💡 Trivia Congress' anti-Duterte investigations backfire

The US-backed Marcos administration's plot to demonize former president Rodrigo Duterte by regurgitating allegations that there were widespread extrajudicial killings (EJK) in his war against îllégâl drugs six years ago has totally backfired.

The hearing last week by the Senate — which has again proven to be independent of the incumbent administration as it should be, in contrast to the shameless servility of the House of Representatives — reminded Filipinos that in contrast to the incumbent, Duterte was a strong, true leader, willing to take risks to wage an uncompromising stand against the drug lords, who could have made the country worse than several Latin American nations as a narco-state.

Social media — now the equivalent of the "mosquito press" that helped topple the Marcos dictatorship — was deluged with such posts as "Millions love PRRD... that is enough..."; "This is the PRRD that we miss... my president, salamat po"; and even sarcasm directed at Sen. Risa Hontiveros: "Good job talaga ma'am Risa Hotier, proud kaming mga adik sa'yo."

A particular viral post highlighted the fact that Duterte's triumph in fending off the Marcos demonization plot could pull down the current president's political support: "I've witnessed the Arroyo, Aquino and Duterte administrations, but this is the first time I've seen an administration (Marcos) that seems to empower criminals and drug addicts while trying to undermine a president who spent six years weakening their influence. Who are we really protecting here? "The millions of innocent people whose safety and security are threatened by the presence of addicts and criminals, or the human rights of the addicts and criminals?"

Marcos has weaponized this EJK issue against Duterte to ensure his clan retains power in 2028, with his daughter Vice President Sara whom many believe to be a shoo-in for the presidency, having been adversely affected by this demonization of her father.

The US is backing this plot to block Sara's assumption to the presidency, either through Marcos becoming incapacitated before 2028, or by her winning the presidential elections that year. Note for instance that the media outlet most biased against Duterte, whose articles echo the Marcos operatives' claims, is Rappler.com, which has received thousands of dollars in funding from the National Endowment for Democracy, funded by the US government and run essentially by the US State Department. Most US and Western newspapers have emphasized Duterte's alleged "confession" over the existence of the death squads, rather than explaining the sarcasm and nuances of the former president's statements.

The US, especially at this time with its rival China rising fast, cannot afford to lose its sole puppet in Southeast Asia, which Marcos has shamelessly made this country. Sara indubitably will restore the country's independence from the US hegemony.

But the US-backed plot is collapsing: Duterte burned the US' two main agents in its propaganda campaign, Hontiveros and de Lima, in the Senate hearing.

He need not lift a finger against the two congressmen at the frontlines of the Marcos campaign to demolish Duterte — former optometrist Dan Fernandez and religious teacher Bienvenido Abante.

In testimony made through a sworn statement, former Mandaluyong police chief Col. Hector Grijaldo revealed that the two congressmen tried to intimidate him into supporting a claim by retired police colonel Royina Garma that Duterte had created a reward system for those who killed drug lords. Abante even arrogantly hinted that Grijaldo could be promoted to general if he cooperated with them.

Congress should stop wasting taxpayers' money in undertaking these useless hearings that will lead to nothing.

Credits: Rigoberto D. Tiglao


 
Actually wala naman nag backfire since may conflict of interest itong senate investigation since we all know naman, Bato and Go will protect and defend their self intersest, only in the Philippines lang yan.
 
Actually wala naman nag backfire since may conflict of interest itong senate investigation since we all know naman, Bato and Go will protect and defend their self intersest, only in the Philippines lang yan.
yung backfire na tinutukoy niya is yung ginagawang rigged investigation sa lower house which was revealed in the senate, yang allegations mo that senate investigation is also rigged later on pa yan magba-backfire if someone like you will reveal such in the lower house as well
 
Interesting take on the dynamics between the Marcos administration and Duterte's legacy. The topic of extrajudicial killings is complex and has definitely raised different opinions about how best to address the country's drug problem. Regardless of who’s in power, I think it’s important for us as a country to ensure that our policies truly benefit the safety and well-being of all Filipinos, while respecting due process and human rights. It’ll be interesting to see how these hearings play out and what they reveal about the balance between security and justice
 
