nope, nakita ko lang sa fb. tsaka the socmed seems X not facebook. instead tumawa ka wala ka bang maayos na constructed argument?haha legit anomaly daw oh, yan fb mo bossing?
yun ang argument ko, panay kayo bash sa demolition job claim pero meron din naman kayong legit anomaly claim that's worth bashing dinnope, nakita ko lang sa fb. tsaka the socmed seems X not facebook. instead tumawa ka wala ka bang maayos na constructed argument?
worth bashing because?yun ang argument ko, panay kayo bash sa demolition job claim pero meron din naman kayong legit anomaly claim that's worth bashing din
it is not for you to decide on the legitimacy of an anomalyworth bashing because?
Its up to the court, not thru any people nor supporters isn't that right.it is not for you to decide on the legitimacy of an anomaly
Luh, hahaha! Then whose money was used in that anomaly?it is not for you to decide on the legitimacy of an anomaly
hehe you still didn't get the point kahit tumulong na si bicycleLuh, hahaha! Then whose money was used in that anomaly?
Pero kanino pera nga ba yun ginamit?hehe you still didn't get the point kahit tumulong na si bicycle
pati pala ikaw hindi rin maka gets that it is not for us to decide, your questions assume the legitimacy alreadyPero kanino pera nga ba yun ginamit?
I already get it at 1st place, ayaw mo lang sagutin yung tanong niya kung kaninong pera ang ginamit niya para sa anomalya, at sibo nag papahintulot sa kanya para gamitin yun sa anomalya.pati pala ikaw hindi rin maka gets that it is not for us to decide, your questions assume the legitimacy already
there is no point on asking such question without the legitimacy of such anomaly, kaya nga sabi ko the question already assumes the legitimacy of the anomalyI already get it at 1st place, ayaw mo lang sagutin yung tanong niya kung kaninong pera ang ginamit niya para sa anomalya, at sibo nag papahintulot sa kanya para gamitin yun sa anomalya.
And you are just assuming things against the government?there is no point on asking such question without the legitimacy of such anomaly, kaya nga sabi ko the question already assumes the legitimacy of the anomaly
i'm not assuming anything against the bangag admin, i'm just neutralizing the bashing you do for the demolition job claimAnd you are just assuming things against the government?
Which you are still assuming that he is a drug addict based on your allegations.i'm not assuming anything against the bangag admin, i'm just neutralizing the bashing you do for the demolition job claim
i don't assume, i only doubt na di siya bangag, it means di ko ma-assume na bangag siya at di ko rin ma-assume na hindi siya bangagWhich you are still assuming that he is a drug addict based on your allegations.