Gusto nyo ba sa corruption?

Una sa lahat this pos is not to insult the user sa screenshot . Ang hirap nya kasing paintindihin tsaka this user disseminate fake news at news and current event.

Ni claim nya na for publicity lang daw yong Pag correct ng angat buhay data collection sa naga page.

Alam naman ata ng lahat na ang angat buhay is a type of NGO or NON GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION na umaasa sa donations. Kung mali ang data na ipapakita nila malaking sampal yon sa organization nila at donators. Kung ako ang isa sa nagdonate ehh di na ako magddonate kasi alam kong di na makakapagtkatiwalaan ang organization. Dahil sa malaking halaga ganon lang ang nakikita ko sa ginagawa nila. Kita ko yan dahil taga magsaysay camsur ako. Alam ko at alam namin ang kung pano gumalaw yan si leni dito lalo na yong kay kristine. Matagal na yan naggaganyan, palaging tumutulong sa mga liblib o remote places dito.

This user also claim na ayaw nya daw sa ganon kasi its not necessary kasi wala daw sa position. Trust me mas malinis pa ang mga NGO kaysa GOVERNMENT AGENCY.. ang dami at lalaking funds ang binibitawan pero kakaunti ang nakikita.

.just a side comment lang parang ayaw kasi ng user ang word na TRANSPARENCY which is the goal of this organization to promote ANTI CORRUPTION

 

[ZummerSoltice]

Lol. News article mismo nanggaling yan. Nagcomment lang sya base sa news. So?Dun ka dapat sa news article/news agency nagrereklamo. May link syang nilalagay. plhbg1 butthurt na butthurt sa news article na naipost mo
Kung goal nyo talaga tumulong , eh di na kayo dapat umiiyak sa record. So it just means totoo pala record lang habol ninyo?Ang layo dun sa reklamo mo na transparency. Di mo ata binasa ang News article at dahil lang sa sinabi nya biglang naging fake news spreader na sya sa news article section. Again kung totoong tulong pala gusto nyong ihatid bakit kayo umiiyak sa record?Isa lang ibig sabihin nyan talaga...FOR PUBLICITY...dahil tatakbo si mama...

 

[PHC-TAKOYAKI]

Lol. News article mismo nanggaling yan. Nagcomment lang sya base sa news. So?Dun ka dapat sa news article/news agency nagrereklamo. May link syang nilalagay. plhbg1 butthurt na butthurt sa news article na naipost mo
Kung goal nyo talaga tumulong , eh di na kayo dapat umiiyak sa record. So it just means totoo pala record lang habol ninyo?Ang layo dun sa reklamo mo na transparency. Di mo ata binasa ang News article at dahil lang sa sinabi nya biglang naging fake news spreader na sya sa news article section. Again kung totoong tulong pala gusto nyong ihatid bakit kayo umiiyak sa record?Isa lang ibig sabihin nyan talaga...FOR PUBLICITY...dahil tatakbo si mama...

? I saw you sa comment tolerating this guys. Anyways what's the purpose of having organization like angat buhay if there's no excellent record? They're promoting this anti corruption movement of course napaka halaga ng data gathering nila kasi nga may impact yon sa organization nila IF MAY BAD FEEDBACK. Imagine millions of money ang hawak nila tapos ganon lang ang nakikita.

It seems na may masabi lang kayo sa pagtulong ni leni without recognizing her ability to help people. Basta makapagsabi lang without any evidence.

Tell me then PROVIDE DATA THAT WILL STAND YOUR BELIEVES.

 

[plhbg1]

? I saw you sa comment tolerating this guys. Anyways what's the purpose of having organization like angat buhay if there's no excellent record? They're promoting this anti corruption movement of course napaka halaga ng data gathering nila kasi nga may impact yon sa organization nila IF MAY BAD FEEDBACK. Imagine millions of money ang hawak nila tapos ganon lang ang nakikita.

It seems na may masabi lang kayo sa pagtulong ni leni without recognizing her ability to help people. Basta makapagsabi lang without any evidence.