Interesting take on the dynamics between the Marcos administration and Duterte's legacy. The topic of extrajudicial killings is complex and has definitely raised different opinions about how best to address the country's drug problem. Regardless of who’s in power, I think it’s important for us as a country to ensure that our policies truly benefit the safety and well-being of all Filipinos, while respecting due process and human rights. It’ll be interesting to see how these hearings play out and what they reveal about the balance between security and justice
we cannot respect the human rights of both the addicts and addict's victims at the same time if we are to wage a bloody war against criminality bossing, we have to choose a side, we can only respect them both by not waging the said bloody war in which matagal nang plataporma ng every president na naupo, matagal na tayong nagre-respect ng human rights of both the criminal and the victim and we already seen that it doesn't work
 
we cannot respect the human rights of both the addicts and addict's victims at the same time if we are to wage a bloody war against criminality bossing, we have to choose a side, we can only respect them both by not waging the said bloody war in which matagal nang plataporma ng every president na naupo, matagal na tayong nagre-respect ng human rights of both the criminal and the victim and we already seen that it doesn't work
I see where you’re coming from—it’s true that balancing human rights for everyone can feel challenging, especially in a strong anti-crime campaign. But I believe respecting human rights and maintaining security don’t have to be mutually exclusive. Other countries have managed to tackle drug issues without compromising human rights, showing that with the right strategies, we can aim for both. It's tough, but worth pursuing a way that protects the rights of all while ensuring safety for communities.
 
I see where you’re coming from—it’s true that balancing human rights for everyone can feel challenging, especially in a strong anti-crime campaign. But I believe respecting human rights and maintaining security don’t have to be mutually exclusive. Other countries have managed to tackle drug issues without compromising human rights, showing that with the right strategies, we can aim for both. It's tough, but worth pursuing a way that protects the rights of all while ensuring safety for communities.
haha i don't think a country has solved the drug problem by respecting human rights of criminals bossing, you should update your database, you need to train from more resources, update your GPT
 
haha i don't think a country has solved the drug problem by respecting human rights of criminals bossing, you should update your database, you need to train from more resources, update your GPT
HAHAHAHAHA! Anyway, I don’t have any reply for that, since you’re great at doing ad hominem things! Hahaha. well again It’s a complex problem, and it might be worth exploring different strategies that prioritize both safety and human dignity!
 
yung backfire na tinutukoy niya is yung ginagawang rigged investigation sa lower house which was revealed in the senate, yang allegations mo that senate investigation is also rigged later on pa yan magba-backfire if someone like you will reveal such in the lower house as well
Rigged if the house of Duterte didin't control both thr Senate and the House just like what they did to DeLima na pinagkaisahan siya sa gamit ang mga false report at mga bayaran witnesses.
 
HAHAHAHAHA! Anyway, I don’t have any reply for that, since you’re great at doing ad hominem things! Hahaha. well again It’s a complex problem, and it might be worth exploring different strategies that prioritize both safety and human dignity!
it still doesn't change the fact bossing na ang tagal na nating nagre-respeto sa human rights ng criminals and we have seen that it doesn't work
Rigged if the house of Duterte didin't control both thr Senate and the House just like what they did to DeLima na pinagkaisahan siya sa gamit ang mga false report at mga bayaran witnesses.
hehe so you mean mas advantage pa rin pala si duterte until now despite the efforts ng lower house? hehe
 
Majority of the Senators in the Senators are all enabler of War on Drugs during the past administration.
and majority of tongressmen are also supporting bangag admin, wala namang problema diyan sa support na yan for as long as walang kabulastugang gagawin like forcing a witness to invent stories
 
and majority of tongressmen are also supporting bangag admin, wala namang problema diyan sa support na yan for as long as walang kabulastugang gagawin like forcing a witness to invent stories
Just like how Duterte and his cohorts invent false naratives against people like DeLima, isn't that right.
 

About this Thread

  • 15
    Replies
  • 943
    Views
  • 4
    Participants
Last reply from:
plhbg1

Online now

Members online
1,031
Guests online
1,720
Total visitors
2,751

Forum statistics

Threads
2,269,138
Posts
28,926,771
Members
1,242,269
Latest member
forchagp
Back
Top