kami kambal tuko pero same beliefs katulad ng how we perceived homosexuality, yes po.

Ano po ba kasi hindi normal ang itinutukoy mo? Hindi normal ang beliefs ng lalake on how homosexuality should be treated po kung kaya, hindi mo magawa ma appreciate ang feelings and emotions ng mismong lalake or hindi dapat enormalize dahil nakisawsaw siya dahil nagdefend siya... na the way na papaano ejudge na mali ang pag act niya is rooted din siya subconsciously sa beliefs na its not quite favorable to homosexuality po?

Kung ang lalake na itinutukoy mismo is hindi lang nag defend or nag salita siya pero same sila ng na peperceived nila when it comes to homosexual, I have a feeling kasi na hindi mo siya makikitaan ng flaws eh. Hindi ka matritrig at hindi ka magiging focus sa kung ano ang tama at mali dapat e behave ng lalake. Bagkus maiintindihan mo sila at magkakaroon ka rin ng understanding based on feelings at emotions nila.

Nagkataon kasi na iba kasi ang ipinahahawakan niya paniniwala patungkol doon, kaya ka nakakapag react din at nakitaan mo siya ng flaws kung ano para sayo na tama at mali na ebehave ng tao po, lalo na nagdefend siya.​

I said... The point is, you both share the same behavior and principle when it comes to this topic.

haha so you believe na need mo pa i-think ang facts? haha ang saya na talaga bossing

So dapat ang i-think lang ay mga biases/fakes/unreal?

 

[plhbg1]

So dapat ang i-think lang ay mga biases/fakes/unreal?

facts are just stated bossing, no need to think about it, they are just stated, yung kailangan mo pag-isipan is yung position mo sa topic if whether agree ka or hindi, pag facts kasi bossing gaya ng claim mong absolute right ka na mawawala na ang saysay ng challenging your views kasi nga fact ka na and you can no longer be challenged

 

[Soul Calibre]

facts are just stated bossing, no need to think about it, they are just stated, yung kailangan mo pag-isipan is yung position mo sa topic if whether agree ka or hindi, pag facts kasi bossing gaya ng claim mong absolute right ka na mawawala na ang saysay ng challenging your views kasi nga fact ka na and you can no longer be challenged

Wrong! If you state a fact, you obviously thought about it.

 

[plhbg1]

Wrong! If you state a fact, you obviously thought about it.

lol haha thinking about it with no reason at all? para anung purpose mo para pag-isipan mo pa ang facts if they can no longer be modified and they don't care about what you think about them, baka ganoon ka nga na klase ng tao since you consider your views as facts hahahahaha

 

[Soul Calibre]

lol haha thinking about it with no reason at all? para anung purpose mo para pag-isipan mo pa ang facts if they can no longer be modified and they don't care about what you think about them, baka ganoon ka nga na klase ng tao since you consider your views as facts hahahahaha

Ang shallow na nga hindi mo pa rin na-gets. Whenever you are saying something, gumagana ang utak o thinking mo. Same when someone is stating facts. Kung may times na nag-i-stop ang function ng utak mo, ikaw na yan. Ikaw lang yan.

 

[plhbg1]

Ang shallow na nga hindi mo pa rin na-gets. Whenever you are saying something, gumagana ang utak o thinking mo. Same when someone is stating facts. Kung may times na nag-i-stop ang function ng utak mo, ikaw na yan. Ikaw lang yan.

haha hindi lang thinking ang trabaho ng utak bossing, don't confuse between simple recall of facts and thinking about them, recalling does not involve thinking, thinking is a higher mental activity, if nakapag aral ka ng Bloom's taxonomy then makikita mo doon that recalling is the lowest form of mental activity and thinking is higher, pero kapag ang tao kino-consider niya ang thinking niya as facts then talaga namang mahirap kalabanin ang tao na yan since facts agad yung views niya like you

 

[Soul Calibre]

haha hindi lang thinking ang trabaho ng utak bossing, don't confuse between simple recall of facts and thinking about them, recalling does not involve thinking, thinking is a higher mental activity, if nakapag aral ka ng Bloom's taxonomy then makikita mo doon that recalling is the lowest form of mental activity and thinking is higher, pero kapag ang tao kino-consider niya ang thinking niya as facts then talaga namang mahirap kalabanin ang tao na yan since facts agad yung views niya like you

Wahahahaha. Mali ka. Ikaw na ang nagsabi na lowest form of mental activity ang "recalling". It is still a mental process. Less complex lang yan if ikokompara sa critical or creative thinking.

 

[plhbg1]

Wahahahaha. Mali ka. Ikaw na ang nagsabi na lowest form of mental activity ang "recalling". It is still a mental process. Less complex lang yan if ikokompara sa critical or creative thinking.

haha then you just agreed to what i said na di lang thinking ang trabaho ng utak haha

 

[Asherah Goddess]

I said... The point is, you both share the same behavior and principle when it comes to this topic.​

Same behavior katulad ng akin na understand feelings & emotions and sayo naman is know what is right & wrong. Ganun ang dating.​

Okay.

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

The thread is like 1+1=2, and you are forcing your way to say it's 1+1=11. The purpose of this thread is to share the idea and take a factual idea, not some biases as you call it.

Hindi mo nmn pwede ihalintulad ang mga ethical issues tulad ng topic mo sa mathematical questions. There are no clear right and wrong sa ethics dahil iba iba ang basis nito. Wala kang position na masasabing walang bias.

Some based ethics on laws, some base it on religion, some based on empathy while others, based on utility.

Ewan ko kung familiar ka sa philosophy ni David Hume, rephrasing what he said: you cannot logically deduce what ought to be (right or wrong) solely from what is (facts).

This means kapag umabot ka sa right or wrong judgement mo, you are inevitably using biases, and that is fine. No need to claim na wala ka nyan.

 

[arjoe_ajfc]

you do you na lang, kay OP at sa ating lahat na may kanya-kanyang opinion.

 

[plhbg1]

you do you na lang, kay OP at sa ating lahat na may kanya-kanyang opinion.

sabi ni OP wala daw siya opinion, kasi facts daw yung views niya