Tell me then PROVIDE DATA THAT WILL STAND YOUR BELIEVES.

excellent record is very nice bossing, but magkaiba kasi ang contexts, hindi public funds or government funds ang na-liquidate dito para maging requirement ang publicity, leni only ows excellent record to her partners being an NGO as in non-government so-to-speak, and her publicity will only cast doubts to her intentions in this context

 

[PHC-TAKOYAKI]

excellent record is very nice bossing, but magkaiba kasi ang contexts, hindi public funds or government funds ang na-liquidate dito para maging requirement ang publicity, leni only ows excellent record to her partners being an NGO as in non-government so-to-speak, and her publicity will only cast doubts to her intentions in this context

Yet, many NGOs voluntarily embrace transparency to build trust with donors and beneficiaries. In Leni Robredo’s case, this transparency may serve as a way to honor her commitments to her partners, showing that contributions are used effectively and as promised. Her approach, which some see as “publicity,” may simply reflect her efforts to keep operations visible to maintain donor trust and credibility in a field where skepticism can arise easily.

On the flip side, it’s valid to question if too much visibility could cast doubts on intentions, as it might look like self-promotion. But for Robredo, who transitioned from public office to the NGO sector, transparency could be a strategy to extend her established record of accountability into her new role.

 

[plhbg1]

Yet, many NGOs voluntarily embrace transparency to build trust with donors and beneficiaries. In Leni Robredo’s case, this transparency may serve as a way to honor her commitments to her partners, showing that contributions are used effectively and as promised. Her approach, which some see as “publicity,” may simply reflect her efforts to keep operations visible to maintain donor trust and credibility in a field where skepticism can arise easily.

On the flip side, it’s valid to question if too much visibility could cast doubts on intentions, as it might look like self-promotion. But for Robredo, who transitioned from public office to the NGO sector, transparency could be a strategy to extend her established record of accountability into her new role.

hehe the public doesn't have to know nga since she just owed excellent record to her partners, kaya unnecessary talaga ang publicity ng pag slam niya dun sa LGU, it casted doubt given na tatakbo siya

 

[PHC-TAKOYAKI]

hehe the public doesn't have to know nga since she just owed excellent record to her partners, kaya unnecessary talaga ang publicity ng pag slam niya dun sa LGU, it casted doubt given na tatakbo siya

I already answer this one : Without direct evidence of her “slamming” the LGU, it’s reasonable to interpret her actions as a commitment to clear communication with her stakeholders rather than a public confrontation. The transparency may come across as “publicity” to some, but for others, it could simply be a means to stay accountable to those who support her NGO’s initiatives.

 

[plhbg1]

I already answer this one : Without direct evidence of her “slamming” the LGU, it’s reasonable to interpret her actions as a commitment to clear communication with her stakeholders rather than a public confrontation. The transparency may come across as “publicity” to some, but for others, it could simply be a means to stay accountable to those who support her NGO’s initiatives.

i don't think tagging an LGU as irresponsible is not a direct evidence of slamming

 

[plhbg1]

Siraulo inulit din.

hehe yes inulit since it appears na you don't think of it as evidence

 

[PHC-TAKOYAKI]

hehe yes inulit since it appears na you don't think of it as evidence

HAHAHAHAHHA nasan ang evidence na yan

 

[plhbg1]

HAHAHAHAHHA nasan ang evidence na yan

you already agreed that she actually tagged the LGU as irresponsible bossing

 

[PHC-TAKOYAKI]

you already agreed that she actually tagged the LGU as irresponsible bossing

Hanapin mo muna comprehension at logic mo sir hahahah jusko di kita kinakaya

 

[plhbg1]

Hanapin mo muna comprehension at logic mo sir hahahah jusko di kita kinakaya

ehehe it still doesn't change the fact that Leni has tagged an LGU as iiresponsible bossing

 

[PHC-TAKOYAKI]

ehehe it still doesn't change the fact that Leni has tagged an LGU as iiresponsible bossing

Hehe, fair enough! I get where you’re coming from. Tagging an LGU as ‘irresponsible’ can definitely come across as harsh or critical, and I can see why it would stand out. At the same time, from her perspective, it may have been more about calling attention to accuracy and accountability. But I get it—different people will take it differently!

 

[plhbg1]

Hehe, fair enough! I get where you’re coming from. Tagging an LGU as ‘irresponsible’ can definitely come across as harsh or critical, and I can see why it would stand out. At the same time, from her perspective, it may have been more about calling attention to accuracy and accountability. But I get it—different people will take it differently!

ehehe yung issue nga is the publicity bossing, i don't find tagging the LGU irresponsible in public necessary unless merong personal interest involved